-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 01:30:42 +0100
Source: dnrd
Binary: dnrd
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.8-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:32:34 -0800
Source: gtk+
Binary: libgtk-doc libgtk-dbg libgtk1 libgtk-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:1.0.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:22:07 +
Source: xsoldier
Binary: xsoldier
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:0.96-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 12:18:30 +0100
Source: dbf2sql
Binary: dbf2pg
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.0-7.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dr. Guenter Bechly [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 23:44:45 +0100
Source: gtktalog
Binary: gtktalog
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:0.9.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Marillat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 03:02:59 -0300
Source: lftp
Binary: lftp
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.3.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nicolas Lichtmaier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:22:26 +
Source: cftp
Binary: cftp
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 01:31:39 -0800
Source: glib1.2
Binary: libglib1.2-dev libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dbg
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.2.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dwayne C . Litzenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things to do when you
reinventing for other reasons.
The only feature I've
Hi guys,
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things to do when you
reinventing for other reasons.
If I had to change something in the Debian package manager,
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the debian packaging system answered most things i want from a
packaging system. what exactly is missing/wrong with the debian
packaging system that makes you feel the need for wheel reinvention?
I also cannot see anything wrong with the Debian packaging
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
Hi guys,
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things to do when you
reinventing for other
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:18:09AM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Dwayne C . Litzenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things
On 2000-12-23, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes and no. It can daemonize a program, but will not restart it when it dies.
It sounds like what you want is a simple shell script that would be daemonized
by start-stop-daemon:
/usr/sbin/myprogram.wrapper:
However, I would say that
Here is a (somewhat?) constructive idea regarding the spam.
i would like to point everyone to sugarplum:
(http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/)
quote from README file:
sugarplum is a spam-bot database poisoner utility. The
specific usage of a spam poisoner is to provide a spammer's email
spider with
Here is a (somewhat?) constructive idea regarding the spam.
i would like to point everyone to sugarplum:
(http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/)
quote from README file:
[snip]ac
I'd suggest putting a lot of IFRAME tag which include the document generated
by sugerplum which occuplies only a minimal
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Josh Huber wrote:
built. Should I just do it myself? I also know that there's no
(automated :) autobuilder for Alpha, so I understand that there might
be some delay for alpha.
In Alpha's case, I'm normally very on-top of the builds, but am going to
be slow for the next
!
, :)
$50
1000$/. 3-4
, e-mail.
-.
, -,
. -:
1. .
- , ,
,
,-.
.
2. 5$-20$.
,
50-100 .., ,
.
3.-
.
4. , ,
.
5. , , .
6.-
.
7.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package mifluz.
Package: mifluz
License: GPL
URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/mifluz/
Description:
- ---
The purpose of mifluz is to provide a C++ library to build and query a full
text
hello,I would like to adopt the package
gdict and maintain it. Would you guys ther like to give me some pointers on how
should i do? I'm not a debian developer yet, but i have intention to be (and am
appling).regards,Related
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
However, I would say that if the program dies so frequently that it needs a
wrapper like this, it should probably be fixed.
tail -f of a logfile into a secured less. To search and scroll
backwards, one must kill the tail,
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Gil Bahat wrote:
Here is a (somewhat?) constructive idea regarding the spam.
i would like to point everyone to sugarplum:
(http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/)
quote from README file:
Cool program! Might be a good way to discourage spammers
from
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 08:43:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
I have a comment: NO WAY IN HELL. The day that we start rejecting DUL
posts is the day that several people leave the project, me included. How
many ISPs these days route mail worth a damn?
:-) Joseph you make it too easy.
You
hi *,
after being asked so by the upstream author i declare my intention
to orphan (from now) the following packages:
python-popy
zope-popyda
merry xmas,
federico
--
Federico Di Gregorio
MIXAD LIVE Chief of Research Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian
Dwayne C . Litzenberger wrote:
Hello!
I'm starting work on a new linux package manager. The idea is to be able to
replace rpm, dpkg, apt, dselect (backend) with one,written mostly from scratch
and designed to be as simple (code, not features) and clean as possible. For
now, the work
Dwayne C. Litzenberger writes:
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
Undo.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
Dwayne C . Litzenberger wrote:
Hello!
I'm starting work on a new linux package manager. The idea is to be able to
replace rpm, dpkg, apt, dselect (backend) with one,written mostly from scratch
and designed to be as simple (code, not features) and clean as possible. For
now, the work will
Previously John Hasler wrote:
Undo.
dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
transactions.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
Previously John Hasler wrote:
Undo.
dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
transactions.
that's completely crazy. will you force anybody who wants rollback to
use raiserfs? generic applications like
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
Previously John Hasler wrote:
Undo.
dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
transactions.
that's completely crazy. will
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Ben Collins's letter:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
Previously John Hasler wrote:
Undo.
dpkg will support rollback at some point, when
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 04:10:43PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Ben Collins's letter:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
Previously John Hasler
Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
less has a mode to select() and watch the end of a file, invoked with
the 'F' command. I don't think that it's currently possible for less to
enter this mode with a command-line flag, but I've often wished that it did,
so maybe this feature should be
Dwayne C . Litzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
Relocatable packages so a user can do an individual package install into ~
without being r00t (this may be possible now with some dpkg foo?).
The ability to install more than one
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:18:55AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
flame war
Now maybe if we were using the RBL, DUL, and RSS lists... :-)
/flame war
GNU mailing lists (supposedly) use RBL, but in a mode where `spam' isn't
deleted, but rather just gets a header added saying `this message is
Federico Di Gregorio writes:
or am i missing something?
In addition to the things Ben mentioned, dependencies and broken
installs.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
If I had to change something in the Debian package manager, I would
like it to use bzip2 instead of gzip, but this doesn't need a
omplete reimplementation. The problem isn't technical, but it's been
debated many times. I don't
Joseph Carter wrote:
I think if dpkg used some sort of hashed database index it would be a hell
of a lot nicer to people's CPUs and memory. Whether or not that requires
a re-implemenetation of dpkg or not isn't for me to say since I haven't
looked at dpkg's code in 3 years.
That smells
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
Severity: wishlist
This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
I used reportbug --email=ADDRESS.
I apilogize if the --email didn't prevent it from being mailed out to debian.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Package: general
Severity: normal
Version:
Synopsis: sndconfig
Class:sw-bug
Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness)
System: Linux 2.2.16-22 i586 unknown
Description:
I used sndconfig to configure my Sound Blaster 16 pnp sound card. The
tests worked fine, but when I try to play
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
Joseph Carter wrote:
I think if dpkg used some sort of hashed database index it would be a hell
of a lot nicer to people's CPUs and memory. Whether or not that requires
a re-implemenetation of dpkg or not isn't for me to say since I
Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2000 14:53:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#80434: sndconfig
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Hi Tomasz!
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Tomasz Barszczak wrote:
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
Severity: wishlist
This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
Didn't work, it went to Debian all way through.
Merry Xmas!
yours,
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 05:53:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
It has been said in a related thread on a mailing list that shall not be
named :) that making a DNS lookup for hosts carrying the blacklists on each
delivery would slow it down. It has also been said that this isn't hard to
work
On Dec 24, Tomasz Barszczak wrote:
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
Severity: wishlist
This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
I used reportbug --email=ADDRESS.
I apilogize if the --email didn't prevent it from being mailed out
to debian.
--email changes your
Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2000 22:12:51 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#80433: test, ignore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:13:36PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Spam to the Debian mailing lists tends to be especially annoying since
the spammers always seem to hit each and every mailing list (or at
least, a large number of them), which makes each spam much more
noticable.
Oh yeah. If only
Today, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously John Hasler wrote:
Undo.
dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
transactions.
Even then, I imagine it to be difficult. What about installs that cross
filesystem boundaries, etc. Either you'd have to have
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:38:50PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Oh yeah. If only there was some way of automatic killing of such spams, sent
to more than X (say, 5) mailing lists... something that would remember the
last X-1 mails from the same domain name (or whatever) and kill off the
On 12/24/2000 13:13, Mark Brown at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spam to the Debian mailing lists tends to be especially annoying since
the spammers always seem to hit each and every mailing list (or at
least, a large number of them), which makes each spam much more
noticable.
The GIMP-user and
I'm now getting regular X freezes. Only thing I can pick up is:
/usr/bin/X11/WindowMaker fatal error: got signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
from ~/.xsession-errors.
Trying to rebuild an unstripped wmaker from source, but automake makes
my life miserable:
aclocal
aclocal: configure.in: 15: macro
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:44:13AM -0500, Adam Lazur wrote:
Dwayne C . Litzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
Relocatable packages so a user can do an individual package install into ~
without being r00t (this may be possible now
open up a co-ordination page on sourceforge and start a public design
process. do not stick to a religious idea like it should be written
in C, or in perl.
I don't know. I've seem a number of projects fail because they spent too much
time on discussion and didn't ever get down to business. I
Answering my own question. Needed to install:
libtool, libltdl0, libltdl0-dev, libproplist0-dev
(maybe a little overdone).
Cheers,
Cristian
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
I'm now getting regular X freezes. Only thing I can pick up is:
/usr/bin/X11/WindowMaker
Dwayne C . Litzenberger wrote:
I wrote..
It should be re-usable as a library for implementing packages/modules
for PLs·
Erm, now I'm getting confused. I assume you mean that this package manager
should also be a framework for loadable modules. Isn't that way outside the
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 02:21:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
If I had to change something in the Debian package manager, I would
like it to use bzip2 instead of gzip, but this doesn't need a
omplete reimplementation. The
56 matches
Mail list logo
