Pour le paquet Geneweb, je lance actuellement le démon de la façon
suivante :
GENEWEBSHARE=/usr/share/geneweb
GENEWEBDOC=/usr/share/doc/geneweb/doc
GENEWEBDB=/var/lib/geneweb
GENEWEBUSER=geneweb
DAEMON=/usr/bin/gwd
NAME=geneweb
LOGFILE=/var/log/$NAME.log
.../...
echo -n Starting
Nicolas Bertolissio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Y aurait-il un DD dans les régions sus-citées ?
Quant à moi, je sur sur Mulhouse et travail à l'EuroAirPort.
Va vraiment falloir qu'on se fasse un p'tit meeting, vu le nombre
qu'on est, un de ces jours.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux
Nicolas Rueff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Après avoir reçu quelques réponses, une question m'est venue (Aahh,
l'éternel quête de connaissances ...). Existe-t-il un site
géolocalisant précisément les DD ? Ou ai-je eu une idée révolutionnaire,
ce qui m'étonnerait vu mon déficit de sommeil ;)
Les
Quoting Julien Gilles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A priori le umask est hérité lors du fork entre le père et le fils,
donc il suffit de positionner le umask avant de lancer
start-stop-daemon.
Ca, c'est ce que j'avais essayé en premier et, devine ? Ca ne marche
pas.. :-)
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Les infos de localisation sont dans la base LDAP, ce qui veut dire que
les développeurs y ont accès. (c'est comme ça qu'on génère la world
map)
Ce qui serait cool serait de pouvoir zoomer sur le world map. Un amas de
points sur l'europe cela n'est pas
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
| C'est volontairement imprécis, il est hors de question de donner des
| infos de localisation trop précises.
Mouarf.
Il y aurait un zoom qui permettrait de mettre l'Alsace en plein ecran que
la vie privee des DD ne serait pas encore trop mise a mal.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: 1-mb-random-data
Version : 1
Upstream Author : entropy
* URL : /dev/urandom
* License : ? (may violate various licenses at random, though
probably won't)
Description : one megabyte
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
I intend to dd if=/dev/urandom of=debian/tmp/usr/lib/1-mb-random-data
Will this be available via CVS?
;)
Mike
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Joe Drew wrote:
This is the new fulltext index for Zope and is the most feature-complete
solution for fulltext indexing under Zope.
Supported Formats: HTML, PDF, Postscript, WinWord, PowerPoint, OpenOffice
Again, s/fulltext/full text/g.
What does this mean?
Hi Ian:
I have been long time user of linux and I find the greatest weakness to
be the ability to easily install applications which seems to be the
intent of this group. I would like to make a suggestion with respect to
handling of dependancies.
Most software installs fail as a result of
Package: gimp1.2
Version: 1.2.3-2.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
gimp1.2-nonfree
I find non-appropriate for a package in main to advertise for non-free
packages in non-free, which is theoretically not part of Debian -- a
package part of
Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
working on the legal issues for LaTeX2HTML [1], at debian-legal [2], we
concluded that LaTeX2HTML will have to be removed from main because it
[...]
With /usr/bin/latex2html
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 01:08:55 -0500, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: 1-mb-random-data
Version : 1
Upstream Author : entropy
* URL : /dev/urandom
* License : ? (may violate various licenses at random, though
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problems of this approach, off the top of my head:
a. Having a binary package of the same name that is produced by
different source packages on different architectures may or may not
drive the archive maintainence scripts nuts. On the other hand,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Don Armstrong wrote:
Odd. I was looking for a package that does exactly this on monday.
I'm going to evaluate it and see if it does what I hope it does, and
then prepare it for packaging in debian... assuming it fullfills the
nich that I need filled.
Just keep me
On Tuesday, Nov 11, 2003, at 23:39 America/Denver, Peter Zoeller wrote:
Most software installs fail as a result of missing libraries. I would
like to see a central repository for all libraries, old, new and
development. A repository that when a library dependancy needs to be
satisfied, the
reopen 220363
thanks
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au a tapoté :
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:00:44AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Package: gimp1.2
Version: 1.2.3-2.4
Severity: normal
Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
gimp1.2-nonfree
If you don't want to
* Mathieu Roy
| Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
| gimp1.2-nonfree
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy, it's not a
technical discussion.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:15:19AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Can someone provide a link to a clear explanation about latex2html
being non-free?
Read the latest DWN
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
* Mathieu Roy
| Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
| gimp1.2-nonfree
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy, it's not a
technical discussion.
1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Isaac Clerencia) a tapoté :
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:15:19AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Can someone provide a link to a clear explanation about latex2html
being non-free?
Read the latest DWN
You mean the DWN from yesterday which has not already been translated?
Ok,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:27:35AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Mathieu Roy
| Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
| gimp1.2-nonfree
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy, it's not a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:56:44AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Read the latest DWN
You mean the DWN from yesterday which has not already been translated?
Ok, thanks.
In case someone else is wondering, the explanation is finally there:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you're using busybox then try regenerating the initrd image with
BUSYBOX=no.
I did not generate the image, i'm using a stock kernel-image-2.4.22-1-k7
package, no trace of busybox in the initrd image, and it's not even installed
on this
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:53, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy, it's not a
technical discussion.
1) Do you have a pointer that give that information in the debian policy?
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
1) Do you have a pointer that give that information in the debian
policy?
Policy 2.2.1:
Every package in main and non-US/main must comply with the DFSG
(Debian Free Software Guidelines).
In addition, the packages in main
* must not require a
Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:53, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy, it's not a
technical discussion.
1) Do you have a pointer that give that
Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:27:35AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Mathieu Roy
| Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
| gimp1.2-nonfree
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this,
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 11:27, Mathieu Roy wrote:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-main
...the packages in main
* must not require a package outside of main for compilation or
execution (thus, the package must not declare a Depends,
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
2) Why the gimp cannot any longer save gif files without installing
non-free software?
The software itself is free, but the algorithm necessary to save GIF
files (LZW) is patent encumbered in certain parts of the planet, and
the patent is actively
Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
* Mathieu Roy
| Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
| gimp1.2-nonfree
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy,
Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* must not require a package outside of main for compilation or
execution (thus, the package must not declare a Depends,
Recommends, or Build-Depends relationship on a non-main
package), ...
Note, no mention of
Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If not, why incitating people to get non-free stuff while you just can
provide a Gimp that can save GIF without LZW?
If it isnt already there - write a patch for it if you want that.
--
bye Joerg
A.D. 1492:
Christopher Columbus arrives in what he
Le mer 12/11/2003 à 10:31, Mathieu Roy a écrit :
If you have anything on topic to do, you are welcome to reply to this
mail.
The whole thread is off-topic on this list.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
If not, why incitating people to get non-free stuff while you just
can provide a Gimp that can save GIF without LZW?
Because no such non-LZW plugin exists for the GIMP. [And since people
may wonder why they can't save GIFs, it is appropriate for the
Scripsit Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description : one megabyte of pseudo-random data
I intend to dd if=3D/dev/urandom of=3Ddebian/tmp/usr/lib/1-mb-random-data
Please, please, no! /dev/urandom does not reliably deliver
pseudo-random data. There is a chance that fresh entropy will arrive
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
reopen 220363
thanks
Please do not abuse the BTS. If you want to discuss it, feel free to do
so, but this is not a bug in the gimp package.
Are you kidding?
Do you really think that I'm the only person to find UNACCEPTABLE that
a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:54:29AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html
It is also possible to create GIFs using a patent-free run
length encoding but this doesn't achieve the compression that
one normally expects in a GIF.
If not,
On Mi, 2003-11-12 at 07:44, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Joe Drew wrote:
This is the new fulltext index for Zope and is the most feature-complete
solution for fulltext indexing under Zope.
Supported Formats: HTML, PDF, Postscript, WinWord, PowerPoint, OpenOffice
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au a tapoté :
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
reopen 220363
thanks
Please do not abuse the BTS. If you want to discuss it, feel free to do
so, but this is not a bug in the gimp package.
If you consider that not being a bug,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:17:57AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
| Please, please, no! /dev/urandom does not reliably deliver
| pseudo-random data. There is a chance that fresh entropy will arrive
| in the middle of the computation and mess up with the pseudoness.
No, I already covered that in
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux
Version : 2.4.22
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others, see:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/CREDITS
*
On Nov/12, Mathieu Roy wrote:
As you're not a member of the Debian project, you don't get any say
in what's to be accepted or not
Apparently you forget about a specific part of the Social Contract.
(Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software...)
Note that Users goes before Free
Hi!
It will not be necessary to name it 1.0really, but as many others do:
1.0final...
What about that one?
Rolly
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux-experimental
Version : 2.4.22
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others, see:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/CREDITS
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/
* License
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:37:29PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:11, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
That would need a reimplementation of some (all?) of the servers. Wouldn't
it? Old ones (cistron, livingston) call getpwnam()|getspnam() to retrieve
the user's
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:02:14PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:47:14PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
However,
for the matter of finding out wether there will be much people in that
userbase, there's the Popularity Contest.
Some people just never learn.
I know,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:48:26PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:40:11PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
There are already several forks of the Linux kernel in Debian anyway.
Robert wishes to attempt to unify them, does that not grant him use of the
name 'linux'?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:14:02PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
Robert Millan schrieb:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:17:10PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
Robert Millan schrieb:
I don't see why. I have a bunch of resources to find a solution for
this trivial bug.
[...]
I didn't want to imply
[ CCing debian-hurd ]
Hi Joey,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:08:55AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: 1-mb-random-data
Version : 1
Upstream Author : entropy
* URL : /dev/urandom
* License : ? (may violate various
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:07:27AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:02:49PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:52:00AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
The packages at http://www.tbble.com/freeradius/ will be sponsored into
the
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:29:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Either satisfies the first part of my question, but at least your second
option doesn't satisfy the second part of my question. I'll repeat:
without leaving old System.map junk around for eternity
When would you clean up the
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 00:23, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:31, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux
Version : 2.4.22
Upstream Author : Linus
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others, see:
He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:44:01PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:18:38AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:30:50PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
CAN-2001-1376 and CAN-2001-1377 made the rounds last Spring, with
advisories
from Red Hat,
Peter Zoeller schrieb:
I have been long time user of linux and I find the greatest weakness to
be the ability to easily install applications which seems to be the
intent of this group.
I allways found it less easy to
- go to mozilla website
- find the appropriate binary
- download it
- run
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:31, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux
Version : 2.4.22
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others, see:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cistron begat FreeRADIUS. FreeRADIUS is certainly actively maintained
upstream. xtRADIUS is also begat of Cistron. I'd assumed that Cistron
is dead upstream too, and xtRADIUS active.
Cistron radius is not dead. It's just in
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others, see:
He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is ok now.
--
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:11:47PM -0700, Hans Fugal wrote:
In order to get realtime capabilities, jackd can be run with a suid
wrapper (jackstart), instead of being run as root, if the following
patch is applied to the kernel:
It has implication for libcap* packages too, doesn't it?
--
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others, see:
He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
s/transmeta.com/osdl.org/
J
--
* Daniel Jacobowitz [Tue, 11 Nov 2003 at 22:18 -0500]
I would want considerably more information on the security implications
of allowing CAP_SETPCAP than either of those documents provides, if I
were you.
The POSIX capability code is notoriously subtle and prone to anger.
Which is why I
* Francesco P. Lovergine [Wed, 12 Nov 2003 at 14:48 +0100]
It has implication for libcap* packages too, doesn't it?
I would assume so.
--
Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est.
http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg
http://gdmxml.fugal.net/ |
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:17:38PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
Does Debian by Policy have a standard directory to store Certificate
Authority certificates? I've run into the need to incorporate a
certificate into a number of services on my system: web browsers, email
clients, email servers,
* Mathieu Roy wrote:
Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
[...]
Note, no mention of Suggests.
No mention is not necessarily approval. It may be just something
forgot.
That's why Tollef suggests to discuss this on -policy.
--
- nobse
On Nov 11, 2003, at 11:00 PM, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
gimp1.2-nonfree
Discussion aside, this is a nonissue, since the gimp1.2-nonfree package
is gone in unstable.
I would very much like to close this bug. Does this solve this issue
to
* Francesco P. Lovergine [Wed, 12 Nov 2003 at 14:48 +0100]
It has implication for libcap* packages too, doesn't it?
From libcap2's README.Debian:
This library should be used in conjunction with the kernel patches
from
On Nov 12, 2003, at 1:27 AM, Mathieu Roy wrote:
So you confirm what I thought (yes, I checked this page before):
- the support for GIF creation inside the main gimp package, in
main, has been removed in favor of a package in non-free, that
provide the same functionality (plus patented
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Nov 11, 2003, at 11:00 PM, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Installed the gimp, I got a message suggesting me to install
gimp1.2-nonfree
Discussion aside, this is a nonissue, since the gimp1.2-nonfree
package is gone in unstable.
I would very much like to
Ben Gertzfield schrieb:
As I mentioned in a response to the bug report, this is mostly a
nonissue, since the LZW patent has expired in the US and I've merged
the -nonfree package back into the main package in the unstable Debian
distribution.
As far as I know(*), the patent is still valid in
Hi,
Debian needs a new Packages section, named gis, or perhaps geography or
cartography, to prevent the mapping related packages from being
scattered in sections graphics and science, and misc, etc.? as at present.
I'd consider this section much too special.
Why not sort out which
On Nov 12, 2003, at 7:38 AM, Eike Sauer wrote:
As far as I know(*), the patent is still valid in Europe and Japan
until mid 2004. Shouldn't this matter for an international project?
This is true, I believe. Whether or not the main GIMP source
(distributed in main) is even allowed in Europe and
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
The mozilla-locale* packages need some uniformity to their short (and
maybe long, I haven't looked) descriptions.
(Mozilla $LANG Language Package, Mozilla $LANG language add-on,
Mozilla $LANG language/region pack are all examples)
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Igor Stroh wrote:
How about mentioning ZCatalog in some way?
Any suggestions to enhance my latest version:
This is the new full text index for Zope objects and is the most
feature-complete
solution for full text indexing under Zope.
.
TextIndexNG will live happily as
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:19:02AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:07:27AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
Maybe I'm mistaken, but the rpm spec file seems to use a 'radiusd' user
whileas the Debian rules package does not. I would be more confident with
Eike Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
Ben Gertzfield schrieb:
As I mentioned in a response to the bug report, this is mostly a
nonissue, since the LZW patent has expired in the US and I've merged
the -nonfree package back into the main package in the unstable Debian
distribution.
As far
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:41:10PM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
Sure, keep lowering the quality of Debian in matter of freedom,
there's no matter discussing that.
I don't see how making more packages available to our users is
lowering the quality of Debian in matter of freedom.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:36:40PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:47, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
[...]
unix_chkpwd is a reasonable solution to this.
One possible solution to this is to have a special GID for
non-root programs which are allowed to check passwords. I would
be
* Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
someone else said, eventually there will be a kernel-freebsd or
kernel-netbsd, and having an uniform scheme to call these
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:10:02PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Apparently you forget about a specific part of the Social Contract.
(Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software...)
I have a creepy feeling that you are not wearing a user hat
but rather a hat of an organisation with a specific
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:23:09PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
It does adduser freerad shadow on first installation, but not after that
(on the advice of Steve Langasek) to allow the local authentication code
to work, and to give the admin the freedom to disable this for
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:27:10 +0100, Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:53, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Suggests are ok, Recommends and Depends are not ok.
If you disagree with this, please discuss it on -policy, it's
not a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Do you really think that I'm the only person to find UNACCEPTABLE that
a package in mail suggests packages in non-free, which ARE NOT PART OF
DEBIAN?
Packages are free to suggest whatever the maintainer wishes; I wouldn't even
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
* Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
someone else said, eventually there will be a
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:44:01PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This is exactly the kind of situation I don't want going forward...there is
so much neglected software in Debian that bugs like these sometimes go
unnoticed, or even if they are noticed, the maintainer doesn't care enough
about
Mathieu Roy schrieb:
As far I know, there are still no patent for software in Europe,
whatever an European institution know to fail to comply to European
rules may do.
Neither GIF nor LZW is software, though.
The patent is about the LZW compression algorithm.
Ciao,
Eike
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
* Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the
name choosed by
Ben Gertzfield schrieb:
good question. How do we deal with this situation for other source
projects that contain things like encryption that are outlawed in
countries X, Y, and Z but OK in the US?
Establish non-non-US? ;o)
Ciao,
Eike
Hi!
Simon Richter schrieb:
How about science/geography?
Establishing subsections?
Or as a section name?
Either way, we should use science/math, science/pysics,
science/biology, science/whatever... as well then.
I think geographyco neatly fits into the current science section.
Ciao,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:37:58PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
4) Patch apt-listchanges so that id doesn't mail about suggestions
on packages that are not available.
apt-listchanges neither knows nor cares about suggests or recommends.
--
- mdz
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:35:53AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:23:24PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:00:40AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
PostgreSQL requires license changes, and I've not had much luck buiding
impetus for this, nor even
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 21:04, Joe Drew wrote:
Description : gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server
How about client for masqdialer?
The problem with calling it just that is there are many more clients for
masqdialer than just this one, like the qt/kde client, the cli client,
the java
Robert Millan wrote:
There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
you believe would be in a linux-kernel package? When someone
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:29:07AM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
We have procedures in place to handle all this, perhaps it's time you
learnt to use those, instead of whining about things which aren't even
the case.
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder on
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
I
for one _would_ appreciate having a debian-standard linux package.
kernel-source-*, kernel-image-*, kernel-headers-*
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `'
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
2) Do you have any valid proof of what you claim? Please, avoid being
a liar, this is a very bad attitude. Keep your personal feeling
out of this mailing-list, I do not give a toss about it and I think
that noone else does.
A liar? You have a
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I think this is a serious bug: the functionality of the free version
has been lowered to promote patent emcumbered package.
Patented software isn't really non-free. Search the list archives.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:28:20PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Do you really think that I'm the only person to find UNACCEPTABLE that
a package in mail suggests packages in non-free, which ARE NOT PART OF
DEBIAN?
Packages
I apologise if this is covered elsewhere, I am currently totally
swamped and can't afford too much time for Debian.
I am going to be away from my machine(s) starting 22 Nov until the
middle of December. I currently have 1 RC bug and several other bugs
against my packages. If sarge's release will
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:23:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
* Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
