Le Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:57:25 -0400, Peter S Galbraith a écrit :
Sans être certain de comprendre ta question... Après avois fait ces
étapes, tu insère cette ligne en haut de debian/rules :
include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make
Puis tu peut faire (manuellement) :
$ debian/rules patch
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
As I have said before, as long as the default is to not cause data loss for
everyone (since dropping emails may cause data loss), but allow people to opt
in to have their mail filtered, I would have no objection. Opt in
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:22:24 +1000, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can understand the unease. But consider this: POSIX is already
over a decade old; and it standardized practices that were
SuSv3 aka POSIX was released one year ago.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if the bug is for upstream fixing a typo in a comment? :)
If it caused a Debian bug to be closed, that is a significant
change in status for the Debian package (it may not
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:43:48 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
false positive rate of as high as 2 per day by some estimates, do
we as a body consider it acceptable if some percentage of Debian
developers:
1) Don't receive a mail
dien dan dau tu va so huu tri tue: http://www.luatgiapham.com
dien dan dau tu va so huu tri tue: http://www.luatgiapham.com
Ok, a bit late in this thread, but just a small remark on the future
Opteron port : we have to take a *great* care of the migration process.
The main difference betweek Intel-64 and AMD-64, if I am correct, is that
administrators can unplug their ix86 disk from the server, and replug it
on a
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
There is no excuse for this. Access to servers that are not in spam
lists is well available to Debian developers. I tunnel my outgoing
mail through a server in Melbourne no matter where I am, this avoids
all issues of spam blocking by IP
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:45:17AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
If some number of Debian developers utilizing blocking that has a
false positive rate of as high as 2 per day by some estimates, do we
as a body consider it acceptable if some
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
That could be. Somehow, the C++ ABI would have to be added to the
Build-Dependency information. Either that, or C++ packages would have
to use a specific C++ ABI compiler, e.g.,
(control)
Build-Depends: c102, ...
[...]
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:33:35AM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
Then, a nice thing would be on Debian, for a regular user/administrator:
- switch the disks to a Opteron box
- update the APT sources to a Opteron source, or to a Opteron
migration source
- then, use something like :
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hello people,
I propose to restructure the vim package so that it builds fewer vim
variants.
I propose to have only the following:
vim (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde support; no
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:19:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
FWIW, the next version of spamassassin (2.60) will have no forgeable
negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)
Just out of curiosity, how will this be accomplished?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:11:22PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Given that it's been pointed out that the MTA supports per-user bouncing
of mail from open relays, and that it's very possible to use LDAP to
provide easy management of per-user preferences, why is there any need
to continue
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it caused a Debian bug to be closed, that is a significant
change in status for the Debian package (it may
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:20:12PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:18:57AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
How can they say no to using some of them in /warn mode ... ?
Santiago holds that more than half of the spam could be eventually
avoided. I'd very much
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 03:39:00PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
Hi.
[...]
I might thing I spoke BS on my proposal, since I have not heard any
comments...
mooch
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Read a previous message by Duncan Findlay. He said that 39.2668% of
all the spam might be blocked by using the DSBL, but doing that you
would block 0.0185% of ham.
I just ran a quick test on my current email folders. At the
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
OK, it's the inquirer
It it was proved to be true, shouldn't we *all* Linux users ( as well as
Stallman plus the FSF as a whole ) sue SCO for copyright infringement ???
That could be *quite funny* g g
Regards,
J.L.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:37:00AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
The bandwidth reduction will only happen if you decide to discard the
mail, since the mail will always be accepted, scanned to find the IP
which originated the message, the IP will be checked agains the
database and then the
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What if the bug was reported after the new Debian package was
uploaded? Why does it suddenly stop being a significant change?
This is meant to be a rhetorical question.
My answer to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Luca Filipozzi wrote:
Hello people,
I propose to restructure the vim package so that it builds fewer vim
variants.
I propose to have only the following:
vim (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SuSv3 aka POSIX was released one year ago.
And changed nothing in the Lex definitions. As I said, we are
dealing with decades old design.
Hmm you must've missed section 1.1 :)
The entire document is aligned with ISO/IEC 9899: 1. There
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:37, Jesus Climent wrote:
account via Debian machines, I guess the reduction in bandwidth usage
by master and murphy is not to be taken lightly.
The bandwidth reduction will only happen if you decide to discard the mail,
since the mail will always be accepted,
[Please avoid posting messages that aren't about Debian development to
-devel. Moved to -curiosa, although -project or -legal would probably be
OK too.]
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:44:41AM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
OK, it's the inquirer
It
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:37, Jesus Climent wrote:
account via Debian machines, I guess the reduction in bandwidth usage
by master and murphy is not to be taken lightly.
The bandwidth reduction will only happen if you decide to discard the
Le lun 16/06/2003 à 11:44, José Luis Tallón a écrit :
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
OK, it's the inquirer
It it was proved to be true, shouldn't we *all* Linux users ( as well as
Stallman plus the FSF as a whole ) sue SCO for copyright infringement ???
That could be
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:37:00AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
Given the ammount of spam that I get delived to my account via Debian
machines, I guess the reduction in bandwidth usage by master and murphy
is not to be taken lightly.
The reduction happens in the output,
Which is
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:51:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Which just proves that listing things in the changelog on the basis of bug
reports is meaningless.
No, it only shows that it is not possible under some circumstances:
specifically, when there was no bug report at the time. To say
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:50:59AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Build-Depends: g++ (= 3:3.2.2-0)
Many transitioned packages use(d) this to guarantee that the correct
compiler was used.
Which, of course, does not help with the situation he originally reported
(building a woody package on
Hi,
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:19:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Stock OpenOffice seem to be able to embedd java applets into
documents. RedHat nuked this.
And we can't do the same because ... ???
We have done that (as Jan wrote.)
Building needs
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SuSv3 aka POSIX was released one year ago.
Huh? POSIX is the same as SUSv3 now? They used to be separate.
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I am the rocks.
Looking for a developer in St. Louis? http://web.springies.com/~ats/
Ten animals I slam in a net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 June 2003 09:12, Emile van Bergen wrote:
# echo x86-64 /etc/dpkg/legal-archs
or, if ordering matters,
# echo x86-64 /etc/dpkg/legal-archs.new
# cat /etc/dpkg/legal-archs /etc/dpkg/legal-archs.new
# mv /etc/dpkg/legal-archs.new
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:31:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:38:47PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
2 ocaml status?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg00986.html
and bug 187155. Done?
Done! OCaml 3.06 has successfully
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 12:36, Colin Watson wrote:
I can't see any basis for the Inquirer's claim that anyone with a copy
of Linux could sue. If SCO copied GPLed code into UnixWare, then the GPL
only requires them to provide the source to those to whom they
distribute object code or executable
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:03:45AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:19:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
FWIW, the next version of spamassassin (2.60) will have no forgeable
negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)
Just out of curiosity, how will this be
Martin List-Petersen writes:
So anybody that has got a copy of the written offer can go to SCO and
require the Source, even if they didn't buy the Product.
However, if SCO fails to comply only the copyright owner can sue.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:04:17AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Which, of course, does not help with the situation he originally reported
(building a woody package on testing with a newer compiler than was
originally used). Time travel is still required there. :-)
it works in this case if you
Hello!
I'm intending to move to SID from my woody box. I was wondering what
problems should I expect while building packages using new gcc 3.3. Does
kernel 2.4.21 build correctly? What about other progs like mplayer,
mozilla etc? Can I install gcc 3.2 (f.egz. from testing)?
regards
cayco
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 20:14, John Hasler wrote:
Martin List-Petersen writes:
So anybody that has got a copy of the written offer can go to SCO
and
require the Source, even if they didn't buy the Product.
However, if SCO fails to comply only the copyright owner can sue.
That is correct ..
Mathieu Roy wrote:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
The 127th Ferengi rule of acquisition: Even if you got it for
free, you paid too much.
But the Rule 37th says otherwise: If it's free, take it and worry
about hidden costs later.
But the 96th confirms that For
Hi,
I want to gain some insight in how well my bayesian spam filter [1,2]
works over time and, hence, want to plot the trends of my regular inbox
in comparison to my spambox (that is, the spam properly identified as
spam) and the false negatives (not identified as spam).
The statistics as
On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 02:50 US/Eastern, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Build-Depends: g++ (= 3:3.2.2-0)
Many transitioned packages use(d) this to guarantee that the correct
compiler was used.
That doesn't guarantee the correct compiler. It could, for example, use
gcc 3.4 which could have yet
On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 14:59 US/Eastern, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
it works in this case if you build all the packages your package
depends on,
like the build is doing, because in that case apt wopuld habe been new
abi,
too.
Yeah, but then again, its quite superfluous in that situation, too.
On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 11:04 US/Eastern, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Which, of course, does not help with the situation he originally
reported
(building a woody package on testing with a newer compiler than was
originally used). Time travel is still required there. :-)
Agreed. To fix Woody
Quoting Krzysztof Kajkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm intending to move to SID from my woody box. I was wondering what
problems should I expect while building packages using new gcc 3.3. Does
kernel 2.4.21 build correctly? What about other progs like mplayer,
mozilla etc? Can I install gcc 3.2
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:46:13PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Now, if we changed sarge to use g++-c102 (as I briefly suggested),
would that prevent this problem in sarge+1 or sarge+2 or whenever the
ABI changes again?
no, because we WANT the packages beeing build with the new abi. We
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Duncan Findlay wrote:
The only negative rules will be: bayesian rules, bondedsender and
habeas. Figuring how to autolearn ham (non-spam) is the only obstacle
we still need to figure out.
Sure sounds like throwing the baby out with the bathwater... but I
presume you all are
On Friday 13 June 2003 05:13 pm, Don Armstrong wrote:
Oh, what the hell. This damn song won't get out of my head, so now you
all get to be subjected to it to[1]:
FWIW, the original version of this song has also been in my head for weeks.
Thanks for digging up the full text :)
1: Misery
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 18:44:12 +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote:
I have written a little Python program that analyses
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html
to find out where the bottlenecks are for packages going into testing.
Essentially, it is a count
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:18:49 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
There is no excuse for this. Access to servers that are not in
spam lists is well available to Debian developers. I tunnel my
outgoing mail through a server in
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:43:53PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Duncan Findlay wrote:
The only negative rules will be: bayesian rules, bondedsender and
habeas. Figuring how to autolearn ham (non-spam) is the only obstacle
we still need to figure out.
Sure sounds like
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:51:07 +1000, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What if the bug was reported after the new Debian package was
uploaded? Why does it suddenly stop being a
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:36:24 +0100, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it caused a Debian bug to be
hey do you happen to know the world record for f1 2000...time trial at indianapolis
By the way some folks live in countries considered spam countries by
other people, and they can't get a email in edgewise to the high class
users.
By the way how about my http://jidanni.org/comp/spam/spamdealer.html
solution for the little guy, remote and without root.
--
http://jidanni.org/
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:04:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:36:24 +0100, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Good point. Shall we mandate that all bug closures be adequately
documented in the
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Good point. Shall we mandate that all bug closures be adequately
documented in the ChangeLog? I would be quite happy with that.
I do think bug closures be documented in the ChangeLog (I
shall attempt to do so from now on for every real bug that is closed
for
Duncan Findlay wrote:
The only negative rules will be: bayesian rules, bondedsender and
habeas. Figuring how to autolearn ham (non-spam) is the only obstacle
we still need to figure out.
This is fairly off topic, but the other day I tired of downloading all
my spam to check it for false
On Jun 13, Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:20:37 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:40:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:53:07 +0200
Source: libgsf
Binary: libgsf-gnome-1 libgsf-1 libgsf-gnome-1-dev libgsf-1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:54:56 +0200
Source: mol-drivers-macosx
Binary: mol-drivers-macosx
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.9.69+20030616-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:54:44 +0200
Source: mol-drivers-macos
Binary: mol-drivers-macos
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.9.69+20030616-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:36:09 +0200
Source: mol
Binary: mol mol-modules-2.4.20 mol-modules-source
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.9.69+20030616-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:49:37 +0200
Source: directory-administrator
Binary: directory-administrator
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:03:41 +0200
Source: stunnel
Binary: stunnel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.04-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:52:50 +0100
Source: ccache
Binary: ccache
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Paul Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:18:36 +0900
Source: evolution
Binary: evolution-dev evolution
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Takuo KITAME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:33:23 +0200
Source: xmedcon
Binary: xmedcon libmdc2 medcon libmdc2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Marcus Rutschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 04:08:29 -0400
Source: developers-reference
Binary: developers-reference-ja developers-reference-fr developers-reference
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Di Carlo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:03:11 +0900
Source: libio-socket-inet6-perl
Binary: libio-socket-inet6-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.26-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Masahito Omote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:13:17 +0200
Source: pingus
Binary: pingus pingus-data
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 0.6.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Simon Richter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:41:54 +0900
Source: nd
Binary: nd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fumitoshi UKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Fumitoshi UKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:23:22 +0200
Source: libdebug
Binary: libdebug0-dev libdebug0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Abraham vd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:28:54 +0100
Source: gprolog
Binary: gprolog gprolog-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Salvador Abreu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Salvador Abreu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:20:43 +1000
Source: autorespond
Binary: autorespond
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Johnston [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:01:41 +0200
Source: fetchmail
Binary: fetchmailconf fetchmail
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 6.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:22:33 +0200
Source: tipptrainer
Binary: tipptrainer-data-en tipptrainer tipptrainer-data-de
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.4.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andreas Tille [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:14:22 -0400
Source: analog
Binary: analog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:5.32-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:24:59 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:34:15 +0200
Source: docbook-utils
Binary: docbook-utils
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:03:10 -0400
Source: db3
Binary: libdb3++c102 libdb3-util db3-doc libdb3++-dev libdb3-dev libdb3 libdb3-tcl
Architecture: source ia64 all
Version: 3.2.9-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Matthew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:18:45 +0200
Source: toshset
Binary: toshset
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.60-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:26:41 +0200
Source: gkrellm-mailwatch
Binary: gkrellm-mailwatch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sjoerd Simons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:18:58 +0200
Source: toshset
Binary: toshset
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.60-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:35:27 -0400
Source: debhelper
Binary: debhelper
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.47
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:07:29 +
Source: gkrellmms
Binary: gkrellmms
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll Overgaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:03:06 +0200
Source: xbanner
Binary: xbanner
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.31-22.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Perrier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:04:17 +0200
Source: stunnel
Binary: stunnel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.04-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:54:30 +0100
Source: newt
Binary: libnewt-dev libnewt-pic libnewt0.51 newt-tcl whiptail python-newt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.51.4-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:54:11 +0200
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.8a-13.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Perrier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:47:58 +0200
Source: caudium
Binary: caudium-ultralog caudium-pixsl caudium-perl caudium caudium-dev caudium-modules
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:1.2.27-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:57:25 +0200
Source: libber
Binary: libber0-dev libber0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Abraham vd Merwe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:07:37 +0200
Source: tint
Binary: tint
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.03a
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Abraham van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Abraham van der Merwe [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:34:21 +
Source: gkrellmms
Binary: gkrellmms
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll Overgaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:27:10 +0200
Source: tinysnmp
Binary: tinysnmp-module-resources tinysnmp-module-mib2 tinysnmp-manager-dev trafficd
tinysnmp-module-traffic tinysnmp-agent-dev tinysnmp-agent tinysnmp-tools tinysnmp-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:34:51 -0400
Source: coreutils
Binary: shellutils coreutils fileutils textutils
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 5.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:18:37 +0200
Source: chrpath
Binary: chrpath
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:07:56 -0700
Source: gtkmm2.0
Binary: libgtkmm2.0-1c102 libgtkmm2.0-doc libgtkmm2.0-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
