Bug stamp-out list for Jan 31 00:03 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 39
--
Package: apache (main)
Maintainer: Johnie Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files
On Jan 30, 1999, Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jan 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
I agree there is a problem to be fixed, I just think that libtool
is not the only piece of software that may have to be changed to
fix it, because it is not the only piece of software that uses
On Jan 30, 1999, Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you would have /usr/lib/libfoo.2 as rpath, but
really would use /usr/lib/libfoo-libc6.2 or libfoo-libc5.2, you get the
idea.
Just a minor nit: rpaths and sonames are independent of one-another.
Although it is possible to arrange
On 30 Jan 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
libtool is however the only piece of software that we cannot easially
change.
then I said one could just as easily edit the libtool script, and I
have even posted a script that would do that for you.
Ah I missed that script, maybe we should just
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:06:04 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 Jan 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Obviously, this would have never been needed if old libraries had not
been replaced with (in)compatible versions, but the maintainers of
Debian have
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:52:48 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's not what I'd like libtool to do. I agree there is a problem to
be fixed, I just think that libtool is not the only piece of software
that may have to be changed to fix it, because it is
On Jan 30, 1999, Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jan 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Thanks God I've got only one group of developers almost forcing me to
change something that is correct, and whose change wouldn't even help
them work around a problem they're facing.
shrug I'm
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Joey Hess wrote:
I'd say installing debhelper 1.2.28 with --force-conflicts is a _very_ bad
idea.
Unfortunatly, it looks like the current version of dpkg has
--force-overwrite (which is what I meant to say above) enabled by default.
And so anyone who ran
On 30 Jan 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
You cannot deny that it is necessary, and that it effects more that just
Debian and our users but everyone using a libc5/libc6 linux system.
I can, that that's what I've been doing since the `Debian x Libtool
War' started, a few days ago. I've
Anderson MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Avery Pennarun wrote:
Octopi and ants may also be good, if they have wings.
Octopi with wings? Now -that- is a confusing bunch of appendages, if you
ask me. =)
Squid is a better choice than octopus. Some of them actually do
Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anderson MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Avery Pennarun wrote:
Octopi and ants may also be good, if they have wings.
Octopi with wings? Now -that- is a confusing bunch of appendages, if you
ask me. =)
Squid
Our web site has a nice section http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
which allows anyone to locate a package based upon various criteria.
However, the packages are all i386 packages. Do we have anything
similar for other platforms?
The sane home page, http://www.mostang.com/sane/source.html,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 30 Jan 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anderson MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Avery Pennarun wrote:
Octopi and ants may also be good, if they have wings.
Octopi with wings?
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 10:30:58PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:57:47PM -0600, Anderson MacKay wrote:
The key here is cute. People don't want an ugly chicken-like creature
that is clearly ready to attack at the slightest provocation.
And furthermore, even
[Huge followup list trimmed]
On 31 Jan 1999, Martin Mitchell wrote:
1) A m68k computer with a 60Mb debian installation. Normally I use the nfs
method. Apt is just not feasible, it wants to copy everything over before
it starts - there simply isn't space on the disk to do this. Also the
No,
Hi, all!
There's been so much traffic on this thread, that I suspect most
people have missed the fact that Ian Lance Taylor has analyzed and
*solved* the problems with interaction between libtool and
libc5-compat shared libraries.
I'm quoting and reposting his message so that it doesn't get lost
Hello,
I am taking a graduate class in computer security. I have been asked
to research some security questions for the class.
I saw your FAQ, but one question remains.
The professor asked me to find out :
What is distinctive about Debian Linux development that affects
its
Hello,
Where can I find the kernel to support FAT32 disk in linux?
And also the driver to view EXT2 in MSDOS?
Thank you
image/jpeg
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
There's been so much traffic on this thread, that I suspect most
people have missed the fact that Ian Lance Taylor has analyzed and
*solved* the problems with interaction between libtool and
libc5-compat shared libraries.
I don't think this adresses the core problem.
Joey Hess wrote:
* Program xfoo is linked with libXaw.so
* -rpath is used so it's hard coded to look for this library in
/usr/X11R6/lib/
* The user of program xfoo wants to use the xaw3d widget set with it instead
of the default libXaw.so. They expect to be able to set LD_PRELOAD to
Amos Shapira wrote:
It's the same version I have as well (latest Slink). Do you have
gnuserv installed as well? With gnuserv 2.1alpha-4 installed it
doesn't work. I tried purging gnuserv and then run gnuclient.xemacs20
but I still get an error like:
(1)
Well, let's see what's holding up slink. :)
apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files [0]
(Johnie Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED])
There's a suggested fix in the bug report. Is it problematic?
autoconf 32391 Autoconf patches for slink [0] (Ben Pfaff [EMAIL
Michael Stone wrote:
chameleon 32522 chameleon in slink depends on too-new libs [0]
([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean E. Perry))
Looks like it just needs a recompile against the right libs; or does it not
work against the older glib?
The (former) maintainer just did a new upload that
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian My versions of dpkg claim that --force-overwrite isn't on
Brian be default (otherwise it should have [*] after it):
As does mine: and it lies! I've been testing package upgrades dpkg
itself is very definately using --force-overwite
Might it be possible to include fewer packages in each profile and then
present the user with a list of additional packages that might be of
interest to them given that they have chosen this particular profile?
Something like You have installed the Scientific Workstation profile. The
Hello,
At the beginning of January, I reported that mutt was losing mail. This
behavior *appeared* to disappear with a certain kernel upgrade, but again it
persists. Losing mail is a very serious system failure.
I do not know what may have changed to cause the failure again, but it is
here.
I
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 09:22:28PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
XGGI is an X server based on XF86 code that will run under any supported
libGGI target.
Currently, other than a few XF 3.3.3.1 compliance points, XGGI
works fine; it's been tested with the X
Stephen Zander wrote:
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian My versions of dpkg claim that --force-overwrite isn't on
Brian be default (otherwise it should have [*] after it):
As does mine: and it lies! I've been testing package upgrades dpkg
itself is very definately
Brian May wrote:
Unfortunatly, it looks like the current version of dpkg has
--force-overwrite (which is what I meant to say above) enabled by default.
And so anyone who ran dselect in the past 24 hours and upgraded from
unstable has probably beeen bitten by this bad package.
Can you be
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 07:14:04PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
I'd like to propose that for now the FHS is changed to read
The mail spool area location is undefined. It is guaranteed that both
/var/mail and /var/spool/mail point to this mail spool area if the system
has a mail spool. The
dpkg -l file-rc
ii file-rc 0.4.3 Alternative one-configfile boot mechanism
i don't know if this is supposed to be the case or not, but contrary to
file-rc's documentation, scripts are not run in reverse order for shutting
down. is this a debian-specific thing or merely a bug?
I'd live with that, but I'd prefer just /var/mail be used and if vendors
want to create a symlink for backward compatibility or even from
/var/mail to /var/spool for easy upgrades, let them.. (creating a
symlink from /var/mail to /var/spool/mail if /var/mail does not exist is
likely how
On Sun, January 31 1999, Ionutz Borcoman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
te:
|packages from potato. I am running the mule xemacs. Do we fill a bug
|report against gnuserv ?
I've already filed a bug report against gnuserv on October 19th:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/28/28175.html
That's error #28175
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 10:06:30PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian My versions of dpkg claim that --force-overwrite isn't on
Brian be default (otherwise it should have [*] after it):
As does mine: and it lies! I've been testing
BENCHMARK PRINT SUPPLY
1091 REDSTONE LANE
ATLANTA GA 30338
CALL 770-399-0953 FOR TONER SUPPLIES ORDERS/PRICING
ONLY
CALL 770-399-5505 CUSTOMER SERVICE/SUPPORT ISSUES
CALL 770-399-5614E-MAIL REMOVAL COMPLAINTS LINE
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
The point is that you've just been asking for libtool not to use
-rpath at all,
Yes, I think this is the correct solution.
but this would only work for people who create .deb or .rpm binary
packages,
You fill this house with lies. It works for anyone putting libraries in
MS == Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dpkg-dev 31508 parsechangelog broken? [22] (Ian Jackson and
others [EMAIL PROTECTED])
MS No one ever wants to touch dpkg...
There is a patch provided with this bug report.
xxgdb 32206 xxgdb: Can't rebuild xxgdb from
Craig Sanders wrote:
As does mine: and it lies! I've been testing package upgrades dpkg
itself is very definately using --force-overwite
which is a damn good thing.
please, nobody suggest changing the default behaviour until dpkg has
a config file in /etc allowing each system admin to choose
Have our anti-spam policy been enforced before ?
If so how succes was it ?
We really need to make the spammers pay.
Jonathan P Tomer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ii file-rc 0.4.3 Alternative one-configfile boot mechanism
This version has many errors, some of them are fixed in the actual 0.4.7.
i don't know if this is supposed to be the case or not, but contrary
to file-rc's documentation,
Hi,
Ever since I installed the new apt (0.3.0) on a hamm system it can't
access the non-us archives. Trying to access them via ftp or netwcape
fails as well. I tried both the default config given in the sample
sources.list file and some lines which used to work before the last
upgrade.
Can
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) A local mirror, hand constructed. No extra or useless packages in there.
Apt doesn't construct or handle this type of arrangement well by default.
The mounted method deals with this just fine.
I'd be interested to know how any other method
On 30 Jan 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anderson MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Avery Pennarun wrote:
Octopi and ants may also be good, if they have wings.
Octopi with wings? Now -that- is a confusing bunch of
Amos Shapira wrote:
Can anyone send me a working configuration for non-us?
This worked yesterday:
deb ftp://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/Linux/debian-non-US hamm/binary-$(ARCH)/
deb ftp://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/Linux/debian-non-US
slink/non-US/binary-$(ARCH)/
deb
Jonathan P Tomer wrote:
dpkg -l file-rc
ii file-rc 0.4.3 Alternative one-configfile boot mechanism
i don't know if this is supposed to be the case or not, but contrary to
file-rc's documentation, scripts are not run in reverse order for shutting
down. is this a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Due to the latest patches, the following entries in the libnessus result
in undefined symbols on the nessus client (with a picky linker):
plugutils.c:311: log_write(Error: Missing scan ID.\n);
plugutils.c:316: log_write(debug: --proto_post_hole:
Previously John Goerzen wrote:
Also, whenever I shut down the client (an Alpha box), it displays:
lockd_down: no lockd running
What kind of NFS server are you using? Linux? User or kernel nfsd?
Are you running rpc.lockd? Mounting with nolock? You really need to
tell us a bit more..
Wichert.
Here we go again :)
Previously Brian White wrote:
apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files [0]
(Johnie Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED])
We should just force SymLinksIfOwnerMatch for /home to solve this.
autoconf 32391 Autoconf patches for slink [0] (Ben
Previously Stephen Zander wrote:
As does mine: and it lies! I've been testing package upgrades dpkg
itself is very definately using --force-overwite
The [*] marks are hardcoded in dpkg, and Daniel Jacobowitz forgot to
change that when he made NMU 1.4.0.31 which turned --force-overwrite on
by
Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote:
In fact, using 'dpkg -iGROEB' is much worse:
You forgot another important one: it's *horribly* slow. I actually used
the ftp method and mounting a cdrom where ftpd could get it for a while
to speed things up.
I submit that they *must* be removed from the
Previously Anderson MacKay wrote:
Or bite your legs off. =)
Nah, that was a cute little bunny rabbit :)
We could then have conversations like this with our users:
CART DRIVER: Bring out your dead!
LARGE MAN: Here's one!
CART DRIVER: Ninepence.
BODY:I'm not dead!
Wichert.
--
Previously Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
Is there any way of changing that default behaviour (e.g. some config
file) apart from recompiling dpkg? I'd like to leave it disabled at all
times no matter what the default is in the current dpkg package.
No. Are there other things that would be useful in a
Previously Enrique Zanardi wrote:
[ Please, don't CC: me. I'm subscribed to -devel, -boot and -testing.
Three copies of the same message are enough. ;-) ]
Put this in your .procmailrc:
:0 Whc: msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache
Two (dpkg and dpkg-defaults) are not a bunch, are they?
Previously Larry Wilson wrote:
The professor asked me to find out :
What is distinctive about Debian Linux development that affects its
assurance?
Mostly the fact that we have an amazing numbers of developers who can
respond to security issues. Usually when a security issues comes up it
is
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
perl-suid 31904 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Secuity hole with perl
(suidperl) and nosuid mounts on Linux] [13] (Darren Stalder [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
I'm not sure there's much we can do about this one--it's a library (kernel?)
problem. Perhaps a note in the
On Sun, 31 Jan, 1999, Michael Stone wrote:
transfig 32520 transfig: puts files in /usr/lib/X11, should use
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11 instead [0] (Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED])
This seems fairly simple, right?
Sitting in incoming
--
GNU does not eliminate all the world's problems,
dinstall, the software which installs packages into the hierarchy, can
now announce packages and close bugs for you.
If you'd like to use this feature, upgrade to the dpkg-dev in my home
directory on master. The changes are checked in to va's dpkg cvs
tree.
dinstall will look for a Format field
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
I actually did the other way first, it wasn't siginificantly different
except Brandon Robinson was in 3rd place (X).
Spell m' damn name right, boy!!!
spits, puts dentures back in, and sits back down in the rocking chair on
the porch
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the same version I have as well (latest Slink). Do you have
gnuserv installed as well? With gnuserv 2.1alpha-4 installed it
doesn't work. I tried purging gnuserv and then run gnuclient.xemacs20
but I still get an error
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ionutz Borcoman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem with gnuclient is that it fails when there is no
gnuserv started. Is there any workarround ?
bash-2.01$ gnuclient.xemacs20
gnuclient.xemacs20: Connection refused
gnuclient.xemacs20: unable to connect
Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk writes:
It seems rather clumsy, though. Why was this scheme chosen, instead of
one where the K scripts are run for the previous runlevel?
K scripts are not supposed to shut down everything that was started
from that runlevel. They are supposed to shut down
Quoting Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
perl-suid 31904 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Secuity hole with perl
(suidperl) and nosuid mounts on Linux] [13] (Darren Stalder [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
I'm not sure there's much we can do about this one--it's
Quoting David Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No. The maintainer needs to get the new license (or clarification of the
old, depending on how you split your hairs) from the LyX website and
change the copyright file. Being more or less error-proof, it seems to
call for a simple NMU.
I thought I
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 12:27:15AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
I wouldn't mind taking lilo
Ok, looks like Vincent Renardi took the package over and has uploaded an -4
already. Thanks.
Bernd
All right, here's the revised list (removing anything that someone confirmed
as almost done.)
Quoting Michael Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files [0]
(Johnie Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED])
There's a suggested fix in the bug
Quoting John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
At the beginning of January, I reported that mutt was losing mail. This
behavior *appeared* to disappear with a certain kernel upgrade, but again it
persists. Losing mail is a very serious system failure.
IIRC, you were using a mix of kernel
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:54:20AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
xbase 30852 X packages do not upgrade automatically due to
name change. [41] (Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED])
xdm 29360 xdm: Stopped X without warning/asking [77]
(Branden Robinson [EMAIL
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously John Goerzen wrote:
Also, whenever I shut down the client (an Alpha box), it displays:
lockd_down: no lockd running
What kind of NFS server are you using? Linux? User or kernel nfsd?
I believe (I thought I
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 06:10:11AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
dinstall will look for a Format field of 1.6 and a new Closes field.
Closes is a space separated list of bugs closed by the upload. In
your changelog, the perl regular expression
/closes:\s*(bug)?\#\d+(,\s*(bug)?\#\d+)*/i is used to
Also, would somebody please document this in the Packaging manual?
Otherwise, it won't be terribly useful as anybody that didn't see the
message won't know about it.
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 12:19:33PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 06:10:11AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Phillip R. Jaenke, Stardate 300199.2241:
Why a dolphin? Well, they're intelligent. Definitely intelligent. They're
pretty cute. :) And they're definitely flexible. (I'd like to see *you*
burst out of the water, do a backflip or two midair, and make a perfect
reentry.;)
hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Brian May, Stardate 310199.1320:
I have noticed this behaviour, too. However, at the time, I assumed
the apt-get forced the file to be overwritten because the package
I was installing was required/base (ldso from memory, but this
problem has already been fixed). Now I am
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sysutils 29392 oldversion procinfo in sysutils is broken [76]
(Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Is there a reason not to put the new version in?
I need someone to confirm for me that the new sysutils that I put in
potato will work
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 06:10:11AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
dinstall, the software which installs packages into the hierarchy, can
now announce packages and close bugs for you.
Hmm, is it really a good thing to have dinstall announce the uploads? I
often depend on the announcements to alert me
Gordon Matzigkeit writes:
Hi, all!
There's been so much traffic on this thread, that I suspect most
people have missed the fact that Ian Lance Taylor has analyzed and
*solved* the problems with interaction between libtool and
libc5-compat shared libraries.
By, as far as I can tell, breaking
I need to make a new frozen release of wmakerconf, but my system is potato
all the way. Does anyone have a computer I could compile this on?
Adam
MD == Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MD I need someone to confirm for me that the new sysutils that I put
MD in potato will work with 2.0.X kernels. I don't have one to test
MD with---my only non-production system can't do 2.0.X because of
MD driver issues.
It does for me. No
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 12:53:28PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 10:14:15AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
snip
I brought this up on IRC, and got the following suggestions:
1. Dragon (well-liked choice on IRC)
2. Octopus (my own suggestion)
3. Monkey
4. Ant
Hi all.
I have been working with Etienne Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a replacement
for iplogger for a few months.
We have come up with a program called ippl (IP Protocols Logger) which has
the following characteristics:
* it logs ICMP messages.
* it logs TCP connections.
* it logs UDP messages.
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, M.C. Vernon wrote:
On 30 Jan 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anderson MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Avery Pennarun wrote:
Octopi and ants may also be good, if they have wings.
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:17:59AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
I need to make a new frozen release of wmakerconf, but my system is potato
all the way. Does anyone have a computer I could compile this on?
Sure.
I just fresh reinstalled slink last night. Contact me privately for more
information.
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 10:40:33PM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
There's been so much traffic on this thread, that I suspect most
people have missed the fact that Ian Lance Taylor has analyzed and
*solved* the problems with interaction between libtool and
libc5-compat shared libraries.
Previously Brian White wrote:
apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files [0]
(Johnie Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED])
We should just force SymLinksIfOwnerMatch for /home to solve this.
You know, I don't see this as grave. It means that a user can
effectively
Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
to me..
Jules
/+---+-\
| Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd|
| Jules aka | [EMAIL
Jonathan P Tomer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a possibility i considered: divide user-space...packages into
heirarchical groups (structure identical or similar to the debian
menus, possibly?). have a level wherein the user selects any of these
he wants; it will be easy to skip those things he
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
to me..
Doh!
I'll shut up now.
Lesson - read the changelog..
Jules
/+---+-\
Alexander N. Benner wrote:
hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Phillip R. Jaenke, Stardate 300199.2241:
Why a dolphin? Well, they're intelligent. Definitely intelligent. They're
pretty cute. :) And they're definitely flexible. (I'd like to see *you*
burst out of the water, do a backflip or two
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
to me..
Doh!
I'll shut up now.
Lesson - read the changelog..
Going for the record in
Jules Bean wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
to me..
Doh!
I'll shut up now.
Lesson - read the changelog..
Jules == Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jules Dear overworked gtk maintainer... Did you deliberately
Jules upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused to
Jules me..
It was deliberate, but it was a mistake. The GTK+ maintainers told
me 1.1.14 was binary compatible
On 31-Jan-99 Adam Klein wrote:
I need to make a new frozen release of wmakerconf, but my system is potato
all the way. Does anyone have a computer I could compile this on?
Adam
Adam, remember my VAIO laptop -- it is PURE slink. You or any other developer
is welcome to contact me for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi there. Most of you probably don't know me. Don't worry about that; we
can save introductions for a more appropriate place (read; off the list,
private email.) Anyways, here I am, and I've got a proposal/idea that I'd
like to run by all you happy overtaxed
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:05:34 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) said:
* Heavily modified the boot floppies to make them simpler and
less flexible; i.e., you aren't given choices about partitioning, it
does it for you. Thus the install is idiot-proofed enough that even
the guys in
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:08:51 -0600
From: David Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am the Debian and upstream maintainer of the libc5 ld.so. Ian's
patch will not be going in.
I think most people understand this, but I should make clear that it's
not my patch. I assume it's from Eric
From: Olaf Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 31 Jan 1999 11:39:23 +0100
Hi, all!
There's been so much traffic on this thread, that I suspect most
people have missed the fact that Ian Lance Taylor has analyzed and
*solved* the problems with interaction between libtool and
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 13:33:56 -0500 (EST), Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Someone might want to package this. From
http://odo.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/:
FWIW, pdf{tex,latex,jadetex} already do a pretty nice job, too, if
you're just looking for hyperlinking from TeX-based systems.
--
Adam Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, is it really a good thing to have dinstall announce the uploads? I
often depend on the announcements to alert me to new versions in Incoming.
In the new setup, the announcements won't come until the package is
installed, which in some cases can be
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, would somebody please document this in the Packaging manual?
Otherwise, it won't be terribly useful as anybody that didn't see the
message won't know about it.
I'll document as soon as I'm convinced that the bugs are out.
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, let's see what's holding up slink. :)
automake 32390 Automake patches for proper Alpha detection [0]
(Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Maintainer says upload is coming.
The fix has been uploaded and is waiting for installation.
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
OK. I was thinking of this a lot the night after my exam (a nice way
to forget I have one ;) .. and I think Debian mascot should in some way
try to capture some of its essence.
I feel some of the essence in keywords of Debian might be:
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
