On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:54:39AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Why does debian have to be different than the rest of the world in
everything? Why do I get colors when I set TERM=xterm? there was already
xterm-color and xterm-debian which could do colors.
Other Linux distributions tend to
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 10:40:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
[snip]
With this system, each developer can add his own page on one of his
bookmark and from time to time he can check what he's responsible for and
what he should do in one look.
[snip]
It would be my first bookmark...
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Chris Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my question is, what are your thoughts on adding a signature to the
current Packages.gz file, or adding a similar *dsc file for it,
which is then signed?
Do you want to sign each
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
a while ago :
[..]
I'd have to bookmark myself. ;
--
Joseph Carter [EMAIL
Hello,
I'm not sure about this, but I think there's no web frontend for mail in
Debian, so I am going to try to package twig.
I have not seen any entry for this app in WNPP, but if anyone really wants
this package, I have no problem giving it away.
Taken from fm's description,
TWIG is a
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:43:51AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
I'm not sure about this, but I think there's no web frontend for mail in
Debian, so I am going to try to package twig.
Well, there's IMP... but twig looks nice, so don't let that stop your
ITP :-)
--
Alisdair McDiarmid
Okay, since everyone really desperately wants to know, I ran the numbers
on the effectiveness of RBL, RSS, DUL and ORBS against the mail intake for
lists.debian.org. All of this is theoretical and done offline against the
log file, we are blocking only via RBL (and now RSS)
The period of
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
A perusal of the DUL ips all suggest they are *all* modems which is a
really selective filter swath. No DSL or Cable IPs appear to be listed!
Well, I don't know about the US, but I suspect that's because you can
have a dialup
I have packaged 'pcrd', which is a utility for controlling an Icom PCR-1000
radio receiver. It is probably mostly of interest to amateur radio folk,
and so will go in the hamradio section.
The upstream site for this package is
http://www.mv.net/ipusers/cdwalker/pcrd.html
The PCR-1000
* Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 08:45]:
[...]
ORBS - 314
Comparing connections it is found that 3970 out of 40236 connection
attempts would have been blocked. This can be roughly considered to be
3970 emails blocked.
[...]
ORBS deserves special mention because of their
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
ORBS deserves special mention because of their insane hit count, I don't
know what that is about but ORBS would block 10% of the mails we get. I
think it is without question that the majority of those blocks are
legitimate mails. ORBS is also almost
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Michael Neuffer wrote:
ORBS deserves special mention because of their insane hit count, I don't
know what that is about but ORBS would block 10% of the mails we get. I
think it is without question that the majority of those blocks are
legitimate
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
ORBS has a tendancy to not take the time to make sure their messages go to
the right places and then they are very slow to take sites off the list
after problems are fixed.
afaik, ORBS sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What other right place could there
be?
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:23:16 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug fixed by now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:26:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Themes in debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:30:50 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line ITP with URLs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:21:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bad non-US line in its sources.list
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz| Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:46:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line old kde packages and qt lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:35:02AM +0200 , Michael Meskes wrote:
e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
check that you don't mount devfs, and have IDE subsystem compiled in (it
changed location).
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:41:37 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line subarch for i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:36:11 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Good sources.list file with non-US
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:48:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing old bug reports related to bo-hamm transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:48:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing old bug reports related to bo-hamm transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:48:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing old bug reports related to bo-hamm transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
Do you have an IDE ZIP drive? I believe I had the same problem starting
around 2.3.43. The
As discussed on the debian-hams list, I am packaging xastir.
Xastir is an X client for APRS, the Automatic Position Reporting System.
In APRS, objects (houses, cars, people or whatever) report their position
on the air. (Usually their position is obtained using GPS for mobile
objects, or entered
Nils Jeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And taking people off the list is automatic. Fix it, enter the IP in their
form, it gets re-cehcekd and taken off the list. Works like a charm.
My recent experience with ORBS backs this up.
If people configured their servers correctly, they'd never get on
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:42AM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
ORBS has a tendancy to not take the time to make sure their messages go to
the right places and then they are very slow to take sites off the list
after problems are fixed.
afaik, ORBS sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What other right
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
a while ago :
Just like everyone else: A great idea to which I have no futher idears
right now.
If I
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:41:09AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
The domain's technical contact.
Ideally, yes. In practice, I'd say that's no more likely to work
than [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen NIC entries with technical contacts
called NOC Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]; do you think hotmail
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:59:12 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line base mess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, I can find at least one site real quickly whose admin will tell you
that he got a message from ORBS, fixed the problem, was blacklisted
anyway, and it took him a month to get off that list even though the
problem was fixed
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:03:27AM -, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
The base package doesn't exist any more for quite a long time, those first
time Debian user are most of them quite good and knows what to do to
correct this problem. Furthermore for those who can't, they simply have
to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:42:50 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Mechanism for detecting unmaintained packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Le Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:39:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
I think we are closing bugs for the sake of it here. Any reason
why the suggestion can't be implemented? (ie make base-files.postinst
Yes, because Santiago Vila doesn't want it and because it looks like
a crude hack. If you
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:05:40AM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
ORBS blocks all open relays. A lot of people have open relays. Since open
relays still do not have any reason for existence other than admin
ignorance, the correct way here would be to block all open relays and
ORBS also blacklist
There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists.
I have made some test packages which should be available from:
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgmerk/software
If they are OK and a developer is prepared to sponsor me I'd love
to have the packages added to the distribution.
--
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 15:17:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FHS man pages not found by the old man-db
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 15:22:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug never reassigned
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
ORBS also blacklist sites for other reasons, such as if their probes are
firewalled out. This will, for example, catch sites that automatically
firewall out sites that attempt to relay through them - the site notices
the first check, blocks the rest and
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
afaik, ORBS sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What other right place could there
be?
The domain's technical contact.
Might be a good idea to do this in addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I
fail to see where this is better - Most domains have quite
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:00:34AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
on my hardware, and god knows how long on anything moderately old or
outdated. I certainly wouldn't want to try it on m68k on a regular basis,
eg. (If doing
On 26 Mar 2000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
postmaster at a host I co-admin got mail from ORBS a few days before
Christmas of 1999. We were given four weeks to fix our open relay,
plenty of logs and a reasonable amount of help from the ORBS website
on how to fix it. The only difficult part
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:54:39AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Why does debian have to be different than the rest of the world in
everything? Why do I get colors when I set TERM=xterm? there was already
xterm-color and
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
Or it appears to have been accepted and goes nowhere. I've seen a setup
or two like this specifically for the purposes of tracking who was trying
to use the relay...
Just check your reject log for ip adresses ;-)
If someone has some weird setup like
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:12:26AM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel écrivait:
There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists.
I have made some test packages which should be available from:
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgmerk/software
If they are OK and a developer is prepared to
Hello
Sorry for asking again about my problem but I can't make my
letter E work in bash (neither in console nor xterm). See what
happens:
- E is treated like a dead key. It is not showed at first time, but
when you press another key after E, it beeps
- E works in other programs and
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Given every report I've heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
false positives.
This used to be true.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:12:26AM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists.
If they are OK and a developer is prepared to sponsor me I'd love
to have the packages added to the distribution.
I already uploaded a package to Incoming.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:34:37PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Unfortunately, it demonstrates that ORBS is a little more indiscriminant
than perhaps is good.
Yes; because innocent people do get caught in the middle of it. But it's
the only method to fight open relays. I've said it before and
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 16:57:10 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line rmdir --ignore-... and chmod --reference
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
The point exactly.. If RBL or RSS blacklists someone, it's a known
spammer or a site which has refused to act against spammers abusing their
systems. In these instances, the blacklisting happens as a last resort.
But you can't keep up with the
Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Oh crap, you're right. I wasn't thinking on that one. Oh well, I guess
somebody will have to find good colour combinations for every colour
package.
I can do that. Black on white. Proven to work
perfectly for centuries. Or do you only read books with white
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 12:14:04PM +, Joseph Heenan wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk wrote:
The nature of the problem is this:
There is a tendency for the image to be smeared to the right. This is
particularly noticeable with the mouse
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:51:50PM +0100 , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 12:31:54AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog crivait:
Hi dear co-developers,
Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
be great if some of you gave their opinion about this
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to upload this package
till friday
Nils Jeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
ORBS also blacklist sites for other reasons, such as if their probes are
firewalled out. This will, for example, catch sites that automatically
firewall out sites that attempt to relay through them - the site
On 26 Mar 2000, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
It's just an illustration of the problems of attempting to enforce
your preferred policies upon others.
I'd call it self-defense, really.
--
Kif, if there's one thing I don't need it's your 'I don't think that's
wise' attitude.
Package: cmatrix
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Installed-Size: 76
Maintainer: Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 1.0b-1
Depends: libc6 (= 2.1), libncurses4 (= 4.2-3.1), xbase-clients (=
3.3.3.1-5), kbd-compat | kbd
Description: Console Matrix simulates the
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
I got
[-- PGP output follows --]
...
Good signature from ...
...
gpg: waiting for lock (hold by 829 - probably
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:08:10AM -0600, David Starner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
I got
[-- PGP output follows --]
...
Good
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
I got
[-- PGP output follows --]
...
Good signature from ...
...
Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: cmatrix
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Installed-Size: 76
Maintainer: Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 1.0b-1
Depends: libc6 (= 2.1), libncurses4 (= 4.2-3.1), xbase-clients (=
3.3.3.1-5), kbd-compat |
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 07:56:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila écrivait:
Perhaps we should open the Bug System to upstream maintainers by adding a
flag to every package. If this flag is on, reports are automatically
forwarded to a
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Michael Neuffer wrote:
* Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 08:45]:
[...]
ORBS - 314
Comparing connections it is found that 3970 out of 40236 connection
attempts would have been blocked. This can be roughly considered to be
3970 emails blocked.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to upload this package
till friday
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:05:43PM +0400, Konstantin Kivi wrote:
I also had to add
Set_LCDClk 40
to the Device section. Be aware that parse-xf86config
used in /etc/init.d/xdm doesn't unserstand it
Be aware that because of problems like this, parse-xf86config has been
eliminated from
Hello,
Is there any debian package (or in fact Unix tool at all) that allows
uncompression of Mac .sit (stuffit) archives?
Nils
--
Kif, if there's one thing I don't need it's your 'I don't think that's
wise' attitude.
--- Zap Brannigan
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:54:39AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Oh crap, you're right. I wasn't thinking on that one. Oh well, I guess
somebody will have to find good colour combinations for every colour
package.
I can do that. Black on white. Proven to work
perfectly for
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
So why don't you just change your local settings to make xterm be mono?
Ummm. `XTerm*ColorMode: no' seems like it'd do what you want.
That seems to work just fine. I wish I was aware of that resource a bit
earlier...
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:53:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Yes, because Santiago Vila doesn't want it and because it looks like
a crude hack.
There is no correlation there. Or if there is, it is a negative one.
--
G. Branden Robinson| If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
On 00-03-26 Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to
To be removed from this mailing list immediately press reply and enter REMOVE
on the subject line.
Would you like some information on saving 30% on your Phone bills each month
and how to get up to 8% back each month on your Utilities including phone. This
service works for both business and
Nils Jeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Four weeks? Did they change this? When we got blacklisted coz a customer
(open relay) used us as a smart host, they gave us four days ;-).
All I can report is my experience. I got four weeks.
Yeah, me too. They're competent, cool people, and their system
| - I booted with init option (linux init=/bin/bash) in order to run no
| init script and it didn't work either. I also tried D option (linux
| D).
Assuming that your mail is serious requires a fair amount of work, but
I'll try anyway.
bash man page reports that /etc/profile is read first. What
Steve Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is misleading. What ORBS does is *test* mail servers to ensure that
it *is* an open relay, before adding the relay's address to the list.
They do NOT (according to the web page) scan the net for open relays.
Rather, the list is generated
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 08:13:25AM -0800, David Benson wrote:
I only have one debugging idea, but your problem sounds
like no fun, so I hope this helps...
Try running ``strace bash'' to see whether the key-event
is making it to bash.
If so, try other libreadline-based programs (eg
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:07:15PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
| - I booted with init option (linux init=/bin/bash) in order to run no
| init script and it didn't work either. I also tried D option (linux
| D).
Assuming that your mail is serious requires a fair amount of work, but
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either
the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and
you're fine. It's quite simple, really.
Actually, I ran the relay test at abuse.net on two
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either
the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and
you're fine. It's quite simple, really.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:02:20PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:00:34AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
on my hardware, and god knows how long on anything moderately old or
outdated. I
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 01:11:17AM +0200, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
I have no idea, but what does it do when you press your E key while in the
middle of a command (while editing).
I am afraid it has the same symptoms. :-(
PS: Please carbon copy messages to me.
[]'s
--
Rodrigo
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
DUL and ORBS both seem to think they need to punish anyone whose config
or origin does not meet their standards (or as someone else noted in the
case of ORBS, if they are unable to test
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Do you want to sign each package entry, or the whole file?
The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
on my hardware, and god knows how long on
I've built a package of bidwatcher, which is a tool for users of eBay, that
assists in placing and monitoring bids. I don't really want to maintain the
package, though, so I'm calling for a volunteer to package this for real and
upload it. I'm happy to provide what I've done so far, but it's
Le Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:10:36PM +0200, Petr Cech écrivait:
This is cool. Could it be added to db.d.o right now?
It could, but not right now since I've not yet started to
work on this... I'll have some technical details to resolve.
I need access to the BTS, the LDAP database and probably the
87 matches
Mail list logo
