On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:33:43AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
(c) Copyright 2000, Bernd Eckenfels, Germany
Please don't assert copyright without including a license.
Actually there is no difference if the line is present or not, as long as i
dont claim otherwise it is my intelectual
Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds
of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to
host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending
that members of the free world do such builds?
If the answer is to not build
On Mar 28, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to change all lists commands in your ~/.muttrc in
subscribe.
I have both. Do you mean I can get rid of lists altogether?
You can't. If you use both commands then I suppose you know what they
do and configured your system for your
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:57:11AM +0100, Pedro Guerreiro wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:46:04AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
Using the Space and the Backspace keys for up and down movement is
absurd,
it's even stupid. Backspace is back-space. Those keybindings where thought
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:58:15PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz écrivait:
that's exactly the name i was going to suggest. has the author decided on a
language to tame this beast in? if php, i'd love to help.
No, not yet. But as it must integrate in what we already have ... WML has
support for eperl. But
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:14:39PM -0500, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:09:43AM -0800, Andrew Lenharth wrote:
It is the unstable branch, lets take advantage of it and make it
unstable to start out with. The sooner we can find problems and fix
them, the shorter our
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:48:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
This is what experimental is for, no?
Unstable is for unstable Debian, not necessarily unstable software. The
experimental distribution is much more appropriate for unstable upstream
software.
experimental is for
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote:
Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds
of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to
host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending
that members of
Please let me know what I need to do or who I need to contact. I should
be on debian-devel but feel free to CC me.
we would like to know what license your software is under. We only place Open
Source licensed code into Debian proper. See our web site for details (you
will often hear this
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
No, not yet. But as it must integrate in what we already have ... WML has
support for eperl. But I have decided of absolutely nothing and it's
possible that I end without eperl and without php with a simple perl
script (I don't know python but most
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:20:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
There's a list of uninstallable packages for both woody and potato
(sorted by source package) linked from there too. Stats for potato at
the moment are: (number of uninstallable binary packages by arch)
* sparc:45
*
Thank you for your comment.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.G. I'll be interested in looking at it (you didn't provide a URL).
http://feff.phys.washington.edu/~ravel/gnuplot/
P.S.G. I don't use gnuplot, but this looks like it would help the
P.S.G.
I would like to join the beta test team. I am presently a software test
engineer for Ontrack Data International and do alpha test of software
that is used for data recovery.
I am interested in Linux and would like to help in whatever way I can.
John Bristle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 03:53:22PM -0600, Jeffrey Watts wrote:
Hello, I'm a member of the Paradise Netrek development team. Paradise
Netrek is a X based game that started as Xtrek back in 1986. It is a
multiplayer, real-time, Internet game.
Paradise has undergone a revival recently, and
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm in the process of debianising the vanilla server, and a few of the clients,
if you wish, I can also take care of the paradise server.
Neil
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 03:53:22PM -0600, Jeffrey Watts wrote:
Hello, I'm a member of the Paradise Netrek development team. Paradise
Think I may have a bug report for Mozilla. Twice I
tried to use it to download a rather large file (iso
cd rom image) and after about 50-100 megs or so my
computer went into a swap fit with constat disk
thrashing. I was running mozilla under gnome desktop
with sawmill as the window manager. I
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Neil Hunt wrote:
I'm in the process of debianising the vanilla server, and a few of the
clients, if you wish, I can also take care of the paradise server.
Unfortunately, this cannot be done. I have discovered that the Paradise
server code has an annoying non-commercial
I've already got it packaged. I posted to debian-devel about it some time
ago. I'm working out a couple of minor issues with the potato binary
package, the slink one's up. See ftp.madhack.com/debian.
I plan to post some info on the postinst problem I'm running into tomorrow,
when I have better
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 10:03:33AM +1000, Brian May
Richard wrote:
I set the severity to important, as I feel that bbdb support is
important for gnus, and also, because I think it should be easy
to fix (if you
Sorry, simple reply for the sake of testing out poor mail server.
Ben
Hello,
I want to help the authors of the German SelfLinux project.
They are searching for German documentation of Debian and the
license of it. Unfortunately I didn't looked for such stuff and
I'm currently not able to do some investigation, because of
short time. Could anyone possibly help
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:48:01PM -0800 , Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
This is what experimental is for, no?
Unstable is for unstable Debian, not necessarily unstable software. The
experimental distribution is much more appropriate for unstable upstream
software.
agreed with the
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's just the point: the security of a singly-signed Packages.gz
would not be much higher than that of the ftp sites themselves.
Nothing to win, here.
Actually I'm not concerned right now with the security of the main
debian ftp site. While that's
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:02:23PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Alexander Koch wrote:
DUL is interesting. I changed my mind on that. I rather say
we use it since the amount of spam is certainly increasing
the last weeks and DUL is understandable.
Yes there is more
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:17:46AM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
Yes there is more spam, but I've been looking and I haven't seen that much
(if any at all) would be blocked by DUL.
I personally think the DUL is most harmless RBL and the most
legitimate (bad wording probably) for use. And if
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Ahh, I see... I was looking through the sources a little, but i
couldn't find the 'main file' so to speak... :)
How much is done, need any help? We need it at work, and i can
do much of this
On Tuesday 28 March 2000, at 15 h 53, the keyboard of Jeffrey Watts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Paradise Netrek developers would like to work with Debian to get
Paradise included in Debian GNU/Linux.
Thanks for your interest in Debian and welcome here.
First, you should tell what your
Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Where's the design specs of the rest of the system so far?
http://kitenet.net/doc/debconf/specification.html
--
see shy jo
Hi,
Do you want to go in and change defaults in the database? Yes, that's
doable, though there is no well-polished program to do it as of yet.
yes, that's what I want to do. My aim is to use FAI (Fully automated
installation, cf. http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/) for
the installation of
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing. If you have a spare system, please try it out and
blame me for problems.
NOTE: This is not for production use !!
More infos and download: http://www.linuxia.de/minivend/mvgoesdebian.en.html
Any comments will be
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:05:26PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
How do you say this bug is important enough to be fixed for frozen?
Often, for instance, there are times when a really simple bug causes a
package to break seriously for some users. While the package should
not get dropped if it
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Where's the design specs of the rest of the system so far?
Joey http://kitenet.net/doc/debconf/specification.html
I'll have a look at it, and see what I can come up with...
--
nuclear Saddam Hussein
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:20:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
tkirc (not installable on any arch, depends on ircii, which isn't in
potato or woody)
ircii is now in non-us.
Richard Braakman
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 11:33:41PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
often than not knows better. (Let pacbell.net's shoody NT mail server
route MY mail? NOT LIKELY!)
Have you ever had mail actually disappear through their server, or do
you just distrust it because it's running on NT? Seriously?
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 08:56:15AM -0300, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
Hello, I noticed Jazz++ (www.jazzware.com) is now released under
the GPL, is there anyone working on it? Unfortunately I don't have the time
to do it, but I'd like to see it packaged. It is the best linux midi sequencer
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 08:58:38AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 08:27:29PM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
...or maybe not. It's got cryptographic hashing algos (tiger, sha1, etc),
so
I probably can't package it due to wonderful US laws. Drat.
Strange... I read
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote:
Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds
of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to
host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending
that members of
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 03:53:22PM -0600, Jeffrey Watts wrote:
Hello, I'm a member of the Paradise Netrek development team. Paradise
Netrek is a X based game that started as Xtrek back in 1986. It is a
multiplayer, real-time, Internet game.
Paradise has undergone a revival recently, and
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing.
Excellent. I've long been awaiting an upgrade to the mv command.
--
G. Branden Robinson| A committee is a life form with six or
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Hell, Joseph, have you ever stopped to read one of your own posts to
see what you really sound like?
I agree, knghtbrd, you sound too fanatical(sp?). Calm down, and perhaps
people will pay more attention to what you're saying.
--
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:06:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hell, Joseph, have you ever stopped to read one of your own posts to
see what you really sound like?
I agree, knghtbrd, you sound too fanatical(sp?). Calm down, and perhaps
people will pay more attention to what you're saying.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 08:19:18AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
This is what experimental is for, no?
Unstable is for unstable Debian, not necessarily unstable software. The
experimental distribution is much more appropriate for unstable upstream
software.
agreed with the addition
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:13:45PM +0200 , Josip Rodin wrote:
grep experimental /etc/apt/sources.list, please?
deb http://samosa.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/ /
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 08:56:15AM -0300, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
Hello, I noticed Jazz++ (www.jazzware.com) is now released under
the GPL, is there anyone working on it? Unfortunately I don't have the time
to do it, but I'd like to see
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
often than not knows better. (Let pacbell.net's shoody NT mail server
route MY mail? NOT LIKELY!)
Have you ever had mail actually disappear through their server, or do
you just distrust it because it's running on NT?
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Well, it'd be nice to be able to do so, to verify that a mirror hasn't
been compromised, but no, you're right.
Actually I don't care that much if the mirror is compromised, if it
affects only packages that I don't install. If it affects some of
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard If you think a bug is particularly important, then by all
Richard means do whatever you can to fix it, or call attention to
Richard the bug in some other way. Severity normal does not
Richard mean please ignore this
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing.
Excellent. I've long been awaiting an upgrade to the mv command.
Oh, don't you know that Linux is
** On Mar 29, Stefan Hornburg scribbled:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing.
Excellent. I've long been awaiting an upgrade to the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing.
Excellent. I've long been
On Tue 28 Mar 2000, Peter Makholm wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouldn't manpages-dk be the correct name?
That depends
The two letter language code is da and the two letter country code is
DK (making the correct locale: LC_ALL=da_DK)
There shouldn't be any
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:24:38PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
That sounds good in theory, but does it work in practise? I don't
think so.
Last time I checked, we were fixing some 30 bugs per day. Let's not
look only at the unmaintained packages.
I have a number of bugs, which I consider
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grendel) writes:
** On Mar 29, Stefan Hornburg scribbled:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
for testing.
Excellent. I've long been
How can a programmer have the right of putting his own program on the
Official Debian's Distribution ?
I have heard something about the PGP key, but I haven't a clear idea.
Please, is there anybody who can explain it to me ?
Thank you.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
grep experimental /etc/apt/sources.list, please?
deb http://samosa.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/ /
Here's a prettier one, as discussed on IRC :)
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ project/experimental/
--
Digital
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:59:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can a programmer have the right of putting his own program on the
Official Debian's Distribution ?
I have heard something about the PGP key, but I haven't a clear idea.
Please read the information in Debian Developer's
On Wednesday 29 March 2000, at 13 h 59, the keyboard of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can a programmer have the right of putting his own program on the
Official Debian's Distribution ?
#ifdef I_WANT_TO_BE_A_DEBIAN_MAINTAINER_MYSELF
Debian lesson #1
Previously Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
I'll have a look at it, and see what I can come up with...
Be warned that I reasonably know what I would like to see there and
there is already code (gconf) which implements it. I really need to
check what the build and runtime-dependencies for gconf are
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
gnome-session itself does NOT provide window management services.
The package also doesn't depend on a real window manager.
True.
I think having it masquerade as a window manager could lead to people not
having a window manager installed at all.
Hmm, can't
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
OK, now as MV 4.03 is out, there is a Debian package available now
On Wed, 29 March 2000 01:57:45 -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
I'm not the only person here who thinks so. Make Debian use all the
blacklists you want. You'll find users and developers dropping like
flies.
If everything else fails, this is the best argument to bring
up, really. Tell me why I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:51:35PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
Normally linuxia.de is well connected, but I uploaded both archives
to ftp://www.ecoservice.de/debian/. This at least geographically
closer to Poland (I assume you come from this country).
Could You please put source packages
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:57:45AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
I have read them. (I did write them after all.)
One does not necessarily follow based on the other.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:07:59AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
First: YOUR SPAM IS NOT MY FUCKING PROBLEM.
Second: Broadband providers are not a commodity. And they're usually not
cheap.
Third: The difference in cost between my DSL service and any other
broadband service (even with lest
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:46:29AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote:
Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds
of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to
host this
Robert Ramiega [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:51:35PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
Normally linuxia.de is well connected, but I uploaded both archives
to ftp://www.ecoservice.de/debian/. This at least geographically
closer to Poland (I assume you come from this
(I'm also a first-time aptitude user)
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Remark: I think I would find the overloading of the '-' key confusing.
Please consider using a different key for hold operations. 'h' seems
intuitive but might be pressed by novices as an attempt to get help.
FB == Franklin Belew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
FB This is actually a bug in libzvt2, I have submitted a patch to libzvt2 to
FB comply with debian xterm specs. Hopefully the maintainer will apply this
FB and upload to potato soon
I've make a more friendly patch for libzvt2.
Soon in
Excuse this mail , it is only a test
-
Maurizio Boriani
General Services (Systemist)
20138 Milano - Via Mecenate 76/3 - Italy
Tel. 02/509081 - Fax 02/50908080 - E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpmoFbnlcMYF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi.
The following bug (#25847) is currently assigned to base-files:
The mountpoints /cdrom and /floppy are set to g+wxs. However, I think that
the g+w flag is of no use here, as when a fstab entry with 'user' option
enabled is mounted, the access flags are changed and the mount point is
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:16:11PM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
btw - if you really need to find a smarthost that is working
well I doubt you have to search for a long time. Mail is not
just mail and I can imagine many specials for those like you
that need a decent smarthost. It is just the
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 11:33:41PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
often than not knows better. (Let pacbell.net's shoody NT mail server
route MY mail? NOT LIKELY!)
Have you ever had mail actually disappear through their server, or do
you just distrust it because
I second this. I can't tell you how many times I have had to get the
source to something try to get it to compile and bang my head on the
computer for 10 hours trying to get it to work. Having say the newest
version of blackbox would be nice as well as some of the newer kernels,
the newest Xemacs
I tried, but it would not build and failed in several places.
Ditto.
Yup. I have actually resolved most of these issues (not all), and I've
been thinking about setting up a package. I actually started working on a
package of the (still-alpha-quality) Gseq sequencer, but it needs some
Permissions on mount points don't seem to make much difference. I was able to
mount a filesystem on a mount point with mode 0, and once mounted the
permissions come from the mounted filesystem, not the mount point.
Thanks
Bruce
On 29-Mar-00, 07:16 (CST), Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 March 2000 01:57:45 -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
I'm not the only person here who thinks so. Make Debian use all the
blacklists you want. You'll find users and developers dropping like
flies.
If everything
On 29-Mar-00, 09:00 (CST), Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I'm also a first-time aptitude user)
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Remark: I think I would find the overloading of the '-' key confusing.
Please consider using a different key for hold operations. 'h'
OK. Michael Vogt and I spoke and he's fine with me maintaining the aide
package (I'm still waiting on new-maintainer, but it looks like it'll fully
reopen long before the cutoff for uploading packages to woody ;).
I do have one strange problem I'd like to ask about. I include in my
package a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew == Andrew Lenharth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Andrew It is the unstable branch, lets take advantage of it and make it
unstable
Andrew to start out with. The sooner we can find problems and fix them,
the
Andrew shorter
Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay=00:00:21, mailer=esmtp,
pri=6332789, relay=chiark.greenend.org.uk. [195.224.76.132], dsn=4.2.0,
stat=Deferred: 450 Site not yet trusted, try later [Irritated]
Maybe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 49962 =
Bug#49962: Debian FSS-upgrade process: man pages
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 49962 wishlist
Bug#49962: Debian FSS-upgrade process: man pages
Severity set to `wishlist'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:42:14PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
A. swbell has frequent problems with their mail-servers, both inbound
(POP) and outbound (SMTP). I don't know (or care) what OS they run.
B. When I got my DSL line, swbell was the *only* ISP possibile in
houston.
That's part
Closing Bug 49962, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything has been said, and there's no clean
solution. It would be a crude hack to make (all or most of
the) packages conflict with an old man-db simply because
the man page moved.
That'd be a crude hack indeed. But aren't
Branden,
Hey, please leave me out of that ;-) But would you please provide me with
a link for DUL so I can finally check out what it's all about?
But the points about ORBS are still valid, no matter what DUL is. Being
listed in orbs IS something you can change: Fix your server! And if you're
Rather than contribute to the flame war, I would like to ask a question.
Apologies if this is a total rookie question.
Why is murphy.debian.org not adding a Received: header to show where
messages are originating? This information is useful when trying to
track down actual spammers. Is this
If I su, I then get the message bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
on almost every command I try.
I found that `exec sh' let me do things. So it seems that something has
changed in the set-up of bash or su
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of
Hi Bdale,
Since I'm the one maintaining the SourceForge version, maybe you and I
should talk. :-)
--
Larry Gilbert
Seattle, WA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Bdale Garbee wrote:
The original author has abdicated, and a fork has occurred. I'm currently
using the version from
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 11:06:19PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Branden,
Hey, please leave me out of that ;-) But would you please provide me with
a link for DUL so I can finally check out what it's all about?
But the points about ORBS are still valid, no matter what DUL is. Being
listed in
On Wed, 29 March 2000 12:42:14 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Joseph's arguments, while occasionally strident, are not foolish. I
find it interesting that his opponents devolve into name calling and
obscenity.
You can read? Sure, you can.
I tried to explain some point to him on irc but I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 11:06:19PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Hey, please leave me out of that ;-) But would you please provide me with
a link for DUL so I can finally check out what it's all about?
Leave you out of what? I mailed the list, not you personally.
But the points about ORBS are
Hello,
I'm attempting to write support for scsidev at boot time in conjonction with
a fork of hwtools to create a new scsitools package that will provide only the
scsi stuff of hwtools and compile on non-i386 Debian architectures.
However, my scripts will eventually make use of freeramdisk
is somebody running main(for(;;){fork();})? :)
Oliver Elphick (olly@lfix.co.uk) wrote:
If I su, I then get the message bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
on almost every command I try.
I found that `exec sh' let me do things. So it seems that something has
changed in the set-up
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:15:27PM -0800, Larry Gilbert wrote:
Rather than contribute to the flame war, I would like to ask a question.
Apologies if this is a total rookie question.
Why is murphy.debian.org not adding a Received: header to show where
messages are originating? This
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Larry Gilbert wrote:
Why is murphy.debian.org not adding a Received: header to show where
messages are originating? This information is useful when trying to
track down actual spammers. Is this being deliberately omitted or does
qmail just normally not include this
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
Some MTA's -- and I don't know which ones -- apparently choke if there is
more than n bytes' worth of Received: headers.
So, as I understand it, these are stripped out by murphy to help make sure
the list mails get to all the recipients.
Maybe
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:21:52PM -0800, Lawrence Walton wrote:
Nils: you still need a DNS named,
nope, DUL doesn't care whether you have a DNS entry and a matching
reverse lookup.
static,
yep. the DUL lists dynamic (dialup) IPs, it doesn't list static IPs.
that's why it's called the MAPS
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With those two keys you usually will type 'u' and then 'f' in aptitude to
reset it to its default working mode. In that mode you have a list of:
If you have a packe selected, you will get information about it in the
status
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:15:27PM -0800, Larry Gilbert wrote:
Why is murphy.debian.org not adding a Received: header to show where
messages are originating? This information is useful when trying to
track down actual
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
