-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:04:52 -0500
Source: dbd-odbc
Binary: libdbd-odbc-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.43-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:28:21 -0700
Source: entity
Binary: entity-tcl entity-gl entity-python libentity-dev entity-c libentity0
entity entity-javascript entity-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:31:55 -0400
Source: gcl
Binary: gcl-doc gcl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.5.0.cvs20020625-47
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Camm Maguire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 12:29:53 +1000
Source: libapache-mod-python
Binary: libapache-mod-python2.1 libapache-mod-python libapache-mod-python2.2
libapache-mod-python-doc
Architecture: m68k all
Version: 2:2.7.8-2
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 05:12:35 +
Source: libhtml-parser-perl
Binary: libhtml-parser-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.25-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 15:33:42 -0500
Source: libhttp-ghttp-perl
Binary: libhttp-ghttp-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.07-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ardo van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:02:34 +0200
Source: bigloo
Binary: bigloo-examples bigloo-runtime-2.5b bigloo-devtools bigloo bigloo-ude
bigloo-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.5a+really2.5b-beta-2002-09-02-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:38:38 +0200
Source: python-extclass
Binary: python-extclass python2.1-extclass python2.2-extclass
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.0zope-2.5.1-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 18:30:22 -0400
Source: pike7.2
Binary: pike7.2-crypto pike7.2-sane pike7.2-sybase pike7.2-odbc pike7.2-pg
pike7.2-gz pike7.2-gtk pike7.2-gdbm pike7.2-image pike7.2 pike7.2-mysql
pike7.2-gl
Architecture: m68k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:00:00 -0500
Source: pyogg
Binary: python-pyogg
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher L Cheney [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 06:28:44PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:13:51PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Now we just have to solve the upload-to-security problem, or simply
write some other check that scans the security.d.o web pages and
make clever
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:38:52PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Still, the Packages files should only be removed after no software in
our stable distribution depends on it. If you remove the Packages file
from unstable now you will break apt-proxy (and perhaps other tools
too).
Well,
Hi,
I've been using self compiled kernels throughout the years and up to
2.4.18 never experienced a problem. But Now I tried switching to the
debian kernel and cannot do that at all. When using 2.4.18 the first try
ends before Uncompressing ... is written on the screen. A reset then
makes it boot
Hello,
After upgrade of lilo in unstable my whole SCSI disk got trashed. It
could only be recovered with the use of the IBM drive fitness test
tool, and a complete erase disk was necessary :-( What happened?
A reinstall of Woody showed that it can only boot from the MBR
partition, not the root
* Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-29 09:50]:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
How to do this? They should be rather be tagged sarge than be closed
by an upload to unstable. Not
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:43:25AM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
|
| Excerpt from the changelog:
| * we no longer have task packages, instead, we define tasks using a
| special field in the control file (and these should be added only
| after discussion on the mailing lists)
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:49:04AM +0200, Helios de Creisquer wrote:
Package: wnpp
[...]
* Package name: tetrinetx
[...]
I CC-ed [EMAIL PROTECTED], closing the RFP, I though it was
the right thing to do, but apparently I was misleading...
Thx to Daniel Burrows for reporting it, and sorry
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:57:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
The dpkg-iasearch package used to contain a program called dpkg-query.
When the dpkg maintainers added a program with the same name, the
dpkg-iasearch maintainer renamed his file, without worrying about
'seniority'. I think he
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
kronstadt:~# dpkg --status debian-test
Package: debian-test
Wasn't this at least a start? Shouldn't we build on it instead of
starting from scratch?
Using this framework could ease many of the problems testing
script started on Tue Sep 3 12:00:00 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# pbuilder build --distribution woody --basetgz \
/var/cache/pbuilder/woody/base.tgz \
~shaul/devel/debian/libv/libv1.25/libv1.25_1.25-3.dsc
W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist
pbuilder-buildpackage/i386 $Id:
Moin,
the manpage of debconf.conf says it uses the topmost writable database
in a stack for saving users choices. But debconf complains if the
topmost database in a stack isn't writable.
--
c u
henning
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
makes it boot but later I get a lost interrupt on hda. Now I installed
2.4.19 and do get that message about bios checksum or so. But after that
it stands still again.
Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
error message?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bas,
It is actually courtesy to file a bug/ contact the maintainer prior to
uploading a NMU (even to DELAYED/3-day). Have a look at Bug #159174 which I
received two hours after your NMU notification.
Mark
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:36, you wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:43:04PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
The strict minimum is :
- create a patch for the NMU
- make the patch available to the maintainer (via direct mail or bts)
DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
I think he would have been within the guidelines
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
I agree, filing bugs and direct mails are much better than -devel-announce
posts, much less likely for one to skip by accident IMHO.
That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
to follow -devel-announce
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
I agree, filing bugs and direct mails are much better than -devel-announce
posts, much less likely for one to skip by accident IMHO.
That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
to follow
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:43:25AM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
|
| Excerpt from the changelog:
| * we no longer have task packages, instead, we define tasks using a
| special field in the control file (and these should
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or
two.
Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that
it
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
error message?
2.4.19-k7.
As for the BIOS message, I will look it up when I get to the machine the
next time. It may take a day or two though. Anyway, that message did
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or
two.
Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that
it
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Robert Jordens wrote:
Users complained they were not able to compile ardour because of these
libraries and C++'s ABI instability.
So Paul Davis (upstream) decided to include all C++ libraries except
libstdc++ (I
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or
two.
Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that
it
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:25:34PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
Therefore the NMU. When you have finally understood the problem and
solved it, either through incorporating the NMU or in your own way, you
(the maintainer) can upload a new version.
How about we start from the simple issue of
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:25:34PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
And by the use of DELAYED it does not even need to be installed in the
pool before you react. Why get so upset about a, what I can tell from
this discussion, working NMU.
Having been in this position in the past I have to say
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:49:14PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
How about we start from the simple issue of notifying maintainers and making
sure they are _aware_ of the exact problems? People can be reasonably alert
for fixing their packages without knowing what's that's going on in the
bigger
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
What I'm trying to say is, does it really matter? Why not just make a
maintainer upload when you have time, be it before or after the NMU
enters the pool.
For you the NMU seems like a waste of time, but it was not a waste of
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:40:02 +1000
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't install the latest version of debootstrap (in case this
is going to help), the whole idea of using pbuilder was so I don't
have to upgrade libc6 to unstable on my host system.
You may upgrade your chroot from woody.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:30:43 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Extracting source
unable to get login information for username shaul at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 56.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/dpkg-source line 22.
pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
- unmounting
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:55:06PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
You may upgrade your chroot from woody.
pbuilder create --distribution woody
pbuilder update --distribution sid
Tnx for the hint.
Anyway, do you know when a fixed version of pbuilder will be available?
I have to use pbuilder on
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:25:16PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Anyway, do you know when a fixed version of pbuilder will be available?
Never mind: I've just tried a pbuilder create --distribution sid and
it worked fine.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ.
,,!!
***
20' 40' 40HQ
***
(ALL IN)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:30:13PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Well, I have always held (right or wrong) pretty much the opposite
view to yours: /var/www _is_ for Debian content, and local content
belongs in /usr/local. (thats why you don't see all that much in my
/var/www :-] )
IMO this is
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Thanks. Then is everyone ok if I include (or submit bug against the packages
that
don't) Task: spanish to the control files for
No, that's not how it works. File a bug against tasksel if you are not
seeing the spanish task, which it already has.
Try
Then the policy document is wrong? Shouldn't it be bugged?
I guess the policy document describes how this is to be done _now_.
(That is after woody ;)
Whereas the override file was they way this was handled for woody.
Maybe ask on debian-policy on this issue?
Greetings,
Erich
--
Henning Glawe wrote:
the manpage of debconf.conf says it uses the topmost writable database
in a stack for saving users choices. But debconf complains if the
topmost database in a stack isn't writable.
This will be fixed in a future release.
--
see shy jo
pgpIV3RmBj44W.pgp
Description:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:44, Svante Signell wrote:
After upgrade of lilo in unstable my whole SCSI disk got trashed. It
could only be recovered with the use of the IBM drive fitness test
tool, and a complete erase disk was necessary :-( What happened?
If you need to run an IBM diagnostics program
Hello,
some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj mailing list
somebody was pointing out that I need the latest version of foomatic to get
good results.but it seems that the Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in
sid are outdated. I contacted the maintainer, Manfred
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
NMUer time is better spent on really unmaintained packages.
Amen.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpydQfe90SCO.pgp
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
error message?
The error message is:
BIOS data check successful
Interestingly the very same message is printed my my manually installed
2.4.18 kernel, but not by the
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsdl-console
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Boris Lesner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garrett Banuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sdlconsole.tuxfamily.org
* License
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
I agree, filing bugs and direct mails are much better than -devel-announce
posts, much less likely for one to skip by accident IMHO.
Can we file bugs to ask that a package needs to be recompiled and uploaded
in a staging area ?
* Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 11:43]:
DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
Can DELAYED be set up to email the maintainer with the changelog?
Would that help the unexpected NMU from ambushing the maintainer?
Ciao!
--
When the only tool you have is a hammer, you
On Wed Aug 28 11:37:29 2002 Allan Wind wrote:
On 2002-08-27 21:59:28, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr).
tr
I'm not the brightest bulb in the box, so perhaps it's just me, but tr
seems kind of a complicated way to do this. I don't
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:12:58PM +1000, Mark Purcell écrivait:
Bas,
Mark,
why do you need to complain about that in -devel ?
It is actually courtesy to file a bug/ contact the maintainer prior to
uploading a NMU (even to DELAYED/3-day). Have a look at Bug #159174 which I
received two
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:01:33PM -0500, The Doctor What écrivait:
* Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 11:43]:
DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
Can DELAYED be set up to email the maintainer with the changelog?
Would that help the unexpected NMU from ambushing
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:06:23PM -0700, Vikram wrote:
If you are too busy for this I still offer to look into packaging tcptrace
with xplot.
If you want to go ahead and package xplot, please do. You'll need to
handle the fact that we've already got an xplot package that installs a
program
What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
/usr/include/foo.h contains
#include bar.h
but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on
libbar-dev?
--
Stephen
Farcical aquatic
#include hallo.h
* Peter Mathiasson [Tue, Sep 03 2002, 06:44:54PM]:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
NMUer time is better spent on really unmaintained packages.
Amen.
Dito. Unused and maintained package are not bad, they will be excluded
if they have RC bugs. But
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
program called xplot. Consider using the alternatives system for that.
You'll need to coordinate with the maintainer of the other xplot package
for that to work.
That sounds ugly though - having an alternative for something that does
entirely different stuff. Isn't it
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:01:33PM -0500, The Doctor What écrivait:
* Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 11:43]:
DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
Can DELAYED be set up to email the maintainer with the changelog?
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr).
If it can be done with something else it might not be too necessary. It
is your choice though.
JFYI, it can also be done with
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Romain Lerallut wrote:
Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600:
file renamer (that can change case).
Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ?
(I guess that you meant 'mv'?)
Anyway, it's similar to the 'rename' command that someone else
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:03:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Additionally I'm of half a mind to suggest that the maintainer have the
ability to remove the files from the DELAYED system; their timing may be
off, the person who put them there may be unavailable, etc.
I agree. Actually I was
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:02:20PM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Romain Lerallut wrote:
Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600:
file renamer (that can change case).
Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ?
(I guess that you meant
Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj
mailing list somebody was pointing out that I need the latest
version of foomatic to get good results.but it seems that the
Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in sid are
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Build time is important too: that's the only time you can attempt fine
grained testing of modules rather than executables, and it lets you catch
problems before you upload too. eg, after some irritating bugs that happened
to only show up on one or
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:52:13PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:56:46PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
...
What I'm saying is that to must have a mail-server install, even if it is
just ssmtp or something like that.
Yes,
Hello!
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:16:15AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 23:05, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
That will also break rsyncing them, which saves a lot.
Let's just keep pestering gzip upstream to include the rsyncable patch.
...
I want to second this, as the
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, I wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Romain Lerallut wrote:
Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600:
file renamer (that can change case).
Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ?
(I guess that you meant 'mv'?)
I feel appropriately
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:58:10 -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on
libbar-dev?
How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of linking against a
library statically?
Ray
--
The problem with the global village is all the
Martin Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
If you're not able to maintain
your packages properly and in a timely manner, and your holding up a
major part of the distribution, it's your fault.
I'm interested in this.
Individuals differ
J. Scott Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed Aug 28 11:37:29 2002 Allan Wind wrote:
On 2002-08-27 21:59:28, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
file slicer (that can slice up a file into different size chunks).
dd?
Yea, that would do it, slightly more cumbersome to use.
split ?
MfG
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
/usr/include/foo.h contains
#include bar.h
but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend
Ray == J H M Dassen J.H.M. writes:
Ray How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of
Ray linking against a library statically?
That need might reasonably be met with a Recommends: or Suggests:
--
Stephen
To Republicans, limited government means not assisting people they
would
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr).
If it can be done with something else it might not be too
And if you use zsh, you don't need to bother with mmv or rename, since
there's zmv.
Anyway, it's similar to the 'rename' command that someone else mentioned.
It renames multiple files like converting all the files in a directory
from upper to lower case
mmv \* \#l1
zmv '(*)' '${(L)1}'
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
A NMU is a waste of effort if the same thing can be done by the maintainer
after just one quick email message -- primarily a waste of effort for the
NMUer who has to go in and figure out how to fix the package, not the
maintainer. If
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rrdcollect
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Dawid Kuroczko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://rrdcollect.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : RRDcollect -
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gjay
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Chuck Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://gjay.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : an automatic and learning DJ for xmms
Hi Joey,
Joey Hess wrote:
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Thanks. Then is everyone ok if I include (or submit bug against the
packages that
don't) Task: spanish to the control files for
No, that's not how it works. File a bug against tasksel if you are not
seeing the spanish
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:57:33PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Ray == J H M Dassen J.H.M. writes:
Ray How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of
Ray linking against a library statically?
That need might reasonably be met with a Recommends: or Suggests:
Recommends and
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 18:13, Andrew Suffield wrote:
And lastly, am I the only one who finds complaining about *other
people* wasting effort to be insane in a volunteer-based organisation?
There's a difference between advice, and telling people what to spend
their time on.
Am I the only one
i'm not 100% certain that it's related but for the last week or so, i've
been unable to run apt-get update on any of my home machines. what i
get is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [09:01:52] ~# apt-get update
Get:1 http://siva.taz.net.au unstable/main Packages [2097kB]
Get:2 http://siva.taz.net.au
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:13:07PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
A NMU is a waste of effort if the same thing can be done by the maintainer
after just one quick email message -- primarily a waste of effort for the
NMUer who has to
Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-29 09:50]:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
How to do this? They should be rather be tagged sarge than be
On Tue, 03 Sep 2002, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time.
but if
I wrote a longer response to this but then thought about what you
wrote a bit more and deleted it.
Henrique == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henrique The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time.
Then why not mandate symbol versioning instead; that would be
On Sep 03, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj mailing list
somebody was pointing out that I need the latest version of foomatic to get
good results.but it seems that the Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in
sid are outdated. I contacted
I deleted /var/cache/* today to free up some space on my /var
partition. However, instead of applications re-creating the files as I
expected, I recieved a bunch of error messages.
apt/apt-get refused to do anything until I manually created the
directory /var/cache/apt/archives/partial
I also
Duncan Findlay wrote:
True, the FHS does not specifically say that directories have to be
recreated, but I would consider it a bug if they aren't. Anyone agree?
I think it would be at best a feature request, but I would like to see
that feature implemented, nontheless..
--
see shy jo
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:34:23PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
I deleted /var/cache/* today to free up some space on my /var
partition. However, instead of applications re-creating the files as I
expected, I recieved a bunch of error messages.
apt/apt-get refused to do anything until I
On Tue, 03 Sep 2002, Stephen Zander wrote:
I wrote a longer response to this but then thought about what you
wrote a bit more and deleted it.
Henrique == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henrique The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time.
Then why not
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hmm. According to the latest policy the Task: method should be used
which I think is not the best thing...
From the changelog of Debian policy package:
debian-policy (3.5.7.0) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* we no longer have task packages, instead, we define
Clint Adams wrote:
alias ren='noglob zmv -W'
ren *.c *.x
Ok, I love zsh and all, but: RUN AWAY!!
I find the last preferable to the more cumbersome syntaxes of rename and
mmv.
rename 's/\.c$/.x/' cumbersome?
--
see shy jo, suffering 4dos flashbacks (see my .zshrc)
pgpl43ZOy1ZMN.pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:52:25 +0100
Source: mosixview
Binary: mosixview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Viral Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:56:34 +0200
Source: xmms-sid
Binary: xmms-sid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:30:35 +0100
Source: lvm10
Binary: lvm10
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.4-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:02:34 +0200
Source: bigloo
Binary: bigloo-runtime-2.5b bigloo-ude bigloo-devtools bigloo bigloo-examples
bigloo-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.5a+really2.5b-beta-2002-09-02-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:34:55 +0200
Source: e2fsprogs
Binary: e2fsck-static e2fsprogs-bf e2fslibs-dev comerr-dev ss-dev e2fsprogs uuid-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.28-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 11:44:46 +0200
Source: tora
Binary: tora
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
