Bug stamp-out list for Dec 22 05:15 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 485
Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 0
--
Package: afbackup (debian/main)
Maintainer: Christian Meder
Hi there,
A number of people have reported problems with unsubscribing from
various lists, principally debian-user and debian-devel.
We, the listmaster team, believe we have fixed the underlying
problem and you should merrily be able to [un]subscribe as needed.
Please inform us if you aren't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 05:25:06 -0700
Source: cmatrix
Binary: cmatrix
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1b-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:59:06 +0100
Source: black-box
Binary: black-box
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 04:25:16 +0100
Source: tidy
Binary: tidy
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2804-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:22:19 -0600
Source: sgrep
Binary: sgrep
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.92a-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jim Studt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:09:44 -0700
Source: tar
Binary: tar
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.13.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:01:38 -0600
Source: update
Binary: update
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:24:32 +0100
Source: bsdmainutils
Binary: bsdmainutils
Architecture: sparc
Version: 5.20001028-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:22:00 -0700
Source: kdelibs
Binary: libarts-dev kdelibs3 kdelibs3-dev kdelibs3-doc libarts
Architecture: all sparc
Version: 4:2.1-20001218-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:48:30 +0100
Source: libmcal
Binary: libmcal0-dev libmcal libmcal0
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.6-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 01:13:00 -0700
Source: qt2.2
Binary: qt2.2-doc libqt2.2-dev libqt2.2-mt-dev libqt2.2-mt libqt2.2 libqt2.2-gl
Architecture: sparc all
Version: 2:2.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:32:23 +0900
Source: ami
Binary: ami ami-gnome
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:50:00 -0700
Source: kdegraphics
Binary: kpixmap2bitmap kghostview ksnapshot kfract libminimagick-dev pixie
kview libminimagick5
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4:2.1-20001218-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:27:58 +0900
Source: imagemagick
Binary: libmagick++5 imagemagick libmagick5-dev libmagick5 libmagick++5-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:5.2.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:18:27 +0900
Source: w3c-libwww
Binary: libwww-dev libwww0
Architecture: sparc
Version: 5.3.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Takuo KITAME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:48:35 +0100
Source: mc
Binary: mc mc-common gmc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4.5.51-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Bialasinski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:32:34 +1100
Source: ash
Binary: ash-udeb ash ash-medium
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.3.7-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Herbert Xu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:17:53 +0900
Source: t-code
Binary: t-code
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:2.1pre3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: UEYAMA Rui [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/charities.cron/
I'll look at it and make a package, unless someone really objects...
Fix the tmp security hole while you are at it, will you?
Thanks,
--
Marcelo
Hi,
I am maintainer for run and console-log, and waiting for NM to
complete. Unfortunately, run has a nasty bug that causes console-log
to hang which in turn may prevent a clean shutdown. Upstream doesn't
maintain run any more (and I shouldn't have packaged it in the first
place), and isn't
On 22-Dec-2000 Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hi,
if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
package of LinkChecker:
W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
a
It has been more than 1 year since the technical committee decided how
the /usr/share/doc transition would be accomplished[1], and in that time
most packages have implementede the transition. The decision stated that
Thus, potato+1 (woody) ships with a full /usr/share/doc, and a
/usr/doc full of
No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
on Slashdot this morning.
Looking at:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
to provide enhanced security.
Should we be merging these patches into Debian, assuming they
Donald J Bindner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 01:44:54PM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
The cruddy, slow, GUI based email program I use at work seems to imply your
reply to address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but your email came from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Or maybe its the other way around. I hate
There are a total of 645 packages that have not been converted[2]. There
are 16 weeks between December 31st and Aj's projected freeze date for woody.
If 40 people could do one package a week, we would be done. Or 20 people
doing two a week, or just 6 people doing one a day. In other words,
Joey Hess wrote:
There are a total of 645 packages that have not been converted[2]. There
are 16 weeks between December 31st and Aj's projected freeze date for woody.
If 40 people could do one package a week, we would be done. Or 20 people
doing two a week, or just 6 people doing one a day. In
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:04:26PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
It has been more than 1 year since the technical committee decided how
the /usr/share/doc transition would be accomplished[1], and in that time
most packages have implementede the transition. The decision stated that
Thus, potato+1
I'd be glad to help. How should we proceed? Should we send patches to
the appropiate maintainers or directly upload the NMUs? Honestly, they
had enough time to tranist to /usr/share/doc.
send patch, wait some period of time (maybe a week?) then warn of NMU, then NMU.
Hi there,
A number of people have reported problems with unsubscribing from
various lists, principally debian-user and debian-devel.
We, the listmaster team, believe we have fixed the underlying
problem and you should merrily be able to [un]subscribe as needed.
Please inform us if you aren't
from the secret journal of Brent Fulgham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
on Slashdot this morning.
Looking at:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
to provide enhanced
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 3.x, 95 and 98
to
nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft's professional and
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:58:54PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Is there any way to submit an ITP bug on WNPP, so that the bug
number appears in the copy to -devel?
Yes, put -devel in Cc: or (X-Debbugs-Cc:) fields.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
on Slashdot this morning.
Looking at:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
to provide enhanced
At 04:38 PM 12-22-2000 -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of Brent Fulgham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
on Slashdot this morning.
Looking at:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
there appears to be several utilities that
Piotr == Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piotr ITO: libapache-asp-perl
Piotr ITO: libapache-filter-perl
Piotr ITO: libapache-ssi-perl
Piotr ITO: libcgi-pm-perl
Piotr ITO: libdbd-csv-perl
Piotr ITO: libhtml-clean-perl
Piotr ITO: libhtml-simpleparse-perl
from the secret journal of Buddha Buck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
unless we have a policy against security, it should be fine. :) it's all
gpl.
i posted that before i hit the download page.
Security-enhanced Linux is not an attempt to correct any flaws that may
currently exist in Linux. Instead,
Some days ago I uploaded mutt 1.3.12 to experimental.
Please test it, because if people will not complain I'm going to upload
it to woody.
README.Debian says:
~~
~ NOTES ABOUT THE EXPERIMENTAL PACKAGE
~
~ There is no
Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
coming from the NSA audited carefully before being included.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: The Source will be with you... always.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000,
from the secret journal of Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
coming from the NSA audited carefully before being included.
Britton Kerin
you're
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 01:39:45AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:43:03AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hmm, the debian lists get quite a lot of spam lately. Is there anything
that can be done about this?
Pardon my French, but this is a fucking stupid idea. Did
Package: general
Version: 20001222
Severity: important
Hi,
I feel that there exists a general confusion among some Debian developers as
to what user ids such as 'nobody' should be used for. I suggest that the
policy be updated with relevant advice.
As I see it, 'nobody' should be a user
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:58:54PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Is there any way to submit an ITP bug on WNPP, so that the bug
number appears in the copy to -devel?
Yes, put -devel in Cc: or (X-Debbugs-Cc:) fields.
When I have done this,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
coming from the NSA audited carefully before
Dear debian-devel@lists.debian.org
We inform you in priority as domain
specialist for promoting and affiliation,
the ccTLD (Top Level Domain).cf just opens for public sales.
http://www.lists.cf
http://www.business.cf
http://www.internet.cf are certainly available
Do not loose time and money,
I'm getting tired of getting spam through mail lists I subscribe to that
have an open post policy. Can we please close the debian-devel and other
such lists that should be closed. I don't think trademark domains is doing
anything for debian development.
--
Carl B. Constantine ([EMAIL
Carl B. Constantine wrote:
I'm getting tired of getting spam through mail lists I subscribe to that
have an open post policy. Can we please close the debian-devel and other
such lists that should be closed. I don't think trademark domains is doing
anything for debian development.
This is
Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm getting tired of getting spam through mail lists I subscribe to
that have an open post policy. Can we please close the debian-devel
and other such lists that should be closed. I don't think
trademark domains is doing anything for debian
Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
I am maintainer for run and console-log, and waiting for NM to
complete. Unfortunately, run has a nasty bug that causes console-log
to hang which in turn may prevent a clean shutdown. Upstream doesn't
maintain run any more (and I shouldn't have packaged it in the
from the secret journal of esoR ocsirF ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A possability might be to have a signature key. This is not
significantly different than the extra header idea but it would allow
*any* MUA to work with it. Could be something like a GPG fingerprint or
whatever. Just a thought.
from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
discussions.
Ben
amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it, PLEASE make
debian-devel spam-free. But the problem is that you CAN'T.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:03:28PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, put -devel in Cc: or (X-Debbugs-Cc:) fields.
When I have done this, the report shows up on -devel the same as
I submitted it - the Bug Number doesn't appear.
If you CC it it will -
Adrian Bunk wrote:
BTW: Are there any rules when a developer has to use which urgency or can
he if he wants to simply do all his uploads with the urgency set to
high? I read the Packaging Manual and I did only find a very vague
how important it is to upgrade to this version from
Daniel Stone wrote:
from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
discussions.
Ben
amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it, PLEASE make
debian-devel spam-free. But the
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:00:26PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
from the secret journal of Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Solution: just deal with the few spam we get so as not to hinder real
discussions.
Ben
amen.
OK, if you can do that, I'm absolutely thrilled to do it,
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
can ignore it, so can everyone else, IMNHO.
Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it is
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
can ignore it, so can everyone
You going to send them the bill then? At the bottom off the mailinglist
subscription page:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe
is the mailinglist policy. Basically, the policy says either pay us
$1,000 up front or $1,999 after. Martin (Joey, whatever you prefer...),
Remco,
I was kind of feeling sorry about including you as a CC in the last
post--partial oversight, partial personal policy (I never quite know how
to deal with tertiary CCs: I generally detest people who adulterate a
message they're replying to, but I also think that responsibility for
replies stops
Hello,
if i take for example:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/update_excuses.html
adns 1.0-3 (low)
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adns is 27 days out of date!
out of date on alpha: libadns0, libadns0-dev (from 0.8-2)
out of date on i386:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
can ignore it, so can
Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm getting tired of getting spam through mail lists I subscribe to
that have an open post policy. Can we please close the debian-devel
and other such lists that should be closed. I don't think trademark
domains is doing anything for debian
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:04:26PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
base/update
I uploaded a NMU for this already.
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/22/2000 19:44, Miles Bader at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, lets not.
Right now I'm subscribed to debian-devel, but often in the past I've
read it occasionally in the archives, and sent mail as I thought
appropriate. I know there are other people who do this.
The fact is that the
Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yo ppl, it's not hard to archive a closed list, most list software supports
archive directly. Sheesh! You make it sound like it's the end of the world
for crying out loud. Give me a break!
I was complaining about not being able to post to the list
This discussion is being taken off list to avoid yet another flame war (not
my intention to start another flamewar).
--
Carl B. Constantine ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Phone: 250.953.2650
Open Source Solutions Inc. Fax: 250.953.2659
4252 Commerce Circle,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:04:03AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
if i take for example:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/update_excuses.html
adns 1.0-3 (low)
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adns is 27 days out of date!
out of date on alpha:
67 matches
Mail list logo
