-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:09:12 -0400
Source: binutils
Binary: binutils-multiarch binutils-dev binutils-doc binutils
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.12.90.0.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:40:35 +0900
Source: gconf2
Binary: libgconf2-4 gconf2 libgconf2-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Takuo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 01:38:44 -0400
Source: tolua
Binary: libtolua-dev libtolua0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.0a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jimmy Kaplowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:20:15 +0100
Source: wily
Binary: wily
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.13.41-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:24:18 -0700
Source: libtext-csv-perl
Binary: libtext-csv-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stephen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2002 02:48:27 -0400
Source: sinek
Binary: sinek
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:37:39 +0200
Source: tcpflow
Binary: tcpflow
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.20-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:07:51 +0200
Source: tora
Binary: tora
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.3.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:37:36 +0200
Source: ssldump
Binary: ssldump
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.9b2-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:37:33 +0200
Source: sniffit
Binary: sniffit
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.3.7.beta-10.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:26:37 +0200
Source: openssl
Binary: libssl0.9.6 ssleay libssl-dev openssl
Architecture: all m68k
Version: 0.9.6g-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:32:29 +0200
Source: bigloo
Binary: bigloo-runtime-2.5b bigloo-ude bigloo-devtools bigloo bigloo-examples
bigloo-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.5a+really2.5b-beta-2002-08-09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:33:11 +0900
Source: bonobo-activation
Binary: libbonobo-activation4 bonobo-activation libbonobo-activation-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:26:18 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes fortunes-off fortunes-min fortune-mod
Architecture: m68k
Version: 9708-26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:47:52 -0400
Source: zsh
Binary: zsh zsh-static zsh-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Clint Adams [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:10:12 -0300
Source: sylpheed-claws
Binary: sylpheed-claws
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.8.1claws68-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gustavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:37:35 +0200
Source: snort
Binary: snort-mysql snort-common snort-rules-default snort-doc snort snort-pgsql
Architecture: m68k all
Version: 1.8.7-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2002 01:48:02 -0400
Source: bblaunch
Binary: bblaunch
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 20:28:29 +0200
Source: snd-motif
Binary: snd-dmotif-alsa snd-dmotif
Architecture: m68k
Version: 5.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:20:09 -0600
Source: ctsim
Binary: ctsim-doc ctsim ctsim-help
Architecture: all m68k
Version: 3.5.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:01:38 +0200
Source: mailman
Binary: mailman
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.12-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:43:44 +0200
Source: bglibs
Binary: bglibs-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.001-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:12:12 +0900
Source: reaim
Binary: reaim
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: A Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:52:54 +1000
Source: acl
Binary: acl libacl1 acl-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nathan Scott [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:48:17 +0200
Source: gcompris
Binary: gcompris-sound-fr gcompris-sound-en gcompris-data gcompris-sound-de
gcompris-sound-es gcompris
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 16:11:05 +0900
Source: e2ps
Binary: e2ps
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.33-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:27:49 +0900
Source: ipvsadm
Binary: ipvsadm
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.21release2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: KiHyeon Seo [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:59:22 +0200
Source: openssl
Binary: libssl0.9.6 ssleay libssl-dev openssl
Architecture: all m68k
Version: 0.9.6g-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 21:11:15 +0200
Source: dwww
Binary: realpath dwww
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.7.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:09:51 -0300
Source: sylpheed
Binary: sylpheed
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.8.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:55:43 +0200
Source: gnome-libs
Binary: libgnorbagtk0 libgnorba-dev libart-dev gnome-bin libgnome32
libgnome-dev libgtkxmhtml1 gnome-libs-data libart2 libgnomesupport0 libzvt2
libgnomeui32 libgnorba27 libzvt-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:08:00 +1000
Source: python-adns
Binary: python2.2-adns python2.1-adns
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:06:06 -0600
Source: modutils
Binary: modutils-basic modutils-full modutils
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.4.19-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:04:19 +0200
Source: libapache-mod-filter
Binary: libapache-mod-filter
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pawel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:30:46 -0700
Source: libglademm1.3
Binary: libglademm1.3-4 libglademm1.3-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.3.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:34:15 +0100
Source: db1-compat
Binary: libdb1-compat
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.1.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Colin Watson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:04:24 +0200
Source: libapache-mod-index-rss
Binary: libapache-mod-index-rss
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.10-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:55:27 +0200
Source: mydns
Binary: mydns
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Helios de Creisquer (aka creis)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:34:26 +0200
Source: ninpaths
Binary: ninpaths
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:18:34 +0200
Source: libapache-mod-repository
Binary: libapache-mod-repository
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:06:51 -0400
Source: gphoto
Binary: gphoto
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.4.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: christophe barbe [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:54:13 +0200
Source: vim
Binary: vim-python vim-gtk vim-ruby vim vim-tcl vim-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 6.1.152-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:16:14 +0200
Source: gkrellweather
Binary: gkrellweather
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.2.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:08:04 -0400
Source: gtkspell
Binary: libgtkspell0 libgtkspell-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ari
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:56:28 +0100
Source: latd
Binary: latd
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:13:05 +1000
Source: lprng
Binary: lprng-doc lprng
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.8.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Small [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:28:43 +0200
Source: libapache-mod-acct
Binary: libapache-mod-acct-pgsql libapache-mod-acct-mysql
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.4-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:17:57 -0700
Source: libnet-ssleay-perl
Binary: libnet-ssleay-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stephen
Le ven 16/08/2002 à 20:08, Christian Marillat a écrit :
Seulement si c'est de la doc utilisateur. A mon avis ce doit être de la
doc développeur dans elle doit aller dans le paquet -dev
En fait, comme je l'exposais, il existe un wrapper python pour cette
bibliothèque. Donc si jamais je produit
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 12:16:41PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Perhaps it would be possible to use the FOIA to get the terms of the
contract?
Bwa ha ha ha, it has been the Bush administration's directive to all
Federal agencies since BEFORE September 11th of last year to flush all
FOIA requests
Joseph == Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph Sun's JDK.
I know for a fact there's no use of dynamic C++ libraries in any JDK
prior to 1.4.1 and I just check the latest 1.4.1 beta find no
mention of libstdc++ in any of the executables. If there's C++ code
in there, it's
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:49:03PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Joseph == Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph Sun's JDK.
I know for a fact there's no use of dynamic C++ libraries in any JDK
prior to 1.4.1 and I just check the latest 1.4.1 beta find no
mention of libstdc++
Hi,
I intended to ask for removal of this list but Joey sugested to ask
first whether anybody intents to use this list or finds it useful as it
is now.
In my -release folder I found:
| Total messages since November 2001: 128
| (some spam has been fltered out by SA locally, I won't dig them out)
This one time, at band camp, Joseph Carter wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0_01/jre/plugin/i386/ns610$ ldd
libjavaplugin_oji.so
libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40044000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4008e000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2
Previously Peter Palfrader wrote:
I intended to ask for removal of this list but Joey sugested to ask
first whether anybody intents to use this list or finds it useful as it
is now.
I think it would be useful, but if the release manager doesn't use it
we might as well remove it I guess.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
or do a staging in experimental or somewhere else. Upload everything
there, let people look at it for a day or two then move it over.
That's the way I interpreted this, too. It's insane to try to NMU 1000
packages in one day.
My one
Hi,
The following is a list of packages which I found to be missing dependencies on
libpng2-dev or libpng3-dev, although their runtime library depend on libpng2 or
libpng3.
I want these packages to depend on libpng2-dev or libpng3-dev
specifically, so that mix-match dependency of libpng2 and
Gerhard Tonn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The disadvantage is that we must know all C++ packages in advance.
A large majority of C++ packages depend on libstdc++*; the ones that
doesn't are probably libraries which have been linked using cc instead
of c++. For example libsigc++-1.1-5 and
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 06:11:10PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
That's one hell of a figment of my imagination. Although, it does seem
the plugin is the only thing which uses libstdc++.
ldd will traverse the library dependencies tree for all libraries, so it's
possible that the libstdc++
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am planning Debconf 3 to be held in Oslo, from Friday July 18th to
Sunday July 20th.
Nice initiative.
--
Peter Makholm | I have something to say: It's better to burn in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | hell, than to fade
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I only created the list manually, so I might be missing something.
If anyone knows of a better way to find out a list, please tell me.
Check the library packages for a dependency on libpng2 or libpng3,
obtain the Source package name, look for a
Here's an update.
After consulting with debian-legal, I emailed Bigelow and Holmes
tonight to ask them to reconsider the license they have chosen so that
they can be included in debian. If anyone is interested, I can post
that email here.
I've ITP'd the one latin ttf font I know of which is
Title: ÖйúÖÆÔì×ÊÔ´Íø
µÚÒ»ÆÚ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Loewis) writes:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My concern is that locally compiled apps built against C++
libraries other than libstdc++ will silently stop working on
upgrade. This is certainly not the most important issue facing us
in the transition,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 13:27:24 +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
This is not how Debian has done similar transitions in the past: libc4 to
libc5, and libc5 to libc6, did not cause this breakage in Debian. Old
programs continued to work without user or operator intervention (in fact
libc4
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Gerhard Tonn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The disadvantage is that we must know all C++ packages in advance.
A large majority of C++ packages depend on libstdc++*; the ones that
doesn't are probably libraries which have
Here is a plan on how to do so. It requires to modify dpkg but allows
complete compatibility and no breakage of binaries (building with
G++-2.95 would no longer work unless wrappers are written).
1. Create a new version of dpkg that does the following;
In the postinst script it checks whether
[Matthew Wilcox]
I got sick of listening to people discuss the gcc 3.2 transition in an
uninformed manner. So I've whipped up a transition plan which will
hopefully get us from A to B without causing too much pain. Haha.
I'm entirely fallible and I don't pretend to understand all the issues
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A large majority of C++ packages depend on libstdc++*; the ones
that doesn't are probably libraries which have been linked using
cc instead of c++. For example libsigc++-1.1-5 and libgtkmm1.3-14
would pass unnoticed even if they are both
On 17 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
Here is a plan on how to do so. It requires to modify dpkg but allows
complete compatibility and no breakage of binaries (building with
G++-2.95 would no longer work unless wrappers are written).
1. Create a new version of dpkg that does the following;
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
or do a staging in experimental or somewhere else. Upload everything
there, let people look at it for a day or two then move it over.
is probably upwards biased). This
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:13:17AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Gerhard Tonn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The disadvantage is that we must know all C++ packages in advance.
A large majority of C++ packages depend on
Hi,
In case noone noticed this, and noone posted this, I will post my observation
to the list:
libgdk-imlib2 was introduced, to allow png3-linked gdk-imlib, so that gtk2.0
applications
can link with gdk-imlib.
libgdk-imlib-dev accompanies libgdk-imlib2 ( which I think should have been
HAHAHAHAHA. No.
.__.
_|doogie|_ -- dpkg hat
No because of technical reasons, or because it's too much work?
IMHO since changing library filenames breaks compatibility with other
distributions, this is the only way to allow installation of old
packages (that, still IMHO, must
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is probably upwards biased). This would represent a 2% increase
in the number of packages (1 GB increase in the archive size? 400
kB average size for a library package? Sounds ok, we have some
pretty large
1 GB*12 active archs in unstable == 12GB.
I forgot an important thing: all new non-C++ packages should be tagged
as non-C++ in some way so that dpkg doesn't need to scan them.
This should of course be done by having the build tools scan the package
build directory and set either a new field ('Uses-C++-ABI: No') or by
dependency on the
(first-time poster, beware of possible stupidity)
I'll throw in my views on the subject:
(1) If I understand correctly, SONAMEs are not meant to provide any
other metadata than a reference to the *library's* ABI. Using SONAMEs for
anything else, like which compiler the library was built with,
On 17 Aug 2002 17:47:17 +0200
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments and corrections welcomed.
When this was discussed in June, one of the suggestions was to include
the ABI format (compiler name/version) in the library package name and
soname. Did you consider it when you
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:23:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
libgdk-imlib2 was introduced, to allow png3-linked gdk-imlib, so
that gtk2.0 applications can link with gdk-imlib.
gtk2.0 applications should be using the gdk-pixbuf included with gtk2.0,
which is already linked against png3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:23:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[...]
Christian Marillat decided to recompile libgnome against
libgdk-imlib2, and libpng3, so some parts of gnome1 are recompiled
against libpng3.
And more ABI breaking here -- why are we breaking
On Friday 16 August 2002 20:26, you wrote:
On Friday 16 August 2002 15:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
If it is done by the platform porters a special build server has to be
setup for each platform recompiling all packages depending on c++. A wanna
build feature creating packages for NMUs can be
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A large majority of C++ packages depend on libstdc++*; the ones
that doesn't are probably libraries which have been linked using
cc instead of c++. For example
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:24:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be easy enough to find all the C++ libraries that need to be
recompiled. First, find all the packages that depend on some version of
There's also the case that with gcc-2.95, you could cheat and write C++
without
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so when you go to recompile the programs with gcc 3.2, you'll find
that the build fails because ld can't resolve (differently-mangled)
symbol names in the libsigc++ and libgtkmm libraries.
Oh, I see what you meant before. Yeah, that sounds right.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:24:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:13:17AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
It should be easy enough to find all the C++ libraries that need to be
recompiled. First, find all the packages that depend on some version of
There's also
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:00:02PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
I'll throw in my views on the subject:
(1) If I understand correctly, SONAMEs are not meant to provide any
other metadata than a reference to the *library's* ABI. Using SONAMEs for
anything else, like which compiler the library
Luca Barbieri wrote:
HAHAHAHAHA. No.
.__.
_|doogie|_ -- dpkg hat
No because of technical reasons, or because it's too much work?
IMHO: No because it is unclean/ugly/fragile/hacky/total mess/etc.
IMHO since changing library filenames breaks compatibility with other
distributions, this is the
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 12:23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I haven't had time to experiment, but I think there should be some
occurrences of
libpng2 and libpng3 being linked at the same time, which we tried to avoid,
but
failed.
Indeed. Try recompiling the latest Evolution, for example. It
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:24:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:13:17AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Gerhard Tonn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The disadvantage is that we must know all
Joseph == Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph That's one hell of a figment of my imagination. Although,
Joseph it does seem the plugin is the only thing which uses
Joseph libstdc++.
And I asked originally were you refering to plugin code or a JDK.
plugin != JDK.
--
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 01:38:42PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:00:02PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
I'll throw in my views on the subject:
(1) If I understand correctly, SONAMEs are not meant to provide any
other metadata than a reference to the *library's*
Moving the thread off of private.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
2. I don't understand your point. In fact I can't see what your point
is. I suspect Glenn can't either since the discussion when arround
in circles a couple of times.
it seems like people still don't get that bugtraq is subscribed to
debian-security-announce...
And bugtraq seems unable to add some Footer to the posts that clarifies
this...
Couldn't we
- unsubscribe bugtraq from our list
- send out security-announces to bugtraq separately?
Gruss,
Erich
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 14:51:04 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Indeed. Try recompiling the latest Evolution, for example.
Gnumeric is another; see my messages in the New gnome-libs package build
against libpng3 thread on debian-gtk-gnome.
Ray
--
[...] computer source code, though unintelligible
On 17 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
HAHAHAHAHA. No.
.__.
_|doogie|_ -- dpkg hat
No because of technical reasons, or because it's too much work?
Because you have no clue what you are talking about.
Because you have no clue what you are talking about.
The problem is that people who have a clue are proposing solutions that
would break existing packages and would cause the user to recompile
everything he has compiled on his own.
Furthermore, they don't explain what is wrong with the approach
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moving the thread off of private.
Thank you.
2. I don't understand your point. In fact I can't see what your point
is. I suspect Glenn can't either since the discussion when arround
in circles a couple of times.
Gratuitous
Firewall died, taking down disk. New disk: clean install of Woody
upgraded to testing. Two network cards: 3COM 3C905C 10/100M as (internal)
card (eth0) 3COM Etherlink III as cable modem facing (external) card eth1.
Simple Iptables firewall. DHCP needs to work, as does ddtc for resolving
dynamic
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:46:42PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
it seems like people still don't get that bugtraq is subscribed to
debian-security-announce...
And bugtraq seems unable to add some Footer to the posts that clarifies
this...
Couldn't we
- unsubscribe bugtraq from our list
-
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 20:56:48 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Now flooded with screens full of
IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:04:76:de:b9:53:08:00 SRC=0.0.0.0
DST=255,255,255,255 LEN=328 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 PROTO=UDP SPT=68
DPT=67 LEN=308
on all machines.
Advice
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo