Apparently this has been fixed:
Login as anonymous...
Setting transfer mode to binary...
Cd to /debian...
getting: frozen/binary-i386/mail/smartlist_3.10-16.deb (78216)
getting: frozen/binary-i386/mail/procmail_3.10.4-2.deb (112164)
getting: frozen/binary-i386/base/modconf_0.2.10.deb (17576)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 21:38:26 +0200
Source: libc
Binary: libc5 libc5-pic localebin libc5-dbg libc5-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4.23-6
Distribution: frozen
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Helmut Geyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libc5
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 22 May 1997, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 1997, Dale Scheetz wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 1997, Bob Nielsen wrote:
In /frozen, the packages file shows:
procmail_3.10.4-1.deb
modconf-0.2.9.deb
The actual files
'Raul Miller wrote:'
'=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= wrote:'
So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$ =D
On May 21, Chris Fearnley wrote
No, PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' !
I'd prefer PS1='\$ '
However, if you want all that fanciness, a compromise is:
PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED] \W\$ '
Any chance of getting the ethernet drivers listed as supported
in the ethernet howto, but stored at cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov instead
of in the main linux kernel, included in the base debian kernel
distribution?
--
Raul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL
Since I didn't get an answer on -private, I'll do this the public
way. Xemacs seems to be missing from bo. It's in rex and hamm. I con-
sider a missing major package a bug unless there was a reason it
was pulled. Brian? Anyone?
Tim
--
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Sailer) writes:
Since I didn't get an answer on -private, I'll do this the public
way. Xemacs seems to be missing from bo. It's in rex and hamm. I con-
sider a missing major package a bug unless there was a reason it
was pulled. Brian? Anyone?
See bug 8857.
Guy
--
Guy,
I think you made the wrong decision here. James LewisMoss never
responded to the 8857 bug list to your request for pulling xemacs. In
fact, I couldn't find anyone other than yourself who supported the
decision to pull xemacs completely. The discussion was whether
xemacs-19.14 or 19.15 was
Darren == Darren/Torin/Who Ever [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Darren -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Amos Shapira, in an
Darren immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
Or an audit-trail of invocations of dpkg (e.g. adduser 3.1-2
installed and configured successfully on Wed May
From: Karl M. Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So do I. It would make it a lot easier to do bug reports when things
fail at installation or upgrade time.
--
I agree. As a member of the deity team, I can tell you that
there will be an audit trail. This will be especially important
in phase 2
Any chance of getting the ethernet drivers listed as supported
in the ethernet howto, but stored at cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov instead
of in the main linux kernel, included in the base debian kernel
distribution?
The Boomerang driver (updated Vortex driver) has already been included
in the
I've just read a few messages complaining about the removal of xemacs
from bo. Why don't we simply move those packages with critical bugs to
contrib?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a continuous problem. I don't know why ftp.debian.org takes so
long to get in sync with master, but the problem simply propogates from
there to all the additional mirrors. Debian is the only distribution I
know that depends so heavily on
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Karl M. Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So do I. It would make it a lot easier to do bug reports when things
fail at installation or upgrade time.
I agree, but I'm puzzled by what you chose for the subject line. This sort
of functionality belongs in
On May 22, Raul Miller wrote
Any chance of getting the ethernet drivers listed as supported
in the ethernet howto, but stored at cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov instead
of in the main linux kernel, included in the base debian kernel
distribution?
Do they compile as modules? Maybe someone could package
On May 23, Christian Hudon wrote
Do they compile as modules? Maybe someone could package them up as kernel
modules in a separate desdis-drivers package, or something like that.
The eepro100.c file had a line in it (grep gcc eepro100.c) which
said how to compile it (given /usr/include/linux for
Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The discussion was whether xemacs-19.14 or 19.15 was the best choice
for bo. Could you please state your reasons for removing xemacs?
Moving 19.15 to bo was out of the question because of the time and the
seriousness of bugs still being filed against it.
I know nothing about runlevel standards, just my opinions:
AK == Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AK: level 1 is without net, 2 is with it all (imo including nfs
AK: and the like) and 3 is xdm, 6 was shutdown or halt or
AK: whatsoever. at least that i remember from some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
When installing trn, the dependency screen pops up and suggests (ie. puts
an asterisk beside) both cnews and inews. Shouldn't this only select
one of the two? I don't know what package to report a bug against, so I
thought I would ask here first. Cheers, Colin.
On Mon, 19 May 1997, Brian C. White wrote:
Hamm
I think its been agreed that this will be called Debian 2.0, so why not
add this here.
* All packages are in the new package format.
Possibly a new source package format may be created, so we should resolve
this before putting too much
You're absolutely right. I should have thought before I posted. In fact
I already patched ibcs to work regardless which gcc/C library is used,
since ibcs (as a kernel module) should include the kernel headers, but
not the differing application headers.
I'm sorry for reporting a non existant bug.
[Aside: I think I sent a message about ethernet configuration
with a subject line from an X configuration problem. My prior
message on the subject was a bug report about a non-bug. Third
strike and I'm out, but by jove I think I've got it.]
Turns out I've got a buslogic 946C and a 32 bit lance
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In case you're interessed, I just got the acknowledgement of bug report
#1
Lucky for us, the bug scripts are bug-1 compliant... ;-)
--
Mike Coleman http://ctr.cstp.umkc.edu/~coleman
I'm
23 matches
Mail list logo
