On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:58:15 +0200
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
oltre a questo mi e' sorto un'altro problema: il demone fa uso di 2
librerie dinamiche. La debian-policy mi pare di aver capito che
imponga di pacchettizzare separatamente le librerie, ma e' veramente
eccessivo
At Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:32:17 -0400,
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:47:55PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At 21 Jun 2003 00:27:18 +0200,
Mathieu Roy wrote:
RedHat provide glibc for i386, i586 and i686. Why doesn't Debian
provide several packages for i*86 when the
Herbert Xu wrote:
Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* New upstream release (closes: #123) which includes:
- tmpfile race condition fix (closes: #124)
- manual page included (closes: #125)
The thing is: It helps the users and the person who reported the bug to
see what bug
* Aurelien Jarno
It's already packaged:
[...]
| * Package name: kernel-patch-2.4-low-latency
| Upstream Author : Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| * URL : http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html
| * License : GPL
| Description : Reduces the latency of
* GOTO Masanori
| - NPTL/TLS support. NPTL currently supports i486 and later because
| pthread_spin_trylock uses cmpxchgl instruction (well, it's not
| difficult to support i386, but imagine pthread on i386 with the
| max clock (I recall it was 20MHz?) speed and memory...)
33MHz,
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 04:15:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Not all of it, but you can't object to duplicating a single sentence saying
what it is.
When the sentence in question is the one that goes in the short
description, and already
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:14:26PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
It is unfortunate, that there is no easy access to the changelog, I know of,
but all other infos can be seen on the package tracking system:
I guess that you've never heard of
http://changelogs.credativ.org/
Any reason
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:35AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but
Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running debuild as normal user under the 2.5.73+ kernel results in fakeroot
actually setting the file ownership to root (or any other uid/gid for that
matter).
[...]
Either there is a big misunderstanding or a big bug in 2.5.73+.
Are you saying that
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During some of the discussions lately on debian-devel another usage of
the changelog has risen interest:
* New upstream release (closes: #123, #124, #125)
This has also raised some discussions. The thing is
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:34:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Debian-Developers,
first, many thanks all of you for your great work. As I am not a pro, I am
very glad that most of Debian works out-of-the-box.
But, I was looking around and wondering about that I couldn't find any
Hi,
I've been unable to find documentation about how we're supposed to
choose a priority for alternatives. It seems like every web browser
maintainer likes their browser the most, so wants it to be the highest.
I'm CC'ing debian-devel in the hope that somebody will be able to point
me in the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:43:34AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
It's already packaged:
[...]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ apt-cache show kernel-patch-lowlatency-2.4
Package: kernel-patch-lowlatency-2.4
Oops ! Sorry, closing the bug...
I searched with apt-cache for low-latency and it didn't give
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:47:42AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* GOTO Masanori
| - NPTL/TLS support. NPTL currently supports i486 and later because
| pthread_spin_trylock uses cmpxchgl instruction (well, it's not
| difficult to support i386, but imagine pthread on i386 with the
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The solution I would favour would be:
- drop the i386 support
- keep the i386 architecture name
- let dpkg-architecture output the new configuration string
(i.e. i486-linux)
- if anybody wants to start the mini-i386
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I was wondering, should I make a mass filing of bugs for those packages
who fail to produce a proper description?
Go for it. I'm tired of people who care about our users so little that
they will not properly
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:18:56AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
License: perl
Be careful of the tough new perl licensing policy of the ftp master.
:-/
It's not the archive admins' fault that some Perl geeks have a reckless
approach to licensing.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:17:27PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
I was hoping large package developers would write longer descriptions.
Read mine sometime. (You'd be one of the first to do so!)
--
G. Branden Robinson| You are not angry with people when
Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:12:06AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Dan Jacobson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was hoping large package developers would write longer descriptions.
Too bad. The two are not, should not, and should never be related.
I wouldn't say they're strictly decorrelated.
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
s/Get/get/;
s/softwares/software/;
s/width of characters (and strings)? on terminal/
display width of characters and strings on the terminal/x;
(or at least, s/on terminal/on the terminal/)
s/in C/from libc/;
(etc, etc)
I see. I will prepare new packages.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
[...]
Description : The pmk project aims to be an alternative to
GNU/autoconf (configure scripts).
Description field is inappropriate,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:09:24PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
It's not quite a substitute, as it won't reuse autoconf's configs etc. How
about A tool for configuring software source similar to GNU Autoconf?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:04:29AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
135965 (27 Feb 2002) xfree86v3 Branden Robinson
I've been asking for someone to co-maintain this package.
I'm still asking.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Reality is what refuses to go away
Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 03:52, Branden Robinson wrote:
I believe it would be a mistake to kill off support for the 80386 chip.
Well, we're limited by what we can sanely support. After all, we don't
support running Debian on a 286. The 386 is really in the same class
nowadays, in my opinion
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:47:42AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* GOTO Masanori
| - NPTL/TLS support. NPTL currently supports i486 and later because
| pthread_spin_trylock uses cmpxchgl instruction (well, it's not
|
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:18:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* lose the article
Why?
* do not capitalize the beginning of the description unless a proper
noun, proper adjective, abbreviation, or acronym requires it
Why?
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With work, school, and taking part to some extent in my local community, I
have had virtually no free time to devote to Debian for many months now.
Having just received my approval of my application to transfer to the
University of Oregon, I know that
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:20:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I though the limit was 60 chars, as stated in one of the debian
documents.
Friendly,
Beside the fact that is was to hurry in sending that mail (synopsis was short
enough), as i can read from Policy (I've 3.5.10), it must be less
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:57:36PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko scribbled:
Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Modify fakeroot to check the kernel version, the type of fs on which it
is currently working and have it issue a sysctl to enable
restricted_chown. It looks better
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in that case you can do this:
* New upstream release
and then use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to close the bugs, and everyone has a
wonderful day.
Really? For the two groups of people affected by this change:
1. BTS readers -- No change. The
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 08:42:03AM +0200, Andreas Metzler scribbled:
Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running debuild as normal user under the 2.5.73+ kernel results in fakeroot
actually setting the file ownership to root (or any other uid/gid for that
matter).
[...]
Either
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:03:26AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
scribbled:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:18:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* lose the article
Why?
* do not capitalize the beginning of the description unless a proper
noun, proper adjective, abbreviation, or
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:14:05AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:20:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I though the limit was 60 chars, as stated in one of the debian
documents.
Friendly,
Beside the fact that is was to hurry in sending that mail
Henning Moll [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
Hi!
I was just looking for a 'open use' debian favicon. But i can't find it on
http://www.debian.org/logos/index.en.html
Is it ok to use the resource from http://www.debian.org/favicon.ico ?
Shouldn't it also be published on the logo page?
A
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:55:56AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 03:52, Branden Robinson wrote:
I believe it would be a mistake to kill off support for the 80386 chip.
Well, we're limited by what we can sanely support. After all, we don't
support running Debian on a
* Colin Walters
| On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 03:52, Branden Robinson wrote:
|
| I believe it would be a mistake to kill off support for the 80386 chip.
|
| Well, we're limited by what we can sanely support. After all, we don't
| support running Debian on a 286. The 386 is really in the same
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:49:13PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
My argument was based on a matrix lintian error tags -
maintainers. There's lintian tags practically owned by
maintainers. That's what I meant with patterns. In those cases,
pointing things out directly will help more. In some
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:07:12PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Colin Walters
| On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 03:52, Branden Robinson wrote:
|
| I believe it would be a mistake to kill off support for the 80386 chip.
|
| Well, we're limited by what we can sanely support. After all,
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this indeed feasible, then this is the solution that appeals most to
me personally.
It certainly is feasible. In fact, such a patch has been in existence
for at least a year.
Also, Herbert Xu, the 80386 kernel-flavor maintainer, would have to be
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:57:57AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
and remember that many embedded processors still use 486 and 586
based chips, and some 386. Lossing 386 might be acceptable in the
embedded market (many 386 based systems have too little memory to run
Debian) but loosing
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
It is in fact detrimental for a third group, people who are trying to
extract the version in which a given bug was fixed.
Aah, but if the bug wasn't fixed due to a change in the package, then it is
misleading to say that the bug was somehow fixed in that
Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running debuild as normal user under the 2.5.73+ kernel results in fakeroot
actually setting the file ownership to root (or any other uid/gid for that
matter). The result is that the parts which don't run under fakeroot -
Why is fakeroot calling the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
Hmm... I'm not sure about this as the last time I used assembler was
in the times of real mode DOS, but there is a yet another option:
we can patch the kernel so when an invalid opcode occurs, whatever
instruction was at CS:EIP gets emulated
Le mer 25/06/2003 à 00:34, Marek Habersack a écrit :
Hey list,
Running debuild as normal user under the 2.5.73+ kernel results in fakeroot
actually setting the file ownership to root (or any other uid/gid for that
matter). The result is that the parts which don't run under fakeroot -
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:36:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but also of
generating them. This
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:52:31AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
The drawbacks:
* Someone actually has to write this kernel patch.
http://miaif.lip6.fr/~tarreau/linux-patches/486emulation/
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, you can still try to install the Hurd yourself on a free
partition, for example using the crosshurd package. Most people have an
i386, so it's just a matter of perhaps freeing some disk-space and
reading the docs. If it doesn't work with your
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 12:00, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:57:57AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
and remember that many embedded processors still use 486 and 586
based chips, and some 386. Lossing 386 might be acceptable in the
embedded market (many 386
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:30:32PM +1000, Herbert Xu scribbled:
Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running debuild as normal user under the 2.5.73+ kernel results in fakeroot
actually setting the file ownership to root (or any other uid/gid for that
matter). The result is that the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:03:26AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:18:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* lose the article
Why?
Because
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-pkg-synopsis
states that
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:49:54AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:23:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Tell me, you seriously think that there is a libc5 program still around
that uses DRI ? Hell, libc5 was abandoned well before DRI even existed.
the only libc5
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:46:24PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
If there is no permanent buildd running, I think most developers will
not be able to identify hurd specific problems, even if they were very
minor.
Well, there is a buildd, it's just not running at the moment (and it
dies frequently).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
libtext-charwidthp-perl: get display widths of characters on the terminal
downloaded from: CPAN
(http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Text/Text-CharWidth-version.tar.gz)
License: dual license of Artistic and GPL1.
---
Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
libtext-wrapi18n-perl: internationalized substitute of Text::Wrap
Downloaded from: CPAN
( http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Text/Text-WrapI18n-version.tar.gz )
License: dual license of Artistic and GPL1.
---
Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:03:26AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:18:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* lose the article
Why?
Because Branden is agent sent by Russians to demoralize our English
grammarians, and removing article advances his agenda.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:14:57AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:33:02 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:54:23PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:49:15 +0200, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I have also been thinking about creating a complimentary program that
would help cleanup the system by finding unused packages, seldom used
packages, cruft, unnessisary files... As with debbackup, there are things
to do some of the functons
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:42:04PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
As the person who originally submitted this idea, I'm probably the
one who is morally obliged to write it, even though:
The patch has been already written: http://lwn.net/Articles/8634/ I'm
sure theere's a better link, but
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-network
Version : 1.99.0
Upstream Author : German Poo-Caamano
Rodrigo Moya
* URL : ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-network/
* License :
* lose the article
Why?
* do not capitalize the beginning of the description unless a proper
noun, proper adjective, abbreviation, or acronym requires it
Why?
Argh, we really should decide these two points now and for good. Just today I
received through DDTP a description
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libgnomecups
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Dave Camp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.ximian.com/
* License : LPGL
Description : GNOME library for CUPS
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 08:51:12PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
It certainly is feasible. In fact, such a patch has been in existence
for at least a year.
Cool.
I have no problems with integrating such a patch. I will look at it
right now.
Excellent. Thanks!
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 06:05, Colin Watson wrote:
I disagree. Unlike 286, we've got the kernel, the libc, and *almost*
everything else. The only thing missing is part of the C++ ABI, which as
described can be handled by a small kernel patch (at least this has been
claimed and nobody has
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:03:26AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:18:28AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* lose the article
Why?
* it wastes space that is precious in the short description
* it's implicit
* see the archives of this list
* do not
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030625 12:35]:
The problem is that we really don't have sensible support for
subarchitectures at all. This makes the job of creating such a
specialized port much greater than just I have some hardware and need
to make a small tweak to support it; you need to
Hi,
I had an idea and I would like to hear you about it.
Recently I had a problem of exceeded quota in my home directory, so I
went cleaning it, and I saw many and many files and directories with
configurations for applications that I've runned in the past, but that
packages were purged from my
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:34:23PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
2. debian/changelog readers -- No change. They have lost a slight bit
information that is irrelevant for the purpose of documenting Debian
changes.
I am one of these readers. I do this. A lot. Every day. And I am telling
you
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
What does oppose us to make subarchitectures quite more easy than now?
(That would also be useful for the AMD Opteron and the like that could
use normal i386-code, but can profit from optimized code.)
Nothing opposes it, we're just
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During some of the discussions lately on debian-devel another usage of
the changelog has risen interest:
* New upstream release (closes: #123, #124, #125)
This has also raised some discussions. The thing is
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:30:32PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Running debuild as normal user under the 2.5.73+ kernel results in fakeroot
actually setting the file ownership to root (or any other uid/gid for that
matter). The result is that the parts which don't run under fakeroot -
Why
Colin Watson dijo [Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:05:56AM +0100]:
We should foist the job of supporting i386 onto some specialized Debian
port for it.
The problem is that we really don't have sensible support for
subarchitectures at all. This makes the job of creating such a
specialized port
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:26:38PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Performance improvement is _not_ my primary intention.At least it needs to
support libc6-686:
- LinuxThreads floating stack support. It's ready for i686 and later.
- NPTL/TLS support. NPTL currently supports i486 and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:30:32PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Why is fakeroot calling the real chown(2)?
I think it's to be able to report errors like ENOENT. You can turn
it off by setting FAKEROOTDONTTRYCHOWN in the environment.
It should be possible to replace this chown with something
(please don't remove the CC to debian-hurd)
Hi Benj,
Jeff commented me he had plans for a developer accessible GNU/Hurd
machine, so he might have something to say (CCing him..)
As for the hosting, what are the requisites for placing a public debian
machine at home? I'd be willing to help but
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Description:
devfsd - Daemon for the device filesystem
Changes:
devfsd (1.3.25-14) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fixed a bug in creating compatability links for DAC960 devices.
you did:
diff -u devfsd-1.3.25/devfsd.c
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:21:22AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
me wrote:
some pages where mozilla/opera/konquerror fails. I would hate to reboot, to
Tried mozilla recently? It's a thousand times better than Netscape 4.7x
navigator is much
Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:49:13PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Writing and maintaining a package description seems to clearly be the
package maintainers job. In reference to Branden's message in this
thread, one would hope that the maintainers are also particularly
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:04:29AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
Hi,
Here is a list of bugs older than a year; most of them are related to
translated debconf templates, so fixing them is trivial and I might
NMU some of these packages soon.
Many bugreports were missing, here is a more accurate
[Please cc me; I'm very behind on -devel]
I'm very confused by this bug and am sufficiently busy this week that
I'm not going to be able to diagnose it right now.
Could anyone who has a chance to do so please look at exactly what is
failing from a dependency standpoint?
I get the feeling I'm
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
It is in fact detrimental for a third group, people who are trying to
extract the version in which a given bug was fixed.
Aah, but if the bug wasn't fixed due to a change in the package, then it is
misleading
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:34:23PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
2. debian/changelog readers -- No change. They have lost a slight bit
information that is irrelevant for the purpose of documenting Debian
changes.
I am one of these readers. I do this.
Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's pointless to go through this again. Instead, I'll offer a concrete
example of the confusion this can create (the original submitter asks
for clarification of how the bug was fixed):
http://bugs.debian.org/188740
That's a documentation issue.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:43:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:43:34AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
It's already packaged:
[...]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ apt-cache show kernel-patch-lowlatency-2.4
Package: kernel-patch-lowlatency-2.4
Oops ! Sorry, closing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:52:45 +0200
Source: zope-extfile
Binary: zope-extfile
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Tille [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:18:45 +0200
Source: control-center
Binary: gnome-control-center
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:15:36 +0200
Source: roundup
Binary: roundup
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:06:52 +0200
Source: gtick
Binary: gtick
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 06:14:06 -0400
Source: gkrellm
Binary: gkrellm-common gkrellmd gkrellm
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.1.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian M. Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:20:29 +0200
Source: gwhois
Binary: gwhois
Architecture: source all
Version: 20030625-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Holzt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Holzt [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:17:31 +0200
Source: phpdoc
Binary: phpdoc
Architecture: source all
Version: 20030623-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:36:57 +0100
Source: drwright
Binary: drwright
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:23:26 +0100
Source: drwright
Binary: drwright
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:50:52 -0400
Source: zsh-beta
Binary: zsh-beta-static zsh-beta-doc zsh-beta
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:01:00 +1000
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2003040709-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:34:58 +0100
Source: hitop
Binary: hitop
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.36-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Stribblehill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Stribblehill [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:55:10 +0200
Source: conglomerate
Binary: conglomerate
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:17:24 +0200
Source: gmetadom
Binary: libgdome2-cpp-smart0 libgdome2-cpp-smart-dev libgdome2-ocaml-dev
libgdome2-ocaml
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.1.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:15:54 +0200
Source: inn2
Binary: inn2-inews inn2 inn2-ssl inn2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:24:24 +0100
Source: libdebbug-java
Binary: libdebbug-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Howard [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:27:51 +0100
Source: debbuggtk
Binary: debbuggtk
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
