-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:43:46 +0200
Source: gramofile
Binary: gramofile
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:22:43 +1000
Source: aprsdigi
Binary: aprsdigi
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0-0pre3.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:08:56 -0500
Source: kdetoys
Binary: eyesapplet kscore kodo kdetoys-doc-html kteatime ktux amor kmoon
kworldclock fifteenapplet
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4:2.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:08:28 +0200
Source: printtool
Binary: printtool
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: A Mennucc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:58:31 +0200
Source: geneweb
Binary: gwtp geneweb
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.03-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:32 +1000
Source: aprsd
Binary: aprsd
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.14.vk3sb.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:13:10 +1000
Source: xastir
Binary: xastir
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:15:00 +0200
Source: id3ed
Binary: id3ed
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.10.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: peter karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:48:48 -0500
Source: htmldoc
Binary: htmldoc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.8.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jeff Licquia [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:36:26 +0200
Source: icmpush
Binary: icmpush
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:00:00 -0500
Source: sendmail
Binary: sendmail libmilter-dev sendmail-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 8.12.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 23:24:55 +0200
Source: tela
Binary: tela
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.33-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mikael Hedin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 04:57:17 +1000
Source: xringd
Binary: xringd
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.20-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Kowalik [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:11:39 +0200
Source: gmt
Binary: gmt
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:26:47 +0200
Source: glame
Binary: glame
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.4.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:36:26 +0200
Source: icmpush
Binary: icmpush
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:25:47 +0200
Source: mysql
Binary: mysql-common libmysqlclient10 mysql-doc mysql-server mysql-client
libmysqlclient10-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.23.42-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:10:37 -0400
Source: gri
Binary: gri-html-doc gri gri-ps-doc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:00:00 -0500
Source: sendmail
Binary: sendmail libmilter-dev sendmail-doc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 8.12.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 04:57:17 +1000
Source: xringd
Binary: xringd
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.20-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Kowalik [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:11:39 +0200
Source: gmt
Binary: gmt
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 23:24:55 +0200
Source: tela
Binary: tela
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.33-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mikael Hedin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:36:24 +0200
Source: wipe
Binary: wipe
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.16-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:58:20 +0200
Source: noweb
Binary: nowebm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.9a-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 12:10:00 -0700
Source: kdelibs
Binary: libkmid-dev libarts-alsa libkmid libarts-dev kdelibs3 libkmid-alsa
kdelibs-dev kdelibs3-cups kdelibs3-doc libarts
Architecture: sparc all
Version: 4:2.2.1-1
Distribution:
I would like to volunteer to maintain the documentation.
Paulo Ney de Souza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 15:20:07 2001
From: Boris Veytsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Maxima] Future of maxima
Yow!
Things are getting confusing. Great Britain used to be called Britain by the
Romans (so if someone still does on this list, he must be very old.) Great
was not just added to include other places. Great Britain is just the modern
and correct way to call it. This or you can use UK, a synonym
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Laurent de Segur wrote:
Things are getting confusing. Great Britain used to be called Britain by the
Romans (so if someone still does on this list, he must be very old.) Great
was not just added to include other places. Great Britain is just the modern
and correct way to
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
In the excuses file a see a lot of :
Unsatisfiable Depends: libesd-alsa0 (= 0.2.22-4)
Actually, you see a lot of them for ia64 and m68k. libesd-alsa0 doesn't
exist on ia64 or m68k. On the upside, most/all of them are |'ed
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
A note.
Good. Send me a patch.
I will apply it.
... after woody, probably.
It has been there since potato, and I don't think I will make a last
minute change to a package.
This is, IMO a bogus bug.
Go and fix a real bug. There are enough
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
IIRC, the UK is England, Wales and Scotland, while Great Britain includes
Northern Ireland, and a few other colonies.
The other way around.
UK is the country, GB is the island.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:03:11PM -0700, Sulaiman Fahad Alhasawi wrote:
I dont find any packge that supports iso 8859-6
-- that is arabic fonts .
Try iso10646-1 fonts. The fixed fonts at 10x20, 9x15, 9x15B and helvR12
all have most of the Arabic characters, as does the GNU Unifont. You
might
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:20:31PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
This is, IMO a bogus bug.
Go and fix a real bug. There are enough already.
A package that will do grave damage to your system if installed
is not a real bug?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website:
severity 112723 critical
thanks
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:20:31PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
This is, IMO a bogus bug.
Go and fix a real bug. There are enough already.
A package that will do grave damage to your system if installed
ÎÒ´ÓÍøÉÏÏÂÔØÁËxcin_2.5.2-1.debÕâ¸öÈí¼þ¡£¿ÉÊÇÎÒ²»ÖªµÀÔõôʹÓá£Çë°ïæ¡£
£¨I¡¡download the xcin_2.5.2-1.deb,but I don't know how to use it.Please help
me for it.)
ÖлªÍøȫдòÔì¡¢¹¦ÄÜ׿ԽµÄÊÕ·ÑÓÊÏä¡°ÐÅÌ
On 19 Sep 2001, Camm Maguire wrote:
Is there any interest in forming a group to continue the development
and maintenance of maxima? I for one would certainly be interested in
Definitely. Unfortunately, Maxima is very alien to me. I have been
learning LISP just to work with Maxima, but
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:49:28PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 19-Sep-2001 Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have a simple question. Is it possible to run dpkg -r foo
from within a postinst-script when using dselect or apt?
What is the result?
It whould be very helpful when
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:23:03AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ola Lundqvist wrote:
How it it done when the base system is istalled? It removes (it the
user tells so) the pcmcia and ppp packages.
That's not run from dpkg but from a special script that is run during
system
Martin F Krafft wrote:
also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:42:44AM)
I would like to propose to form an Apache (web server) task force to
maintain the Apache packages currently maintained by Johnie Ingram
(netgod) (and potentially related packages if the need arises).
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an alternative Ardo could invent [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
simple alias.
Out of curiosity: what is required in order for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be distributed to several people? Is this automated?
--
Marcelo | Dock-a-loodle-fod!
[EMAIL
Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
[ I sent this to debian-testing a month ago, but the mailing list ]
[ doesn't exist anymore - it is not archived at http://list.debian.org/ ]
[ If there is a more appropriate list for this discussion let me know. ]
The list does exist. For some reason it wasn't
Matthias Berse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be aware that, by default, xinit (and thus startx) starts the X
server using the -dpi 100 argument, which forces the X server to treat
the display as having 100 dots per inch.
[...]
So why has this change made? Sorry if that's an faq. Maybe
Package: general
Severity: normal
Version:
Synopsis:
Class: sw-bug
Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
System: Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686 unknown
Debugging information:
(no debugging symbols found)...
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/netscape/netscape-communicator
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:14:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#112885:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:37:15PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
While en_GB is english as spoken in Great Britain. Perhpas one of the
residents thereof can explain the difference.
Great Britain == England, Wales, Scotland
United Kingdom == England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland
British Isles
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:08:48AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Matthias Berse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why has this change made? Sorry if that's an faq. Maybe the answer
should be included in the note.
I just wanted to start arguing that 100dpi matched the real
resolution usually
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Matthias Berse wrote:
meaning it should be changed back?! Anyway my main concern about the
font resolution is that many programs break, because they expect the
fonts being 75dpi.
File bugs against those programs.
--
G. Branden Robinson
Nick writes:
So using GB as a country code is incorrect, as Great Britain is *NOT* a
country, really.
You better have a talk with the ISO about that.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
(Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org)
There you'll get the appropriate answers ...
(your friend is dpkg -i xxx.deb ; but you should have a look at the
debian package-management: man dpkg ; man apt-get ; man dselect ;or
just install the apt-dpkg-ref and/or apt-howto packages for example
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:45:18PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xcin_2.5.2-1.deb
Idownload the xcin_2.5.2-1.deb,but I don't know how to use it.Please
help me for it.)
Please use English in this list.
If you want to use Chinese, you can go to
debian-chinese-gb/debian-chinese-big5
Camm == Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Camm Greetings! And thanks for the help that you can give!
Camm Raymond Toy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Camm == Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Camm Is there any interest in forming a group to continue the development
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:16:13PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:01:24AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
packages such as diskless-image-secure, diskless-image-simple, xfsprogs-bf,
e2fsprogs-bf should automatically qualify for grave or even critical bugs
for breaking
ehm... this bug seems to be preventing lots of packages to make in
testing, shouldn't it get some more attention?
thanks
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
On 19-Sep-01, 18:16 (CDT), Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
read the description for xfsprogs-bf and e2fsprogs-bf, your NOT
SUPPOSED to install them. we need them for boot-floppies.
Fine. Why are they in the main archive? If it's so that the bf can
access them over the net, then they
On 19.09.2001, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
Interesting. How did you obtain the environment dump?
set, with no arguments. May be a bashism, though. Not sure.
I used the env program.
~$ env --version
env (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11
~$ env|grep SHELL
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:42:53AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Nick writes:
So using GB as a country code is incorrect, as Great Britain is *NOT* a
country, really.
You better have a talk with the ISO about that.
[grin]
There are enough fucked-up standards out there that one more won't
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:10:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Matthias Berse wrote:
meaning it should be changed back?! Anyway my main concern about the
font resolution is that many programs break, because they expect the
fonts being 75dpi.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:10:44PM +0200, Matthias Berse wrote:
Anyway, could you, Branden point out, or give me a pointer to, why
this change happened from using 75dpi to 100dpi? I just want a good
reason to give to all those people, who tell me the fontsize sucks.
Because of the popularity
Nick Phillips writes:
Besides, it was probably the ignorant Brits on the committee that decided
on the codes that insisted that they didn't like UK :(
But GB is listed opposite United Kingdom, not Great Britain. A
political compromise, I guess.
I assume residents of Northern Ireland supposed
#include hallo.h
Norbert Veber wrote on Thu Sep 20, 2001 um 09:58:16AM:
If its not to be installed, it should not be in the archive. This is like
going to a restaurant and being told not to eat a certain dish under any
circumstances because you'll get food poisoning.. :)
What is the problem?
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:09:38PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
ehm... this bug seems to be preventing lots of packages to make in
testing, shouldn't it get some more attention?
I was under the impression this bug was fixed in libtool 1.4.x. Is
that not the case?
-Ossama
--
Ossama
On Sep/20/2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
Because of the popularity of 17 and larger monitors, and the fact that
the dpi's actually in use are closer to 100dpi than 75dpi these days.
So, am I the only one that even in 17 monitors uses 75dpi fonts?
--
Roberto Suarez Soto
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Nick Phillips wrote:
Besides, it was probably the ignorant Brits on the committee that decided
on the codes that insisted that they didn't like UK :(
Well, UK is rather improper for a country code, because that is an acronym
for a generic term. Same
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:37:59PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On Sep/20/2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
Because of the popularity of 17 and larger monitors, and the fact that
the dpi's actually in use are closer to 100dpi than 75dpi these days.
So, am I the only one that even
Hello,
Since your organization is the official authority for maitaining and ISO
country codes, I extensively used your page
http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/ for
the last, in need of a list of ISO 3166 country codes.
The page web claims to list the ISO country codes as used in the
hi guys,
i am not yet an official maintainer, but i do already have an advocate
and sponsor (Colin - what's the status?)
however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting
ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of
these ITPs reached the debian-devel
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have taken the opportunity to create some nice (or not?) graphics of
the mailing lists that Debian serves on lists.debian.org. I have
analysed both the posting frequency and the total list of subscribers.
The graphs are indeed nice, what did
What you really want to do is to implement
Recommanded-Conflicts: brokenmailer, etcpassoire, trivialtohackftpd
or even
Suggested-Conflicts: easyr00ted, lametelnetd
Right ?
Well, creates an
harden-recommanded-conflicts package
that conflicts with brokenmailer, etcpassoire, trivialtohackftpd
and a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Suarez Soto) writes:
So, am I the only one that even in 17 monitors uses 75dpi fonts?
Are you using 75dpi fonts on a 75dpi monitor, or just using 75dpi
fonts because you like them?
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors!
Cheer Up! Things
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:11:53PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I have a simple question. Is it possible to run dpkg -r foo
from within a postinst-script when using dselect or apt?
What is the result?
You can't do it directly, as dpkg has
John Hasler wrote:
that.
Surely there are locales for welsh and Scottish gaelic?
--
I should think not. Those are two *very* different Celtic languages.
--- Paulo Ney de Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to volunteer to maintain the
documentation.
As to the documentation, I believe all we have right
now are a few examples, man pages and a manual
describing the functions. A more friendly, complete
manual (using docbook maybe?)
You can either Cc: debian devel, or add a X-Debbugs-Cc: header (works
like Cc, but includes the bug# in the subject too).
IIRC, it is documented somewhere in the doc-debian package.
Cheers,
--
Gergely Nagy \ mhp/|8]
pgpWqyKFvBmI9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting
ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of
these ITPs reached the debian-devel list. they have been confirmed,
but they haven't been
Previously Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
The graphs are indeed nice, what did you use to make them?
The graphs say `rrdtool', which is a pretty good hint :)
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented
On Sep 20, Martin F Krafft wrote:
i am not yet an official maintainer, but i do already have an advocate
and sponsor (Colin - what's the status?)
however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting
ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of
these
http://people.debian.org/~shaleh/lintian.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:16:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
What you really want to do is to implement
Recommanded-Conflicts: brokenmailer, etcpassoire, trivialtohackftpd
or even
Suggested-Conflicts: easyr00ted, lametelnetd
Right ?
Well, creates an
harden-recommanded-conflicts
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:17:43PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:11:53PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I have a simple question. Is it possible to run dpkg -r foo
from within a postinst-script when using dselect or apt?
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:40:32 +0200
Martin F Krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
however, in the mean time i am happily packaging along and submitting
ITP's to bugs.debian.org the proper way. However, not once has one of
these ITPs reached the debian-devel list. they have been confirmed,
but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Suarez Soto) writes:
So, am I the only one that even in 17 monitors uses 75dpi fonts?
Dunno, I'm using 75dpi fonts on 19 and 21. Fwiw, the change annoyed
me too. I'm not using a larger display because my eyes fail me, I'm
using it to get more text on it.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:58:16AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
If its not to be installed, it should not be in the archive. This is like
going to a restaurant and being told not to eat a certain dish under any
circumstances because you'll get food poisoning.. :)
Clearly these pacakges are
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
i am not yet an official maintainer, but i do already have an advocate
and sponsor (Colin - what's the status?)
Back from vacation and I'll help you now. Tell me if there are any
changes from the last iprelay stuff you sent me and
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:51:26PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
Since your organization is the official authority for maitaining and
ISO country codes, I extensively used your page
http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/ for the last, in need of
a list of ISO 3166 country codes.
Norbert == Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Norbert From the description of diskless-image-simple: WARNING:
Norbert This package can and will break your computer. Do not
Norbert install manually. It should only be installed via the
Norbert diskless-newimage, part of the
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:40:32 -0500,?f(
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:)
q On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:51:26PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
Since your organization is the official authority for maitaining and
ISO country codes, I extensively used your page
Ah, now it's there; yay. I'm still curious what was holding it up,
though.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (finger [EMAIL PROTECTED])
87 matches
Mail list logo
