Existe-t-il quelque part des recommendations aux mainteneurs pour les
priorités des questions debconf ?
Je voudrais revoir celles de mon paquet geneweb (pour les diminuer)
mais je voudrais auparavant vérifier si des recommendations générales
existent.
PS : rien vu dans debconf-doc
--
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:45:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Existe-t-il quelque part des recommendations aux mainteneurs pour les
priorités des questions debconf ?
Je voudrais revoir celles de mon paquet geneweb (pour les diminuer)
mais je voudrais auparavant vérifier si des
60%
IP17909
[ip]
VIPMAIL
[12]
http://ip60.5188.org/
http://ip88.5188.org/
(
___
http://mail88.312400.com/;
On Tuesday 20 May 2003 15:22, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
(Of course, this still doesn't answer the question of whether anyone
would ever want or use locale support to be enabled during the initial
boot sequence, such that the boot messages come up in the local
language)
You don't have a dad who
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigcperl
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Ron Steinke rsteinke@@w-link.net
* URL : http://sigcperl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Helper library
* Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030521 02:35]:
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
The policy vetoe to symlinking intends (in my interpretation) two
goals. One is to ensure that the licences don't change unintendidly.
This could e.g. happen if there is a global
On Tuesday 20 May 2003 14:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
[snipped warning]
I wanted to show this here to ask for opinions whether this is a bug in the
libdb3++-dev header files. I regard it not to be related to the problem
but I think we should fix this anyway. Should I file a wishlist bug report
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigc
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Ron Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sigcperl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Perl bindings to the
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Scenario B:
Consider the case where the quorum is 45, and there have been
44 votes -- 23 for, 21 against. (Only one option on the ballot). I am
opposed to the option.
At this point; under my version; I can
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
knowledge
A situation where a vote would be successful, but fail for lack of
participation, often requires no insider knowledge at all to be recognizeable
as such. In that situation, the opponents can
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
knowledge, the votes are secrets, and the results published only after
the election is closed.
This doesn't change the fact that there is a chance that by voting
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:09:43AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
knowledge
A situation where a vote would be successful, but fail for lack of
participation,
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
If there is such a lack of participation that even our low quorum
requirement is not meet, then is this a bad thing ?
Yes -- because it encourages people not to vote in that situation.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Here, the vote(s) for B caused A to win.
Other examples are possible (for example: 19 ABD, 1 BDA).
To make your proposal work right, we'd need a separate quorum
determination phase which is independent of the voting phase.
Hiya Debian,
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:24:54PM -0500, michael d. ivey wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Debian Wiki (http://wiki.debian.net) is
back online, and should stay that way.
[..]
Am I missing something or is there no diff/version control functionality?
Does this mean there is no
Hello,
Afaict after qt3 has entered testing avifile could go there
finally too:
| trying: avifile
| skipped: avifile (0 - 241)
| got: 386+0: a-88:a-91:h-79:i-128
| * i386: avifile-xvid-plugin
which http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=avifile translates to:
| Checking avifile
|
Hi,
Nick Phillips wrote:
If a winning option would be discarded due to quorum requirements, then
I think the vote should probably be considered void.
That seems to be the best choice.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ehnt
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Extreme Happy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
as I've no longer time to properly maintain my packages I'm
searching for a new maintainer for:
Package: ntop
Description: display network usage in top-like format
ntop is a Network Top program. It displays a summary of network
usage
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
food, flights and tshirts?
His response:
} We would provide the conference facilities and try to get accomodations with
} some LUG members. There may be more, but I need to
On Wed 21 May 2003, Craig small wrote:
* Package name: ehnt
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Extreme Happy Netflow Tool - Obtains useful
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Dennis Schoen wrote:
Package: apt-show-source
Description: Shows source-package information
This program parses the APT lists for source packages and the
dpkg status file and then lists every package with a different
version number than the one installed.
It's very
W licie z wto, 20-05-2003, godz. 05:52, Eric Dorland pisze:
Hi Everyone,
From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/. Just add:
To avoid confustion and to
Sorry for replying to my own message. :)
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
Package: apt-show-source
Description: Shows source-package information
This program parses the APT lists for source packages and the
dpkg status file and then lists every package with a
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
Hiya Debian,
Hiya! =)
Am I missing something or is there no diff/version control
functionality? Does this mean there is no version control of pages or
just that it's hidden from users?
Stock Kwiki 0.13 doesn't have anything.
Package: ntop
Description: display network usage in top-like format
ntop is a Network Top program. It displays a summary of network
usage by machines on your network in a format reminiscent of the
unix top utility.
.
It can also be run in web mode, which allows the display to be
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:22:03AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Uhm ... what about shipping a separate library libdebtags? It seems to
me a good way to share the C code you mention in a previous mail and
also a good way to avoid future incompatibility if you decide to change
the format of
Hello
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
as I've no longer time to properly maintain my packages I'm
searching for a new maintainer for:
Package: ntop
Description: display network usage in
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:57:13PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Here, the vote(s) for B caused A to win.
Other examples are possible (for example: 19 ABD, 1 BDA).
To make your proposal work right, we'd need a separate quorum
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
At this point; under my version; I can express my opinions
with no fear of harming my candidate. Under your amendment; if I do
not vote; the vote is nullified. However, if I vote against the
option -- the option
On Wed, 21 May 2003 21:57:13 +1200, Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Here, the vote(s) for B caused A to win.
Other examples are possible (for example: 19 ABD, 1 BDA).
To make your proposal work right, we'd need a separate
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:57:13PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
I don't believe that it's acceptable for an otherwise beaten option
to win due the the otherwise winning option being discarded due
to a quorum requirement, as John suggests might happen.
Under the proposed system, we would do
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Denis Barbier wrote:
i believe that it looks nicer keeping the layout coherent across
translation.
But you do not explain why!
because it looks nicer and it is coherent with the original one. This was
always what i told along the thread. I tought it was clear ;)
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
We asked why the removal of the number «3» from the word «PHP3» caused
the format of the whole description to the changed. We asked _why_,
we did not say «do not do this». First, we wanted to know why. Then,
we might want to ask it to
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
Internationalizing, translating and being internationalized and translated
[SNIP]
I think that having atleast some references on how to handle translations
will avoid other flamewars and misunderstandigs.
But atleast the flamewar was not completly
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dpkg-rebuild
Version : Will be 0.1
Upstream Author : Patrick Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cs.duke.edu/~reynolds/projects/dpkg-rebuild
* License : GPL
Package: ntop
I'd like to take this one. I have been using it for a long time and
is quite experienced with the code.
- Dennis: I think Ola is better than me for this package (since I
have not much experience with ntop code), forget my offer.
Frederic
* (Aaron M. Ucko)
| Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
| the third person. I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
| this way?
As other people have said: I'm not going, but I don't object to a
conference in the US per se.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:05:47AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
If the winning option is discarded due to quorum requirements, then
given that all non-default options have the *same* quorum requirement,
this is exactly what would happen.
I think this is not inherently true. Since all
On Wed, 21 May 2003, michael d. ivey wrote:
It'll be in, either by upstream or by me, within a few weeks. I want to
see what he comes up with, and then I'll hack something for us.
Why not starting with phpwiki ? We are using it on various
high-volume site, this is quite stable
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:07:27PM +0200, Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
Why not starting with phpwiki ? We are using it on various
high-volume site, this is quite stable and got a lot features and
don't eat the memory like... (you know ;-)
I'd really like to not have the Why not
Raul Miller wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:57:13PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
I don't believe that it's acceptable for an otherwise beaten option
to win due the the otherwise winning option being discarded due
to a quorum requirement, as John suggests might happen.
Under the proposed
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:34:37AM -0500, michael d. ivey wrote:
Stock Kwiki 0.13 doesn't have anything. Our local version has a basic
RCS checkin
dont want to argue here, but there are enough Wikis which do support that.
PErsonally I use Tavi (mysql) which is only missing file uploads.
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 06:33:51PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
* Package name: dpkg-rebuild
Description : Rebuild dpkg's status file.
Rebuild the Debian '/var/lib/dpkg/status' file from information in
'/var/lib/dpkg/available' and '/var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list'. This is
useful if
Josip Rodin (2003-05-20 23:21:02 +0200) :
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:06:17PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[...]
No because alioth has its own DNS delegation (in order to manage
myproject.alioth.debian.org).
But why doesn't it have any slaves?
That's a good question. The Sourceforge and
reopen 192068
thanks
John O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100
Source: ptkei
Binary: ptkei
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.18.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: John O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: John
Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:31:23 +0200
Source: directory-administrator
Binary: directory-administrator
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Grzegorz B. Prokopski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
W li?cie z wto, 20-05-2003, godz. 05:52, Eric Dorland pisze:
Hi Everyone,
From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
repository at
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:24:42PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
John O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Changes:
ptkei (1.18.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fixed Bug#192068
...another fine example of changelog abuse.
... although not what actually closed the bug; he did that
* Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Everyone,
From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/. Just add:
Hi,
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
Package: ntop
Description: display network usage in top-like format
ntop is a Network Top program. It displays a summary of network
usage by machines on
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
requests for a new version, which they were not.
to me it reads: fixed by the new version.
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
requests for a new version,
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
requests for a new
Could you be more specific? If there's a permission problem I'd like
to fix it :)
* Andreas Happe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
I've installed a bunch of extensions while using root and now Mozilla
Firebird hangs when starting it as
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
It's much more helpful to write this as:
yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and
usefulness is :)
At least I think it is not a good idea to talk about abuse if maintainers
save themself some work.
Are any arches other than debian ppc sid
seeing the new mozilla 1.3.1-1 release segfault?
This new version also causes galeon to segfault
as well. Regressing back to 1.3-5 fixes both.
Jack
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:25:47PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent
Thus spake Eric Dorland:
Could you be more specific? If there's a permission problem I'd like
to fix it :)
I've seen this happen when installing extensions, such as the tabbrowser
extensions... the .jar file gets installed with 400 permissions, which
can be Ok if you're installing it locally,
Hola.
Antes de nada, un par de cosas. En primer lugar, saludar a los miembros de la
lista (es mi primer correo aquí), y felicitar a todos los que ayudan a Debian
de cualquier forma. Esta distribución a mí me está encantando en muchos
sentidos, y veo que a mi alrededor muchos más se están
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 02:28:23PM +0200, Alex wrote:
[pedazo de cacho de trozo omitido]
Como me extrañaba mucho todo esto, aún intenté empaquetar una aplicación KDE
totalmente trivial. Con esta sí que funcionaba la compilación, e incluso
debuild llamaba a lintian. Sin embargo el proceso se
Jesus Climent dijo:
Pues si alguien se moviera un poco y se mojara el culo, seguro que
entre extremadura y andalucia ponian dinero y todo.
Yo estoy convencida.
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo dijo:
Me temo que debconf4 toca en el otro continente.
No tiene por qué llamarse Debconf ;-)
Le podemos
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 23:15 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
No tiene por qué llamarse Debconf ;-)
Le podemos llamar la European Debian Celebration si queremos ;-)
Bueno, como los australianos... pero eso no es LA DebConf ;-)
La de Australia se llamó Debian Mini-Conf @ LCA2003
Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sobre a idéia da debconf brasileira, achei muito interessante. Mas, como
trata-se de um evento especificamente voltado a quem está intimamente
ligado de algum forma com o desenvolvimento do Debian, não sei se seria
algo que atrairia muita
Eduardo Marcel Macan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fizemos um evento para 100 pessoas aqui em SP (a oficina)
e no terceiro dia de inscrições por telefone já tinha fila
de espera.
Isso é relativo
Eu concordo contigo porem acho que algo nao restrito ao Debian seria
mais interessante por mobilizar
Sou Ricardo Bimbo do Governo Eletrônico da Prefeitura de São Paulo. Fazemos
os projeto Telecentros e temos 57 unidades abertas (serão 107 até agosto)
usamos Debian em todos os nossos Telecentros e até hoje já oferecemos cursos
a 50.000 pessoas e atendemos 103.000 pessoas por mês. Todos usuários de
66 matches
Mail list logo
