Work-needing packages report for Aug 29, 2003

Report about packages that need work for Aug 29, 2003 Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 59 Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 1 Total number of orphaned packages: 205 Number of packages orphaned this week: 20 The number in parenthesis after each package name is

[RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?

A little over one week ago, I posted a survey[1] to the debian-legal mailing list, requesting the opinion of subscribers regarding one of a pair of related questions that have been asked with increasing frequency on that list, and in a few other forums around the Internet. Does the GNU Free

Re: Fusionner mes modifs a la nouvelle version du paquet

Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : | Le Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:29:12PM -0400, Daniel Déchelotte écrivait: | et j'aimerais maintenant profiter des corrections de la 0.80.1-8. | Quelle est la procedure a suivre pour, evidemment, ne pas perdre mes | bidouilles ? | | S'assurer qu'on les

Fusionner mes modifs a la nouvelle version du paquet

Bonjour, J'ai commence a modifier wmaker lorsqu'il en etait a la version 0.80.1-6, et j'aimerais maintenant profiter des corrections de la 0.80.1-8. Quelle est la procedure a suivre pour, evidemment, ne pas perdre mes bidouilles ? Questions connexes : si je veux faire une copie de sauvegarde de

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:59:04PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:51:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: It's a bit extreme but I'm sick of deleting such messages, especially in light of the Blaster worm. Not extreme at all. I imagine there are some legitimate

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote: We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in the Debian BTS. Because users that submitted bugs using the Debian BTS do not deserve the right to get

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700 Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely stopgap measures that try

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Re: looking for nco maintainer Brain Mays

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:25:30PM -0400, Brian Mays wrote: Thus, the situation is as follows. If someone can point me to an new upstream source that is fairly similar to the source in the current Debian package, then I can incorporate these changes into Debian in a very short time. If,

Re: source code on sh4

On Friday 29 August 2003 10:29, wrote: debian-develHi Where can I find the source code on sh4 for Debian linux http://www.m17n.org/linux-sh/debian/ and go from there. greetings -- vbi -- Sterility is inherited. If your parents never had kids, odds are you wont either. --

GDM in sid does not read /etc/environment anymore

I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the same problem ..? -- Fabio Rafael da Rosa - f 2 r [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian- http://debian.org Debian-BR - http://debian-br.org Debian-SP -

Re: GDM in sid does not read /etc/environment anymore

[Fabio Rafael da Rosa] I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the same problem ..? It is probably a PAM configuration problem. You need the following line in the /etc/pam.d/ file used by gdm: auth

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:31:59 + benfoley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote: Oddly enough Spamassassin doesn't exasperate the problem. TDMA does. exacerbate is probably what you meant here. Quite so. 1:30am emails before the requisite

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

on Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55, Adam McKenna wrote: My own inbox supports this statement. 140 responses to Sobig.F mails, of which 43 are virus or other content-based autoresponders, and 97 being delivery

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote: We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in the Debian BTS. Because users that submitted bugs using the Debian

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: The virus responses are irresponsible, and have been for almost two years as the number of sender-spoofing emails has grown. BTW, amavisd-new has # Treat envelope sender address as unreliable and don't send sender # notification

Olivia Erickson is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 08/28/2003 and will not return until 09/02/2003. I will respond to your message when I return.

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version:

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55, Adam McKenna wrote: My own inbox supports this statement. 140 responses to Sobig.F mails, of which 43 are virus or other content-based autoresponders, and 97 being delivery failure messages or other autoresponders (e.g.: ISP help desk). How many were

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

* Adam McKenna #0, #1, #2 and #11 are basically opinion and rhetoric. Well. Let's take a look at what Karsten had to say about point #2, Misplaced burden: [...] «C-R may place the burden on third parties either inadvertently (via spoofed sender spam or virus mail), or deliberately

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

Herbert Xu wrote: This is bullshit. We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in the Debian BTS. Fine. Then don't close them with the Debian changelog at all; instead, use [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that mailing lists bounce the messages, if it gets bad I could filter out all mailing list messages temporarily. Hmm, how about giving tmda its own special header so we can auto-filter

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:47, Adam McKenna wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: The comparison to mailing list software makes no sense. Maybe not in the context of viruses, but for the Joe Job problem it does. If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that

Re: Sarge+1: ideas for Experimental V1.2 (or is that 0.2?)

* GOTO Masanori ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 11:05]: I may need to explain the status glibc: [...] The current version is 2.3.2-4. We're working for fixing bugs, some bugs were resolved. Sorry, I didn't want to step on your feet. I know that glibc is a nasty beast, and you're really good at

Re: On packages depending on up-to-date data (was Re: Snort: Mass Bug Closing)

Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [Short version: see the patch below.] (after a few days w/o answers from Snort's maintainer) Sander, any comments wrt to this patch? Please at least say wether you are going to forward this to Snort maintainers or use it in

Re: GDM in sid does not read /etc/environment anymore

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Fabio Rafael da Rosa] I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the same problem ..? It is probably a PAM configuration problem.

MAIL FOLDER INBOX - IMOBILIARE CLOSED DUE TO ACCESS ERROR

I do receive a lot of messages and use pine's filtering features to sort them out to different folders. The same thing happened with folder IMOBILIARE. I have sorted there some messages after i've readed them. After i renamed the

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:46:48AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: Earlier, you've stated that your time is precious. Well, so is mine. How dare you assume that the time I spent reviewing *your* callenge mail and deciding it was junk is less precious than the time you (could have) spent

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700 Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings. Oddly enough

Re: Details

hello, Can't reply to your mail at the moment, I will reply as soon when possible. If you didn't send a message, please control your pc for virusses. greetings christophe

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : The bug has been fixed is everything I would need to know. I don't really care if it was a typo, a new library, a rebuild or some magic incantation with black dribbling candles, the bug has been fixed. On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:46, Mathieu Roy

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:31:59PM +, benfoley wrote: On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700 Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by design, and all anti-spam programs

Re: NEED HELP: Making woody LSB compliant

Martin Schulze wrote: Updated alien The alien changes have been in testing and unstable for a similar amount of time. Unfortunately I can't find the source for the above packages. ...? Context error. I also remember some talk about start-stop-daemon having to be altered.

Bug#207709: ITP: module-assistant -- helper script to automate kernel module building

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-28 Severity: wishlist * Package name: module-assistant Version : 0.1 (currently beeing written) Upstream Author : myself, nativ package * URL : http://modass.alioth.debian.org (when it has been approved) * License

Anti-Virus software has detected a virus in a document you authored.

Please contact your system administrator. The infected file attachment in the scanned document was deleted. Virus Information: The attachment your_details.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was deleted.

$B!ZL$>5Bz9-9p![K\F|Cf$K(B100$BK|Kx(B

$B"#5^$0$"$J$?$N6/$$L#J}!*%"%$%(!<%+!<%I$N%b%P%$%k%-%c%C%7%s%0(B $B"#$*?=$79~$_$+$i?69~$_$^$G:GB.(B20$BJ,!#5^$J=PHq$G$*:$$j$NJ}92$F$kA0$K$^$:Ev

source code on sh4

debian-develHi Where can I find the source code on sh4 for Debian linux Best Regard! Cong Ming [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

on Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: #2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity. People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm the

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: That doesn't help all that much - it's also important see why the bug has been closed. Because it is fixed... whatever it was I was trying to do when I generated the error rather than by fixing the error handling. it wont help

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:03:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Also, I don't have any hard data to support this, but it's obvious to me that the volume of mail generated by virus scanners in response to

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote: When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for several days. Why not make your tmda package depend on amavis-new and clamav-freshclam? If they

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

reassign 207300 humanity thanks On pe, 2003-08-29 at 10:36, Adam McKenna wrote: Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings. The fact

Re: libraries being removed from the archive

On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:32:57 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Peter Mathiasson wrote: [...] distcc sends the complete preprocessed source code across the network for each job. Hmm, OK, but that would just speedup the actual compilation. Granted, that's the largest chunk, but

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: #2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity. People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm the e-mail. the point that

debian-devel@lists.debian.org

TEL13311210700 010-85762212 E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:12:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote: When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for several days. Why not make

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote: We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in the Debian BTS. Because users that submitted bugs using

debian-devel@lists.debian.org

µã»÷ http://hengingv.533.net ½Ì¸øÄúÈçºÎÀûÓÃÍøÂç׬Ǯ

dpkg -- overwrite empty directories?

Hello, I have a package that Replaces: another package. The former package stored files in a particular directory (/usr/lib/foo); when the package is removed, it leaves that directory behind, empty. The new package has a symlink at that location, instead of a directory. dpkg, however, does

Re: glibc 2.3.2 and testing

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:46:54PM +0200, Mike Dornberger wrote: I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have a dependancy on glibc = 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just on glibc? Binaries built against glibc 2.3.2 really do depend on glibc 2.3.2

Bug#207791: ITP: ITP: libdata-formvalidator-perl -- Library for easily validating user input, mainly for HTML

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: ITP: libdata-formvalidator-perl Version : 3.12 Upstream Author : Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Data/ * License : GPL +

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:05:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: A proper entry is as follows: * New upstream release. * no longer does foo when bar happens. Closes: #12345 * wrapper script rewritten to not use $$ in tempfile names. Closes: #12345 Please, everyone remember, a changelog

Re: GDM in sid does not read /etc/environment anymore

I've actually sent him an email but got no answer. I've posted in debian-devel few days ago and nobody complained that GDM could source /etc/environment in the init script. That's an one-line patch (already tagged as patch in bts for more than a year)... I think that if the maintainer doesn't

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: There's at least one other solution: what if, when a bug tagged upstream was closed, the mail sent would include the upstream ChangeLog (hopefully named ChangeLog in the top directory of the package)? Can someone familiar with the

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

The bug has been fixed is everything I would need to know. I don't really care if it was a typo, a new library, a rebuild or some magic incantation with black dribbling candles, the bug has been fixed. On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:46, Mathieu Roy wrote: This approach surely don't raise the

glibc 2.3.2 and testing

Hi, I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have a dependancy on glibc = 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just on glibc? BTW: Why are all those packages going into testing if they are uninstallable? Regards, Mike Dornberger PS: Please Cc me, I'm not

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:12, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that mailing lists bounce the messages, if it gets bad I could filter out all mailing list messages temporarily. Hmm, how about giving

Re: dpkg -- overwrite empty directories?

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Ryan Underwood wrote: Hello, I have a package that Replaces: another package. The former package stored files in a particular directory (/usr/lib/foo); when the package is removed, it leaves that directory behind, empty. The new package has a symlink at that

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Glenn Maynard wrote: If I report segmentation fault in ls, I--as a user of ls, not a developer--couldn't care less about why it was segfaulting or how the bug was fixed; I only care that it's been fixed. If a developer wants to spend their limited time researching how

unsubscribe

- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:08 AM Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V2003 #1147

Re: DebToo: Debian, Gentoo-style

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:16:04PM +1000, Brian May wrote: Of course there are downsides either way, but there is no dispute that the size of the Debian archive is huge, and mirrors are struggling to keep up as a result. Is this so? I havent seen reports in this area for a while. Greetings

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: Fine. Then don't close them with the Debian changelog at all; instead, use [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation that it is fixed in such-and-such a version. The changelog bug closing facility is only a convenience. I'm confused.

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send confirmation emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an email. Really? TMDA and all C-R systems are broken-by-design, just as many stupid

MISC

Dear Candidate, Thank you for getting in touch with Prometric Auto Response System. We are in receipt of your e-mail. This e-mail contains the following I. KEY WORDS TO PUT IN THE SUBJECT FIELD OF YOUR E-MAIL TO US. In order to get a reply from us, you are required to put ONE of the relevant

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:34:58PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: It's not about summarizing how the bug was fixed. It's about summarizing the bug *itself* in the changelog. The description of the bug is already available(as the title of the bug report). At the very least this should be placed

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:51:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: It's a bit extreme but I'm sick of deleting such messages, especially in light of the Blaster worm. Not extreme at all. I imagine there are some legitimate people I might receive emails from, reply to them and never know it

Re: Sarge+1: ideas for Experimental V1.2 (or is that 0.2?)

At Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:24:15 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: Really? The latest glibc in sarge is from 2003-03-22, and there are currently 1103 packages waiting for glibc. I may need to explain the status glibc: 2003-03-22 glibc is 2.3.1-17. The next version of glibc is 2.3.2-2, which was

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:42:53AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: PS Before someone raises the issue of license of viruses. I believe that anyone who distributes a virus does so with the desire that it be installed on as many systems as possible and that the implied license permits you to

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send confirmation emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an email. TMDA and all C-R systems are broken-by-design, just as many stupid end-user

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

I'm cc'ing PSG, maybe he'll be interested. * New upstream release .* (Closes: #1, #2, #3) to * New upstream release \1 * fixed BTS summary line of #1 Closes: #1 * fixed BTS summary line of #2 Closes: #2 * fixed BTS summary line of #3 Closes: #3 in changelogs would probably go

debian archive disk space requirements.

Hi, I've noticed the growth in the debian archive with some concern over the last few weeks/months. We're now hitting the limit of the partition that debian is on and it will be quite difficult technically for us to deal with this in the short term. We have some new storage which is being

Re: That movie

Your email to Crown International has been sent. You should receive a response within 1 business day. If you need a faster response, feel free to contact us Toll Free at 1-800-715-4227 during regular business hours. Thank You, James P. Cox President, Crown International

configure web proxy via DHCP server

Is this possible? It would be really cool(tm) if I didn't have to reconfigure every program on my laptop to use a different proxy server every time I plug it into a different network. Just venting my irritation for the day... -- Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: configure web proxy via DHCP server

On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:01:42PM +1000, Brian May wrote: Is this possible? It would be really cool(tm) if I didn't have to reconfigure every program on my laptop to use a different proxy server every time I plug it into a different network. Just venting my irritation for the day...

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: A script to convert eg. * New upstream release .* (Closes: #1, #2, #3) to * New upstream release \1 * fixed BTS summary line of #1 Closes: #1 * fixed BTS summary line of #2 Closes: #2 * fixed BTS summary line of #3

Accepted ncurses-ruby 0.7.1-4 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:49:49 -0400 Source: ncurses-ruby Binary: libncurses-ruby Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Brian M. Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Brian M. Almeida

Accepted devfsd 1.3.25-16 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:04:00 +1000 Source: devfsd Binary: devfsd Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.25-16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted gimp1.3 1.3.19-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:40:21 -0400 Source: gimp1.3 Binary: libgimp1.3 gimp1.3 gimp1.3-nonfree gimp1.3-python libgimp1.3-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.19-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ari Pollak [EMAIL

Accepted microwindows 0.90-2 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:47:49 -0700 Source: microwindows Binary: microwindows microwindows-fb libmicrowindows-dev libmicrowindows0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.90-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David Schleef

Accepted wmtv 0.6.5-15 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:53:19 +0200 Source: wmtv Binary: wmtv Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6.5-15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted loadwatch 1.0+1.1alpha1-5 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:27:13 +0200 Source: loadwatch Binary: loadwatch Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0+1.1alpha1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Nicolas Boullis

Accepted kcd 0.1.3.1-3 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:29:05 +1000 Source: kcd Binary: kcd Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1.3.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Accepted file-roller 2.3.5-2 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:53:09 +0200 Source: file-roller Binary: file-roller Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.3.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL

Accepted limewire 3.4.5-2 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:43:48 -0700 Source: limewire Binary: limewire Architecture: source all Version: 3.4.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: michael cardenas [EMAIL

Accepted gtetrinet 0.7.4-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:09:32 +0200 Source: gtetrinet Binary: gtetrinet Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL

Accepted apcalc 2.11.8.1-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:50:57 +0200 Source: apcalc Binary: apcalc apcalc-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.11.8.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Buck [EMAIL

Accepted remem 2.11-7 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:36:25 +0200 Source: remem Binary: remembrance-agent Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.11-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Javier

Accepted quantlib-python 0.3.3-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:01:49 -0500 Source: quantlib-python Binary: quantlib-python Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dirk

Accepted quantlib-ruby 0.3.3-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:03:06 -0500 Source: quantlib-ruby Binary: quantlib-ruby Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel

Accepted spamassassin 2.59pre2.60rc3-1 (i386 source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:59:24 -0400 Source: spamassassin Binary: spamassassin spamc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.59pre2.60rc3-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted circuslinux 1.0.3-8 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:22:02 -0400 Source: circuslinux Binary: circuslinux Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.3-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Christian T.

Accepted xfree86 4.2.1-11 (powerpc all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:17:07 -0500 Source: xfree86 Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients twm xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp xlibs xlibosmesa3-dbg

Accepted hermes1 1.3.3-4 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:22:14 -0700 Source: hermes1 Binary: hermes1-dev hermes1 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: David Schleef [EMAIL

Accepted pantomime 1.1.0-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:19:42 +0200 Source: pantomime Binary: pantomime1 pantomime-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matthias Klose

Accepted librmail-ruby 0.14-1 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:02:41 +0900 Source: librmail-ruby Binary: librmail-ruby Architecture: source all Version: 0.14-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: akira yamada [EMAIL

Accepted dpsyco 1.0.22 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:28:16 +0200 Source: dpsyco Binary: dpsyco-doc dpsyco-samba dpsyco-ssh dpsyco dpsyco-cfengine dpsyco-devel dpsyco-sudo dpsyco-base dpsyco-mysql dpsyco-lib dpsyco-skel dpsyco-patch Architecture: source all Version:

Accepted cl-net-telent-date 1:0.4.1-1 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:54:03 -0600 Source: cl-net-telent-date Binary: cl-net-telent-date Architecture: source all Version: 1:0.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kevin

Accepted ctn 3.0.6-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:05:50 -0600 Source: ctn Binary: ctn-dev ctn Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.0.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL

Accepted mailliststat 1.3-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:32:39 -0600 Source: mailliststat Binary: mailliststat Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kevin M. Rosenberg

Accepted manpages 1.60-2 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:22:54 +0200 Source: manpages Binary: manpages manpages-dev Architecture: source all Version: 1.60-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Schulze

  1   2   >