On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 23:37:54 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
Is there a particular use case for such support, other than because we
can? If not, then not having multi-arch support in wheezy doesn't seem
a huge issue; ymmv, obviously.
ACK.
I can prepare another version for wheezy
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 09:11 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Introducing a new binary package is a quite big change. Please contact
the release team on whether such a change is acceptable at this point of
the freeze.
Apparently no-one did that before uploading. As Helmut said, it's not
really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 09:11 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Introducing a new binary package is a quite big change. Please contact
the release team on whether such a change is acceptable at this point of
the freeze.
Apparently no-one did
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 23:09 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 09:11 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Note that simply removing M-A:same is also way to solve this
issue and that libphone-utils0 has very few reverse dependencies.
That would mean having no multi-arch support in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Is there a particular use case for such support, other than because we
can? If not, then not having multi-arch support in wheezy doesn't seem
a huge issue; ymmv, obviously.
ACK.
I can prepare another version for wheezy incorporating this. What
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
Is there a particular use case for such support, other than
because we can? If not, then not having multi-arch support in
wheezy doesn't seem a huge issue; ymmv, obviously.
The package is more or less smartphone exclusive,
[Dropping adsb as he is probably not interested in technical details.]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:25:54AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
preparing a upload for testing was what I indented to do, too.
I planed to check how to fix this without removing M-A support,
though. It should be possible
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:41:19AM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
I propose that you, Helmut, try to test whether this fixes the problem and
report back if it does.
Thanks for your work on this issue.
Introducing a new binary package is a quite big change. Please contact
the release team on
Package: libphone-utils0
Version: 0.1+git20110523-1.2
Severity: serious
It is technically possible to install libphone-utils0:amd64 and
libphone-utils0:i386 in parallel. If I then purge libphone-utils0:i386,
/etc/phone-utils.conf will disappear even though it is still needed by
9 matches
Mail list logo
