-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:24:27 +0200
Source: python-4suite
Binary: python2.1-4suite python-4suite
Architecture: m68k all
Version: 0.11.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bonjour,
Impossible lancer une compile du 2.4 AVEC make menuconfig.
Je pars d'une base install fraiche de la deb 3.0 (netinst via http) ...
Si je dl le kernel-source et les headers du 2.4, que je reprend la config du
2.2 (cp /boot/conf-2.2
/usr/src/kernel-source) impossible de dmarrer
Il faut le package ncurses-dev pour faire un menuconfig
-Message d'origine-
De : Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy : mercredi 14 aot 2002 11:48
: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED];
debian-devel-french@lists.debian.org
Objet : Unidentified subject!
Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Impossible lancer une compile du 2.4 AVEC make menuconfig.
Quel est le message d'erreur ?
Christian
Selon Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Je suppose que les libs ncurses ne sont pas installees...
apt-get install libncurses5-dev il me semble...
Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Impossible lancer une compile du 2.4 AVEC make menuconfig.
Quel est le
I am just installing a Woody system (bf 2.4) on a 486 DX 33 tonight and
after finally getting to the stage to make the system bootable, the
system is left in an unbootable state. It does this to the hard drive
as well as the floppy disk I made with the installer.
The error is the following
Hi Nikita,
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hello.
I wanted to install g++ 3.2 (instead of 3.1 that is buggy) on our server
running woody with several packages from unstable.
I noticed that g++ 3.2 depends on recent libc6. Is it safe to install libc6
from unstable now? Are libdb problems resolved?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2. The
old libraries compiled with g++ 3.0.x or 3.1.x can't be used
with 3.2 anymore.
Again? *sigh* Apparently their C++ ABI stability goes about as far as my
vision. (For
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2.
Again? *sigh*
The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and
common C++ ABI for
Package: general
Version: 20020814
Severity: normal
There is a 'K/Preferences/System' menu and there is also a
'K/system' menu. This is redundant and thus confusing.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux pumpkin 2.4.16-586 #1 Wed Nov 28 08:21:15 EST 2001
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 05:16:42PM +0200, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
Hello!
First I wanted to thank all who discussed about the idea of
free-java-sdk. I have included small FAQ and (as adviced) I'll
be including some documentation about 'why ABC is better than XYZ'.
Please, could
On 14 Aug 2002 00:27:05 -0400
Stephen Depooter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This uses the installer's rescue disk kernel which boots fine, so I
don't know where the problem lies. I tried to get around it by using the
rescue disk to boot and install a different kernel image however, I
couldn't do
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 05:35, Shaya Potter wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:09, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 17:48, Russell Coker wrote:
I have written SE Linux policy for administration of a chroot
environment. That allows me to give full root administration access
(ability
Even if M$ has made unavailable for download true type fonts required by
msttcorefonts, the fonts license (as someone pointed out on the familiar
mailing list http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/familiar,
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) seems to
permit redistribution.
This is the key
The MyInsuranceJob.com weekly Insurance Industry Newsletter
The Premier On-Line Insurance Industry Career Site Newsletter
*** Read by more
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:40:43AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
I grant you that, this piece of software is a young 'un;
although I'm surprised that this didn't come up any sooner. (Lucky us.)
I don't think either library has more than one piece of software
that currently requires
Hi all,
I believe that the just released MailMan security fix for woody may be broken.
I am running a Debian woody server which runs several MailMan lists which
have been running sweetly until just recently. The only thing I can think of
that has changed is that, like you do, I installed the
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Given the above, what do you think about establishing localized
security-announce lists? Please discuss this issue on debian-security
and not on debian-devel or debian-project to reach a larger audience.
Not being a CVS guru
reassign 156617 kdebase
thanks
There is a 'K/Preferences/System' menu and there is also a
'K/system' menu. This is redundant and thus confusing.
One is for system programs, the other for system settings. What's
redundant about that?
Thomas
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 156617 kdebase
Bug#156617: general: Kde K menu is confusing
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `kdebase'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written SE Linux policy for administration of a chroot
environment. That allows me to give full root administration
access (ability to create/delete users, kill processes running
under different UIDs, ptrace, etc) to a chroot environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 14 August 2002 10:35 am, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
reassign 156617 kdebase
thanks
There is a 'K/Preferences/System' menu and there is also a
'K/system' menu. This is redundant and thus confusing.
One is for system programs, the other
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:40:43AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
As the man page at http://libdnet.sourceforge.net/dnet.3.txt refers to the
library as dnet - dumb networking library how about renaming it libdumbnet?
:-)
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:06:54AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:40:43AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
As the man page at http://libdnet.sourceforge.net/dnet.3.txt refers to the
library as dnet - dumb
Even if M$ has made unavailable for download true type fonts required by
msttcorefonts, the fonts license (as someone pointed out on the familiar
mailing list http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/familiar,
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) seems to
permit redistribution.
Yes, I know.
btw, when I said stole i didnt mean it to be harsh. sorry if it came
off that way.
shaya
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 04:26, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 05:35, Shaya Potter wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:09, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 17:48, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 06:50, Sam Vilain wrote:
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written SE Linux policy for administration of a chroot
environment. That allows me to give full root administration
access (ability to create/delete users, kill processes running
under
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:50, Sam Vilain wrote:
argh. its so cool that you essentially stole my summer research. :(.
Does this allow you to create any amount of chroot jails? We are also
working on making virtual IPs that each jail would get. We are also
working on being able to move the
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:47, you wrote:
btw, when I said stole i didnt mean it to be harsh. sorry if it came
off that way.
No probs, I didn't take any offense. I'd be happy to work with you on
developing such things if your interests are similar to mine.
--
I do not get viruses because I do
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:47:31AM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
I may need to contact Microsoft for clarification of the terms of their
license. I don't know why MS ended their font program, but if it's
because they felt that the interest of cross platform compatibility was
no longer in MS's
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:47:31AM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
There used to be more information about Microsoft's interprettation of
their own EULA on the font web page. Since that page is gone, it's no
longer there, but the gist of it was that they were taking a very very
strict view of a
On Aug 06, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
As the new upstream of python-gnome (for GNOME 2) needs python 2.2 for
building I am wondering when python 2.2 will get the default version
for Debian. Any insights?
I believe a consensus was reached on debian-python that we would move
to Python 2.3 as the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:47:31AM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
There used to be more information about Microsoft's interprettation of
their own EULA on the font web page. Since that page is gone, it's no
longer there, but the gist of it was that they were taking a very very
strict view of
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:16:14PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
So now, the list of packages in violation of non-free font licenses:
...
feh
- contains 'helmetr' (Sun)[1]
gozer
- contains 'helmetr' (Sun)[1]
...
xplanet
- contains 'helmetr' (Sun)[1]
...
Footnotes:
...
[1] I have been
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:50:14AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
You might want to investiage `security contexts', a new kernel feature
that can be used for virtual IP roots as well as making processes in
one context (even root) not able to see other contexts' processes.
The userland utilities also
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2.
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 02:00, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Please note
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and
common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:23:05PM +1000, David Fisher wrote:
I believe that the just released MailMan security fix for woody may be broken.
I am running a Debian woody server which runs several MailMan lists which
have been running sweetly until just recently. The only thing I can think
Hi,
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aug 14 18:48:03 2002 qrunner(1300): AttributeError : 'string' object has
no
attribute 'lower'
This is certainly suspicious, since all Python 'string' objects are supposed
to have a 'lower()' method, as far as I know.
I can't look at
Thanks for the post, Laura. I agree -- Python 2.3 won't be ready for
a long time, and I recommend to the Debian folks that they
standardize on Python 2.2. For now, that will be Python 2.2.1; a
maintenance release, 2.2.2 will be issued some time later this year.
I don't expect 2.3 to reach
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-nl
Version : 0.0-0.10
Upstream Author : Dirk Vermeir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://tinf2.vub.ac.be/~dvermeir/software/dv/nl-aspell/index.html
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Laura Creighton wrote:
On Aug 06, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
As the new upstream of python-gnome (for GNOME 2) needs python 2.2 for
building I am wondering when python 2.2 will get the default version
for Debian. Any insights?
I believe a consensus
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:02:18AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Thanks for the post, Laura. I agree -- Python 2.3 won't be ready for
a long time, and I recommend to the Debian folks that they
standardize on Python 2.2. For now, that will be Python 2.2.1; a
maintenance release, 2.2.2 will
Thanks for the post, Laura. I agree -- Python 2.3 won't be ready for
a long time, and I recommend to the Debian folks that they
standardize on Python 2.2. For now, that will be Python 2.2.1; a
maintenance release, 2.2.2 will be issued some time later this year.
But Zope 2.5, one
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:47, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:50:14AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
You might want to investiage `security contexts', a new kernel feature
that can be used for virtual IP roots as well as making processes in
one context (even root) not able to see
Okay, I (and several other people) are confused. What does
'the next default python' and 'skipping 2.2 entirely' that Chris Lawrence
writes mean?
If typing apt-get is the hardest technical thing you ever do, I want
you to get 2.2, not 2.1 or 2.3 when you decide to get Python. Also, I
want
Martin Schulze:
what do other developers think about localized lists for security
advisories, such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That sounds like a good idea. However, to make sure that the
information is sent out as soon as possible, I think it would be a good
idea that, whenever a new advisory is
Att:Sr.Rector:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Gratamente nos dirigimos a vds.para invitarles y comunicarles la
concesion del grado de Gran Emerito por su vinculacion durante tantos
años a la difusion y defensa de la medicina naturista.
Por medio de JOSE FRANCISCO BLAZQUEZ de University
Laura Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I (and several other people) are confused. What does
'the next default python' and 'skipping 2.2 entirely' that Chris Lawrence
writes mean?
It means that, if realized, the next Debian release would have:
- python 2.3 in the standard set of
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zinf
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Authors: Mark B. Elrod, Robert Kaye, Isaac Richards, Brett Thomas,
Jason Woodward
* URL : http://www.zinf.org
* License : GPL
Description :
Laura Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I (and several other people) are confused. What does
'the next default python' and 'skipping 2.2 entirely' that Chris Lawrence
writes mean?
It means that, if realized, the next Debian release would have:
- python 2.3 in the standard
ATTN: CEO/PRESIDENT
May I indulge your trust and confidence as I introduce
myself as well as
intimating you of this business proposal. I am Mr
Abdelhadi Benzaghou the
Algeria OPEC Governor (Organization of Petroleum
Exporting countries).
Through the sale of our allocated oil quota in OPEC, I
was
Em Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:25:36 +0100, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Mmmh... Comes to mind... What are the chances for a non-developer to be
on writers at CVS now that we're authenticating via developer-related
ssh keys? That would be very convenient just as many
Dear Gentleman,
Greetings in the precious name of Jesus Christ. I have received a very
reliable information about you, and would like you to assist me in this
transaction. However,
I am MR. ANGUS OBIOMA the only son to the former Chief of Army Staff Federal
Republic
of Nigeria who is presently
Russell Coker writes:
They don't apply to SE Linux either, the NSA says that SE Linux is
licensed under the GPL only. If anyone wants to dispute that then they
have to sue the NSA...
The licensing of the software is orthogonal to the licensing of the
patents.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now would be a really good time for people to email authors of decent
TrueType freeware fonts to see if they can be convinced to put their fonts
under a DFSG-free license if anyone is interested in doing that.
For the author of ttf-larabie-*, i tried that when i made these
packages. The
Le Wed, Aug 14, 2002, à 10:15:17AM -0400, Michael Stone a écrit:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively
John Hasler wrote:
Russell Coker writes:
They don't apply to SE Linux either, the NSA says that SE Linux is
licensed under the GPL only. If anyone wants to dispute that then they
have to sue the NSA...
The licensing of the software is orthogonal to the licensing of the
patents.
Not
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:50, John Hasler wrote:
Russell Coker writes:
They don't apply to SE Linux either, the NSA says that SE Linux is
licensed under the GPL only. If anyone wants to dispute that then they
have to sue the NSA...
The licensing of the software is orthogonal to the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:54:37PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
For the author of ttf-larabie-*, i tried that when i made these
packages. The licence we got does NOT fulfill all DFSG requirements, but
is already very liberate. I don't think we'll get further than that.
So please don't press
[Rob Bradford]
Well, yeh but thats relatively recent. And exim does have eximconfig
which does work even if it isnt pretty.
It does not work well if you want install the packages automatically
on several hosts while supplying the configuration answers using
debconf. I hope it will soon. :-)
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:37:19AM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
The problem with copyright lawsuits is that the opinion of the defendant
has absolutely no bearing. What matters is the opinion of the plaintiff,
who decides if a suit should be filed, and the opinion of the judge,
who decides who
Ben How am I going to deal with it when someone changes my font to
Ben something ugly and it reflects poorly on my skills as a
Ben fontographer?
How is this at all different from the same question asked about
program source code?
In that context, it is part of the rationale for the Q license,
On Aug 14, Laura Creighton wrote:
The new Python Business Forum (www.python-in-business.com) is
collaborating with the Python developers to produce Python-in-a-Tie,
a business-targetted release of Python. This is a 'Sumo-Release',
which will include other useful Python libraries and programs
Now, if 2.3 won't be stable until well into next year (as opposed to
the schedule in PEP 283), then we may want to target 2.2.x as our
default version.
Which version of PEP 283 are you referring to? It once had us release
the final version around the end of August. But the current version
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:54:31PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Aug 14, Laura Creighton wrote:
The new Python Business Forum (www.python-in-business.com) is
collaborating with the Python developers to produce Python-in-a-Tie,
a business-targetted release of Python. This is a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:45:06PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Ben How am I going to deal with it when someone changes my font to
Ben something ugly and it reflects poorly on my skills as a
Ben fontographer?
In that context, it is part of the rationale for the Q license,
AFAIK.
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : netspeed
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Jörgen Scheibengruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL: http://mfcn.ilo.de/netspeed_applet
* License : GPL v2
Description : Traffic monitor applet for Gnome2
Netspeed is an applet that
snip
BTW: is the PIAT consortium going to offer any DSFG free software?
Jim Penny
It is the PIT-SIG, not consortium, which is part of the Python Business
Forum. You can read our bylaws here: www.python-in-business.org/about/bylaws
(if you care to). We didn't come together for the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:42:21PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:37:19AM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
The problem with copyright lawsuits is that the opinion of the defendant
has absolutely no bearing. What matters is the opinion of the plaintiff,
who decides if a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:36:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:45:06PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Ben How am I going to deal with it when someone changes my font to
Ben something ugly and it reflects poorly on my skills as a
Ben fontographer?
In that context,
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: irssi-snapshot
Version : 0.8.5+cvs.20020811
Upstream Author : Martin Loschwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.irssi.org/
* License : GPL
Description : The irssi IRC
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:16:14PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[1] I have been told that the OpenOffice fonts are not free and were
pulled from CVS a short while ago. This puts ttf-openoffice
into question and any other package that contains a font included
in ttf-openoffice. I
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:30:49PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: irssi-snapshot
Version : 0.8.5+cvs.20020811
Upstream Author : Martin Loschwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There was a little error -
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: irssi-snapshot-dev
Version : 0.8.5+cvs.20020811
Upstream Author : Timo Sirainen
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Development files of the irssi
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xirssi
Version : 0.99+cvs.20020811-1
Upstream Author : Timo Sirainen
* URL : http://www.irssi.org/
* License : GPL
Description : GTK Version of irssi (Development version)
* Martin Loschwitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:30:49PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: irssi-snapshot
Version : 0.8.5+cvs.20020811
Upstream Author : Martin
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:33:26PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: irssi-snapshot-dev
Version : 0.8.5+cvs.20020811
Upstream Author : Timo Sirainen
* URL : http://www.some.org/
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:35:30PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:16:14PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[1] I have been told that the OpenOffice fonts are not free and were
pulled from CVS a short while ago. This puts ttf-openoffice
into question and
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 04:18:59PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
[...]
If this is something that is actually important for translation
in general, the place to take it up is the XDG working group;
however, KDE and GNOME seem (IMO) to take translation seriously,
and they have not proposed such a
Please check out this website...it is NOT porn.
NEED YOUR HELP NOW!
On Aug 15, Denis Barbier wrote:
Is it reasonable to require that source packages ship a
.desktop.in file and manage translations with PO files?
For Debian-specific menu entries, this would be a reasonable
requirement, as it would for any menu entries being adapted from an
upstream project that
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 20:01, Martin Sarsale wrote:
Since micro$oft stopped giving their true type fonts for free
(http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/default.htm), msttcorefonts is
unusable :(
It would be interesting to investigate either if a font author could be
convinced to
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:28:53PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:54:31PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Aug 14, Laura Creighton wrote:
[...]
One final point. We will almost definitely not switch the default
python in sid (current unstable), until there is talk that
- it's upstream is really interested in having robust and widely
used
JVM [2], not only another research tool for students
- it is written in pure C, should be very easily portable to other
architectures (currently it supports x86, not sure about alpha,
but in
few months sparc
I need at least one official debian developer in the Atlanta area to sign my
key.
Please let me know if we can find some time in the next week or two to meet.
-iridium
pgpHb5urhPPbi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:48:06PM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 20:01, Martin Sarsale wrote:
Since micro$oft stopped giving their true type fonts for free
(http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/default.htm), msttcorefonts
is unusable :(
It would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 22:38:52 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 31545 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 03:38:51 -
Received: from unknown (HELO pub.foshan.gd.cn) (218.13.92.41)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 03:38:51 -
From:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:31:44PM -0300, Matias Moreno Meringer wrote:
He empaquetado algún que otro programa, uno de creación propia y
una versión modificada de Tcsh, directamente from scratch. Lo
divertido que fue su construcción, me llevo a plantearme la
posibilidad de adoptar a un
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:31:44PM -0300, Matias Moreno Meringer wrote:
He empaquetado algún que otro programa, uno de creación propia y
una versión modificada de Tcsh, directamente from scratch. Lo
divertido que fue su construcción, me llevo a plantearme la
posibilidad de adoptar a un
Olás,
Estou empacotando a libgcode[1] e gostaria de ter um pouco mais
de teste nos pacotes antes de publicá-los. Pacotes preliminares estão
disponíveis em http://www.dcc.ufmg.br/~gopaixao/debian/packages/
(sources e binários apt-gettable). Quem estiver disposto a fazer o
teste,
93 matches
Mail list logo
