On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Isn't the goal of Debian
providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
software anymore?
No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
4. Our Priorities are Our Users and Free
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from the system, and
the simplest thing is then to run some UTP to the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
dnrd
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
some solutions for it (namely using a good, free MUA). You just let
the person helpless, I try to point him to the fix. However if you try
to help somebody you should not be a debian developers because you
said that non-free software is the problem
Hi Johnny!
You wrote:
I am researching the Debian release cycle.
Where can I find information about how long time there should be
between a Stable release and the next Testing freeze?
I have searched the Debian web site and the mailings lists, but I
have not found any such information.
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 06:32, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
I'm trying to set up my Debian machine as a gateway to the outside network,
with (for now) one windows machine going through it via a hub (Linksys
router). I've followed instructions for both Debian and Redhat to set it up,
but after I
I agree that debian doesn't have no fixed dates for the release. And I
think that's a good thing about debian, but i researched about this, and
I would like to know if there is a defined roadmap for woody becoming
frozen... What's the target milestone?
Em Qui, 2002-04-11 às 10:27, Bas Zoetekouw
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software.
You restrict
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software.
You
Good day Baz,
I am researching the Debian release cycle.
Where can I find information about how long time there should be
between a Stable release and the next Testing freeze?
I have searched the Debian web site and the mailings lists, but I
have not found any such information.
The
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
some time
Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a document, and what is a program? How can Debian even begin
to distinguish what makes free documentation different from free
software when we can't distinguish whether a particular piece of
data is software or documentation in the first place?
Hi Matt,
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody for i386.
On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
component
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:15:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:31:12PM:
I have installed many SCSI systems (including the one that I'm using right
now) with potato CD #1, which I assume has a similar configuration. I've
Your
* #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
security problem
Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: C. Scott
Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tags: security.
So are there any objections if I clone this bug and reassign the grave
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
* #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
security problem
Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: C. Scott
Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tags: security.
So are
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
* #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
security problem
Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: C. Scott
Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tags: security.
So are there
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
* #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
security problem
Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: C. Scott
Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tags: security.
So are there
NOTE!
I am *not* talking about release dates.
(Anyone who starts talking release dates from hereon will be taken
out back and given an ice cold shower-down ;o))
Through time many people have criticised Stable Debian for having an
extremely slow release cycle, which causes an outdated
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:55:03PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a
core component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way
that it could
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
some time
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
The method described on http://www.sateh.com/hacks/alcatel.php certainly
looks like a hack. It basically describes a way to convert a Home model
to a Pro model without paying. Given
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
'whine-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-/whine'
thread to not repeat itself?
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction, or
you stop
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
* #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
security problem
So are there any objections if I clone this bug and reassign the grave
clones to xchat, ssh, vim, lftp, galeon, ytalk, etc? I've found that
middle-clicking
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:15:24PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
No. This is directed at the people who would mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
mesages like Go home proprietary l0s0rz! j00 are l4m3! Debian doesn't
need you! Signed, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, it seems to me like you're implying
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of the
USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
Protocol. How can a Linux Router speek
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:02:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
booting the installation system.
a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability
of reading iso9660. Show me one failure
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:57:26PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
These packages have not needed any updates.
[...]
Is it really necessary to make a new upload, rather
than copying or linking these packages to the pool?
I will make a new upload before the woody release if it is
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Debian's current problem with old packages can be seen by the fact
that a number of vendors have reportedly dumped the current Stable
release in favor of the Testing distribution some time ago.
That can only mean that currentness of content has become more
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and
Steve contemporaries, then; to be honest, my memory of Debian
Steve history isn't good enough to even know who to approach. (The
Steve debian-doc package is conspicuously lacking
Anthony Towns wrote:
Are you being serious or was that rhetorical? [0]
[0] There was a time when I wouldn't've had a second thought about
the answer to that question, either... :)
I think facetious is the word you're looking for. :-P
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Adam == Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam The byte compilation should be done when the package is built,
Adam not at runtime, not at install time.
That's certainly an opinion, though it does not address the
technical reasons that prompted the compile-at-install behaviour we
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction,
or you stop
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it
is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to
reinvent the wheel by the proprietary programs licenses.
Forced to by whom? By Jeroen,
David == David D W Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David So far I've done the following
David 1) Replaced the OLD key (42D8F306) with the NEW one (C5A76BF6).
Replaced where?
David 2) Signed the OLD public key (42D8F306) with the NEW one (C5A76BF6).
David 3) Posted the OLD public
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
That's fine with me. At least I'll have a lot more leisure when using
an available product instead of re-inventing the wheel. Even RMS used
commercial software when the GNU software for it was not yet written.
With your logic
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Hi *,
[libusb-dependent packages not making it into Woody]
sane-backends has two RC bugs, one of which has been open for more than a
week. 139509 appears like it should get sane-backends to build on mips; it's
not clear what'll fix it on alpha, but
hi.
just tested the woody-bootdisks (for a installation via network).
unfortunaly i can't load the driver-disks (driver-1.img and driver-2.img). i
always get a critical error with the message 'unable to mount the floppy
disk'.
this is why i can't install debian on the hard disks (scsi-disks on an
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
at runtime, not at install time.
So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
separate packages for
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
The first place to check when you have questions about the status of a
package is http://bugs.debian.org/package. In this case, you would have
found:
* #92698: IMP3 yes
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
At the current pace 3.0 may be out right around May 1St 2002.
At that time it will have been more than 1 year and 6 months since
the previous point release, which by then contains packages more than
1 year and 6 months
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The membership also seems
to have shifted towards a more radical^H^H^H^Henthusiastic support of
_only_ free software, and helping people use whatever they wish on
Debian, while providing them with free alternatives, seems to be on
the wane.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
The main proposal is to introduce a fixed short Testing development
period into the development cycle like this:
1. Feed Unstable packages to Testing for a fixed short period of time.
2. Freeze, bugfix, release.
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:43, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Witness the response to Jeroen.
I don't think we can draw any conclusion from the response to Jeroen
other than a lot of us think rudeness is a bad thing. (Including even
Jeroen himself, per his apology a few flames back in that thread.)
--
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the
USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:09:58AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
me some time.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:49:45PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
To clarify, not all of these packages are buggy in sid. The ones (by
source package) that have a problem appear to be something like this at
the moment:
courier-ssl dbf2sql ddt gql gtksql guile-pg libch libnss-pgsql
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of tom, an experimental programming language. The
archives contain a version from October 1999. Trying to recompile it now
on a sid machine fails.
Upstream development on this implementation was already dead, as they
switched to a new system writen in tom itself. And there
On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
I just tested
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:33:34PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it
is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to
reinvent the
I don't understand why all theses packages are not entering woody.
As Julien explained, everything seems to be clean.
I believe we need some manual help.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Hi *,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:39:33AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:28PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
Not much more I can do since the old secret key and public keyrings were
lost. It's going to have to suffice as I have taken every step possible
to ensure that
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:47:33AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have you done anything that I can't do as well right now? I
mean, I can download your old key, create a new one, and do all you
have outlined?
manoj
Because I am not yet an official dd (I am waiting for the DAM
Em Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:00:41 -0400, christophe barbé
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Would it be possible for the new 'David D.W. Downey' to hijack the
identity of the old 'David D.W. Downey' and then upload packages without
getting his new key signed by a dd ?
no no, he needs to get his key
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello!
What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
Beta packages can be found at:
http://tabaluga.ipe.uni-stuttgart.de/~nils/download/
Cheers,
--
Luis Bustamante[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
I have a Digital Celebris
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal
grownups would do?
If you think I
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
moments and take this as
Good day Torsten,
thank you for your kind answer.
The main proposal is to introduce a fixed short Testing
development period into the development cycle like this:
1. Feed Unstable packages to Testing for a fixed short period of
time. 2. Freeze, bugfix, release.
Repeat.
This was the
Good day Matt,
thank you for your kind answer.
At the current pace 3.0 may be out right around May 1St 2002.
At that time it will have been more than 1 year and 6 months
since the previous point release, which by then contains packages
more than 1 year and 6 months old.
Er, it will
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 13:20, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
at runtime, not at install time.
So you're saying that the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:44:36PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
moments and take this as
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: enigma
Version : 0.38a
Upstream Author : Daniel Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/enigma/
* License : GPL
Description : A game where you
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:46:55PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
I am not a developer, and I am not suited for code development.
But I would like to spend untill 1St of May collecting additional
information about the release procedures.
Currently that is black magic, mostly the release
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
# SPAMASSASSIN
:0fw
| spamc -f
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
junk
# End of SPAMASSASSIN section
And
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
# SPAMASSASSIN
:0fw
| spamc -f
Could it be that spamd was
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
will be useful.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:52:54PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 13:20, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
And build-depend on all available versions of emacs...
That'd be silly. Instead, we should just add them to build-essential.
Adding them to build-essential would take a policy
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adding them to build-essential would take a policy amendment...but now that
we've reached a consensus on debian-devel, they can be Essential: yes
instead.
That's as it should be, anyway. Now to move at least emacs from /usr
to / so that it can replace
christophe == christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
christophe Would it be possible for the new 'David D.W. Downey' to
christophe hijack the identity of the old 'David D.W. Downey' and
christophe then upload packages without getting his new key signed
christophe by a dd ?
No,
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: med-imaging
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : local file
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Med imaging packages
Part of Debian-Med
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: med-imaging-dev
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : local file
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Med packages for medical image
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal
grownups would do?
Having discussed all this before in my 6 year old tenure with Debian,
no, I really don't have time to rehash it
quiero el read player ¿como le hago?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:29:04AM +, Wilmer van der Gaast [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:40:47 +0100:
I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
spamassassin, by default, does not check messages larger than 250k.
On Apr 11, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
and dput?
Dumb question, but what dput, and why is one better then the other?
(please leave
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:15:43PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
will be useful.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:07:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
On Apr 11, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
To make things worse, 3.0 contents will at the time of release
already be about 6 months out of date.
Here's a challenge for you: identify the top date in the changelog for
the current version of every package in testing (3.0). I doubt
there's a single
Johnny Ernst Nielsen: Don't worry about flames launched by
cranky developers who didn't get what they wanted for their
birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
a while bring up some issue that has been discussed
Ok that is it.
I have increased the limit size of spamc (with -s) and the message got a
nice :
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.3 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MALFORMED,FROM_NO_USER,BADTRANS_WORM,MISSING_HEADERS version=2.11
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Brian May wrote:
I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
Why is nobody actively developing it?
AFAIK, it solves all the problems regarding server load discussed in
rsync, doesn't it???
No. I tested it out, and it still hits the server hard.
--
To
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
...
I just tested it on all the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
on a CD and try booting it
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
a while bring up some issue that has been discussed previously.
This isn't exactly every debian list for the
On 12 Apr 2002, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
I've added a lot more detail about rproxy, and my understanding of
Goswin's proposal. Let me know if they're unclear.
Why is nobody actively developing it?
I'm not sure what kind of
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
Torsten Landschoff replied that This was the whole idea of
testing. Experience shows it does not work.
I think testing is an excellent thing to have, since it
provides a semi-stable proto-release. Unfortunately it is
true that
gphotocoll just moved from non-US to main. It hasn't been compiled for
all architectures yet, and the source is actually in both archives at
the moment. The testing scripts rightly rejected it:
trying: gphotocoll
skipped: gphotocoll (152+1)
got: 8+0: a-8
* alpha: gphotocoll
But then it
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:39:54PM -0500, David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
a while bring
Grande Marcio,
Tinha postado na debian-rs. Tentei acessar agora e não
consegui, tente por ai, http://f1.com.ua/ora/.
[],
Franciosi
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olá pessoal.
Sou novo nesta lista. Aspirante a mantenedor. Não
sou profissional em computação, nem sei programar.
Estou
101 - 199 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
