Report about packages that need work for Jan 5, 2001
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 46
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 0
Total number of orphaned packages: 105
Number of packages orphaned this week: 6
The number in parenthesis after each package name is
Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 0
--
Package: afbackup (debian/main)
Maintainer: Christian Meder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:21:17 +
Source: xoids
Binary: xoids
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.5-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:10:56 -0600
Source: psutils
Binary: psutils
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.17-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 12:18:23 +0100
Source: mutt
Binary: mutt
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.3.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:15:00 -0700
Source: kdebase
Binary: kdm kdebase-libs task-kde-devel libkonq-dev libkonq3 kdebase konsole
konqueror kdebase-dev task-kde kdebase-doc kdewallpapers
Architecture: sparc all
Version: 4:2.1-20010101-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:43:02 +0100
Source: wdm
Binary: wdm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.20-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 13:50:11 +0100
Source: xosd
Binary: xmms-osd-plugin libxosd0 libxosd-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.4.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 11:09:38 +0100
Source: sunclock
Binary: sunclock
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.27-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Rosenfeld [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:39:17 -0800
Source: lwm
Binary: lwm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.01-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: William Ono [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:43:37 -0800
Source: xdaliclock
Binary: xdaliclock
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.18-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 18:47:27 -0800
Source: mgdiff
Binary: mgdiff
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 13:27:33 -0500
Source: netcat
Binary: netcat
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.10-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Decklin Foster [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 17:25:05 -0300
Source: wget
Binary: wget
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.5.3-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nicolas Lichtmaier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:54:17 +1000
Source: coldsync
Binary: coldsync
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.6.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bradley Marshall [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 18:40:58 +0200
Source: libcdb-file-perl
Binary: libcdb-file-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.83-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tommi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:32:23 +0100
Source: snort
Binary: snort
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.6.3a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Hammers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 15:40:11 +0100
Source: xfaces
Binary: xfaces
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.3-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 23:01:29 +1100
Source: wwl
Binary: wwl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 22:44:34 -0800
Source: nana
Binary: nana
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.5-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brent A. Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 13:12:40 +0100
Source: yabasic
Binary: yabasic
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.65r5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:47:52 -0500
Source: libunicode-map8-perl
Binary: libunicode-map8-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 04:47:04 -0800
Source: bk2site
Binary: bk2site
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:1.1.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bradley Bell [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:30:05 -0800
Source: libset-object-perl
Binary: libset-object-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.02-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:42:09 -0500
Source: libunicode-string-perl
Binary: libunicode-string-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.06-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:28:38 +0300
Source: catdoc
Binary: catdoc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.91.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Novodvorsky [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 21:41:48 +0100
Source: libstorable-perl
Binary: libstorable-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 22:29:28 +0900
Source: libjcode-pm-perl
Binary: libjcode-pm-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.68-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsushi
If you don't like large Packages files, implement a rsync transfer
method for them.
--
see shy jo
Bdale Garbee wrote:
Getting this right has two major components that are worth my commenting on
here. First, the package 'bind' will continue to be 8.X to avoid violating
the principle of least astonishment for our users, and there will be a new
'bind9' package and friends delivering 9.X.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:12:56PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, D-Man wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:53:04PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
mutt allegedly shares code with pine...
^^
That would be very strange since mutt's author was a part of the elm
Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above?
Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the flags entry,
which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for
it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running 2.4.0 could tell you).
Thus, it would die immediately for me.
...and bind9 is going to be run as non-root by default, right? :)
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
snip
BIND 9 source package in non-US because it's DFSG-free but has crypto
code, including only BIND, producing binary packages
bind9
On Friday 5 January 2001, at 11 h 21, the keyboard of Russell Coker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a repository of packages to support such people?
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/apt-sources/
* Manoj Srivastava
| How do you suggest I reply to sender if someone scribbles all
| over the reply-to header that the sender has set (in case the from
| header is invalid)?
you use gnus, gnus is able to do this in a sane manner.
from 'info gnus', under Group Parameters
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
don't know why. :-/
It is what my users learned on some other AIX maschine at my
university. It is the first mailer I learned and used.
Pine is extremely easy to use and
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:21:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote:
Basically: don't do them.
Cool! I will tag all pine bugs as wontfix...
Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
This has been bugging me for a while, but with linux 2.4.0 being
official, I'm wondering about gcc versions. The recommended compiler
for the kernel is, AFAIK, egcs 1.1.2 (gcc 2.91.66?). There's a warning
in Documentation/Changes specifically for 2.95-derived compilers...the
only recent i386 gcc
[sorry, either fetchmail or my ISP made me lost 30 or so emails.]
The problem with bigger and bigger Packages.gz,
[I thought is obvious. :-(] is,
1) It prevent many more packages to come into Debian, for example,
Linux Gazette are now not present newest issues in Debian. People
occasionally got
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 04:24:44AM -0500 , Jason Lunz wrote:
This has been bugging me for a while, but with linux 2.4.0 being
official, I'm wondering about gcc versions. The recommended compiler
for the kernel is, AFAIK, egcs 1.1.2 (gcc 2.91.66?). There's a warning
in Documentation/Changes
Hi Mariusz!
You wrote:
Bakery is a C++ Framework for creating GNOME applications using Gnome--
(gnomemm) and Gtk-- (gtkmm).
What's the difference with Glade?
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait
Hi all!
dpkg 1.8.1, which was installed a few hours ago, comes with broken
dpkg-source. You can't make your packages with it.
Please see #81152 and #65021 for more info.
BTW. Applying my patches from #81152 will cause that source packages
generated by dpkg-source 1.8.1 could not be unpacked
On Friday 05 January 2001 07:29, Andres Salomon wrote:
Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above?
Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the flags entry,
which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for
it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running 2.4.0
zhaoway == zhaoway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
zhaoway 1) It prevent many more packages to come into Debian, for
zhaoway example, Linux Gazette are now not present newest issues
zhaoway in Debian. People occasionally got fucked up by packages
zhaoway like anachism-doc because the
ZK == Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ZK Hi everyone
Hi,
ZK After a while there is finaly version which looks stable enough for me,
ZK so there are new packages of this program available here
ZK http://master.debian.org/~kabi/libaviplay_20010103-1_i386.deb
ZK
Hello
I'd like to package dynswapd. It's a small daemon I wrote that dynamically
adds (and removes) swapfiles, if necessary (in other words: when swap
partition is almost full).
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek +48603240006 http://www.coven.vmh.net/ |
o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:17:49PM +0100, Bart Schuller wrote:
(the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
accessible pretty well (which ftp.debian.org is not).
download.sourceforge.net
which of course is ftp.debian.org. :-)
Does rsync too :-)
With which server?
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:32:49PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
But you haven't bothered to try five percent of those. Why do you expect
others will bother to reply to your mail? :
Na, I did check 20% (make that 30 today) of the primary sites. :-)
That's everyone's hoping :) It was down for a
Santiago Vila wrote:
* Remove this file altogether, since it serves no useful purpose.
The file does serve a useful purpose: it concentrates the debian version
number string that is used in a number of places (issue.net and so on)
into one central place to be modified.
* Make it a conffile
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:09:17AM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
There could be a helper setuid program, man-cache-writer. man would call
this program and pipe it the catpage. man-cache-writer would just write it's
stding to the proper place. End of the problems.
No so simple. You don't
Am 5.01.01 um 10:10:53 schrieb Martin Bialasinski:
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
don't know why. :-/
[...]
Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't know any other
mailer like it. Last time I
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:33:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Joey Hess (See Bug#81249) complains about the fact that local changes
to /etc/debian_version are not preserved on upgrades (he wants this
file to read unstable instead of the current testing/unstable).
What should I do?
Move it
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Move it to /var/lib/dpkg
Nope, debian_release is independent on the dpkg used. /var/lib/dpkg/
would be a most unintuitive place to place the version of the
distribution as a whole.
Screw it, just kill the file. We don't have a mechanism for coping with
it.
--
Mike Stone
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:29:58AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above?
Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the flags entry,
which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for
it, I reverted to test10. Anyone
Just saw this as I suppose many already have
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-01-05-001-04-NW-LF-KN
Since Woody is probably still many months away is
there a chance that it will include the 2.4 Kernel?
=
Amateur Radio, when all else fails!
http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze
Debian
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:04:55AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
Yes, I've been in a packaging mood lately :)
I'd like to have Tk707 packaged. Tk707 is a software clone of the
Roland TR-707 rhythm composer, a drum machine.
Reading this reminded me of Freebirth, which doesn't seem to be
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:07:44AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
Screw it, just kill the file. We don't have a mechanism for coping with
it.
I've seen third-party software install scripts use the file to determine
which Linux distribution it's running on.
--
The idea is that the first face
There could be a helper setuid program, man-cache-writer. man would call
this program and pipe it the catpage. man-cache-writer would just write it's
stding to the proper place. End of the problems.
No so simple. You don't want the trusted program trusting the output of
a non-trusted
http://www.softsound.com/Shorten.html
Does anyone know of a free replacement for the shorten tool, from SoftSound?
It is used to compress/decompress digital audio to/from the shn format, a
compressed audio format which gets about 2:1 lossless compression. It is
gaining popularity for lossless
On Friday 05 January 2001 07:29, Andres Salomon wrote:
Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above?
Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the flags entry,
which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for
it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running
Hi,
it seems that more and more Packages disapear from potato and are
replaced by links into the pools. And thats not new pakages that are
becoming stable, but old once getting moved.
Did I miss something there?
Also a link is placed in /debian/dists/potato/main/source for each
package thats
* David Greene
| On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
|
| The problem is L4M3RZ using that broken piece of non-free shit PINE, which
| doesn't appear to respect *any* conventions of netiquette.
|
| Is there a free mailer to replace that broken piece of non-free shit
| PINE that
* Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 5.01.01 um 10:10:53 schrieb Martin Bialasinski:
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
don't know why. :-/
[...]
Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't
* Bart Schuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010105 07:48]:
I've seen third-party software install scripts use the file to determine
which Linux distribution it's running on.
Yes, I think it's important to have one central file that can show
(roughly) which version of the OS is running. Being human
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Petr Cech wrote:
i use 2.95.2 and it works. if you want to be really sure, use gcc272
Nonono, if you read Documentation/Changes for 2.4 it actually says that
o Gnu C 2.91.66 # gcc --version
Please note specifically this part of the same
In Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:41:50 -0500 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum
veritate scripsit :
Reading this reminded me of Freebirth, which doesn't seem to be packaged yet.
http://www.bitmechanic.com/projects/freebirth/
It seems to be dead upstream, with over a year since the last release,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
I thought aj introduced the serious severity so that important bugs
wouldn't be considered release-critical anymore, but it looks like bugscan
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
I thought aj introduced the serious severity so that important bugs
wouldn't be considered release-critical anymore, but it looks like bugscan
doesn't know that important bugs aren't RC.
Thanks, fixed:
@priorities = (serious, grave, critical);
Those
Joey Hess wrote:
Santiago Vila wrote:
* Remove this file altogether, since it serves no useful purpose.
The file does serve a useful purpose: it concentrates the debian version
number string that is used in a number of places (issue.net and so on)
into one central place to be modified.
How about creating a directory called /etc/organizations including the
following files:
/etc/organizations/debian-unstable
Contains the text Debian Unstable http://www.debian.org;
Found in perhaps the unstable version of base files package.
/etc/organizations/helixgnome
Contains the text Helix
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 06:40:06PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
If you want to see a list of the update timestamps of all known mirrors
look at http://attila.bofh.it/~md/ .
Thanks. That helps a lot.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Heikki Kantola wrote:
For few days (first experienced this on 1.1.) I've been trying to figure
out what's wrong with APT as whatever command I try, I get:
Er, ah, er, the only time I've seen that is when someone had too many
items in their sources.list, but I did not think
Previously Vince Mulhollon wrote:
How about creating a directory called /etc/organizations including the
following files:
You mean the /etc/dpkg/origins/ files?
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at
On 04-Jan-01, 15:24 (CST), John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
MS He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone
MS can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply
MS to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to
On 5 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
If that suits your needs, feel free to write a bugreport on apt about
this.
Yes, I enjoy closing such bug reports with a terse response.
Hint: Read the bug page for APT to discover why!
Jason
Hi
I don't know C, thus couldn't do more than keep it available.
(quick and dirty translation in [])
- Forwarded message from Stefan Eilemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:15:23 +0100
To: Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stefan Eilemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Hi,
the Author of tar changed the --bzip option again. This time its even
worse than the last time, since -I is still a valid option but with a
totally different meaning.
This totally changes the behaviour of tar and I would consider that a
critical bug, since backup software does break horribly
UH == Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UH On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:59:21PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas on
this, or has it been done already?
UH Hi.
UH I guess vsound is what you're lokking for...
UH Should be listed on Freshmeat...
Any idea for video
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
I thought aj introduced the serious severity so that important bugs
wouldn't be considered
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:05:03AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Whats the problem with a big Packages file?
If you don't want to download it again and again just because of small
changes I have a better solution for you:
rsync
apt-get update could rsync all Packages files (yes, not
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
don't know why. :-/
It is what my users learned on some other AIX maschine at my
university. It is the
I run several ancient programs, by housing them in /usr/local/bin, with
the libraries they need (which are no longer provided in Debian) situated
in /usr/local/lib. In previous systems, right up to potato, this worked
fine.
I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:46:35AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
how about diffs bethween dinstall runs?..
sorry, but i don't understand here. dinstall is a server side thing here?
yes, when dinstall runs it would copy the old packages file to, lets say,
packages.old and create it's changes to the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:30:58PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
I run several ancient programs, by housing them in /usr/local/bin, with
the libraries they need (which are no longer provided in Debian) situated
in /usr/local/lib. In previous systems, right up to potato, this worked
fine.
I
Previously Dale Scheetz wrote:
I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to
date, and all these programs stopped working because the needed library
was not found. If I copy the /usr/local/lib contents to /lib everything
works fine, suggesting that ldconfig no longer
Previously Sami Haahtinen wrote:
this would bring us to, apt renaming the old deb (if there is one) to the
name of the new package and rsync those. and we would save some time once
again...
There is a --fuzzy-names patch for rsync that makes rsync do that itself.
Or, can rsync sync binary
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Changes in version 1.9.2:
Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
for Debian (Bug#8181).
oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before potato. dunno why this
would change between potato and
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 17:16:43 +0200, Taneli Vähäkangas wrote:
To me it seems that gcc272 will become obsolete once 2.4 kernel gains
popularity.
s/gains popularity/offers the functionality that a very large majority of
people rely on in 2.2/.
For me, 2.4 currently lacks
- x25tap
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:30:58PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to
date, and all these programs stopped working because the needed library
was not found. If I copy the /usr/local/lib contents to /lib everything
works fine,
Hi,
Quoting J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
For me, 2.4 currently lacks
snip sick x25 line ;)
- kerneli crypto patches
There are preliminary 2.4 kerneli patches available. I will start packaging
those as soon as i have the 2.2.18 version cleaned up and up-to-date.
Greets,
Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
s/gains popularity/offers the functionality that a very large majority of
people rely on in 2.2/.
People still rely on 2.0. Not for features, but stability.
For me, 2.4 currently lacks
- x25tap
- kerneli crypto patches
- ReiserFS
and
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 19:03:45 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
- x25tap
- kerneli crypto patches
- ReiserFS
In that case ReiserFS is a really bad example, it might never be in 2.2
and Linus said it will be added in the 2.4 series.
All
Hi,
what happened to the above machine ? It seems to be unreachble
for a couple of days
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Why is it called common sense when nobody seems to have any?
On 04-Jan-01, 12:32 (CST), Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
And, anyway, caching might be done in a cronjob: look at the pagesa in
manpath every night, check which ones have been accessed since the past
run, and format those. Then delete anything older than N days
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
the Author of tar changed the --bzip option again. This time its even
worse than the last time, since -I is still a valid option but with a
totally different meaning.
This totally changes the behaviour of tar and I would consider that a
critical bug, since backup
== Sami Haahtinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:05:03AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
wrote:
Whats the problem with a big Packages file?
If you don't want to download it again and again just because
of small changes I have a better solution for
== Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
If that suits your needs, feel free to write a bugreport on apt
about this.
Yes, I enjoy closing such bug reports with a terse response.
Hint: Read the bug page for APT to
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:02:40PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
I thought aj introduced the
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Changes in version 1.9.2:
Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
for Debian (Bug#8181).
oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before potato.
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
