Vincent Murphy proclaimed:
a new version of jdk117 from blackdown (v3) has been released. apparently,
the problems with glibc2.1 have been resolved, though i haven't checked this
out myself.
is anybody working on packaging it? can i help?
It is already in Incoming.
S.
--
Son, this is
Hi all, i would like package august, a good html editor
written in tcl/tk and released under gpl.
You can find more information about august at:
http://www.lls.se/~johanb/august/
and contact the developer of this program at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
please put Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for any kind of
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Steve Haslam wrote:
gpg --clearsign works, gpg --sign doesn't, seemingly. (ERROR: Nested
data has unexpected format. CTB=0xCB)
(I did gpg --no-options --load-extension rsa --load-extension idea \
--clearsign -u 0x6494661D --secret-keyring ~/.pgp/secring.pgp \
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 05:19:44PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
(I did gpg --no-options --load-extension rsa --load-extension idea \
--clearsign -u 0x6494661D --secret-keyring ~/.pgp/secring.pgp \
testfile testfile.out)
Try using cat, gpg may try to use fstat to get the
Incidentally, using a dpkg-buildpackage hacked to use gpg with my RSA
key, I was able to produce a signature that dinstall successfully
verified. Evil patch follows.
--- /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage~ Wed Apr 28 22:56:38 1999
+++ /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage Thu May 13 08:59:24 1999
@@ -34,7 +34,7
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Steve Haslam wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 05:19:44PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
(I did gpg --no-options --load-extension rsa --load-extension idea \
--clearsign -u 0x6494661D --secret-keyring ~/.pgp/secring.pgp \
testfile testfile.out)
[sorry for not getting to this message sooner]
Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would fix it,
but it doesn't.
Not true:
frantica:~/src/acct-6.3.5$ lastcomm | head
root ?? 0.00 secs Wed
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 03:37:32PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 12:59:12PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
:0
* ^Subject:.*\((alpha|arm|powerpc|m68k|sparc)\)
/dev/null
A slight mod:
:0
* ^Subject:.*\((alpha|arm|powerpc|m68k|sparc)\)
* !^Subject:.*source
I was trying to compile ssystem, which compiled a couple of weeks
ago. Now libc5 compatible libaries are trying to be linked. Is
this a potato problem, or my problem ?
cc -o ssystem cfgparse.tab.o lex.cfg.o ssystem.o init.o positions.o
joystick.o cmdline.o keyboard.o mouse.o scrnsht.o sun.o
Robert [sorry for not getting to this message sooner]
No sweat.
Dirk GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would
Dirk fix it, but it doesn't.
Robert Not true:
[..]
Well, that is good news. I _thought_ I had it working as well. Maybe I just
messed up on
John == John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John I was trying to compile ssystem, which compiled a couple of
John weeks ago. Now libc5 compatible libaries are trying to be
John linked. Is this a potato problem, or my problem ?
This may be related to the grave bug #37641 I just
Hi,
we all know that netscape communicator is fscked up with glibc2.1 :-(
(bus error when closing windows or with long credentials, hanging and
killing X when closed in this stage etc.)
Now Red Hat 6.0 ships with glibc2.1. I just checked dejanews and
couldn't find any problems reported by Red
On 13-May-99 Bradley Bell wrote:
has anybody thought about packaging an alternative to the man-db/groff
combination for reading man pages? 4mb is a lot for small systems, and
reading man pages is pretty much a neccessity.
Maybe I am wrong here but, how else are you gonna do it? man pages
Well, I wrote something simple in Perl for the last package, but Shaleh says
it fails on his box. What does /usr/sbin/compare_kernel_version say for you?
[ Note that I turned the $debug flag on here: ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ /tmp/compare_kernel_version 2.0
2.2 ? 2.0
2.2 = 2.0
[EMAIL
Gordon Deane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think Debian should have high quality Slink gnome binaries, because
not everyone can afford to run unstable and building from source is
quite a lot of work. Also, Redhat have this shipped :-)
We don't add new upstream versions into stable after
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 09:43:58PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Which kernel-sources, running kernel, libc6, egcc, ... are you using ? I
think on my build machine it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ dpkg -l kernel-image-2.2.7 kernel-source-2.2.5 libc6
egcc|grep ^ii
ii kernel-image-2. edd.1
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 11:17:57PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
:
: On 13-May-99 Bradley Bell wrote:
: has anybody thought about packaging an alternative to the man-db/groff
: combination for reading man pages? 4mb is a lot for small systems, and
: reading man pages is pretty much a neccessity.
:
:
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 09:34:25PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
load-extension rsa
load-extension idea
keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.pgp
keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
keyring /home/jgg/.pgp/pubring.pgp
secret-keyring /home/jgg/.pgp/secring.pgp
Okay, I did that
Hi,
GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would fix it,
but it doesn't. The upstream author, with whom I generally had very good
(albeit sporadic) contact is MIA. AFAICT the other dists don't distribute
acct.
I am still using an acct_6.3.2-2_i386.deb package that
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 04:14:00PM -0700, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
a new version of jdk117 from blackdown (v3) has been released. apparently,
the problems with glibc2.1 have been resolved, though i haven't checked this
out myself.
is anybody working on packaging it? can i
Hi,
I wonder if/when/why not/how/who there is/will be/will package
the CoolEdit HTML editor?
From: http://www.netins.net/showcase/Comput-IT/cooledit/
CoolEdit is a text editor for the X Window System. It provides many
features that are very useful to programmers.
Things like:
*
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 09:07:14AM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote:
I think you should look in http://va.debian.org/~bfulgham/ and download
the version of mozilla that is (hopefully) still there. If it works, and
if more people agree with it, I'll put it in potato.
The only problem I had with
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 09:07:14AM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote:
I think you should look in http://va.debian.org/~bfulgham/ and download
the version of mozilla that is (hopefully) still there. If it works, and
if more people
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 05:29:28AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
How is the other nicname chiark, elrangen, and giano named ?
Are they named after the name of the location ?
The machines had those names in their FQDNs, ftp.uni-erlangen.de,
chiark.greenend.ac.uk, giano.com.dist.unige.it.
--
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Everything seems to build fine according to Tinderbox. Let's
try another build Josip and see how it works out. If we can't
get it to build cleanly, I will pull CVS over my phone line at
home and try building on my Potato
It's in project/misc/debianqueued-0.8.tar.gz. It's no proper Debian
package because it runs on other Unixes, too (mine runs under
Solaris).
Hmm, why does that prevent you from packaging it? :
It doesn't really :-), but:
- A Debian package plus the still necessary .tar.gz is somewhat
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:17:36PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Everything seems to build fine according to Tinderbox. Let's
try another build Josip and see how it works out. If we can't
get it to build cleanly, I will pull
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
What about non i386 builds ?
What about them? The upload will contain source, and you'll be perfectly
free to recompile it :)
Yes, ...
but mozilla is pretty big, 17MB i think, so the compile will use lots of disk
space
reportbug is basically a complete rewrite of bug in Python,
hopefully bypassing all of the former's bugs (no doubt creating some
more, however).
Useful features:
* Architecture pseudo-header in system information.
* You can include text files in your bug report automagically.
* Configurable
lv (http://edie.office.web.ad.jp/~nrt/lv/) is a less-like multilingual
file viewer.
From lv document:
* Multilingual file viewer
lv is a powerful multilingual file viewer. Apparently, lv looks like
less (1), a representative file viewer on UNIX as you know, so UNIX
people (and
Also the mozilla web pages are not very informative about non-i386
compilability, but then maybe i didn't search in the right place ...
I don't know much about porting, but I do know that it works on
Solaris, and some versions worked on AIX and HP-UX... since those
OSs run on different
Hi, I'm packaging x-pgp-sig-el for Debian .
Package: x-pgp-sig-el
Architecture: all
Depends: emacsen, pgp
Description: X-PGP-Sig mail and news header utility for Emacs.
X-PGP-Sig header utility for Emacs.
Liecence: GPL
--
Takuro KITAME
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 11:42:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
It is already in Incoming.
It was rejected from it (see Incoming/REJECT), because of some
no-distribution clause in the licence.
ok. i'm just wondering how SuSE and anybody else who gives it out on CDs
gets away with it. when i
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 01:35:19PM +0100, Vincent Murphy wrote:
It is already in Incoming.
It was rejected from it (see Incoming/REJECT), because of some
no-distribution clause in the licence.
ok. i'm just wondering how SuSE and anybody else who gives it out on CDs
gets away with
Martin Schulze spake thus:
I wonder if/when/why not/how/who there is/will be/will package
the CoolEdit HTML editor?
The author works for the same company as I do, and asked me to
package it, but I really don't have the time.
I'd appreciate it, and I know he would, if someone could package
it
I've always had strange problems with Navigator Communicator for Linux,
but I can't say that glibc2.1 has made it any worse for me. It works just
as poorly as it always has. It hangs a lot, crashes too often, etc.
I wouldn't have much hope for a stable, full-featured browser until
Mozilla
When I add the following line to ~/.gnupg/options (as someone suggested on this
mailing list) the gpg program segv's every time I try to decrypt data.
keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.pgp
Russell Coker
I have added Ethernet cards to two machines, one my Linux box, the other
my partner's Win'95 machine. To reduce the configuration problems, I
installed Debian on the second drive of my partner's machine, reducing the
problem to two Linux machines connected through the same hardware.
Machine one
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Michael Meskes wrote:
keyring /home/meskes/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
secret-keyring /home/meskes/.gnupg/secring.gpg
I'm not sure, I think gpg may add them on its own?
PGP 2.x compatible signatures can be generated using this command:
gpg --rfc-1991 -a --clearsign
Greetings,
There seems to be enough interest to form PDG-LUG (The Philadelphia
Debian GNU/Linux User's Group).
In order to try to accommodate people with families and suburban Debian
GNU/Linux users, we will have an optional ``social hour'' at a Center
City eatery BEFORE the 8:00 PM meeting.
Title: RE: Release Plans (1999-05-10)
Yes, ...
but mozilla is pretty big, 17MB i think, so the compile will
use lots of disk
space and compile time, so i prefer to know if it should
work, or if there
should be major problems to it, and not discover after a
night's compile time
My own reasons for wanting these updates in there is that we go frozen, and then
a major release comes out. Suddenly, Debian may be more stable, but MAJOR
packages are out of date. If we have the updated section available on the ftp
site, we can have these packages there for people to install,
On Thu, 13 May 1999 15:02:40 +0100 (BST), Julian Gilbey wrote:
Glad to hear all of this. I just have one comment:
- The mktexlsr, mktexdir and mktexupd scripts must not be setuid.
If they are, anyone could run them, which is unnecessary. Any
extra privileges they require will be
This is why I suggested the new area, apart from main, non-free, and contrib.
People who want the updates should have a nice, easily accessable place to find
these packages. From a system administration standpoint, it's nice to know
EXACTLY where to go to update the entire distribution
Thank you Josip :)
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 05:29:28AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
How is the other nicname chiark, elrangen, and giano named ?
Are they named after the name of the location ?
The machines had those names
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 09:25:49AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
gpgm is not available anymore. I don't have an idea whether this is by
design.
Oh? Hmm that I should look into, I've been using it :|
It is by desing. As of version 0.9.6.
--
Mike
I agree, I would like to see a system where major releases and minor
releases exist. (No, we really do not have this as I envision it). The
major releases would be the base system and libraries
(libc, X, kernel, compilers, etc) and the minor releases would be much
more frequent and only be non
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:26:09AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
The machines had those names in their FQDNs, ftp.uni-erlangen.de,
chiark.greenend.ac.uk, giano.com.dist.unige.it.
uhm,,, the FQDN of the new upload-queue host is master.debian.or.jp,,,
Do you feel that debian-jp is
The package 'ttfprint' is ready for upload:
Package: ttfprint
Version: 0.9-1
Section: text
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (= 2.1), ttf-twmoe-kai | ttf-twmoe-sung
Installed-Size: 246
Maintainer: Anthony Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
Ttfprint takes a Chinese
Dale Scheetz writes:
The only thing that looks strange here is the Bcast: and Mask:, but I
didn't set them. It isn't clear that this is the failure either.
The ifconfig output looks fine. What does 'route -n' say?
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL
Roman Hodek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's in project/misc/debianqueued-0.8.tar.gz. It's no proper Debian
package because it runs on other Unixes, too (mine runs under
Solaris).
Hmm, why does that prevent you from packaging it? :
It doesn't really :-), but:
- A Debian package
On 14 May 1999, John Hasler wrote:
Dale Scheetz writes:
The only thing that looks strange here is the Bcast: and Mask:, but I
didn't set them. It isn't clear that this is the failure either.
The ifconfig output looks fine. What does 'route -n' say?
I have had several suggestions, all of
David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is why I suggested the new area, apart from main, non-free, and
contrib. People who want the updates should have a nice, easily
accessable place to find these packages. From a system
administration standpoint, it's nice to know EXACTLY where to
I'm going to be in London next week (17/5 - 23/5) and would like
to meet up with other developers, so that I don't have to be all
alone at the pub :). Some key signing would also be nice...
Private email, please, let's not clutter the list even more...
--
We are GNU. You will be GPL'ed.
On Fri, 14 May 1999, David Bristel wrote:
My own reasons for wanting these updates in there is that we go
frozen, and then a major release comes out. Suddenly, Debian
may be more stable, but MAJOR packages are out of date.
Andrew D Lenharth wrote:
I agree, I would like to see a system
Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is quite different. David said he wanted MAJOR packages included
in the updates (e.g. X). You said you agreed, yet you talked of _only_
minor apps being upgraded.
It's probably a good idea to make post-freeze major packages available,
but not as
Rxvp is a validating XML parser. It's GPL'd. The code is already present in
Debian in non-free as part of festival (oddly, with a BSD-ish copyright); I
intend to package it as standalone code and possibly as a shared library
programs like festival can link to.
--
see shy jo
Rxvp is a validating XML parser. It's GPL'd. The code is already present in
Debian in non-free as part of festival (oddly, with a BSD-ish copyright); I
intend to package it as standalone code and possibly as a shared library
programs like festival can link to.
Is that rxp? I had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rxvp is a validating XML parser. It's GPL'd. The code is already present in
Debian in non-free as part of festival (oddly, with a BSD-ish copyright); I
intend to package it as standalone code and possibly as a shared library
programs like festival can link to.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that rxp? I had announced an intent to package two months ago (never
appeared in wnpp). If you want it, have fun. The project I was going to use
it for has dried up.
In fact, the v in rxvp seems to be a figment of my imagination. :-) The
package is rxp.
--
see
The wnpp has become exceptionally incorrect and out of date.
What can we do as a group to fix this?
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Anthony Wong wrote:
The package 'ttfprint' is ready for upload:
Package: ttfprint
Version: 0.9-1
Section: text
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (= 2.1), ttf-twmoe-kai | ttf-twmoe-sung
Installed-Size: 246
Maintainer: Anthony Wong [EMAIL
This is quite different. David said he wanted MAJOR packages
included in the updates (e.g. X). You said you agreed, yet you
talked of _only_ minor apps being upgraded.
I be happier seeing a new X in proposed-updates if it's package
maintainer were happier with it than the one currently in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The wnpp has become exceptionally incorrect and out of date.
What can we do as a group to fix this?
One suggestion I just tossed out on IRC is to use the BTS
--
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 02:29:09PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The wnpp has become exceptionally incorrect and out of date.
What can we do as a group to fix this?
One suggestion I just tossed out on IRC is to use the BTS
Good idea! We just have a wnpp
Here's the summary of what's been going on on debian-policy in the past
week. Let me know if you're finding these useful.
Current and upcoming amendments:
- libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages (#37257)
- logrotation
Active proposals:
- Patented software ==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The wnpp has become exceptionally incorrect and out of date.
What can we do as a group to fix this?
One suggestion I just tossed out on IRC is to use the BTS
Hmm, so newbie developer issues a bug against wnpp ITP foo. When foo is
uploaded he either
DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS Machine one is 10.1.1.10 and machine two is 10.1.1.20.
I believe the problem is you netmask.
Try
ifconfig eth0 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add -net 10.1.1.0
and .20 on the other maschine. You could use tcpdump to watch the
traffic
route add -host 10.1.1.10 dev eth0
route add -host 10.1.1.20 dev eth0
on both machines, the ping still doesn't work, but I get the PKT light on
the hub to blink in time with the pings. This seems to indicate that the
hardware is doing the right thing. I still think there is something
69 matches
Mail list logo
