Hi folks,
Two years and 45 weeks ago, a pair of proposals were bruited
on this mailing list; the details are available in the archives of
debian-vote, and debian-project, circa October 2000. The proposals
themselves are available at http://www.debian.org/vote/.
This issue is
An NMU of the core PAM packages has just been uploaded to unstable with
the maintainer's permission, and is currently available at
http://incoming.debian.org. The upload addresses the longstanding issue
of central management of PAM authentication/password services in Debian.
This message is an
Un souci pour mettre une entrée de menu pour Geneweb.
Celui-ci est un démon qui écoute sur le port 2317 et sert, par le Web,
des bases de données généalogiques.
Je voudrais que mon paquet ajoute une zoulie entrée dans le système de
menus Debian.
Donc, je fais un debian/geneweb.menu avec ceci :
Christian Perrier wrote:
Un souci pour mettre une entrée de menu pour Geneweb.
Celui-ci est un démon qui écoute sur le port 2317 et sert, par le Web,
des bases de données généalogiques.
Je voudrais que mon paquet ajoute une zoulie entrée dans le système de
menus Debian.
Donc, je fais un
Une idée, quelqu'un ?
/bin/sh -c \/usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317\;
Argument invalide : « /usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317 »
:-)
Le mer 20/08/2003 à 11:47, Christian Perrier a écrit :
?package(geneweb):\
needs=text\
section=Apps/Tools\
title=Geneweb\
hints=Geneweb genealogy software\
command=/usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317\
icon=/usr/share/pixmaps/geneweb.xpm
L'icône est bien installée (et en plus elle
Benoit Friry a écrit :
Bonjour,
Lors de l'upgrade d'un paquet correspondant à un daemon[1], le script de
pré-installation l'arrête[2] et le script de post-installation le
relance[3] quel qu'est été l'état précédent.
Je trouve ce comportement erroné, dans la mesure où l'upgrade ne remet
pas le
Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Benoit Friry écrivait:
arrêté[5]. Mais si je mets ma machine à jour, et que zope est dans le
lot d'upgrade, ce dernier sera lancé.
Maintenant, je connais ce comportement et j'y fait attention. Mais je
pense que c'est plutôt un « bug » qu'une «
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Par contre je me permets d'émettre des doutes quant à l'utilisation de
/usr/bin/www-browser. Si c'est un navigateur texte, vu que tu ne
requiers pas de terminal, ça ne marchera pas. Utiliser x-www-browser
serait peut-être plus approprié, mais c'est
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 20:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Je note aussi que la page de manuel parle de policy-rc.d mais que ce
programme n'existe dans aucun paquet de unstable. Aussi je ne suis pas
sûr qeu tout soit prêt pour être imposé ...
Le policy-rc.d est prévu pour être personnalisé, aka
* Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-20 20:30] :
Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Benoit Friry écrivait:
arrêté[5]. Mais si je mets ma machine à jour, et que zope est dans le
lot d'upgrade, ce dernier sera lancé.
Maintenant, je connais ce comportement et j'y fait
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:22:43AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:33:26AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
| Now, I could do the dependency on python (= 2.2), python (2.3) thing.
| But what would that gain me or users? I see no benefit there, other than
| people
We're sorry, but the list that you have tried to post to is an
announcement-only list and does not allow posts. All posts to the list
come from the list owner exclusively, or from authorized subscribers.
If you have questions regarding the posting policy of this list, please
contact the list
I will be away from my office from Aug 20 to 27 and returning on Aug 28, 2003.
Please
contact Sharon Chan at 822-8007/[EMAIL PROTECTED] while I am away for co-op
inquiries.
.
Hello world,
I had been hoping that I wouldn't have to resort to adding a stick to
the various carrots, but evidently we have developers who aren't taking
care to measure twice before cutting once.
The 0-day NMU period has *not* started, and will not start until the 23rd.
People who abuse this
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 12:47:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
Dateline!
[snip]
So, where does dpkg 2.0 fit into this? I can commit to a 1 month finish
date(from now), for implementing the features we desire for it.
If by dpkg 2.0 you mean
Thank You for your inquiry regarding one of our Recreational Vehicles. We are
Currently processing your information request and will be responding shortly.
Thanks Again,
Dennis Charron
General Manager
Giant Recreation World
1-800-654-8475
http://www.grwrv.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is that you can't upgrade python
while wxgtk-python is installed so you can't try out the
latest-and-greatest python in the meantime. This is the issue at
hand.
Sure you can:
$
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:16:03AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:38:10PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
If they get hit by a bus, reassigned by their job to Outer Mongolia, or
just plain get bored with doing it, we lose that benefit entirely, as
things stand today.
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:02:44AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:40:26PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
If you, or anyone else, is interested shipping those overseas could be
arranged (with the caveat that glass might break in transit). I need to
know by
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are
Quoting Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le mar 19/08/2003 à 23:33, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i386.deb
Oh ! non-free software !
Thanks Richard for keeping me laughing.
Great, the debian-legal discussions moved to debian-devel.
Quoting Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now consider that most or all of the FSF documentation for their GPL'ed
software is released under the GFDL. The licenses are incompatible so
someone who forks a project cannot cut and
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
about 2003-12-01 00:00:00 UTC?
Do you have some Official Opinion(tm)[1] as the RM about what KDE, gcc, X,
gnome versions will be in sarge?
greetings
-- vbi
[1]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:00:15PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
[...]
You need to find the .changes file. If the upload closes any bugs, you
can extract it from the BTS,
[...]
Failing that,
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
contributors to Debian to get their GPG key in the Debian keyserver.
[...]
This trust relationship would be eased if I could sign my mails and
Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding a future Date: field for each package in Packages files,
* Should the field be called Date: or Time:?
* Should it be like Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:09:30 GMT or 1061315862?
* Should it refer to the time the developer finished wrapping the
package,
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-20 10:31]:
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
contributors to Debian to get their GPG key in the Debian keyserver.
You can also apply as a NM for translation work. You
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
about 2003-12-01 00:00:00 UTC?
Do you have some Official
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-19 21:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2003-08-17 09:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
As bad as it might be I would like to have a menu tree containing all
packages that can be configured and when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 10:13, Chris Cheney wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
about
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:46:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-20 10:31]:
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
contributors to Debian to get their GPG key in the Debian
cobaco == cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cobaco kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any
cobaco chance we'll wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't
cobaco apply again immediately after release?
But does the first few paragraphs of RM's original
Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
wait
for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again immediately after
release?
It's not KDE 4, so it doesn't really matter that much. And it probably
won't be GNOME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 11:47, Isaac To wrote:
cobaco == cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cobaco kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any
cobaco chance we'll wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't
cobaco apply
Recipient of the infected attachment: Bradley, Leisa\Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: Wicked screensaver
One or more attachments were quarantined.
Attachment movie0045.pif was Quarantined for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
application/ms-tnef
cobaco == cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cobaco quoteBasically, it's the difference between having a sysadmin
cobaco spending fifteen minutes every day or week tweaking your server
cobaco to keep it running, or having a sysadmin come in for a week once
cobaco a year to do a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 12:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again
immediately after
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:10:18PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
| Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
| kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
wait
| for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again immediately
after
| release?
|
| It's not
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:19:03PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Hi.
(...)
So, how to make the init scripts localized?
What do you think?
/etc/default/language? I believe this has been discussed previously, see
for example [1] and debian-boot [2].
From briefly looking at redhat's
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:08:28AM +0200, cobaco wrote:
On 2003-08-20 10:13, Chris Cheney wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I had been hoping that I wouldn't have to resort to adding a stick to
the various carrots, but evidently we have developers who aren't taking
care to measure twice before cutting once.
The 0-day NMU period has *not* started, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 12:36, Isaac To wrote:
cobaco == cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why KDE cannot be used on servers (how about a X terminal server? You
don't have to set it up?)
not what I meant: off course it can be used on a server, so can the
Package: spip
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: normal
The prerm script blindly deletes the following directories and all
subdirectories:
/var/cache/spip
/usr/share/spip/ecrire/upload
/usr/share/spip/ecrire/data
There is no guarantee that the files in these directories belong only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 12:43, Colin Watson wrote:
There's a big difference between being out of date by a major version
and by a minor version.
agreed, though IMHO kde 3.1.2 - 3.1.3 is a minor version upgrade and
3.1 - 3.2 is a major version upgrade
I realise that running unstable I'm kind of sailing close to the wind,
and don't want to put anyones back up, but kpackage really seems to be
somewhat challenged when trying to install the latest KDE updates that
are in unstable... Perhaps unstable should extend to 'it may
beinstallable or
I am currently out of the office.
Please visit our web site:
www.patchworkbydesign.com
WHOLESALE PRICE LIST:
Accessories:
Crib Sheet: $19.00
Toile Crib Sheet:$34.00
3pc Sheet Set: $29.95
Diaper Stacker: $49.00
Valance: $25.00
Toile
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
If by dpkg 2.0 you mean rewritten dpkg and dpkg-dev, it doesn't. There
is no chance that a package management system that hasn't seen the light
of day, let alone reached beta test, will be ready for release in four
months, let alone one.
Just
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:48, Cameron Patrick wrote:
There were pretty major changes between KDE 3 and KDE 3.1. As a Debian
Anyone who wants to can establish their own repository for back-ported KDE
packages. KDE has a good history of having people do that, at times there
have been 3 or more
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
Anyone know where I can get an apt blessed version of libvorbis0? Or
am I just missing a package URL in apt?
As far as Sid is concerned I believe it's already libvorbis0a. There is
no more libvorbis0 there. Perhaps the KDE packages
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:40:53PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
We're never going to manage to release just
after high-profile releases of all our major components, so let's not
delay for this one unless we have to.
true enough, still releasing a week before a high-profile release of KDE is
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for example).
The new glibc has already stalled the progress into testing of a large
number of packages, and the number of
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:26:17PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
and why on stable you do not expect a stable KDE?
kde 3.2. will be the stable kde release come 8 december
The reality is that if KDE 3.2 is stable in KDE, and it entered
testing on December 8th, it would probably delay the release of
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:24:25PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
How about requiring the debian directory to have an appropriately
named parent (as determined by debian/changelog and debian/control,
which should probably also have to
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:38:57PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
On 2003-08-20 12:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:11:20PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
Note that the RM was talking about servers there, while kde is end-user
software, big difference IMHO. Taking into account that kde isn't
server-software and that kde won't do release if there are major bugs left I
don't think
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: DeFX
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Franco Catrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://defx.sourceforge.net/
* License : (GPL.)
Description : Multi-effects
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
I realise that running unstable I'm kind of sailing close to the wind,
and don't want to put anyones back up, but kpackage really seems to be
somewhat challenged when trying to install the latest KDE updates that
are in
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: DeFX
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Franco Catrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://defx.sourceforge.net
* License : (GPL.)
Description : Multi-effects processor
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for example).
The new glibc has already stalled the progress into testing of
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:11:20PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
quoteBasically, it's the difference between having a sysadmin
spending fifteen minutes every day or week tweaking your server to keep
it running, or having a sysadmin come in for a week once a year to do a
major upgrade./quote
Note that
Le mer 20/08/2003 à 13:48, Hamish Marson a écrit :
Perhaps unstable should extend to 'it may
beinstallable or not' as well as the stability of the software (Although
I don't find many really big problems in it usually).
That's exactly what unstable is meant to be.
However... trying to
!
,
!
, ,
2, 2,
.
,
,
-:
2
8 - 14 2003
2
22 - 28 2003
,
, .
:
()
(
/ )
/
()
2/2
.
,
,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 15:33, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:11:20PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
Note that the RM was talking about servers there, while kde is end-user
software, big difference IMHO. Taking into account that kde isn't
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Gaetan Ryckeboer wrote:
/var/cache/spip
/usr/share/spip/ecrire/upload
/usr/share/spip/ecrire/data
All right. I understand the problem. But the directories removed by the
postrm/purge are normaly only used :
- by user, to upload datas related to his spip
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:25:01PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
Anyone know where I can get an apt blessed version of libvorbis0? Or am
I just missing a package URL in apt?
As far as Sid is concerned I believe it's
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:48:15PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:02:44AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:40:26PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
If you, or anyone else, is interested shipping those overseas could be
arranged (with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 15:27, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:38:57PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
On 2003-08-20 12:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 13:30, Russell Coker wrote:
KDE 1.x was quite usable, while many of the beta releases in the 2.x and
early 3.x series weren't...
That's why they're called betas :)
I don't think this whole discussion fits in here, for 2 reasons:
- the KDE conference (which will
Op wo 20-08-2003, om 13:26 schreef cobaco:
On 2003-08-20 12:36, Isaac To wrote:
cobaco == cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why KDE cannot be used on servers (how about a X terminal server? You
don't have to set it up?)
not what I meant: off course it can be used on a server, so can
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really like this idea, thank you! I will accept directory names
Thanks. :-)
matching the regexp /^$package(-.*)?$/ - does that seem reasonable?
Yep, though I might change the * to a +.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at
* Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
$ LC_ALL=C gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv-keys E145F334
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
This is the ID of my key, available from www.keyserver.net and signed by 2
DD. Did I mess something up ?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:49:33AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for example).
The new glibc has already stalled the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:48:51PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
There were pretty major changes between KDE 3 and KDE 3.1. As a Debian
user, I'd be rather miffed if a new version of KDE came out within a
week of sarge being released ... on the other hand, if sarge is to be
frozen in a couple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 15:17, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You're trying to say that it's impossible for an organization to install
some thousands of X terminals that all run KDE (which, of course, is
installed on the server)?
not what I'm trying to say
Or do
Recipient of the infected attachment: DC3, UniteU\Mailbox Store (DC3), Paige
Obrien/Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: Details
One or more attachments were intercepted and deleted
Attachment document_9446.pif was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:45:09PM +0200, Gaetan Ryckeboer wrote:
Package: spip
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: normal
The prerm script blindly deletes the following directories and all
subdirectories:
/var/cache/spip
/usr/share/spip/ecrire/upload
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Brian May wrote:
When Jaldhar takes about dependancies, I assume he means normal
Depends, not Build-Depends???
Correct.
[...]
Source package has the following files (note: this is called a source
package not a binary package):
webmin_1.100.orig.tar.gz
i've had cable
connectivity with charter.net for more than 1 year. until yesterday i've never
had need of an email acct there. i planned on using the address at charter when
the spam at my top-10 acct became unbearable. when i finally got my log-in info
for the charter acct. i logged in and
Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:26:14AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins a écrit :
All right. I understand the problem. But the directories removed by
the postrm/purge are normaly only used :
- by user, to upload datas related to his spip installation,
Is this uploaded data recorded anywhere? In the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:32:03PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
I don't see why it would be idiotic to fork the package.
If you can package this application better than the
current maintainer then go ahead and do so.
Forking packages outside of Debian might or might not achieve the goals
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:46:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-20 10:31]:
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wondered if it would be possible for
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yep. And given that upstream offers webmin as an all-in-one solution to
web-based management needs, I don't really see any reason why they
shouldn't be kept lock-step with one another.
As Debian developers our goal is to make an integrated OS which
Greetings,
Installing a new kernel package can be a bit of a pain, especially for
newbies, what with hand-editing lilo.conf or config files for other
bootloaders, from grub to yaboot/quik, aboot, palo, you name it. Yes,
the kernel-image postinst runs lilo, but lilo.conf is invariably out of
Hello,
The package barrendero is a candidate for removal from testing. It has
two RC bugs, no response from the maintainer, and the upstream website
seems to have vanished (the maintainer is also upstream). It seems like
a useful tool:
Description: Deletes messages on the spool dir depending
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 08:35, Jrme Marant wrote:
Quoting Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le mar 19/08/2003 23:33, Mike Hommey a crit :
Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i386.deb
Oh ! non-free
[ Moved to debian-devel, I don't think this is relevant to private as
the GNU crack is well publicised ]
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:35:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:51, Robert Millan wrote:
What do you suggest
Quoting Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
Except it isn't :-)
According to you :-)
--
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:16:10 -0400 (EDT), Jaldhar H Vyas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Then the source should be split in a way that the normal
debian/rules files work and common files (like headers) stuffed
into a -dev package you can build-depend
Hi, Steve Langasek wrote:
KDE3.2 doesn't miss the deadline by 7 days, it misses the deadline by
almost two months:
Uh, you've got that turned around. October is not _missing_ the deadline,
that's _beating_ it.
* October 15th
Final, last-minute, low-risk bug fixes only
.. which means we
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into contrib
or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What happens if
webmin-squid has an RC bug? As Goswin said, all the webmin-* packages
will be held back from testing. What
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:46:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-20 10:31]:
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
contributors
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Will we some day consider seriously the idea of autobuilders compiling
against testing those packages which do not need libraries from
unstable to be built?
Do you foresee any
On approximately Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:06:15AM -0400, David Smith wrote:
i've had cable connectivity with charter.net for more than 1 year. until
yesterday i've never had need of an email acct there. i planned on using the
address at charter when the spam at my top-10 acct became unbearable.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, cobaco wrote:
I'd agree if there had been a rewrite of kdelibs or something, but kde 3.1 -
3.2 is evolutionary without big changes to what was already there.
It does not take a big change to break software...
e.g., openssh changed a message and the sftp kioslave broke
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
