On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:49:18AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:05:01PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Bilancio tutto sommato positivo per la presenza Debian al Meeting 2003.
Molti i presenti e parecchi hanno resistito comunque fino al pomeriggio.
Luca De
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:24:43AM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
altra altra nota: vogliamo provare a fare quella mini-conference al
webb.it? quanti di voi ci verranno?
Io credo di esserci, e se non faccio tardi, mi piacerebbe parlare un po' dei
pacchatti zope e della policy che sto
Le Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:43:55AM +0200, Frédéric BOITEUX écrivait:
- comment avoir une archive avec des paquets mis dans différents répertoires
(style main, contrib...) ?
je n'ai pas trouvé d'exemples de fichiers de config pour apt-ftparchive, et
mes
Dans les sources de debian-cd,
Selon Benjamin Drieu :
Puisque je serais en vacances je peux y être à partir de 17h et y rester
jusqu'à épuisement/trop faim/fermeture/etc. C'est déjà ouvert à 17h ?
Aucune idée. Perso, je ne pourrai passer avant 19h (y'en a qui
bossent ;-)).
Pareil que Benj ;o) Je pense pouvoir passer
Le mar 15/04/2003 à 09:18, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Le Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:43:55AM +0200, Frédéric BOITEUX écrivait:
- comment faire pour mettre les archives sur CD-rom et qu'il soit
utilisable par apt-cdrom ???
cp ... apt-cdrom est bourrin, il scanne le CD à la recherche de fichier
Salut,
Le Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:18:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit
:
Dans les sources de debian-cd, fichier tools/scanpackages ... tu peux
arriver à décrypter un exemple de fichier de config. Sinon tu peux
Je vais regarder ...
consulter sur auric.debian.org le
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:00:19AM +0200, Loic Bernable wrote:
Selon Benjamin Drieu :
Puisque je serais en vacances je peux y être à partir de 17h et y rester
jusqu'à épuisement/trop faim/fermeture/etc. C'est déjà ouvert à 17h ?
Aucune idée. Perso, je ne pourrai passer avant 19h
It's been a few years since I've actually run a web site which uses
libapache-mod-perl or apache-perl. If there's anyone more interested than I
in maintaining these packages, I'd be glad to pass them on.
They're in pretty good shape; there's one mysterious apache-perl bug which
shouldn't be too
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:27:48PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
[ I host the xshipwars upstream mailing lists... ]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
There is a nice graphical front-end to Postgresql, in the non-US
section :
I would like to vote against nice here. :)
Moreover you can do several stuff but it is not comparable to PgAdmin
http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/pgadmin2.php?ContentID=1
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:31:44PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
depth, i cannot help all that much about
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:07:26PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:11:17AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
lintian says:
W: planets: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/planets
/usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
and the 105 or so packages that will be breaken by its inclusion in
testing, many of them have
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:44 -0400,
Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(3) is the email gateway used?
I tried but failed to change my latitude/longitude data.
None of the following worked. RTFM instructions welcome.
---
Lat: +0334500., Long: +1303000.
---
Lat: 33:45:00.000 N
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 08:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages.
Great work... Just wish I wasn't on there.
Is there any better way of keeping snapshot packages out of testing
Hello
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:07:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I once tried to do something similar, but noticed that
user-mode-linux does the same thing to a fuller extent.
If you look at it this way, user-mode-linux is a fakeroot that traps
all syscalls.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:55:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
and the 105 or so packages that
Hello,
See subject: is this package missing from our archive or did I simply
overlooked it ?
Cordialement,
--
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:39:51AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:55:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but it is better than having our
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
Michael, scnr
--
calc netscape 6 is only really useful for seeing how browsers used
to be broken
Just ignore it or add a override.
Any reason not to Build-Depend: chrpath, and do 'chrpath --delete' on
the result?
Personnaly i don't know, i am no expert in rpath and don't fully
understand the issues involved.
If you are adding an rpath to a non-default directory, there is a
Should we have a review of all debconf questions on debian-qa perhaps?
Anyone interested?
That would be interesting.
Translating some debconf entries, some look too difficult.
I guess many people are looking at debconf questions while translating,
but aren't very expressive about it.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:15:13PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Should we have a review of all debconf questions on debian-qa perhaps?
Anyone interested?
That would be interesting.
Translating some debconf entries, some look too difficult.
I guess many people are looking at debconf
debian-devel:!
,,
www.spwe.com
100
300
http://www.spwe.com
010-66027364010-66026820
010-66025560
010-66027364
QQ94631723
!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-04-15
Le mar 15/04/2003 à 08:55, Sven Luther a écrit :
Well, i don't really care about those packages, it is just that this
will hold up any packages which depend on libvorbis (post 0a). I could
try rebuilding those packages with the testing libvorbis, but i doubt
out autobuilders will be happy if i
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 08:58:40PM -0400, Daniel Martin wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
all the footnote says is that imake Does The Right Thing, which is why
it is exempted.
See, now I read it as imake doesn't quite do the right thing, really,
but it's imake, so
Le lun 14/04/2003 à 16:45, Drew Scott Daniels a écrit :
2 libpng transition? debian-devel has some discussion about this archived
for Jan and Jul 2002.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200207/msg01106.html
is quite interesting.
As the new maintainer of libpng, I can
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:02:16PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Just ignore it or add a override.
Any reason not to Build-Depend: chrpath, and do 'chrpath --delete' on
the result?
Personnaly i don't know, i am no expert in rpath and don't fully
understand the issues involved.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
So, why is the new libvrobis not in
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:40:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mar 15/04/2003 à 08:55, Sven Luther a écrit :
Well, i don't really care about those packages, it is just that this
will hold up any packages which depend on libvorbis (post 0a). I could
try rebuilding those packages with
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:31:16AM +0100, Mark Howard arranged a set of bits
into the following:
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 08:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages.
Great
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, LapTop006 wrote:
Is there any better way of keeping snapshot packages out of testing than
RC bugs?
Picking a random architecture and making its builds fail is not a valid
answer :)
I had been thinking that, something like a control feild Dists:
unstable (Probably a
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
Trying to think up solutions for problems
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:45:04PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
[...]
So my complaints list about debconf questions is:
1. Bad grammar or spelling (in the English templates);
2. Questions/notes that assume too much background knowledge; and
3. Questions/notes which are just too trivial to
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:10:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
It could be a nice solution to this kind
Hi,
Through the shlibdeps system. Probably, the libgcc and libc packages
decided that on ARM they should have those versioned dependencies. The
libcurl2 package needs not do anything by itself to pick them up.
Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
hi,
why is gdm still gnome1 version on unstable ??
version 2.4 works well !!!
at least a gdm2 package should be created
A week ago James rejected my PEAR packages. I need this packages because
there are newer version than libraries in php4-pear package. There are
used by IMP and other applications. I don't like to install PEAR
repository with bundled 'pear' installer as far as I've got Debian
packaging system.
I
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 02:42, Sven Luther wrote:
* chromium : 1 RC bug, out of date on arm.
Note this RC bug is tagged sarge so it doesn't really apply. The only
thing holding this back is the arm autobuilder which I'm hoping will
retry sometime soon with the newly uploaded openal package.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
If you want to help with something, please help in fixing the RC
bugs in these packages.
Yes, sure, easy for you to say. There are so many of them, and on such a
diversity of packages, i could be fixing bugs for weeks and not
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:54:06 +, Michael Banck wrote:
Guess what people are trying to do. It's hunting season guys. It's
bug-squashing *year*, OK? We can only release sarge if we start working
on RC-bugs *NOW*, like asuffield does.
Oh, I don't know, we could start by re-classifying
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:31:16AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 08:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages.
Great work... Just wish I wasn't on there.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:21:15AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 02:42, Sven Luther wrote:
* chromium : 1 RC bug, out of date on arm.
Note this RC bug is tagged sarge so it doesn't really apply. The only
thing holding this back is the arm autobuilder which I'm hoping
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:54:06PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, sure, easy for you to say. There are so many of them, and on such a
diversity of packages, i could be fixing bugs for weeks and not improve
the situation.
seems like broken package..?
Andrius
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:56:06 -0400,
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Joey, I am going to be presumtuous and assume you would not
mind this response going to a public list; I have condensed your
questions down to the technical details, and you did imply that you
considered
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Joey, I am going to be presumtuous and assume you would not
mind this response going to a public list; I have condensed your
questions down to the technical details, and you did imply that you
considered filing a bug, so the email was not really personal and
Package: wnpp
Severity wishlist
BDB URL:http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html is Berkeley DB interface
for Ruby. libdb4.1-ruby provides BDB which links to libdb-4.1.so.
libdb-ruby is already provided. It has Bug#154727. libdb4.1-ruby is
solution for the situation of the bug. I also intend to
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Pingus is a free Lemmings clone. For several years now, the upstream
code has not been in very good shape. A new release (0.6.0) is now
imminent and is an enormous improvement. It does not have very many
levels yet, but is very much playable.
Unless someone has
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:54:06 +, Michael Banck wrote:
I did a couple of NMUs for RC bugs in the last days - I uploaded
straight to DELAYED/7-day, sent a mail with a diff to the BTS and
set the bug to +pending. So far, I did not get much complaints.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:44:49 -0400,
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Flex sets up a number of things that are available in the rules
section, and now cleans it all up before polluting the user
namespace. Now, actions can be any C statement, but using
retitle 189146 ITA: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
merge 158510 189146
thanks
* Peter van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-04-15 11:19]:
Unless someone has objections, I would like to take over
maintainance of this package.
Simon Richter said in August 2002 that he would adopt the package
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:19:08AM -0600, Peter van Rossum wrote:
Pingus is a free Lemmings clone. For several years now, the upstream
code has not been in very good shape. A new release (0.6.0) is now
imminent and is an enormous improvement. It does not have very many
levels yet, but is
Hi Piotr,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:15:56PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
A week ago James rejected my PEAR packages. I need this packages because
there are newer version than libraries in php4-pear package. There are
used by IMP and other applications. I don't like to install PEAR
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:36:56 +, Samuli Suonpaa wrote:
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ straight to DELAYED/7-day ]
Hmm. If I wanted to do something like that (not too sure yet) I'd
have to go through a sponsor. That doesn't sound like a net
reduction of work...
No, you
On 8 April 2003 Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 07, Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A difficulty is that only a whole options { ... };
statement can be included from the named configuration file,
not just the forwarders { ... }; statement inside it.
You can include a file even
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: netbrake
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Salvatore Sanfilippo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.hping.org/netbrake/
* License : MIT/X
Description : network bandwidth
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
At the time, James talked to Adam Conrad and me about the packages, and
we agreed with the decision to hold the packages out of the archive for
the time being. For one thing, it looks like you packaged *all* PEAR
modules available, including some of
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
Current as of when? When the upload was done?
dpkg-shlibdeps has no idea whether an older version would be sufficient,
so it plays safe.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:43:50PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
Current as of when? When the upload was done?
Current at package
* Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
There is a nice graphical front-end to Postgresql, in the non-US
section :
I would like to vote against nice here. :)
Moreover you can do several stuff but it is not comparable to PgAdmin
Björn Stenberg wrote:
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
Current as of when? When the upload was done?
Current as of when libgcc1 froze the shlibs, which was recently.
seems like broken package..?
Broken in what sense?
Kivio 1.2.x certainly had its problems as one of the more unloved
children of the koffice suite. But kivio is getting some loving in CVS
now, and since koffice has just begun tagging 1.3 betas you can expect
some improvements in 1.3 when it
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 07:27:18AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
seems like broken package..?
Broken in what sense?
deb's dependencies :)
now, and since koffice has just begun tagging 1.3 betas you can expect
some improvements in 1.3 when it comes into sid.
good news, when ~?
Andrius
Jim Penny wrote:
Björn Stenberg wrote:
Isn't this a problem? Especially for packages depending on libraries with
long release cycles, such as libgcc1 and libc6.
Not often. Most slow release libraries are strongly backwards
compatible.
That was my point. Since these libs are strongly
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:51:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
snip
If you search ad www.postgresql.org for admin tool you get several links
for instance also
http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/
which might end in a necie tool perhaps. Would be nice if somebody could
check this out.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:48:04PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
Jim Penny wrote:
Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
Isn't this a problem? Especially for packages depending on
libraries with long release cycles, such as libgcc1 and libc6.
Not often. Most slow release libraries are strongly
This is a message to my fellow network security professionals,
www.asquad.com is formed by a group of security professionals with
experience and knowledge. Even so, we would like your participation in
the exchanging of ideas and your contribution of knowledge. We would
appreciate your input
68 matches
Mail list logo
