On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:06:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd?
>
> Ana, could you please have a last word about this?
>
Thanks Andreas.
I haven't given
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd?
Ana, could you please have a last word about this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi all,
Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd?
Scott
3 matches
Mail list logo