Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone checked the temperature in Hell lately?
Not really, but I hope Therese enjoyed it...
Marcelo,
making obscure references to an endothermic hell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sep 06, T.Pospisek's MailLists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why not linuxconf? AFAIK it's the most powerful conftool around and
Because it sucks, is insecure and is buggy as hell.
Looks like three good reasons, to me.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
From: Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: debhelper or fakeroot problem?
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 10:25:43 +0100
But it will be fixed in dpkg 1.7.0 which will use objdump not ldd.
From: Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: debhelper or fakeroot problem?
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000
Seth Cohn wrote :
So, yes, why reinvent the wheel, if there are allready n^x conftools
around with a new one popping up monthly (webmin, COAS, linuxconf,
debconf, yast, ..., ..., ...) ? It's not going to make anything
easier.
Agreed. If you want to do something USEFUL, write a better
Figured everyone should see this, just in case...
- Forwarded message from Keith Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 13:02:09 -0700
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:00:58 -0400
From: Keith Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [slug-chat] RSA is
Frederic Peters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- debconf: dpkg-reconfigure users ? debconf is there to configure
applications and I don't want to replace it at all. It is just not
suited for some tasks
agreed, but effort should be made to keep the interface consistent between
GUI admin
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:28:20AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
I was going to tack this sooner or later (the trust us, we KNOW you
want the daemons to start always current state of almost all daemon
packages annoys me to no end, and from past flamewars I know I'm not
the only one), I
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:17AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
1) Ignore Python 1.6 and up, as long as the license is not compatible
with the GPL. That's probably the easiest way to go, but is it
justified ? Looks like a deliberate discrimination against a
DFSG-free license,
Package: zsh
Version: 3.1.9.dev6-1
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why a new zsh was introduced in potato-proposed-updates ? It's not
compatible with thw previous version...
What do you mean, it's not compatible?
zmodload complist does not work for example (it says it cannot find
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:28:20AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
I was going to tack this sooner or later (the trust us, we KNOW you
want the daemons to start always current state of almost all daemon
packages annoys me to no end, and from past
Hi,
Oliver Schulze is an upstream maintainer of one of my prospective packages,
and he's had problems sending mail to my @debian.org address. I believe that
this is something to do with master's IPv6 configuration - the SMTP error
message from master is:
550 mail from :::216.250.196.10
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:01:31PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Here is what I'm trying to fix: Upgrading a daemon while the system is
in runlevel 4 and the init script system is set up to stop that daemon
in runlevel 4 is a *bug*.
ok, this makes sense.
i must have misunderstood what you
On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Here is what I'm trying to fix: Upgrading a daemon while the system is in
runlevel 4 and the init script system is set up to stop that daemon in
runlevel 4 is a *bug*.
Damn, I should have said Starting a daemon in a upgrade while the
system...
I've opened a bug against zsh for the aforementioned behavior.
Fine. We can move the discussion there then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Timshel Knoll wrote:
Oliver Schulze is an upstream maintainer of one of my prospective packages,
and he's had problems sending mail to my @debian.org address. I believe that
this is something to do with master's IPv6 configuration - the SMTP error
message from master is:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frederic Peters wrote:
Agreed. If you want to do something USEFUL, write a better webmin, debconf
or linuxconf module.
- webmin: I think it is useful (and nice) not to have to launch mozilla
to add an user or change a password.
Excuse me? if you don't want to
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:17AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I think that we are going to see more and more cases of GPL
incompatibilities
as time goes on.
Agreed; although market forces are driving many software development houses
towards Open Source, they're still trying to squirm
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:08:17PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
550 mail from :::216.250.196.10 rejected: administrative prohibition
(failed to find host name from IP address)
Is there any way to get this fixed?
No. The MTA at the destination host is trying to tell you that dialup
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 09:58:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:08:17PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
550 mail from :::216.250.196.10 rejected: administrative
prohibition (failed to find host name from IP address)
Is there any way to get this fixed?
That kind of packaging is a hack, and a very user unfriendly one. I'd like
to have native bzip support, to have a lftp.orig.bz2.
lol, whoever said our source package format was user friendly to begin
with?
Because a *normal* user can't easily unpack a debian source package any
longer.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Seth Cohn wrote:
If you haven't tried webmin, please do. http://www.webmin.com
Last time I looked, webmin packages were sitting in incoming, but rejected
due to the ssl option (Jaldhar wanted it in main, and James bounced it
over the ssl linking). The deb installed fine
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 09:58:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:08:17PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
550 mail from :::216.250.196.10 rejected: administrative
prohibition (failed to find host name from IP address)
Is there any way to get this fixed?
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:33:21PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 09:58:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:08:17PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
550 mail from :::216.250.196.10 rejected: administrative
prohibition (failed to find host
I'm about to start work on a tool to automate network Debian installs,
possibly using a library of images (and eventually tools to create and
maintain those images), or by using a profile of packages to install.
I've been looking at mondo and replicator, but they're not quite what I
need. Is
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:33:21PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
Perhaps it's from being too geeky myself, but Branden's explanation
(the recipient of the error message is not welcome on *THEIR* Internet
under the reasoning that they're ... refusing connections from machines
with
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Niall Young wrote:
I've been looking at mondo and replicator, but they're not quite what I
need. Is there anything similar being worked on already, or any
recommendations on what the ideal method would be?
I havn't checked it, but the URL resides on a save place in my
I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
I'm calling this experimental, because things probably WILL go wrong
here and there. However, I'm using it (at least parts of it), and it
works for me. Be sure to backup
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. get an ISP that can do reverse DNS. YEESHHH! I'll happily bounce
their mail until then.
Are you willing to pay the difference between the cost of that user's
current ISP and one which meets your standard? Until then,
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:57:05PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
Perhaps it's from being too geeky myself, but Branden's explanation
(the recipient of the error message is not welcome on *THEIR* Internet
under the reasoning that they're ... refusing connections from machines
with
[followups to debian-x, please]
[7 September] Phase 2 .debs of XFree86 4.0 are now available. These
are retrievable with apt, and should upgrade smoothly from version
3.3.6 of XFree86, but please note that they are for testing, not
general-purpose use, and the library packages should
Hello!
I just browsed freshmeat and a Debian banner appeared at the
top of that page. Unfortunately it reads version 2.1.
Who might be able to fix this?
bye
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Key
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:55:07AM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. get an ISP that can do reverse DNS. YEESHHH! I'll happily
bounce their mail until then.
Are you willing to pay the difference between the cost of that
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 12:40:19PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
So why not linuxconf? AFAIK it's the most powerful conftool around and
there's *even* a .deb version of it. Further on it's pretty trivial to
write modules for it and once done you can interface to the conftool
through the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I will package Obsequiem 0.3.0, an networked MP3 jukebox with
a web interface and streaming support.
Homepage is http://obs.freeamp.org/ , licence is GPL.
bye
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:57:05PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:33:21PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
Perhaps it's from being too geeky myself, but Branden's explanation
(the recipient of the error message is not welcome on *THEIR* Internet
under the reasoning that
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:55:07AM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. get an ISP that can do reverse DNS. YEESHHH! I'll happily bounce
their mail until then.
Are you willing to pay the difference between the cost of that
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:09:31PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
nobody's telling anyone to get any particular ISP or that they have to
pay for a premium quality service.
True.
it's simple - if you want a service that's worth having, you pay
whatever it costs. if you don't want that, then pay
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:55:07AM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. get an ISP that can do reverse DNS. YEESHHH! I'll happily bounce
their mail until then.
Are you willing
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 06:59:57PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina wrote :
We can fill automagically some of these values. If a user types in
192.168.1.15 as IP, and the interface is eth*, we can figure out that
the gateway will be 192.168.1.1, and class C
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:48:17AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:09:31PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
it's simple - if you want a service that's worth having, you
pay whatever it costs. if you don't want that, then pay for a
cheap/crappy service and put up with it
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:49:20PM +0400, Alexey Vyskubov wrote:
Pyhton 2.0 is released already. And it doesn't seems that 2.0 solve the
license incompatibility...
It's not a stable release.
bye
Christian
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG:
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
I need a developer to sign my GPG-key. Is anyone in or near Munich/Germany
(where I live) or Berlin/Germany (where I'll be for a week in the near
future)?
I am in Berlin for the September so if you are around just write
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 03:19:58PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Package: ppp
Maintainer: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20007 ppp reconnects after poff ...
Submitter not responding; close?
Close it, it has been dealt with upstream a long time ago.
cu
Torsten
--
To
Hey,
I'd like to remove qt1 from woody. I only seem to find 1 package that
depends on it currently (tuxeyes) and due to the fact that it's non-free
and qt2 is out with a gpl'd license and all, I think we should discourage it's
use just as Troll is.
Ivan
--
Ivan E. Moore
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:06:55PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
i think you misread what i said. i said that missing or incorrect
reverse DNS is *NOT* a good reason for bouncing mail.
I guess I did.
Thanks,
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 04:16:03AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
Hey,
I'd like to remove qt1 from woody. I only seem to find 1 package that
depends on it currently (tuxeyes) and due to the fact that it's non-free
and qt2 is out with a gpl'd license and all, I think we should discourage
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:09:58AM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
That kind of packaging is a hack, and a very user unfriendly one. I'd
like
to have native bzip support, to have a lftp.orig.bz2.
lol, whoever said our source package format was user friendly to begin
with?
A calendar.hindu file is needed for 2000/2001 and the yearly
calendar.christian needs to be updated to the new syntax.
Duplicated events needs to be removed from the yearly calendar.judaic
files.
I'll also be happy to add the events of your religion of choice.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To
On Sep 07, Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just your standard lack of reverse DNS.. Part of the anti-spam
bit. The sender needs to get working reverse DNS I suppose..
Looks like a stupid check, to me.
Some very big ISP here have mailservers with no reverse mapping...
--
ciao,
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:35:44AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 04:16:03AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
Hey,
I'd like to remove qt1 from woody. I only seem to find 1 package that
depends on it currently (tuxeyes) and due to the fact that it's non-free
and
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:33:21PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 07, Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just your standard lack of reverse DNS.. Part of the anti-spam
bit. The sender needs to get working reverse DNS I suppose..
Looks like a stupid check, to me.
It is.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
In any case, reverse DNS lookup is reasonable, no matter what you
think of DUL.
I have to agree with this. The previous time, the discussion was using
DUL to block email. This is about reverse DNS lookups failing, which
is a
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
These packages have been uploaded to the experimental distribution
(but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
but are also available by using the following line in /etc/apt/sources.list:
I added the override entries last
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 09:50:07PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:17AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I am disappointed that RMS is fighting over something as trivial as a
company asking that legal issues be settled in their home state
(country). This is
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 10:18:45PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
How do you plan to handle packages that are used by others? For example
your list contains dpkg-scriptlibs in the list of packages that should
be moved to orphanded, but that will have the nice side effect of breaking
all
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 08:23:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Static pages are known to be outdated.
I'm sure I asked this previously, but could we not add a note to that
effect on at least the front page?
--
Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:33:21PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
It says, in plain English, failed to find host name from IP address.
It says in plain English, administrative prohibition (failed to fine
host name from IP address)
Perhaps it's from being too geeky myself, but Branden's
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Michael Beattie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
These packages have been uploaded to the experimental distribution
(but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
but are also available by using the following line in
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
In any case, reverse DNS lookup is reasonable, no matter what you
think of DUL.
I have to agree with this. The previous time, the discussion was using
DUL to block email. This is
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
I will package Obsequiem 0.3.0, an networked MP3 jukebox with
a web interface and streaming support.
Homepage is http://obs.freeamp.org/ , licence is GPL.
Does the default kernel have multicast support? If not, how do you
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
A calendar.hindu file is needed for 2000/2001
I'll do it. Give me a day or two.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just packaged `pdnsd'.
So, I intent to upload this.
pdnsd is a proxy dns server with permanent caching
(the cache contents are written to hard disk on exit)
that is designed to cope with unreacheable or down dns servers
(for example in dial-in networking).
LICENSE is GPL2
about more,
In Wed, 6 Sep 2000 23:10:32 +1100 Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum
veritate scripsit :
I looked at that configuration file. It appeared to me that
there was enough info in there for reportbug just to use
/usr/sbin/sendmail to deliver it, rather than using an MUA at all.
Some people do
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
Yippie!
[...]
deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
After this, apt-get update; apt-get install ipppd isdnlog-data
With all that is going on with ftp.debian.org, I just tried to check there
for alternative mirror sites and it's gone bye-bye.
So, I checked the web page, but the only primary site listed is
ftp.debian.org. The secondary sites are said to have restrictions, but
just what those are for any given
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:39:24AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
Is there any better way to pick a useful ftp site for upgrading?
Do you need a mirror to upgrade you system? What about using http?
http.us.debian.org points to many mirrors.
bye
Christian
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL
Hello,
I wanted to give apt-move a try:
~# dpkg --status apt-move
Package: apt-move
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 160
Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 4.1.9
Unfortunately I get only syntax errors:
~# apt-move
/usr/bin/apt-move:
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
Yippie!
:-)
deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
After this, apt-get
On Thu, 07 Sep at 16:59 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I wanted to give apt-move a try:
Unfortunately I get only syntax errors:
~# apt-move
/usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token `('
What am I doing wrong?
I guess nothing. I had the same problem a few weeks ago and
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
In Wed, 6 Sep 2000 23:10:32 +1100 Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum
veritate scripsit :
I looked at that configuration file. It appeared to me that
there was enough info in there for reportbug just to use
/usr/sbin/sendmail to deliver it,
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Mika Fischer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep at 16:59 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I wanted to give apt-move a try:
Unfortunately I get only syntax errors:
~# apt-move
/usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token `('
What am I doing wrong?
I guess
Frederic,
I think that easier config is a worthy goal. I have long mused about how
to teach a single tool about the myriad config files. But I'm too lazy to
actually write one.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frederic Peters wrote:
Seth Cohn wrote :
So, yes, why reinvent the wheel, if there are
On Thu, Sept 07, 2000 Christian Surchi wrote:
Do you need a mirror to upgrade you system? What about using http?
http.us.debian.org point to many mirrors.
Funny you should mention this, as this is exactly the one I picked.
My question was more about how to pick one. The documentation on the
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
After this, apt-get update; apt-get install ipppd isdnlog-data
should install isdnutils, ipppd, isdnlog, and
Andreas Tille wrote:
I wanted to give apt-move a try:
Unfortunately I get only syntax errors:
~# apt-move
/usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token `('
It's a bug in bash. You may work around it by setting ash as
your /bin/sh shell instead of bash.
My current
From the article I have read about debian Stand On KDE, which said that
debian would like to help kde get there license issues resolved so kde could
be put into debian. Perhaps, that was not the case, and debian just wanted
to kick kde because you guys don't like it and the license issue was just
Today, I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calling isdnrep is not working well: it's looking for the zone files
in /usr/lib/isdn/zone, but they are in /usr/lib/isdn/:
Oh, silly me. I had configured isdnrep to look specifically there, in
/etc/isdn/isdn.conf. Fixed this now, let's see if it works...
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Nate Duehr wrote:
Linuxconf is very broken (and it's documented in the Readme's provided
with the .deb) on Debian, and it mangles perfectly good config files
into nasty-looking ones that sysadmins who prefer vi usually dislike
reading.
Another point in webmin's favor. I
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:51:23PM -0300, Ben Woodhead [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
If I was wrong, I would have expected to see some news on the homepage
saying Yeah, KDEs is completely GPLed and will be included in debian, or
at least something like that. After all the reading I did
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:51:23PM -0300, Ben Woodhead wrote:
From the article I have read about debian Stand On KDE, which said that
debian would like to help kde get there license issues resolved so kde could
be put into debian. Perhaps, that was not the case, and debian just wanted
to kick
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:51:23PM -0300, Ben Woodhead wrote:
If I was wrong, I would have expected to see some news on the homepage
saying Yeah, KDEs is completely GPLed and will be included in debian, or
at least something like that. After all the reading I did where debian was
saying that
This is good for Debian, since we want something cross-platform, and
possibly even cross-kernel (Hurd, anyone?). Adding a network config for
Debian,
Rene Mayrhofer said he was making a start on this. He's away for a few
weeks, when he gets back, I'll find out how far he's come.
a dpkg/apt
I am trying to compile qt 2.2 on a alpha with potato, g++ 2.95.2-13
using rkrustys patches from the
intel qt 2.2 diffs. I get lots of internal compiler errors on the files
generated by moc (moc_*.cpp), and
uic segfaults when compiling tools/designer/designer/listboxeditor.ui
It looks like a
Hello everybody
First I would like to give my appologies, I was not aware of the incomming
directory and I have been told that kde will be included. I would also like
to say that I personally do not use kde nor am a developer for them, my
consern was with the conflicts between linux. Competition
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
My current problem with apt-move is that it wants to delete every
single deb file I have (instead of only those that have never
versions on hand). Also, it makes completely empty Packages.gz
files for me.
I dunno about the first, but I have seen
(I already replied to this, but I figured that would be better style
than replying to my own mails three times in a row.)
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let me know if you use this version, and keep me informed of
ANYTHING, good or bad. I *do* mean anything, like spelling
Peter S Galbraith schrieb:
My current problem with apt-move is that it wants to delete every
single deb file I have
For my archive it was to late:
19M /home/pub/debian
That was ~250M before ... oops. Time to use http and squid
instead ...
ciao, 2ri
--
Note that there are two possible
Yep, I ITP'ed sourcenav and insight.. a _minor_ problem with
the tcl/tk stuff, but I think I'll just wrap it up soon.
Thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I ITP'd this before, hands off :) Why don't you check the list BTW?
And the wnpp? That's why the BTS is being used, right?
Here are the bug report numbers for your reference
#68583: ITP: Insight
#68584: ITP: sourcenav
These are the ITP's I made some time ago, still working on them.
I've
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Ullrich Martini wrote:
I am trying to compile qt 2.2 on a alpha with potato, g++ 2.95.2-13
using rkrustys patches from the
intel qt 2.2 diffs. I get lots of internal compiler errors on the files
generated by moc (moc_*.cpp), and
uic segfaults when compiling
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Yep, I ITP'ed sourcenav and insight.. a _minor_ problem with
the tcl/tk stuff, but I think I'll just wrap it up soon.
Fantastic. I emailed you off-list about some ideas on how to handle that,
in case you needed the tips (doubt you will, but just in
Hi,
as Maintainer of KDE for Debian I'd like to chime in. kdelibs, kdesupport,
and kdoc all are sitting in incoming. We had to wait till yesterday for qt2.2
to come out so that I could build it, then compile kde against it since
the GPL'd status doesn't mean squat if you build against the
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Ullrich Martini wrote:
I am trying to compile qt 2.2 on a alpha with potato, g++ 2.95.2-13
using rkrustys patches from the
intel qt 2.2 diffs. I get lots of internal compiler errors on the files
generated by moc (moc_*.cpp), and
uic segfaults when
Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
Still, if 1.6 were to replace 1.5.2, we had to check all packages that
depend on Python, if we think their license is still compatible with the
new Python license, and remove them if it's not. I'd opt against this.
Hm, I'm confused. Are you saying that you think that
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 03:19:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
People like Mr. Jones don't like to consider impacts. They like easy rules
and easy policies. They don't like to do analysis. And they especially
don't like to be inconvenienced by considerations of the impact of their
Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
as Maintainer of KDE for Debian I'd like to chime in.
[clip]
I was interviewed by a few online
magswhether any of that went anywhere is not my problem.
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/opinions/2281/1/
Editor's
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calling isdnrep is not working well: it's looking for the zone files
in /usr/lib/isdn/zone, but they are in /usr/lib/isdn/:
In /usr/share/isdn/ actually.
Oh, silly me. I had configured isdnrep to look specifically
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
You see, isdnconfig tries to copy from
/usr/share/doc/isdnutils/examples/defaults/ipppd.DEVICE to
/etc/isdn/ipppd.$device.
Now, ipppd.DEVICE is named ipppd.DEVICE.gz (arghl, automatic gzipping
in docs dir?). And it resides in
Today, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calling isdnrep is not working well: it's looking for the zone files
in /usr/lib/isdn/zone, but they are in /usr/lib/isdn/:
In /usr/share/isdn/ actually.
Jep. Local
I'm wondering if anyone still uses this package anymore. It has been
superceded by epic4 for hrmmm it must be several years.
Is it time for it to go? It's not like it's broken or it has any
hideous bugs, but it's not going anyplace, either.
--
David N. Welton, Responsabile Progetti Open
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
