-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:03:01 +1100
Source: asterisk
Binary: asterisk asterisk-sounds asterisk-dev asterisk-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 01:56:33 +0100
Source: vorbisgain
Binary: vorbisgain
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.32-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:46:01PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Hello,
I have decided that since my mailing lists are not currently hosted on
Debian, I don't have the time/resources/testing platform that I used to for
maintaining Ecartis, and I would like some qualified person to take over
(Please cc: me if you reply this message.)
Ok, I understand what your thinking. I will not do NMU.
However, I don't think only ALSA 0.5 is stable release. The current
ALSA is also enough stable for sid (unstable release) users. So I
believe the upload of esound with libasound2 to sid is not
Atsuhito Kohda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-04 13:11:40 +0900]:
I'm not sure but after recent upgrading of unstable
I found /tmp/root
And can anyone guess which package created this /tmp/root ?
Try this on your machine. It might be a clue. Or it might not turn
up anything at all. But it
On 2002-12-03, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please enlighten me, anyway: Why is bouncing the full body of the
mail you received from a person who claims to be Adam back to Adam a
good idea?
This is an implementation issue, not a philosophical issue.
This is correct. The system
It would be useful if someone would package the current
esound program. The esound package maintainer has clearly
expressed his lack of interest in doing so.
esound2 anyone?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:22:35AM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
On 2002-12-03, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please enlighten me, anyway: Why is bouncing the full body of the
mail you received from a person who claims to be Adam back to Adam a
good idea?
This is an
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lufs-{utils,src}
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : Florin Malita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://lufs.sourceforge.net/main/contact.html
* License : GPL
Description : Linux
!
,SMT,
OZ 8031-418F-53-9.5;
:SN58/PB39/BI03;:750G;:150/(200/KG,)
:1.;2.,0.5PICHQFP.
:1.,,,;2.,.
TEL13602577858
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
Hello,
I have uploaded Debian packages of additional TuxRacer courses at
http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/tuxracer-courses/
The packages do not have Debian quality regarding the necessary docs
but they just work. I do not plan to make this an official package because
each single
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:33:49AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
To that end I will be filing important bugs against any lib*-java
package that does not depend on either java1-runtime or java2-runtime
(should the package required features of the standard java.* classes
that are only included
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:40:27AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Atsuhito Kohda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-04 13:11:40 +0900]:
I'm not sure but after recent upgrading of unstable
I found /tmp/root
And can anyone guess which package created this /tmp/root ?
Try this on your machine. It
,(GSM SIM Card)
SIM
V1SIM
PIN
(*)
Lotto()
SIMPUK
25018
SAMSUNG T-108
(SIM)
,, : 0372-5923962 5177321
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 08:29:28PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
is anyone planning on packaging Mozilla.org's Calendar program?
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/
It requires Mozilla 1.2a (1.2 is in Unstable but I don't know about
1.2a). It looks promising and hope someone
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:13:52PM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
This is an ABI change, and as ALSA 0.5 is still the stable release, (and
the only one that seems to work for me) I don't want to change it yet.
Well, what Ryuichi said... ALSA people don't support 0.5 anymore. In any
case, I guess
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: adzapper
Version : 20021128
Upstream Author : Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://adzapper.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : squid_redirect
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lazy
Version : 0.23b
Upstream Author : Lucas Correia Villa Real [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://freshmeat.net/redir/lazy/5502/url_bz2/lazy-0.23b.tar.bz2
* License :
please check
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=armpkg=gradmver=1.5a-1
bison is in build-depends, and at least on i386, it provides
bison.yacc, which yacc is linked to via alternatives.
so what's the deal on ARM?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian
speaks for itself. i didn't notice in months...
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=armpkg=gradmver=1.5a-1
http://bugs.debian.org/gradm
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do
First off, http://packages.qa.debian.org/ ROCKS, thanks Raphaël!
The page on gjay states:
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day
delay is over.
update-excuses lists it as valid candidate. is there something i am
missing?
also, wuzzah's page says that it's Too
martin f krafft wrote:
First off, http://packages.qa.debian.org/ ROCKS, thanks Raphaël!
The page on gjay states:
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day
delay is over.
update-excuses lists it as valid candidate. is there something i am
missing?
also, wuzzah's page says
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:56:44AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
speaks for itself. i didn't notice in months...
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=armpkg=gradmver=1.5a-1
http://bugs.debian.org/gradm
It's easier to notice these things in a timely fashion if you put
'grep-excuses your
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wondershaper
Version : 1.1a
Upstream Author : Bert Hubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
* License : GPL
Description : a script to set up QoS,
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also, wuzzah's page says that it's Too young, only 0 of 10 days old.
i uploaded it to unstable on 17 Nov! What's going on?
Read the lists. :)
Testing scripts are dead since some time.
--
bye Joerg
pgpcQhsJMX3TZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1319 +0100]:
It's easier to notice these things in a timely fashion if you put
'grep-excuses your name' (or just 'grep-excuses' with
GREP_EXCUSES_MAINTAINER='your name' in ~/.devscripts) in your crontab.
nice! still doesn't explain why the
also sprach Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1308 +0100]:
You should have a look at update_output.txt which gives more details about
problems. Details about such outputs can be found in the main testing page.
okay, that explains gjay (build failure on ia64). but i can find
nothing on
also sprach Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1331 +0100]:
also, wuzzah's page says that it's Too young, only 0 of 10 days old.
i uploaded it to unstable on 17 Nov! What's going on?
Read the lists. :)
i am trying...
Testing scripts are dead since some time.
okay, so no package
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:34:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1319 +0100]:
It's easier to notice these things in a timely fashion if you put
'grep-excuses your name' (or just 'grep-excuses' with
GREP_EXCUSES_MAINTAINER='your name' in
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:38:08PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1331 +0100]:
Testing scripts are dead since some time.
okay, so no package will make it to testing in the mean time???
Correct. Also, multiple punctuation marks are a
I intent to hijack the hdf5 package.
Its current maintainer didn't make any upload for about a year, and the
package is currently virtually maintained by me; I have already done 4
NMUs, as I have packages depending on hdf5, and thus needed to solve the
RC bugs.
If I don't have any news from
FRAMESET border=0 frameBorder=0 frameSpacing=0 rows=100%,*
FRAME marginHeight=5 marginWidth=10 name=easymain src=http://www.yinlove.com
/FRAMESET
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:46:12PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
take over maintenance of this package.
is development still active upstream? i used to use listar heavily, but
stopped because i thought it was not being very well maintained by
upstream.
Yes. There is not a lot of activity
Go ahead, it's yours. Please upload a version with a new Maintainer: line
that closes WNPP O bug 171621.
Thanks,
John Goerzen
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:01:22AM +0100, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:46:01PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Hello,
I have decided that since
ÄúºÃ£¡
1¡¢Ö»Òªä¯ÀÀ±¾Õ¾£¬Äú¾Í¿ÉÒÔÒ»´ÎɨÇåÉ̺£ÖеÄÒ»ÇÐÉÌ»ú£¨ÔÚ±¾Õ¾¿ÉÒÔ²éÕÒµ½Êý°Ù¼Ò¸öÍøÕ¾µÄ²úÆ·¹©ÇóÐÅÏ¢£©£»
2¡¢±¾Õ¾»¹ÌṩÁË´óÁ¿µÄÆƽâÐÅÏ¢£¬Ã¿Ì춼ÔÚ¸üУ¬ÆäÊýÁ¿´ïÉÏ°Ù¸ö£»
3¡¢±¾Õ¾ËùÓеÄÓªÏúÈí¼þ£¨50¿î£©ºÍÓÊַתÈÃ50Ôª£¬»¹ÓÐÃâ·ÑÔùË͵ÄÓªÏúÈí¼þÈ«Ì×£¨ÏêÇé¼ûÕ¾ÄÚ£©£»
4¡¢±¾Õ¾ÍƳöËùÓл¯¹¤Å䷽תÈã¬ÏêÇé¼ûÕ¾ÄÚ£»
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:53:52PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Correct. Also, multiple punctuation marks are a sign of insanity. ;-)
^^^
Always knew those things were dangerous.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021203 17:35]:
OK, now, supposing that the unicode license is found to be non-DSFG
free, and hence that UnicodeData.txt is non-free.
Suppose a program implements either unicode collation, regular expressions,
or any of the other things mentioned above.
ÄúºÃ£¡
1¡¢Ö»Òªä¯ÀÀ±¾Õ¾£¬Äú¾Í¿ÉÒÔÒ»´ÎɨÇåÉ̺£ÖеÄÒ»ÇÐÉÌ»ú£¨ÔÚ±¾Õ¾¿ÉÒÔ²éÕÒµ½Êý°Ù¼Ò¸öÍøÕ¾µÄ²úÆ·¹©ÇóÐÅÏ¢£©£»
2¡¢±¾Õ¾»¹ÌṩÁË´óÁ¿µÄÆƽâÐÅÏ¢£¬Ã¿Ì춼ÔÚ¸üУ¬ÆäÊýÁ¿´ïÉÏ°Ù¸ö£»
3¡¢±¾Õ¾ËùÓеÄÓªÏúÈí¼þ£¨50¿î£©ºÍÓÊַתÈÃ50Ôª£¬»¹ÓÐÃâ·ÑÔùË͵ÄÓªÏúÈí¼þÈ«Ì×£¨ÏêÇé¼ûÕ¾ÄÚ£©£»
4¡¢±¾Õ¾ÍƳöËùÓл¯¹¤Å䷽תÈã¬ÏêÇé¼ûÕ¾ÄÚ£»
The second problem is an internal compiler error on hppa:
...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DINET6 -DPREFIX=\/usr\
-DSYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -O -g3
-Wall -Wcast-align -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations
martin f krafft schrieb am Mittwoch, 04. Dezember 2002 um 13:08:46 +0100:
* Package name: wondershaper
Version : 1.1a
Upstream Author : Bert Hubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
* License : GPL
Description : a script to set
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:25:43PM +0100, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
and the other htb-based. cbq is no longer developped, but tc from
iproute does not support htb.
Well, according to the changelog, tc does support htb, but it's probably
based on htb2 and 2.4.20 contains htb3, which seems to be
Package: general
Version: 20021204
Severity: normal
I have a update testing system. I also have the following lines on my
/etc/apt/sources.list for whenever I want to try some bleeding edge
software
deb-src http://ftp.uevora.pt/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.uevora.pt
,(GSM SIM Card)
SIM
V1SIM
PIN
(*)
Lotto()
SIMPUK
25018
SAMSUNG T-108
(SIM)
,, : 0372-5923962 5177321
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
,SMT,
OZ 8031-418F-53-9.5;
:SN58/PB39/BI03;:750G;:150/(200/KG,)
:1.;2.,0.5PICHQFP.
:1.,,,;2.,.
TEL13602577858
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnuzza
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Timo Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.winpt.org/cryptchat/
* License : GPL
Description : A small peer-to-peer chat program
gnuzza (CryptChat) is a small
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: quack-el
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Neil W. Van Dyke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.neilvandyke.org/quack/
* License : GPLv2
Description : enhanced Emacs support for Scheme programming
Quack
Hello,
I think the package descriptions are a very important product of this
project. They're going to be one of the first things people see when
they use Debian, and their quality directly reflects on the quality of
Debian. I've been putting in some random efforts here and there to
comment on
I think the real issue here isn't so much actual package descriptions,
but the ITPs. Most package descriptions I've seen have been pretty
accurate, and tend to change a lot between the time of the ITP and
actual package release.
Colin Walters wrote:
I think the package descriptions are a very
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:55:35 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sami Haahtinen) wrote:
In the past the only thing that stopped me from doing a build of my
own from the sources was that debian missed libical.. and now that
there appears to be libical-dev, i can't see any reason why not
package it..
Yes,
On 04 Dec 2002 12:55:50 -0500
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html
Thanks.
pgpfyKOIrBIap.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Robert Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Package name: kernel-patch-sensors
Version : 2.6.5
Upstream Author : The Lm_sensors Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/
* License : GPL
Description : Lm-sensors is a hardware health
On 04 Dec 2002 12:55:50 -0500
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html
I do have some differences of opinion, though. It's sad, but there are a
getting to be a fairly large number of DDs who are attention grabbers.
Just a few days ago, I saw a
Hello,
Am Mit, 2002-12-04 um 14.25 schrieb Joerg Friedrich:
martin f krafft schrieb am Mittwoch, 04. Dezember 2002 um 13:08:46 +0100:
* Package name: wondershaper
Please notice that the wondershaper has two scripts. First is cbq-based
and the other htb-based. cbq is no longer
On 04-Dec-02, 12:11 (CST), Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the real issue here isn't so much actual package descriptions,
but the ITPs. Most package descriptions I've seen have been pretty
accurate, and tend to change a lot between the time of the ITP and
actual package
Le mer 04/12/2002 à 19:11, Ari Pollak a écrit :
I think the real issue here isn't so much actual package descriptions,
but the ITPs. Most package descriptions I've seen have been pretty
accurate, and tend to change a lot between the time of the ITP and
actual package release.
The problem
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 19:01, David B Harris wrote:
Also, in the description template, two spaces are used after a period -
is that standard nowadays? (My understanding was that they were
primarily used for variable-width fonts, where a single space would take
up very little page space. Since
David B Harris wrote:
Also, in the description template, two spaces are used after a period -
is that standard nowadays? (My understanding was that they were
primarily used for variable-width fonts, where a single space would take
up very little page space.
There was an interesting
Scott James Remnant wrote:
In correct English grammar and typography the space after a full stop
(period in Merkin) is supposed to be a wider space then that between
words and after commas and suchlike.
Therefore typists were always taught to press the space key twice after
a full stop.
On 04 Dec 2002 19:19:38 +
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In correct English grammar and typography the space after a full stop
(period in Merkin) is supposed to be a wider space then that between
words and after commas and suchlike.
Ahh, allright, so there's still reason to
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:33:35 -0800
Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any reason why package descriptions shouldn't be presented
in variable-width fonts. The right margin might look a bit ragged
(assuming the program preserves line breaks, which is probably a good
idea to avoid
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 19:48, Craig Dickson wrote:
Scott James Remnant wrote:
In correct English grammar and typography the space after a full stop
(period in Merkin) is supposed to be a wider space then that between
words and after commas and suchlike.
Hmm, you just gave a rule
On 04-Dec-02, 13:01 (CST), David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, in the description template, two spaces are used after a period -
is that standard nowadays?
(Yes, I've read some of the other responses to this.)
In standard typography, it is to have extra space after a period ending
I believe that you have hit a compilation limit in the pa backend. You
have an unconditional branch that can't reach its target. The only work
around at the moment is to compile without optimization. See the comments
in pa/pa.md for the jump insn. We need a scratch register to load the
I believe that you have hit a compilation limit in the pa backend. You
have an unconditional branch that can't reach its target. The only work
around at the moment is to compile without optimization. See the comments
in pa/pa.md for the jump insn. We need a scratch register to load the
Craig Dickson writes:
Hmm, you just gave a rule specifically for fixed-width fonts, and now
you're tacitly assuming that it applies to variable-width fonts as well?
You are supposed to use an n-space between words and an m-space between
sentences when typesetting. Using two spaces with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 171720 evolution
Bug#171720: general: Evolution1.2 does not compile on testing
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `evolution'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:19:38PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
If you are writing text in something that uses variable width fonts, the
program should know about English grammar and render the wider space
itself on any whitespace. (LaTeX is about the only thing that gets it
right
reassign 171720 evolution
thanks
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:20:15PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: general
this should be filed against the evolution package.
--
gram
The man page for update-alternatives does not give a range for the
possible values for priority.
As a result, when I created a package for the lindowsos warehosue for
ibmjava2-jre, I used a priority of 99, assuming that 100 was the
maximum.
The problem arose when a user installed another jre,
hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:11:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
please check
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=armpkg=gradmver=1.5a-1
bison is in build-depends, and at least on i386, it provides
bison.yacc, which yacc is linked to via alternatives.
so what's the deal on ARM?
hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:11:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
please check
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=armpkg=gradmver=1.5a-1
bison is in build-depends, and at least on i386, it provides
bison.yacc, which yacc is linked to via alternatives.
so what's the deal on ARM?
hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:34:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1319 +0100]:
It's easier to notice these things in a timely fashion if you put
'grep-excuses your name' (or just 'grep-excuses' with
GREP_EXCUSES_MAINTAINER='your
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 05:11:26PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Michael Bramer wrote:
The ddtp will produce also po-debconf files in future. I must only write
some scripts for it...
I did something like:
for lang in cs da de es fr hu it ja nl pl pt_BR ru ; do wget
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:14AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
see if you still don't have a problem. Or try giving the server a local (to
it) address after MAIL FROM: the server should complain unless you're on a
network which it considers to be local.
Tried that with both qmail and postfix,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:12:37PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
But to be sure you're not getting any false positives, you cruise through
your spam mailbox every now and then, right?
I generally try to (although I know one site that receives so much SPAM
that this is simply not feasible).
I'm curious as to why was DDTP (Debian Documentation Translation Project)
was chosen for the project in helping translate, exclusively, the
package descriptions in Debian.
Shouldn't this be renamed to DPTP (Debian Packages Translation Project).
As far as I know the DDTP has nothing to do with:
-
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 14:01, David B Harris wrote:
I do have some differences of opinion, though. It's sad, but there are a
getting to be a fairly large number of DDs who are attention grabbers.
Just a few days ago, I saw a package description that said something
along the lines of this is
On 03-Dec-02, 15:30 (CST), Michael Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fixing our package for ibmjava2-jre, but the man page should be
clarified. Are there any accepted values to use with
update-alternatives? Is it listed in some other documentation
somewhere that I just didn't see?
Hi,
I plan to port Xconfigurator from Redhat to Debian, if that will help
debian to be more simple in installation.
I have search in Internet, if some did that, or there is another tools
already work on debian, but I have not found any! If you know one. That
mean there is no need to port this
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:20:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:14AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
see if you still don't have a problem. Or try giving the server a local (to
it) address after MAIL FROM: the server should complain unless you're on a
network which it
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:20:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:14AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
see if you still don't have a problem. Or try giving the server a local (to
it) address after MAIL FROM: the server should complain unless you're on a
network which it
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:53:46PM +0100, Amir Bukhari wrote:
I have search in Internet, if some did that, or there is another tools
already work on debian, but I have not found any! If you know one. That
mean there is no need to port this package.
Dunno how you feel about this, but
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1353 +0100]:
I'd be extremely surprised if the explanation wasn't something along the
lines of we didn't get round to it or something more important came
up. Humans, not automatic systems, file bugs.
there is not going to be a week when i
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1353 +0100]:
okay, so no package will make it to testing in the mean time???
Correct. Also, multiple punctuation marks are a sign of insanity. ;-)
or of big surprise. then again, i am probably insane.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:57:05PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would this work? Or would you need to be authenticated first?
(ie. I thought we were discussing checking purely based on
the MAIL FROM address, not checking for relaying).
--
also sprach Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.04.1425 +0100]:
Please notice that the wondershaper has two scripts. First is
cbq-based and the other htb-based. cbq is no longer developped, but
tc from iproute does not support htb.
good to know. i asked for tc to include the htb patch a
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:00, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:53:46PM +0100, Amir Bukhari wrote:
I have search in Internet, if some did that, or there is another tools
already work on debian, but I have not found any! If you know one. That
mean there is no need to port
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:13:18PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Dunno how you feel about this, but dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
works quite fine here.
It does kinda assume you know what you want your config file to look
like, asking you about drivers and so-forth.
Install
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:22, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:13:18PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Dunno how you feel about this, but dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
works quite fine here.
It does kinda assume you know what you want your config file to look
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:09:31AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:57:05PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would this work? Or would you need to be authenticated first?
$ telnet mx0.gmx.net 25
Trying 213.165.64.100...
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:07PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:22, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:13:18PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Dunno how you feel about this, but dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
works quite fine here.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[...]
PS: For example, people looking for translations in Debian might end up
reading http://ddtp.debian.org/ddtp-text/misc/ddts-faq.txt instead of
http://www.debian.org/international/
Or
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:42:43PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Install discover, read-edid and mdetect before you install X, and you're
set.
Now explain that to my mother! :p
[snip]
Maybe what we want is a meta-package that depends on discover, read_edid,
and mdetect.
Maybe what we
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:30:39PM -0500, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 14:01, David B Harris wrote:
I do have some differences of opinion, though. It's sad, but there are a
getting to be a fairly large number of DDs who are attention grabbers.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:55:50PM -0500, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
I think the package descriptions are a very important product of this
project. They're going to be one of the first things people see when
they use Debian, and their quality directly reflects on the
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I'm curious as to why was DDTP (Debian Documentation Translation Project)
It wasn't, the expansion is Debian Description Translation Project.
It's not exactly hard to find that
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:07PM +, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:22, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:13:18PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Dunno how you feel about this, but dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:50, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:42:43PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Install discover, read-edid and mdetect before you install X, and you're
set.
Now explain that to my mother! :p
[snip]
Maybe what we want is a meta-package that
ÄúºÃ£¡
1¡¢Ö»Òªä¯ÀÀ±¾Õ¾£¬Äú¾Í¿ÉÒÔÒ»´ÎɨÇåÉ̺£ÖеÄÒ»ÇÐÉÌ»ú£¨ÔÚ±¾Õ¾¿ÉÒÔ²éÕÒµ½Êý°Ù¼Ò¸öÍøÕ¾µÄ²úÆ·¹©ÇóÐÅÏ¢£©£»
2¡¢±¾Õ¾»¹ÌṩÁË´óÁ¿µÄÆƽâÐÅÏ¢£¬Ã¿Ì춼ÔÚ¸üУ¬ÆäÊýÁ¿´ïÉÏ°Ù¸ö£»
3¡¢±¾Õ¾ËùÓеÄÓªÏúÈí¼þ£¨50¿î£©ºÍÓÊַתÈÃ50Ôª£¬»¹ÓÐÃâ·ÑÔùË͵ÄÓªÏúÈí¼þÈ«Ì×£¨ÏêÇé¼ûÕ¾ÄÚ£©£»
4¡¢±¾Õ¾ÍƳöËùÓл¯¹¤Å䷽תÈã¬ÏêÇé¼ûÕ¾ÄÚ£»
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
