Hi,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:03:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:46:08AM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
Moreover, that does not answer to my real question: is there a good
reason not to implement such an extended syntax for versionned
relationships.
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 21:32, Chris Cheney wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:58:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I think the problem with .la files may be solvable by updating
Build-Depends and -dev packages' dependencies to refer to libxrender-dev
(= 0.8.3-1), and/or libraries that are
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 06:12:17AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Actually the problem is somewhat lessened by the fact libtool generally
doesn't put the .la path in dependency_libs and puts -lXrender instead.
The *only* package I can see so far which has
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.la in
10500
http://kensou.web165.com/
,??
PlugUsIn4Cash6003600
10!
http://185998.PlugUsIn4Cash.com/signup/
,,
!!
,?? ,ADSL,
..500-700,
2000-3000.
1.(7)(7
),,.
.,,
102070,7,,
.,!??3547.68,
42572.
2.,,.
,,,
,10,100200,
,.,,
' 1 need 4 ',1,4.,5
,.10,QQ
,!!,.
3.,,
,rifid=12345.,
,,,
http://wisebook.yeah.net
---wise
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:24:37AM +1000, Kim Lester wrote:
There is no way to verify/correct the MODE, USER, GROUP, TYPE
of any files installed in a pkg.
If I am wrong please point out where, with an installed pkg
(and preferably without having a copy
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:07:58PM -0400, Marco Paganini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:57:42PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
That would not be a problem, as no other program imports ask.py...
Are you confident that no other program will ever want to import ask?
Yes. ask.py is
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:37:31PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:07:58PM -0400, Marco Paganini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:57:42PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
That would not be a problem, as no other program imports
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:19:58AM +, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:07:58PM -0400, Marco Paganini wrote:
Yes. ask.py is just the main executable. It imports all the other modules
(which have the .py extension and should be in /usr/lib/ask or something).
That'd be
Virus detected in this email! One or more attachment(s) was infected. Below are the actions taken:The following attachment(s) was infected and has been cleaned and attached herein:Attachment name:Nil.
---The following attachment(s)
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.28.0510 +0200]:
For example, the grsecurity patch has had a history of conflicts
with various patches in the Debian kernel source. Most of those
patches that caused conflicts were in fact essential
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:57:42AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
| That'd be /usr/share (lib is for arch-dependant data, see FHS)
|
| ... except that the Python policy seems to have bizarre rules about
| this. I assume this is because .pyc files are placed in the same
| directory as the
Your message dated Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:36:21 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#213822: general: keymap be-latin1 doesn't allow typing \
or @ by using AltGr
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hello,
I got the following situation:
A server (debian stable) running a number of domains
For each domain I've create a group, and everybody that has
something to do with this domain is in that group
I want everybody in the group to be able to change the website of
that domain, and
also sprach Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.08.1124 +0200]:
If it's a small security fix, then I am willing to work that into
grsecurity. But I won't port grsecurity to a new IP stack nor the
other way around.
So, there will be no grsecurity for 2.6?
There will be, but not ported
Hi Debian,
Kindly refer to the e-mail below:
Selloane
-Original Message-
From: Poppie Rakale
Sent: 08 October 2003 12:58 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Contact numbers
Hi John,
I got your details by surfing the net. We need to speak to someone at
your offices and wish that
Hi!
I wonder why there is a symbolic link
/usr/lib/libcdda_paranoia.so - libcdda_paranoia.so.0.9.8
in package 'libcdparanoia0-dev'. Shouldn't that be in 'libcdparanoia0'?
Regards
Henning
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:13:45PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
I wonder why there is a symbolic link
/usr/lib/libcdda_paranoia.so - libcdda_paranoia.so.0.9.8
in package 'libcdparanoia0-dev'. Shouldn't that be in 'libcdparanoia0'?
No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking,
Re: local Release [Marcos Dione [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at
05:22:19PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
*but*... now I set up atp.conf to have 'frankie' as the default
release, but when I try to install galeon, it tries to get the unstable
ones. if I try to get the frankie version w/
Does Debian have guidelines for minimal usefullnes or documentation of
a new package? Colour me /clueless, but triggered by DWN, I tried
teleport, without much avail:
13:16:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ apt-cache search teleport gtk
teleport - moves GTK applications between displays
Steve Langasek wrote:
The term metapackage is a gratuitous label, here. There is a real
binary package (as opposed to a virtual package) in the archive named
gcc, which comes from the gcc-defaults source package; and its
versions are handled just like those of any other packages.
Ah, silly
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 09:04, Andreas Metzler wrote:
'chown -R ...' accidentally excuted in the wrong directory comes to
my mind. Or filesystem corruption after a hard crash.
But then not only files from packages, but also user files are subject of
corruption. Using a tool like
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
Does anyone have a policy-compliant version comparator in Perl that I can
reuse? I'm slightly confused as to the exact meaning of 5.6.11. This means
some version compares (such as xaw3dg's 1.5+E-1 vs 1.5-25) currently return
John Belmonte wrote:
All those points are well taken. I was trying to pull a fast one:
surely no one would notice a few files added to base which total 1/3rd
the size of bash itself. But I've been caught.
I hope you realize that the perl-base package is itself hardly larger
than bash.
--
Santiago Vila wrote:
Does anyone have a good estimation about the number of packages which
currently do this? (That is, assume *blindly* that /usr/doc exists).
Packages that
a) don't use debconf ( 5%)
b) have not completed the transition yet (85 of 657 here)
c) happen to be written by Manoj?
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
Does anyone have a policy-compliant version comparator in Perl that I
can reuse?
There's one in debbugs CVS, module source, Debbugs/Versions/Dpkg.pm,
translated from dpkg's algorithm as of a couple of years ago. It doesn't
do ~ yet
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote:
No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and
therefore live in development packages.
Thank you for that information!
But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
This programm tries to dlopen
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:46:18PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
Not in Debian at least. XML catalog support is a work-in-progress at
this point. Last time I checked, neither docbook-xsl or docbook-xml
registered themselves using update-xmlcatalog.
I've been meaning to write some
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
This would mean a
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 16:58, Henning Moll wrote:
Is this a bug in k3b? Should k3b try to dlopen 'libcdda_paranoia.so.0'
instead? Is there a standard for so-naming (which is respected by all/
most Gnu/Linux distributions)?
Shared object files that are private to a project are usually not
Henning Moll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
This would mean a dependency to a
Hi!
Am 2003-10-08 16:58 +0200 schrieb Henning Moll:
But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
This would mean a dependency
There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
people who are willing to help those developers out by co-maintaining
their packages for a
* Joey Hess
| a) don't use debconf ( 5%)
s/debconf/debhelper/, I presume?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
I've always managed my own XF86Config, and the debian packages have for the
most part stayed out of my way. How come now I can't upgrade without answering
dozens of questions about my graphics card and monitor etc. I've been stuck at
this version for a while since I always C-c the configuration
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
people who are willing to help those developers out by
I got the following situation:
A server (debian stable) running a number of domains
For each domain I've create a group, and everybody that has
something to do with this domain is in that group
I want everybody in the group to be able to change the website of
that domain, and
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote:
No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and
therefore live in development packages.
Thank you for that information!
But now i am in a bit of trouble:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:26:03 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Santiago Vila wrote:
Does anyone have a good estimation about the number of packages
which currently do this? (That is, assume *blindly* that /usr/doc
exists).
Packages that
a) don't use debconf ( 5%)
b) have not
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Original link at:
http://www.advogato.org/article/716.html
QUOTE
Debian and Democracy
Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Two unrelated words. From experience.
Now, what is the problem with debian? It's because debian claims to be
democratic, but it
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:08:07 -0700
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alioth has been a terrific resource for me in this regard. Using it and
dpatch, I'm easily able to co-maintain packages, maintain bugs, and keep
releases in check with multiple developers.
I'd highly recommend
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
| I think this should be clearly discussed.
|
| Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
| the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Hmm. I've heard that name
It's amazing how problem solving here is equated with actively
waiting for problems to go away.
I wanted to improve Debian, but apparently there is no interest.
Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants because
apparently noone gives a flying food.
I am thus closing the issue for
Thanks Ben, hadn't seen this thread.
-Thom
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
He calls named people village idiots and morons and acuses peoples of
'poor rhetoric'. I don't think that kind of stuff deserves to be
discussed anywhere.
And if you want to discusse anyway then please do it on
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:50, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Colour me /clueless, but triggered by DWN, I tried
teleport, without much avail:
Note that DWN simply picks up new packages; maintainers aren't asked
whether they want them advertised or not. An initial teleport package
has been in unstable
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
| I think this should be clearly discussed.
|
| Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
| the rant you quoted was
He wanted to take over some of my packages and sent an email to
debian-kde, but not to my Debian address. By the time I had learned of
what he was doing, he had already created his own packages. He didn't
know how to work with other people.
If he was a developer, then he probably would have
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
And to immediately stop the any discussion:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:26:03 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Santiago Vila wrote:
Does anyone have a good estimation about the number of packages
which currently do this? (That is, assume *blindly* that /usr/doc
exists).
Packages
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:01:47 +0800, Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that the rant
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:09:31 +0200, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello Debian policy, Ancient policy [1] frowned upon running
automated check of runtime behavior of packages in debian/rules to
save time for the autobuilders, and say that such test should be run
by maintainers
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
And if you want to discusse anyway then please do it on
debian-projects og maybe rather debian-couriosa where it belongs. I
has nothing to do with developing Debian (the distribution).
Why even waste debian bandwidth on it?
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:01:47 +0800
Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
| I think this should be clearly discussed.
|
| Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
Thomas Hood, 2003-10-08 22:00:17 +0200 :
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
I'll add that since I posted [1], [2] and [3], I got
Well... After a little bit more research I found a good email about this
in debian mentors.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200307/msg00252.html
Maybe this thread is not needed anymore. Sorry.
[]'s
daniel
Em Qua, 2003-10-08 às 16:25, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
I think
is there any chance for gnome 2.4 to be included in sarge? maybe as
option? which desktop enviroments are you planing to include in sarge?
--
Ivan Jelic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
DEAR,
BURKLEPCB
013902945673
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:50:01AM +0200, Ron Rademaker wrote:
I got the following situation:
A server (debian stable) running a number of domains
For each domain I've create a group, and everybody that has
something to do with this domain is in that group
I want everybody in the
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
The term metapackage is a gratuitous label, here. There is a real
binary package (as opposed to a virtual package) in the archive named
gcc, which comes from the gcc-defaults source package; and its
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:48:48AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
It appears all of kde has it included as well. Does this happen to have
anything to do with the rpath'ing issue that some of the XFree libs are
causing as well? (iirc it was xrender)
Xrender is not an XFree86 library anymore.
URL:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:04:32PM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:40:18AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
The new version of libXrender moves from /usr/X11R6/lib to /usr/lib
which has already started to cause build failures... :\ I am not
certain if Branden plans to move any
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:21:39PM -0400, Gregory Stark wrote:
I've always managed my own XF86Config, and the debian packages have for the
most part stayed out of my way. How come now I can't upgrade without answering
dozens of questions about my graphics card and monitor etc. I've been stuck
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 04:01:47AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
| Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
| the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Hmm. I've heard that name mentioned before on this
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:00:42PM -0800, Ivan Jelic wrote:
is there any chance for gnome 2.4 to be included in sarge? maybe as
option? which desktop enviroments are you planing to include in sarge?
Currently as far as I know Gnome 2.2, KDE 3.1.4 and XFCE 4.0 will be in
sarge. There were some
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Thanks, you saved me from reading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:47:04 +0900
Source: foiltex
Binary: foiltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.4a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Atsuhito KOHDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:25:06 -0500
Source: kvirc
Binary: kvirc kvirc-doc kvirc-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2:2.1.2.99pre1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robin Verduijn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:20:57 +0200
Source: lablgtkmathview
Binary: liblablgtkmathview-ocaml-dev liblablgtkmathview-ocaml
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.4.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:16:44 +0200
Source: linc
Binary: liblinc-dev liblinc1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:1.0.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastian Rittau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:30:45 +0200
Source: orbit2
Binary: liborbit2-dev orbit2 liborbit2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.8.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:43:26 +0200
Source: hello
Binary: hello
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 23:10:22 +0200
Source: afterstep
Binary: afterstep
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.11-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 23:21:52 +0200
Source: afterstep
Binary: afterstep libafterimage-dev libafterimage0 libafterstep0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.99.0+2.00.beta2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:02:41 +0200
Source: sysstat
Binary: isag sysstat
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 4.1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:46:11 +0200
Source: yaboot-installer
Binary: yaboot-installer
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.0.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:42:20 +0200
Source: hello-debhelper
Binary: hello-debhelper
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:29:37 +0200
Source: aranym
Binary: aranym
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.2beta-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antonin Kral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Antonin Kral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:21:16 +0200
Source: debmake
Binary: debmake
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.7.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:14:06 +1000
Source: pidentd
Binary: idecrypt pidentd-des pidentd
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.0.16-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Herbert Xu [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:17:21 -0400
Source: libcache-cache-perl
Binary: libcache-cache-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.02-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:38:04 -0400
Source: libselinux
Binary: libselinux1-dev libselinux1 selinux-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:32:48 +0200
Source: cuyo
Binary: cuyo
Architecture: source i386 alpha mips
Version: 1.8.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:44:56 +0900
Source: metacity
Binary: metacity libmetacity0 libmetacity-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.4.55-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:34:41 -0600
Source: lw-per-installer
Binary: lw-per-installer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.3.0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:03:47 +0200
Source: ulog-acctd
Binary: ulog-acctd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hilko Bengen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:51:30 +0900
Source: ptex-jisfonts
Binary: ptex-jisfonts
Architecture: source all
Version: 2-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: OHURA Makoto [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:16:05 +0200
Source: quark
Binary: quark
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.20-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:15:21 +0200
Source: openoffice.org-debian-files
Binary: openoffice.org-debian-files
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0-1+2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:04:38 +1000
Source: openexr
Binary: openexr libopenexr-dev libopenexr0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Lau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:17:45 +0200
Source: wwwoffle
Binary: wwwoffle
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 01:25:15 +0100
Source: postgresql
Binary: postgresql-plr libpgeasy odbc-postgresql libpgtcl-dev postgresql-doc libpq3
postgresql libpgtcl libpqpp-dev postgresql-contrib postgresql-client libecpg4 libpqpp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 07:09:12 +0100
Source: postgresql
Binary: libpqpp-dev libpgtcl-dev libpqpp libecpg-dev postgresql-plr postgresql-contrib
libpgtcl odbc-postgresql postgresql-dev postgresql-doc libpgeasy-dev libecpg4 libpq3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:59:57 +0200
Source: mimedefang
Binary: mimedefang
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.37-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Martin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:37:15 +0200
Source: cameleon
Binary: ocaml-zoggy liboptions-ocaml-dev mlchat libconfigwin-ocaml-dev ocaml-ioxml
ocaml-omom cameleon ocaml-dbforge libokey-ocaml-dev libocamlcvs-ocaml-dev cameleon-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:07:47 +0200
Source: ekg
Binary: libgadu2 ekg libgadu-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.3+20031007-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marcin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:48:26 +
Source: conglomerate
Binary: conglomerate
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:48:28 +0200
Source: gngeo
Binary: gngeo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.9a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Delange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien Delange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:22:50 +
Source: pupa
Binary: pupa
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6+20031008-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Millan [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
