Bug#939181: cycle: should it be RM'd ?

2020-02-08 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:06:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd? > > Ana, could you please have a last word about this? > Thanks Andreas. I haven't given

Bug#939181: cycle: should it be RM'd ?

2020-01-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd? Ana, could you please have a last word about this? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#939181: cycle: should it be RM'd ?

2020-01-28 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi all, Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd? Scott