Hi all,
Le dimanche 11 décembre 2011 17:25:41, Holger Levsen a écrit :
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute
the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently?
I believe inside an organisation I
On Montag, 12. Dezember 2011, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
You should have a look at old make-jpkg tool[..]
No, thanks, I shall not. I already have a working solution.
(but someone has to do the work to support newer JDK in this
tool).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Moritz, hi all,
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:43:06PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Since openjdk-6 is fixed now, now would be a good time to remove
sun-java6 from stable in the next point update?
sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
describing its impact to
Hi,
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted.
It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from oracle and
build a fixed package, so IMHO an announcement containing these
* Philipp Kern:
sun-java6 is sadly still a very high profile package. I won't go and
break all those installations which force sun-java6 over openjdk-6
locally, either in unattended installations or through other means.
It's really unfortunate that most of those installations seem to need
On 12/11/2011 01:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted.
It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from oracle and build a fixed
Hi,
I forgot:
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Holger Levsen wrote:
$ debdiff sun-java6_6.26-3.dsc sun-java6_6.29-1.dsc|diffstat
debian/changelog |8
debian/rules |6
jdk-6u26-dlj-linux-amd64.bin |327520
--
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute
the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently?
I believe inside an organisation I can rebundle their bundles to my prefered
kind of bundle, that is, form of
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes:
* Philipp Kern:
sun-java6 is sadly still a very high profile package. I won't go and
break all those installations which force sun-java6 over openjdk-6
locally, either in unattended installations or through other means.
It's really unfortunate that
* Matthias Klose:
On 12/11/2011 01:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug,
me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted.
It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:47:53PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Florian, what's the status of openjdk6 for stable/oldstable?
I've released the pending update for squeeze. lenny will eventually
follow, and so will the pending updates for squeeze, but judging by my
* Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Florian, what's the status of openjdk6 for stable/oldstable?
I've released the pending update for squeeze. lenny will eventually
follow, and so will the pending updates for squeeze, but judging by my
past performance, it will take a while.
If someone else wants to work on
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Moritz Muehlenhoff:
As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
If anyone remembers the rationale behind the
Hi
Von: Sylvestre Ledru [sylves...@debian.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Oktober 2011 11:34
As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
Well, I wonder how (if ?) they can do that...
I'd
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong
* Moritz Muehlenhoff:
As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
If anyone remembers the rationale behind the DLJ, perhaps they can
check if the current BCL matches our needs, too?
Package: sun-java6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with security fixes.
Because some of the fixes, like for BEAST, are very high-profile, perhaps an
update
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with security fixes.
Well, that especially means that it is now
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
* Thijs Kinkhorst:
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with security fixes.
Does the lack of a DLJ version affect us? The special distributor
license is no longer available from Oracle:
| As a
On 10/19/2011 02:09 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Have we been in contact with Oracle upstream and explained that we are
eager to comply with their wish to move entirely to openjdk for our next
release, but have the problem that we have a stable release out in the
field that people rely on? Are
On Wed, October 19, 2011 14:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 10/19/2011 02:09 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Have we been in contact with Oracle upstream and explained that we are
eager to comply with their wish to move entirely to openjdk for our next
release, but have the problem that we have a
On Wed, October 19, 2011 12:50, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with
On mer., 2011-10-19 at 15:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
notwithstanding the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
notwithstanding
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong opinion on
that.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
26 matches
Mail list logo
