Is anyone going to try and get a version of this that works with newer
Apaches out before the freeze?
--
-jam
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d-(--) s: a---? C++()$ UL$ P+ L+++$ E W++(-)$ N- o? K? w---
O-- M-- V? PS PE Y+ PGP t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++(++) DI+ D++ G++ e-
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 08:01:42PM -0500, Justin A. McCright wrote:
Is anyone going to try and get a version of this that works with newer
Apaches out before the freeze?
I'm working on it. It's very broken at the moment!
Dan
Hi,
Santiago == Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Santiago Well, kernel-package is a single package but it would be surely
Santiago a lot of work, since there are a lot of new drivers.
What does not work for you using kernel-package on newer
kernels? I have never had a problem,
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the really sad part about this whole mess. Qt is a nice
library. Non-free, but not everything has to be free. But because of
the refusal of the KDE developers to FIX THE KDE LICENSE PROBLEMS, a
lot of people are being turned off of Qt! Qt
Hello! :-) I hereby announce my intent to package (and upload) oo2c, The
(Optimizing) Oberon-2 to ANSI-C Translator. I will try to upload it soon.
:-) Well, actually, already built it, but will rebuild it again and do some
more testing. :-)
Package: oo2c
Priority: optional
Section: devel
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 11:28:06AM -0400, Roderick Schertler wrote:
On 11 Oct 1998 03:08:22 -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Andy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
After some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain the
same
Hi,
Raphael == Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:57:36AM -0400, Dan Jacobowitz écrivait:
My question is, why are we so intent on removing the versioned
component even though we have lost binary compatibility? I understand
Raphael Because most of
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 01:48:43PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
James A. Treacy wrote:
A number of people would like to see a 3dfx package of mesa. This can
not be done unless there is a legal package of glide (under the
current license I can't even get the libs since I don't own a 3dfx
In my opinion, Qt is not a section of KDE, it is not derived from the
KDE and it must be considered independent and separate from the KDE.
In other words: The KDE's usage of the GPL does not cause the GPL, and
its terms, to apply to Qt.
Indeed Qt is not part of the problem
indeed
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 01:48:43PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Any reason, aside from the lack of volunteers, why we can't do what we
do with netscape/staroffice/etc.? Even if we can't distribute it, can't
we have a loader package? (No, I'm not volunteering, I don't own a 3dfx
card either.)
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 10:52:19PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
[...]
I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
with XForms.
[...]
I don't think so. It is not enough for KDE, why should
The main difference is that LyX is THEIR code. The problem w/ KDE is not so
much its own code, rather it links other peoples GPL app w/QT and KDE to make
Kapp. This is the brunt of the legal issue. The authors of app where not asked
if it was ok to link w/QT, nor was the license modified to
However, the license for that derived work (I'll call it A) claims
that the whole of A must be GPL'd. However, Qt is not part of A (the
GPL says section of). Qt provides services to A, and A depends on
those services: A very different thing.
Qt is part of the derived work. It is
Hi,
I'm having troubles with dselect in slink. I tried addressing this
issue in debian-user, but got absoutely no response, so I thought I'd
try here. I haven't been on this list for long, so if this is in any
way inappropriate, I apologize. I'm very grateful to and have great
respect for
If I use libc, I don't think I am creating a libc. Unless I am, I'm not
deriving, I think. If I use libc, I simply use the services. Hence, libc
is a section of the thing I am making, and does not derive from it.
Your program derives from libc by being linked with it. This is precisely
why an
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guy Maor wrote:
I'm suggesting that dpkg-scanpackages scan the dscs and put the
section and version in the Source field, or perhaps add a new field
Dsc which is simply the full path to the dsc, akin to the Filename
field. Then downloading the source
My $.02 on this - and this is only personal feedback-
is that perl -MCPAN -e shell is even easier than
apt-get. So I maintain a perl5.tgz with our
various modules from CPAN already installed and whenever
debian blows away our perl on any particular machine we
just unpack it from our local
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
If I use libc, I don't think I am creating a libc. Unless I
am, I'm not deriving, I think. If I use libc, I simply use the
services. Hence, libc is a section of the thing I am making, and
does not derive from it.
Your program derives from libc by
If I use libc, I don't think I am creating a libc. Unless I am, I'm not
deriving, I think. If I use libc, I simply use the services. Hence, libc
is a section of the thing I am making, and does not derive from it.
Your program derives from libc by being linked with it. This is precisely
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 01:42:20PM +, Rob Browning wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL for the current STL implementation.
And see
http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/string_discussion.html
for why you should probably be using ropes or
Sorry to follow myself up so quickly, but I found the fault.
The ropeimpl.h file is in error complared to the version from SGI's STL.
Here's the diff:
--- ropeimpl.h.orig Mon Oct 12 14:18:53 1998
+++ ropeimpl.h Mon Oct 12 14:17:25 1998
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@
/* 35 */24157817, /* 36
Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any technical reason why LEIM (Emacs input methods) is not
available as a Debian package? If not, I'll package it.
FWIW It's already part of the emacs20 package.
I'd say including LEIM data *.elc files is worth. I think it's
difficult for an
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, David Stern wrote:
install attempt in dselect error message:
-
[..unmet dependencies, blah, blah.. ]
dependencies:
perl-suid: Depends:perl
libpam0: Depends:libpam0g
perl: Depends:perl-base
I missed the
void main(void)
snippety
BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of
the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return void
in a number of texts though.
HTH,
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:24:49AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote:
void main(void)
snippety
BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of
the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return void
in a number of texts though.
HTH,
Matthew
On Mon 12 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:24:49AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote:
void main(void)
snippety
BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of
the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return void
in
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
joeyI wonder if somebody plans to package this one.
joey
joey Fulcrum Scientific Analysis/Plotting Tool for Unix/GTK
I am swamped right now. But , I'll try to do it if no one else
wants to. I wonder if this is a new incarnation of
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Shaya Potter wrote:
spotte
spotte-Original Message-
spotteFrom: John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spotte
spotte Lyx is currently in contrib.
spotte Lyx is licensed under the GPL (version 2) . It is dynamically
spottelinked against a non-free library (libforms) .
spotte
On 11 Oct 1998, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
torinAndy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
torinAfter some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain the
torinsame directory structure that perl5.00[34]_xx did. (with 5.005 in place
of
torin5.00[34], of
Saw the following on http://slashdot.org. Sounds like very good news.
- Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1998/10/10
Newsgroups: alt.electronics.analog.vlsi, can.vlsi, comp.lsi,
comp.lsi.cad, cu.vlsi
I am pleased to announce that the Electric VLSI Design System is now
available to anyone who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ada-rm is a set of documentation containing the Ada 95 reference
manual, the Rationale and the changes with Ada 83.
Sam
- --
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any technical reason why LEIM (Emacs input methods) is not
available as a Debian package? If not, I'll package it.
FWIW It's already part of the emacs20 package.
Something is missing because when
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 10:52:19PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
[...]
I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
with XForms.
[...]
I
Anyone working on this? I just saw the a screenshot that looks nice. But
since its source is only in cvs I cannot simply try it.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant | business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Go Rhein Fire!
How about this one?
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
Michael
- Forwarded message from Matthias Ettrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
If we do something like this, I'd rather suggest a text like:
The GPL is often a source of missunderstanding
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:07:31PM +, Raja R Harinath wrote:
I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
with XForms.
I don't see how it follows. we have implicitly allowed all users to
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 12:09:15PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
There's probably plenty of other problematic packages in contrib too,
as Raul has been telling us for a while. www-mysql, for example,
although it'll move in to main once I reupload it (since mysql-base
is in main now).
I idn't
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 11:18:53PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
Because *implicit* permission isn't good enough. By default *nothing* is
allowed. So every right the authors grant you had better be written down
in a license accompanying the software, otherwise one of the authors (or
sometimes
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
Dear Alan,
What you have to remember is this.
SuSE are currently too small to be worth sueing in the US
on a licensing issue. Ditto most (all ?) other current
distributors
I'm not trying to belittle people like SuSE quite the
Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:07:31PM +, Raja R Harinath wrote:
I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to
compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx
with XForms.
I don't see how it follows. we have
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
How about this one?
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
looks good to me, with or without the first sentence.
it's true, anyway. the GPL is often a source of misunderstanding and
confusion.
Hi there !
The current way to add sound support on Debian is either installing the
kernel-source and compiling OSS
or installing the ALSA packages.
What about providing a modularized, precompiled OSS package and a sound
installation tool ?
This sound installation tool should use isapnp to
Same for me, snd doesn´t work with current lesstif version
Guenter
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
note that there is also an exemption for libraries which normally come
with the operating system - and libc definitely qualifies there...
Nope.
Some of the time, libc would qualify for that special excemption.
But it doesn't qualify for anything shipped
to increase communication betweenm the ports and between porters and
non-porters, I'd propose a new list:
debian-porting
or sim.
I fully support this proposal (The name debian-porting seems fine to me)
No, we haven't enough topics for this new list.
IMHO, it makes sence to create
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 12:47:09PM -0400, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 11:48:08AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Thomas Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the configuration files of all debian packages are located in /etc.
That's really fine.
But the
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KDE requires Qt currently. So KDE is non free.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
_No_. This does not necessarily follow, even if both statements may
both be true. KDE simply depends on something that is non-free.
Except that KDE programs have been
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 09:27:07AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
I am pleased to announce that the Electric VLSI Design System is now
available to anyone who wishes to use it.
Unless someone has beaten me to it I will attempt to package it asap
(which could be a couple of weeks). Sounds very good
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 09:13:44AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 12:09:15PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
There's probably plenty of other problematic packages in contrib too,
as Raul has been telling us for a while. www-mysql, for example,
although it'll move in to
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 01:51:24PM -0700, Guenter Geiger wrote:
The current way to add sound support on Debian is either installing the
kernel-source and compiling OSS
or installing the ALSA packages.
What about providing a modularized, precompiled OSS package and a sound
installation
Hi,
There is a section from GPL:
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is no combined work until the source is compiled, linked to the
non-free library, and a binary produced.
Please show me where the GPL says this.
I'm tired of pointing out this is false, quoting from the GPL to show
you were it says different, and
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it was mailed from a dummy hotmail account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and the
originating IP was from an ISP in Norway.
On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the
e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system,
Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only pain I had to face was that I had to upgrade my libc6 and
that upgrade broke sendmail, so I had to upgrade sendmail as well.
Uh - oh .. please check out this bug:
#27334: libc6:
Okay, Matthias also agrees with my version. Let´s see if the other LyX guys
say. Could we get this into the LyX package ASAP? Who´s in charge now?
Mark?
Michael
-- Weitergeleitet von MummertPartner
MeskesM/D/ExternalStaff/WLB on 12.10.98 16:02 ---
looks good to me, with or without the first sentence.
For me too.
it's true, anyway. the GPL is often a source of misunderstanding and
confusion. witness KDE, for example.
Yes, your right. But I think this sentence doens´t fit well into a license
file.
if ettrich is willing to write
Hi all and sorry for the SPAM... but I just read my Spetember issue
of the Linux Journal and I noted that on page 6 the Editor says:
This is one reason we choose the Debian distribution to
use in our office. ^^
that's US!
On 12 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the
e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system, and makes no
pretense of such. They will happily hand over records if needed.
Equally the information you supply to
We found an incompatibility between Java on Solaris 2.5.1/2.6 and on Debian
2.0.r2 Could anybody suggest how to find out, if it is a bug in Debian Linux
or JDK?
Additions to the included bug report:
- $ hostname -i
129.69.183.3
gives the correct answer in a shell.
- Debian 2.0 comes with
Alan: This is a perfect example of FUD!
No
SuSE has the biggest rate of growth of all Linux distributors in
the US.
And SuSE and Red Hat and all of them put together are not worth a US lawsuit
yet. Price yourself a US lawsuit then judge again.
Make them 5 times bigger and yes
I might be able to get a similar license agreement for KDE as the one I
send for LyX. Would that be enough to get at least major parts of KDE back
on the site? I have no idea how much we would have to keep out. I know
kghostview and kdvi, but other than that? Since I use Gnome I cannot simply
Yes, it works now! Thanks.
Could anybody think of negative implications of doing this reverse ordering of
the localhost and ip address entries?
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
We found an incompatibility between Java on Solaris 2.5.1/2.6 and on Debian
2.0.r2 Could anybody suggest how to find out,
Hi,
Guenter == Guenter Geiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guenter What about providing a modularized, precompiled OSS package
Guenter and a sound installation tool ?
Please also consider a src.deb package (look at pcmcia_cs
packages for example) that puts the sources in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#27334: libc6: breaks sendmail, probably problem in resolver
details at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/27/27334.html
This is release-critical, IMO.
I agree this is release critical. However,
Just threadening with sueing is simply an action of FUD.
I haven't threatened to sue anyone. You must have been listening to
Matthais foaming at the mouth too much.
Sorry for my harsh words. But it looks to me like some people are trying
to keep kde people from making even better free
This is just to help translators keep up to date with changes to the
Debian pages.
- distrib/distrib.wml was renamed to distrib/index.wml
This caused changes to template/debian/menubar.wml
and template/debian/navbar.wml
I believe those are the only links affected,
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
And SuSE and Red Hat and all of them put together are not worth a US lawsuit
yet. Price yourself a US lawsuit then judge again.
Make them 5 times bigger and yes then its worth it.
Martin Konold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong! If you are not
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally have confidence in Exim's quality in this regard.
Demon (a large ISP in the UK and the Netherlands, www.demon.net)
uses Exim as its customer-facing smtp interface, so I guess that they're
convinced as well.
To be precise, we use Exim for the
Is anyone packing gnotepad?
[ Sorry if anyone tried to a post of mine and bounced. I played with
exim.conf and forgot to unplay the rewrite. ]
--
Eschew obfuscation(go on; look them both up)
(Brian White)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [-: .elOle. :-] [EMAIL
Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Is anyone packing gnotepad?
[ Sorry if anyone tried to a post of mine and bounced. I played with
exim.conf and forgot to unplay the rewrite. ]
wget + ./configure + vi src/main.c + make just finished. It looks
nice, it seems to work. We should include it. However if I
Martin Konold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Programs linked to GPL'd library must be GPL, because by using the
GPL'd library you have to comply to the license terms of this library.
The main point is that USING a GPL'd library for a program is only
allowed if the resulting program becomes GPL'd.
On 12-Oct-98 James A. Treacy wrote:
This is just to help translators keep up to date with changes to the
Debian pages.
- distrib/distrib.wml was renamed to distrib/index.wml
This caused changes to template/debian/menubar.wml
and template/debian/navbar.wml
I
people to distribute LyX in both source and binary forms. This permission
certainly includes linking against GUI toolkits like XForms, Motif, GTK, Qt
or Win32.
`... and distributing the resulting binary.' should be added.
You can always link in the privacy of your home. What GPL
Jim writes:
So this isn't derivative in the sense of the OOP idiom IS-A...
and you're saying that all I have to do to derive from something, is to
include it unmodified or modified?
In copyright law is a derivative of means contains a copy of all or part
of. Copyright is about making copies.
Masato Taruishi writes:
In this, the licence sait that `valid for at least three years', but I
can't understand what date the beginnings of `at least three years'
starts actually from. From the date when the vendor began to sell it, or
when buyers bought it, or else?
From the moment the
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 11:09:34AM -0700, Darren Benham wrote:
Also, developers_corner.wml has been moved/renamed to devel/index.wml (also
affecting templage/debian/menubar.wml and template/debian/navbar.wml as well
as
one of the news files in News/1997 (19971125.wml)
One thing I forgot to
I installed both packages. After starting X I found that the old name is no
longer the one compiled for gnome which removed all my applets from the
panel. I changed my setup to call icewm-gnome instead and re-created my
panels but had to notice that the panel applet no longer works. Not only
does
I noticed that some packages disappeared from the site. Could anyone
enlighten me whether they are superceeded, not needed or whatelse happend?
libstdc++2.8
libg++2.8
I know these are special cases since there is no source. But as long
as we need the libs we need the packages,
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
How can we be sure that LyX does not include things not written by them?
Wait a moment. Don't let this become ridiculous. How can we be sure that
Ulrich Depper didn't include non-GPL stuff in his glibc? You can ask this
ofr every
At Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:02:06 -0400 (EDT),
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hrm...
The requested URL /~monotori/sendmail.html was not found on this server.
Oops, sorry, it's typo.
The URL should be http://www.wide.ad.jp/~motonori/sendmail.html
Is there somewhere else I can look? am
Michael Meskes wrote:
xadmin
Request by maintainer=author, iirc.
x11amp-static
mp3.8hz
You didn't watch the 100 messages thread on debian-private?
Regards,
Joey
--
Linux - the choice of a GNU generation
Michael Meskes wrote:
I installed both packages. After starting X I found that the old name is no
longer the one compiled for gnome which removed all my applets from the
panel. I changed my setup to call icewm-gnome instead and re-created my
panels but had to notice that the panel applet no
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 06:13:33PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
gnome-mico
gnome-mico-dev
Replaced by an ORB written by the GNOME folks themselves, orbit.
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
How can we be sure that LyX does not include things not written by them?
Wait a moment. Don't let this become ridiculous. How can we be sure that
Ulrich Depper didn't include
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
I installed both packages. After starting X I found that the old name is no
longer the one compiled for gnome which removed all my applets from the
panel.
I changed my setup to call icewm-gnome instead and re-created my
panels but had to notice
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
Yeah.
With that first sentence in, I think he'd argue that he doesn't need
anyone's permission to apply it to third-party GPLed software: he's
declaring what the GPL
Grr, after I uploaded it I've found emacs20 *source* package already
contains all the LEIM data files, so I removed the uploaded leim
package.
I think the best solution would be to produce leim binary package from
the emacs20 source package. Rob, could you do so in the next version of
the
Chris == Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see any way of
Chris using gtk-- with gnome at the moment. I was going to try
Chris packaging gnome-hack (for my own use -- I'd want to check
Chris with the nethack maintainer before
First of all a quick apology if it turns out the following message isn't
being posted to the correct forum.
A few weeks ago I switched from RH to debian, and was slightly dismayed at
the installation process, which I found to be less than flexible. After
wrestling with it for some six-seven hours
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I get these errors:
In file included from /usr/include/g++-2/stl_rope.h:2107,
from /usr/include/g++-2/rope.h:18,
from blah.cc:1:
/usr/include/g++-2/ropeimpl.h:1085: warning: decimal integer constant is so
large that it
Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Grr, after I uploaded it I've found emacs20 *source* package already
contains all the LEIM data files, so I removed the uploaded leim
package.
I think the best solution would be to produce leim binary package from
the emacs20 source package. Rob,
Hi
James A. Treacy wrote:
One thing I forgot to mention to you. Could you please add the
final / on directories? It is proper to add them, but not
mandatory. Additionally it confuses the urlchecker I use (yeah
I'll fix it eventually). I have already fixed the occurrences
of devel/ and got a
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 04:18:54PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
We found an incompatibility between Java on Solaris 2.5.1/2.6 and on Debian
2.0.r2 Could anybody suggest how to find out, if it is a bug in Debian Linux
or JDK?
You have to use getLocalHost() on a connected Socket, not on
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So please check your debian/rules files for constructs like the
following:
chmod g+w `find debian/tmp -name foo`
find debian/tmp -name foo|xargs chmod g+w
the correct way to implement this would be
find debian/tmp -name
Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Is anyone packing gnotepad?
[ Sorry if anyone tried to a post of mine and bounced. I played with
exim.conf and forgot to unplay the rewrite. ]
Since nobody stepped forward, I take it for now. It in the process
of being built right now.
Regards,
Joey
--
Linux
Hamish == Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hamish Why doesn't jdk1.1 provide java-virtual-machine? That's an
Hamish officially listed virtual package and would have avoided
Hamish this problem, and would also solve two bug reports filed
Hamish against guavac.
Because I
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
Not really
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
Not really possible
Hi
Why are the sound modules not included with the kernel? Afaik they are in
Redhat.
Regards
--
Robbie Murray
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Mmmh. I just checked. The reason why gtk-- is currently w/o gnome support
is, because I never installed libgnome-dev I think. I'm just doing it now
and will recompile gtk-- (or better: I'll try to compile gtk-- 0.9.17) with
gnome support.
Any
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
