On 2010-04-03 06:34 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
So, I haven't had time to do actual work on this bug yet, but I've
mulled it over a bit. Here's what I think we know for sure:
1) On some people's systems, /usr/bin/aptitude isn't being restored
after the upgrade.
2) On other
Hi,
First, thanks for caring about this bug.
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:54 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2010-04-03 06:34 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
So, I haven't had time to do actual work on this bug yet, but I've
mulled it over a bit. Here's what I think we know for sure:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:52:56PM +0200, Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr was
heard to say:
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:54 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
- The submitter of #575137 uses btrfs which reportedly may cause severe
corruption of dpkg's database and other data:
On 2010-04-03 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU
of the lenny aptitude, you can reproduce it by downloading that
aptitude's source and building it.
Well, I
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU
of the lenny aptitude, you can reproduce it by downloading that
aptitude's source and building it.
Well, I happen not to find any source for it too ... The hg
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de was
heard to say:
On 2010-04-03 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU
of the lenny
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 18:02 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2010-04-03 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU
of the lenny aptitude, you can reproduce it
So, I haven't had time to do actual work on this bug yet, but I've
mulled it over a bit. Here's what I think we know for sure:
1) On some people's systems, /usr/bin/aptitude isn't being restored
after the upgrade.
2) On other people's systems, it is.
3) I don't know why.
4) Even
Hi,
Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote (26 Mar 2010 12:48:04 GMT) :
I just upgraded my system and did *not* see that behaviour.
I use the testing repositories and today's upgrade installed 0.6.1.5-3,
replacing 0.4.11.11-1+b2. /usr/bin/aptitude exists and points to
/etc/alternatives/aptitude,
Hi Daniel,
Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 07:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr was
heard to say:
I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and
lost the 'aptitude' command. It is no more listed in 'dpkg
Hello,
I just upgraded my system and did *not* see that behaviour.
I use the testing repositories and today's upgrade installed 0.6.1.5-3,
replacing 0.4.11.11-1+b2. /usr/bin/aptitude exists and points to
/etc/alternatives/aptitude, which in turn points to
/usr/bin/aptitude-curses.
Regards,
Hi,
I just upgraded my system and did *not* see that behaviour.
I use the testing repositories and today's upgrade installed 0.6.1.5-3,
replacing 0.4.11.11-1+b2. /usr/bin/aptitude exists and points to
/etc/alternatives/aptitude, which in turn points to
/usr/bin/aptitude-curses.
Thanks for
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr was
heard to say:
I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and
lost the 'aptitude' command. It is no more listed in 'dpkg -L aptitude'
too.
Have you ever had aptitude version 0.5+ installed on
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.1.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and
lost the 'aptitude' command. It is no more listed in 'dpkg -L aptitude'
too.
Apparently, the alternative for aptitude has been lost.
14 matches
Mail list logo
