Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-07-24 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:00:48PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On 05.07.21 23:10, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/107 > > I wonder, if we want to display the cloud information only on the > matching architectures, that we build

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-07-22 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On 05.07.21 23:10, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:12:22PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: >>> Stable Cloud Images for Bullseye (stable) >>> - > [snip] > > I've

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-07-05 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:12:22PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > Stable Cloud Images for Bullseye (stable) > > - [snip] I've integrated the suggestions and posted this to the wiki:

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-04-19 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Stable Cloud Images for Bullseye (stable) > - > > The Debian Project will release it's new stable release 11 (code name > Bullseye) along with images for various cloud providers. Images

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-04-19 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > The Debian Project will release it's new stable release 11 (code name > Bullseye) along with images for various cloud providers. Images will nit: We don't typically capitalize the release codename in this context. > * when

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-04-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Here is my draft following today's discussion. Please send along any > feedback. Sounds good. Bastian -- Knowledge, sir, should be free to all! -- Harry Mudd, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-04-18 Thread kuLa
On 2021-04-14 22:36:27, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:56:22PM -0800, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > The (I think) easy question: do we all agree this is worth doing? > > > > The harder question: assuming so, what should the policy say? > > Here is my draft following today's

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-04-14 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:56:22PM -0800, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > The (I think) easy question: do we all agree this is worth doing? > > The harder question: assuming so, what should the policy say? Here is my draft following today's discussion. Please send along any feedback. Stable Cloud

Re: Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-03-18 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 08:36:51PM +, Marcin Kulsiz wrote: > > A while ago, Martin Zobel-Helas proposed documenting the cloud image > > lifecycle. > > The initial thread is at [1]. Bastian and I discussed this at the team > > meeting > > and agreed it'd be good to publish something. But it

Publishing cloud image lifecycle documentation

2021-03-11 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hi team, A while ago, Martin Zobel-Helas proposed documenting the cloud image lifecycle. The initial thread is at [1]. Bastian and I discussed this at the team meeting and agreed it'd be good to publish something. But it should be discussed with more of the team. The (I think) easy question: