-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:18:48 +0100
Source: cwwm
Binary: cwwm
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien J. Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:29:43 +0100
Source: sane-backends
Binary: libsane-dev sane-utils libsane
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:34:05 +0100
Source: xffm4
Binary: xffm4
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Loschwitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:25:00 +0100
Source: xfce4-utils
Binary: xfce4-utils
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.0.0+cvs.20021127-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 14:43:14 +0100
Source: zvbi
Binary: libzvbi-dev libzvbi-common libzvbi-doc libzvbi0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:48:50 -0600
Source: foomatic
Binary: foomatic-bin foomatic-db
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.2-20021202-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:24:51 +0100
Source: pure-ftpd
Binary: pure-ftpd pure-ftpd-common pure-ftpd-ldap pure-ftpd-mysql
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.13a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 13:07:38 +0900
Source: nautilus
Binary: libnautilus2-dev nautilus-data nautilus libnautilus2-2
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:37:04 +0100
Source: bigloo
Binary: bigloo-examples bigloo-devtools bigloo bigloo-ude bigloo-doc
bigloo-runtime-2.5c
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.5c-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:46:24 -0500
Source: perspic
Binary: perspic perspic-texts
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Camm Maguire
J'ai un petit souci pour comprendre le mécanisme des Release.
Je maintiens quelques portages arrière de paquets, notamment un paquet
samba pour Woody (http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian)
J'ai construit un dépôt APT afin qu'on puisse simplement se serveir de
mes paquets
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:34:21 +0100
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apt-get install --reinstall -d samba/bubulle samba-common/bubulle
afin d'installer mes paquets.
Cela suppose que j'indique dans mon dépôt que ma release s'appelle
bubulle. J'ai bien essayé de bricoler des
,(GSM SIM Card)
SIM
V1SIM
PIN
(*)
Lotto()
SIMPUK
25018
SAMSUNG T-108
(SIM)
,, : 0372-5923962 5177321
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 06:02:01PM -0800, Vonsur Kcin wrote:
For a raytracer that DOES use the same file format as Povray, I'd
recommend zrcube. It isn't packaged yet, but looks very nice overall,
and is more advanced than Povray in some ways, especially in that it
adds radiosity for realistic
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:48:42PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Incidently, the other raytracer mentioned in this thread, yafray, has
a plugin for Blender to export to the Yafray format on their site. Its
pretty simplistic, but its something. Yafray uses an XML-based format.
Yafray boasts some
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 06:02:01PM -0800, Vonsur Kcin wrote:
Well, the best examples are in the form of tutorials, which abound
online. Its not really meaningful to have the files themselves, when
in blender's case its the process that is important.
I seem to be unable to access
Brian May wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 06:02:01PM -0800, Vonsur Kcin wrote:
Well, the best examples are in the form of tutorials, which abound
online. Its not really meaningful to have the files themselves, when
in blender's case its the process that is important.
I seem to be unable to
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:19:47PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I just noticed that 'heyu' is non-free, at least according to bug #149128.
Shouldn't this bug be upgraded to serious, at least? (We shouldn't be
shipping it in sarge if it's non-free.)
Why not move it to non-free? Or you defining
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:22:32AM +1300, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
Personally I think bayesian based spam filters are a godsend. They're a bit
naive in places such as being unigram or bigram based, but that'll probably
get fixed in version two. And already
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 07:47:11PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:19:47PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I just noticed that 'heyu' is non-free, at least according to bug #149128.
Shouldn't this bug be upgraded to serious, at least? (We shouldn't be
shipping it in sarge
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-sensors
Version : 2.6.5
Upstream Author : The Lm_sensors Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/
* License : GPL
Description :
I am not at totally stupid
person.I have written a 60k
byte qbasic application program.
I have watched with interest over
the past few years the development
of Linux.I believe it will really
never go very far until someone
removes the hopelessly complex web
of knowledge required to use the
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:20:42AM +0100, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 07:47:11PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:19:47PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I just noticed that 'heyu' is non-free, at least according to bug
#149128.
Shouldn't this bug
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:58:48PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
Also there's the issue of two people having such filters trying to
communicate with each other.
This, of course, is taken care of, see the documentation if you are
interested.
NB You can't just white-list an address when you send
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:31:11PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:18, Stephen Zander wrote:
The above is based on the false premise that those who send spam are
incapable of sending it with (forged) real email addresses. They
already have lots of them to choose from.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:50:14PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
In order to avoid this, spammers merely have to use a forged from
address that will generate an automatic response. There's no shortage of
those. [EMAIL PROTECTED] springs to mind, and I have no doubt that
there are many others.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:01:15AM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:39:30PM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
Time will tell. I fear that some day, the only way to use email
productively is to block all email with invalid sender adresses. And
I don't know a way do valdiate a
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:16:20PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Between stuff like this, and our lack of an XML catalog, I'd say that
Debian really needs someone skilled in XML technologies to step forward
and help out. Is no one out there?
The problem here seems not to be the XML skills, but
Title: Swatch
Swatch
Swatch
Swatch
Swatch
Swatch
* Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-29 10:27]:
But I use the website. Here's a questions. Go to eh redhat site and
see if you can figure out where to get a complete RedHat CD downloaded
from the net?
Uhm, should that have been a statement pro or contra to our page? I
found it
In chiark.mail.debian.devel, you wrote:
Autoresponders, bouncers, and other mail handling programs use the
envelope sender address, not an address found in any header of the mail.
I doubt that any abuse@ address replies to a bounce message. This is no
problem.
I find your faith in mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
What is required is in effect a Windows,xx or DOS based SETUP.EXE
program that would permanently install Linux on ones hard drive
including a Partition to allow dual Windows,XX and Linux to coexist
together.
Just to mention a few Debian-based efforts:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not at totally stupid
person.I have written a 60k
byte qbasic application program.
Are these two statements related?
I have watched with interest over
the past few years the development
of Linux.I believe it will really
never go very
on Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:19:47PM +0100, Gerrit Pape ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
The people who run such stupid filters misunderstand the way the
Internet works.
Maybe you should do a short research on the user of this mail
Hello,
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html
is the page outdated because of waiting for glibc move to
testing or is there another reason?
thx.
--
Nol Kthe
__
Tu correo gratis en UPSEROS http://www.upseros.com
Today, Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan == Jan Niehusmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan Time will tell. I fear that some day, the only way to use
Jan email productively is to block all email with invalid sender
Jan adresses. And I don't know a way do valdiate a (not yet
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:47:52AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
But I use the website. Here's a questions. Go to eh redhat site and
see if you can figure out where to get a complete RedHat CD downloaded
from the net?
Uhm, should that have been a statement pro or contra to our page? I
the linux distro you seek exists. its called windows xp.
nuff said.
Luke
p.s. qbasic is the programming language for stupid people.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:29 AM
Subject: bill gates linux
I am
__
Tu correo gratis en UPSEROS http://www.upseros.com
Title:
6,
Title:
6,
Noèl Köthe wrote:
Hello,
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html
is the page outdated because of waiting for glibc move to
testing or is there another reason?
Please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200211/msg02902.html
Regards,
Joey
Title:
6,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 11:10, Nol Kthe wrote:
Hello,
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html
is the page outdated because of waiting for glibc move to
testing or is there another reason?
- From
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es)
* License : (GPL)
Description : The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
This is simply a reservation to notify that I plan to prepare a
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
I just downloaded the latest upstream source for the iputils packages
and noticed that they it now contains quite a bit of IPsec code. In
particular, this includes libipsec and racoon. Racoon is the KAME
ISAKMP (IPsec key exchange protocol) implementation. I haven't
But they clearly do not want you to modify anything, including
character name! Character name is a searchable field, which some
applications may need.
It's an English field, for which there is a canonical translation
for French, and there should be translation for other languages.
But, on
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:01:02AM -0800, Steve Dunham wrote:
No ITP, but I did manage to get this to compile against the 2.5.50
kernel source tree. It seems to work, but the other side of my
tunnel is down at the moment (he upgraded his kernel but didn't
rebuild freeswan).
Cool, thanks.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello,
Normaly I am using in my~/.baschrc 'export [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
it works quiet well. Same is for the french users.
The tr_TR is half readable.
Now I like to use setings for 'fs_ IR', 'ar_SY' und 'ar_MA'.
I get a very funny screen... ;-))
Where are the console fonts
If a system simply declared a section of data to be
UniCode data, and made no attempt to comprehend the contents, it
probably would not need to have access to the contents of Unicode.txt.
Just like if a system simply declared a section of data to be
code complaint to Fortran-2026, and if
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Right. I just thought up a scheme to exploit this, based on the fake
source-IP address approach you find in descriptions of ping-floods.
Wow, you're pretty smart. Nobody has thought of this before, especially not
the authors of
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:56:10AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Thus, my conclusion: These things are evil. Don't use them or somebody
might use them against you, eventually.
This sounds vaguely like religion -- you haven't even
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: arp-sk
Version : 0.0.15
Upstream Author : Frédéric Raynal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.arp-sk.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Swiss knife tool for ARP
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 05:13:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:56:10AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Thus, my conclusion: These things are evil. Don't use them or somebody
might use them against you,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:26:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
It's easy to be effective if you don't care about false positives.
Yes, and unless you consider people who either:
1) are too lazy to confirm
2) have a philosophical objection to confirming
false positives, then there are no false
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:26:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 05:13:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
/dev/null is the most effective filtering solution at present, and these
days happens to be equivalent to these filters when applied to mail from
me.
It's easy to
Hi,
I am currently in new maintainer phase, and my package was sponsored by
Christian Marillat, and uploaded to the autobuilder. (I am also the author of
the original package)
I have two build problems ; one on s390, mips mipsel architectures, and one
on hppa architecture.
(see
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:40:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:26:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
It's easy to be effective if you don't care about false positives.
Yes, and unless you consider people who either:
1) are too lazy to confirm
2) have a
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
Is this supposed to be there?
It seems to be kinda worrying that someone has registered that hostname.
Particularly since I found it by doing a dns lookup of
keyserver.debian.org
and the host I'm on, fell through to
Title:
6,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Autoresponders, bouncers, and other mail handling programs use the
envelope sender address, not an address found in any header of the mail.
I doubt that any abuse@ address replies to a bounce message. This is no
problem.
Practical
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:58:18AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
Is this supposed to be there?
It seems to be kinda worrying that someone has registered that hostname.
Particularly since I found it by doing a dns
-Original Message-
From: Philip Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
Wildcard DNS. Try foo.bar.org.com or
this.hostname.cant.exist.org.com, it all goes to the same place.
... Adam
Philip Brown wrote:
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
.org.com has a wildcard pointing to it, so if you spell host.org
wrong, your browser is likely to append a .com to it, and off to
.org.com you go.
i pointed my cache to my own dns server that
Wildcard DNS. Try foo.bar.org.com or
this.hostname.cant.exist.org.com, it all goes to the same place.
the same as my, www.debian.org.maticompxp.w-s.pl for example,
or www.debian.org.libtlen.eu.org :)
Mati
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:55:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
BTW, anyone who e-mails you and then asks you to confirm your reply is
either using broken software, or doesn't have their outgoing mail
headers set up properly.
So people who e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then ask for
confirmation
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:46:29PM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
Hi,
I am currently in new maintainer phase, and my package was sponsored by
Christian Marillat, and uploaded to the autobuilder. (I am also the author of
the original package)
I have two build problems ; one on s390, mips
On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 18:46:29 +0100
Xavier Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first problem is a weird assembler message, on s390 mipsel, it seems
that gcc is producing invalid assembly instructions (range error):
...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DINET6 -DPREFIX=\/usr\
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:58:18AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
Is this supposed to be there?
It seems to be kinda worrying that someone has registered that hostname.
Particularly since I found it by doing a dns
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
...
Particularly since I found it by doing a dns lookup of
keyserver.debian.org
keyring.debian.org is the secret sauce
perhaps the appropriate person for debian might put in a CNAME record?
On Tue, 03 Dec 2002, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:58:18AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
Is this supposed to be there?
It seems to be kinda worrying that someone has registered that hostname.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:16:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:55:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
BTW, anyone who e-mails you and then asks you to confirm your reply is
either using broken software, or doesn't have their outgoing mail
headers set up properly.
So
http://www.way2win.com/default.asp?REFID=2629900;
1000~v~
1000
3650
5050
http://www.way2win.com/default.asp?REFID=2629900;
,
,
way2win
50, 50
,
B
3005026020021020
3005015003000
300
!
,SMT,
OZ 8031-418F-53-9.5;
:SN58/PB39/BI03;:750G;:150/(200/KG,)
:1.;2.,0.5PICHQFP.
:1.,,,;2.,.
TEL13602577858
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
Title:
6,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:55, Adam McKenna wrote:
As a side note, I am pretty amused by the people in this thread who say
don't use these systems, they're antisocial, and then follow that up with
I'm going to blacklist anyone who uses these systems.. I guess their
definition of antisocial is
Title:
6,
Title:
6,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:53:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[snip]
When it first occurred to someone that this sort of a trick could be
played on people to hijack domains, an RFC came out specifying that
hostname resolvers should NOT append the local TLD to the requested
Hello,
I have decided that since my mailing lists are not currently hosted on
Debian, I don't have the time/resources/testing platform that I used to for
maintaining Ecartis, and I would like some qualified person to take over
maintenance of this package.
Thanks,
John
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pv
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Andrew Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.ivarch.com/programs/pv.shtml
* License : Artistic
Description : Terminal-based tool
No, you don't have to patch configure.in. Simply doing
CFLAGS=-O0 -Whatever_you_want ./configure
should do it. Of course, you want to put that in a make if-statement, so
that it's only executed on the specific failing architectures...
Yes, that's what I was thinking about. I suppose I'll have to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apt-file
Version :
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : apt-file update failed
I just have tried to update the
Gee, it's a pretty bad topic, but anyway...
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:58:51PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
There's a straight 2 click path to a directory with an ISO image on it
on the gentoo site. For freebsd, it's 3 obvious clicks to a ftp site
directory, then click on arch and version. For
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:29:31PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I have only ever seen browsers do this kind of nonsense. I have never seen
nslookup, dig, or host, attempt such lame lookup methods before.
live and learn:
--
Script started on Tue
Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, now, supposing that the unicode license is found to be non-DSFG
free, and hence that UnicodeData.txt is non-free.
Suppose a program implements either unicode collation, regular expressions,
or any of the other things mentioned above.
(collation is
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:29:31PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:53:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[snip]
When it first occurred to someone that this sort of a trick could be
played on people to hijack domains, an RFC came out specifying that
In chiark.mail.debian.devel, you wrote:
Autoresponders, bouncers, and other mail handling programs use the
envelope sender address, not an address found in any header of the mail.
I doubt that any abuse@ address replies to a bounce message. This is no
problem.
Having received one of the things
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Autoresponders, bouncers, and other mail handling programs use the
envelope sender address, not an address found in any header of the mail.
I doubt that any abuse@ address replies to a bounce message. This is no
problem.
You seem
Today, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Right. I just thought up a scheme to exploit this, based on the fake
source-IP address approach you find in descriptions of ping-floods.
Wow, you're pretty smart. Nobody has thought
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:47:05AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Autoresponders, bouncers, and other mail handling programs use the
envelope sender address, not an address found in any header of the mail.
I doubt that any abuse@ address
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:55:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
The key issue here is that the mail isn't blocked. It's simply held in
another place until confirmed. It doesn't become a false positive until it
is deleted without being read.
It depends how you define the SPAM checking process.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:58:28AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:55:34AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
The key issue here is that the mail isn't blocked. It's simply held in
another place until confirmed. It doesn't become a false positive until
it
is deleted without
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:52:38PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Right. I just thought up a scheme to exploit this, based on the fake
source-IP address approach you find in descriptions
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Luke Woods wrote:
the linux distro you seek exists. its called windows xp.
nuff said.
Luke
p.s. qbasic is the programming language for stupid people.
Because it does not have line numbers ;)
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New
I demand that Adam McKenna may or may not have written...
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:47:05AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Autoresponders, bouncers, and other mail handling programs use the
envelope sender address, not an address found in
debian-devel:!
http://www.jsonline.net/tyn/xwlr5.asp?suo=276
!
debian-devel:!
,2000.
2000FW B :1310/100M:3
:95M
MTBF:3
2000FW E :1910/100M:3
:97M
MTBF:35000
2000 FW EN-T4 :3010/100M:4
:98M
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
