On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Paolo Didone` wrote:
Se riesco (il 23 cade in un periodo di m***a) faccio un salto anche io!
;-)
eh lo so! ma e' l'unica mezza giornata libera che ho in zona.. 24 e 25 lo
immaginate da soli.. il 26 riparto la mattina...
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP
Toujours en attente d'insertion de ma nouvelle clé GPG dans le keyring
Debian, je cherche un sponsor pour uploader la nouvelle version du
paquet poedit.
Les sources (et le .deb.normalement inutile puisqu'il faut
recompiler) sont dans http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/packages
Merci
Bonjour,
J'essaye désespérement de downloader l'iso du netinstall de debian.
En effet tout les liens de http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ me
renvoient des erreurs grossières.
Vu le serieux de debian, je pense qu'il ne doit pas s'agir du bon site, ou
diable puis je télécharger l'image iso du
Scripsit Kevin Kreamer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the case of a NetBSD libc, you could use
Debian NBSD/NBSD
basically having the first half signify which libc is used.
Wouldn't that be a major retcon? AFAIU the GNU/ in Debian GNU/Linux
says that we're using GNU userland tools such as cp, mv,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that
the package should no longer be considered a removal candidate.
The way to do that is to fix all the release critical bugs filed against
the package, and upload to
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:03:55AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Kevin Kreamer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the case of a NetBSD libc, you could use
Debian NBSD/NBSD
basically having the first half signify which libc is used.
Wouldn't that be a major retcon? AFAIU the GNU/ in
Scripsit Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:05:46PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that I've hallucinated the
stated positions of the Catholic, Luthern, Episopalian,
On 2003-12-17T20:05:40+0100 (Wednesday), Andreas Metzler wrote:
PS: My memory might trick me, but Iirc quake2 is free save for the
data-files.
Correct.
--
You don't change the way people think by changing what they say.
You change the way people think with HEADLESS CHARRED BODIES FLY-
ING
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:54:14PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:13:03PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
If we're really worried about this, we can always use the names of the
Dwarves in the Hobbit. Most (all?) of those names are from Icelandic
sags, IIRC. So is
Packaging Lustre has been on my mind for some time (I packaged
intermezzo, but since that never really stabilized, I didn't upload it).
I plan to play w/ it in a bit; if it hasn't been packaged at that
point, I may do it. At this point, it has a lot more resources being put
into its development
-
.
25502
361004
/0592-585325613606934999
Hi all,
I faced a problem with unicode and gotto go inside of this technoligy. I
noticed that for example when I am inserting a Arabic_khah with the unicode
0f 062E two bytes with values D8 AE would be inserted to the file. Can
anybody tell me what is the relationship between these two value,
Branden == Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branden Remember, outside the Free Software community, copyright is
Branden used only as a destructive weapon, not a tool for promoting
Branden cooperation and harmony.
It looks like not only outside Free Software community, considering
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am
16.12.2003 19:15:43:
now it is getting clearer. we are talking about different things.
I'm talking about the md5sums files in the directory
/var/lib/dpkg/info. You talk about the md5 sum of the whole package
(MD5sum). so what I like to
Hi,
On Thu, 27.11.2003 at 12:53:57 -0800, Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems p.d.o is one of the compromised machines?
is there an ETA for this already?
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:03:55AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Kevin Kreamer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the case of a NetBSD libc, you could use
Debian NBSD/NBSD
basically having the first half signify which libc is used.
Wouldn't that be a major
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:11:15PM +0330, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
I faced a problem with unicode and gotto go inside of this technoligy. I
noticed that for example when I am inserting a Arabic_khah with the unicode
0f 062E two bytes with values D8 AE would be inserted to the file. Can
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:41:46AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
You are currently saying that the GNU in GNU/Linux is justified by the
glibc and not by any other GNU software, because these GNU software
are common on other unixes.
Why? If you are right that others unixes uses widely GNU
:
1., :
http://99movie.webspace4free.biz/default.htm
:
http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ptc/PTCinstaller-v0.7.5.exe
2.,,.
: .rmvb
:
http://bt.aodufilm.net/btfile/aodubt2003920193126.torrent
: III.rmvb
:
http://bt.aodufilm.net/btfile/aodubt2003125102121.torrent
:
:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:26:10AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use
demon name for keyword if possible.
Forgive me for the gratuitous Harry Potter reference, but fear
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:37:56PM -0600, Kevin Kreamer wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Dec 17, 2003, at 10:20, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given that we're going to be saddled with with a comprehension problem
anyway, I say we abandon the effort to be descriptive in the product
MEIZHI
ADD
0755-33340399 33340398
Http:www.cnxtm.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as
replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker. Not
that there was a serious chance of that happening - drop-in replacement
of glibc on Linux would be a lot of work and so far none of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:41:46AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
You are currently saying that the GNU in GNU/Linux is justified by the
glibc and not by any other GNU software, because these GNU software
are common on other unixes.
Why? If you are right that others
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:15:37PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Why not?
You said what I expected from you: you revealed that you disbelieve
that the system should be called GNU/Linux. Good to know in this kind
of discussion.
raised brows
I'm not a True Believer, if that's what you mean.
Am 18.12.03 um 11:05:36 schrieb Sven Luther:
That would be a funny naming scheme. That said, how would we then
differentiate the three BSD ports ? GNU/First one that shall not be
named and so one ?
Exactly:
Debian GNU/First one that shall not be named
Debian GNU/Next one that shall not be
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:56:15PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as
replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker. Not
that there was a serious chance of that happening - drop-in replacement
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except the
UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK, for the same reasons that they
have (now) decided that it's OK to have gay clergy and formal recognition
of
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:10, David Palmer. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supply all of the relevant, and none of the extraneous:-
Debian GNU/Free
Debian GNU/Net
Debian GNU/Open
I disagree. Debian GNU/Linux is free, it works well on the net, and it is
open.
I think that your naming suggestion
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 20:08, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 18.12.03 um 11:05:36 schrieb Sven Luther:
That would be a funny naming scheme. That said, how would we then
differentiate the three BSD ports ? GNU/First one that shall not be
named and so one ?
Exactly:
Debian GNU/First one that
At Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:11:18 +0100,
Martin Pitt wrote:
On 2003-12-15 10:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
From the view point of libc6 maintainer, it's no problem to merge /sys
mount for /etc/init.d/devpts.sh. The name of devpts.sh should be
renamed to something, though. And it can be also
Hi,
I am trying to install Sylpheed on PC with
debian( Kernel version 2.4).I am not able to compile sylpheed.I am not
able to download :
libglib version 1.2,
libglib-devel version 1.2,
libgtk-devel version1.2
libgtk version1.2.
Can anyone one help me to find these sources?Or can
anyone help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nunya) wrote on 17.12.03 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:35:54AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
| You are totally rationalizing.
*sigh* From Branden's original post where he mentioned the names:
We might use names from Christian demonology (since
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven That would be a funny naming scheme. That said, how would we then
Sven differentiate the three BSD ports ? GNU/First one that shall not be
Sven named and so one ?
Indeed !
GNU/First one that shall not be named
GNU/Next one that shall not be
shridevi == shridevi anagawadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I am trying to install Sylpheed on PC with debian ( Kernel version 2.4).I
am not able to compile sylpheed. I am not able to download :
Why? Debian unstable already has sylpheed and sylpheed-claws packages?
libglib version 1.2,
Mathieu == Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mathieu If we follow your theory, it means that if someday another
Mathieu system use the glibc, we should remove the GNU from the
Mathieu GNU/Linux name.
FWIW, BeOS uses glibc.
~velco
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
... neither of the two above, who are pretty obviously losers (even though
they're certainly on very different sides; surprise, sometimes there's
more than two of 'em).
There's more than one actual difference between the
Momchil Velikov wrote:
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven That would be a funny naming scheme. That said, how would we then
Sven differentiate the three BSD ports ? GNU/First one that shall not be
Sven named and so one ?
Indeed !
GNU/First one that shall not be named
GNU/Next one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cameron Patrick) wrote on 18.12.03 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:32:41AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
| On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 01:16, Nunya wrote:
|
| Face it. You're practicing hate speech. You're not better than what
| you hate.
|
| Ya
Hi!
On 2003-12-18 22:06 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
What about /etc/init.d/kernfs or mountkernfs?
OK, I would like to rename from /etc/init.d/devpts.sh to
/etc/init.d/mountfs, because (1) for example there is mountnfs which
mounts nfs (2) umountfs in initscripts un-mounts filesystems, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joel Baker) wrote on 17.12.03 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:25:11PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:56:41PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
For the record, however, if you consider saying that the lifestyle or
beliefs of someone you don't
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except the
UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK, for the same reasons that they
have (now) decided that it's OK to have
Julian Mehnle dijo [Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:56:15PM +0100]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as
replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker. Not
that there was a serious chance of that happening - drop-in replacement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henning Makholm) wrote on 18.12.03 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Scripsit Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:05:46PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote:
Mathieu == Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mathieu If we follow your theory, it means that if someday another
Mathieu system use the glibc, we should remove the GNU from the
Mathieu GNU/Linux name.
rereads
Arrgh...
My
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:30:57PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except the
UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK, for the same reasons that they
have (now) decided
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:43:27PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
The US is pretty adamant about separation of church and state.
Which is why the phrase In God We Trust is engraved or printed on all
the US currency. That's why the Pledge of Allegiance has the phrase,
Under God.. Yeah, adamant.
--
Chad
Hi,
I try to build a kernel module (legousbtower to get Lego Mindstorm with
USB working). I builded a module-source package and tried
fakeroot make-kpkg modules_image
This process stops by
config.status: creating Makefile
sed: file ./confstatnlBJkF/subs-1.sed line 47: Unterminated
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joel Baker) wrote on 17.12.03 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since you have no idea *what* civil rights I'm claiming are denied, your
claim that I'm just imagining this denial is... well, I'll just let it
stand on
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:06:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:56:15PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as
replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker.
Not
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:49:06 -0800, Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:38:45AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:53:18AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
| I don't believe in magical beings. I *do* believe some humans |
intentionally set out to hurt other
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:21:23AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:05:46PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that I've
On Wed 17 Dec 2003, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Since SSH upload has been disabled, it looks very slow and unreliable to
upload. (Does dupload uses -C ? Somehow, I felt faster.)
Using -C will not make it faster, as all the files to be uploaded are
compressed already (except .changes and .dsc, which
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:48:31AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except
the UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK, for
Thomas Hood wrote:
Is there a version of run-parts out there that runs all the
scripts in a directory in parallel? I have been writing
such a thing but I want to make sure that I am not reinventing
the wheel.
--
Thomas Hood
yes there is but I dont remember where
look for ways to speed the
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:13:52 -0500, Branden Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think the fundies should crawl back into their spider holes to
await the Apocalypse, while us heathens and sinners who don't TRULY
know the saving grace of Jesus Christ can get back to making the
world a better
On 18-Dec-03, 02:43 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you want to tell us that the absence of the md5sums-files (those which
contain md5sums for every file in the package, and they _are_ absent for a
number of packages) should not be considered a bug, even if debsums
complains about this?
This one time, at band camp, Tom said:
Y'all are going to bust a vein on this one.
So far, on *.debian.org, I've found a great many people who actively
hate Jesus, this german who apparently has familiar views on Jews (as
does frighteningly much of Europe), and a whole bunch of college
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:41:46AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
You are currently saying that the GNU in GNU/Linux is justified by the
glibc and not by any other GNU software, because these GNU software
are common on other unixes.
Maybe what he was saying, but that's obviously not the real issue.
On Thu 12/18/03 08:43, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:43:27PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
The US is pretty adamant about separation of church and state.
Which is why the phrase In God We Trust is engraved or printed on all
the US currency. That's why the Pledge of Allegiance has
reassign 224047 postgresql
severity 224047 normal
retitle 224047 postgresql: restarts postmaster after upgrade even when disabled
thanks, control, and have a nice day
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 09:23:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: general
Version: 20031213
Severity: critical
This
1216!
1214325%!
122A!
1128320%!
1119655%!
1692%!
http://thgfl.363.net/http://thgfl.363.net/;
,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 224047 postgresql
Bug#224047: general: The upgrade starts the postgresql even if runlevel
settings say NO to postgresql
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `postgresql'.
severity 224047 normal
Bug#224047: general: The upgrade starts the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:07:02AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Second, any such effort shouldn't be a branch, but should be mainstreamed in
Debian proper. Please see http://wiki.debian.net/CustomDebian for a
possible approach for this sort of project.
For cases where the added
Packages with these sorts of bugs:
* binaries accessing 'errno' or 'errno_h' directly.
This is easy to fix; just make them #include errno.h in the
appropriate file. If it builds, you've fixed it.
* Build-Dependency breakage.
There's an awful lot of RC bugs due to this. If you can just add or
Adamant about the seperation of state and non-christian churches[0].
But, of course us weirdos[1] in california decided the pledge was
unconstitutional... of course I'm sure that was overturned[2].
No, not overturned. Waiting on appeal to the Supreme Court, which takes
its Own Sweet Time to do
What are the UUs?
Unitarian Universalists.
Possibly the most liberal church in existence. I think they're great.
;-) They don't require adherence to any doctrine (you can even be a UU
atheist; although it started out as a Christian group, that's now
optional). They're very big on social
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:31:17AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Somehow, I don't think Branden will mind being told his dislike of
parochial religious fundamentalists is showing. I suspect he'd be proud
of it. But you'll see for yourself, soon enough.
I've known some quite nice people who had
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:25:31PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Adamant about the seperation of state and non-christian churches[0].
But, of course us weirdos[1] in california decided the pledge was
unconstitutional... of course I'm sure that was overturned[2].
No, not overturned. Waiting
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:39:51AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:49:06 -0800, Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:38:45AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:53:18AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
| I don't believe in magical
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:19:28PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:19:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I believe that if you cared to do the research on Usenet and mailing list
debates of this kind, my statement above is defensible as fact on rigorous
statistical grounds.
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:33:48PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:24:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| Demons are evil,
|
| Demons don't exist. Consequently, their moral value is undefinable.
I claim that their moral
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:17:03AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:31:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:23:39PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:12:56PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Because Christians are the people who primarily
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:18:41AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:39:51AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:49:06 -0800, Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:38:45AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:07:44PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:03:00PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
Oh, its our good friend Tom Ballard. Maybe you could get back to working
on Debian and stop trolling now?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:32:41AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 01:16, Nunya wrote:
Face it. You're practicing hate speech. You're not better than what
you hate.
Ya know, I've always wondered something when people say things like
this...
If I say I hate
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:53:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:07:44PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:03:00PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
Oh, its our good friend Tom Ballard.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:43:29AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:43:27PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
The US is pretty adamant about separation of church and state.
Which is why the phrase In God We Trust is engraved or printed on all
the US currency. That's why the Pledge
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:40:06PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
I guess someone from a culture with a caste system would believe that:
It is justified to sneer and think inferior certain people.
We don't buy that shit here.
plonk
I've noticed that and the Godwin (with no mention of
A levelezm azt hiszi, hogy Matt Zimmerman a kvetkezeket rta:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:07:02AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Second, any such effort shouldn't be a branch, but should be mainstreamed
in
Debian proper. Please see http://wiki.debian.net/CustomDebian for a
possible
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:44:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:19:28PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:19:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I believe that if you cared to do the research on Usenet and mailing list
debates of this kind, my
On Dec 18, GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I would like to rename from /etc/init.d/devpts.sh to
/etc/init.d/mountfs, because (1) for example there is mountnfs which
mounts nfs (2) umountfs in initscripts un-mounts filesystems, so
mountfs makes a name pair. Any comments?
Looks
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:13:29AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Cf. Jesux.
...which has gone for some years without attracting anyone who is both
pious enough and clueful enough to develop it.
I find this inverse correlation suggestive. :)
Or, it could be that Jesux wasn't really
[Late answer, but I just lacked the time to read all mails.]
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:52:13PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:45, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
As per the recommendations from Bruce Perens' User Linux paper
http://userlinux.com/white_paper.html, this thread
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 07:06 am, ROBERT JACOBSEN wrote:
Hello!
I have downloaded the Debian minimal install iso image and
written it to CD. The file on the CD is still in iso format (@185MB)
This is your problem. An ISO is a filesystem image, meant to be burnt directly
to the CD. You've
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:31:42AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:12:21AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
I think you trimmed away content that was crucial for understanding the
parts you did quote, but whatever. If you
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:39, Magosnyi rpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this kind of stuff could be handled in new architectures. For
example the Adamantix project could be merged back by creating
an architecture i386-adamantix for the stack protected stuff, and
the other parts being a CDD by
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
The thought goes something like this:
Well, the mascot of ALL the BSD derivatives is a daemon, in various forms
(and, I will note, they are quite adament about it *not* being a demon,
which is why the form is *always* a
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:02:29PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:43, Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The US is pretty adamant about separation of church and state.
Point to something specific, and we'll kick the fuckers out.
I along with many others are looking forward
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Nathan Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you wanted Greek names, there are plenty of obscure nymphs, satyrs,
centaurs, etc. to choose from. Since the Greeks classified them as
neither evil spirits nor deities, many of them
His
harePC
CPU10%His
hareCPU
His
harewindows2000\XPPCPCI
His hare
70%
0755-33340100 33340110
EmilL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http//www.sl99.com
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:32:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that
the package should no longer be considered a removal candidate.
The way to do that is to fix
I have attached a copy of the README.Debian file from my kernel-patch-2.4-lsm
package which documents the kernel configuration settings for using SE Linux.
I believe that Debian should do the same thing as Red Hat in terms of SE Linux
kernel support. That is 2.6 kernels should be built with SE
Mathieu Roy wrote:
...
When I'm told that a system is running GNU/whatever, I expect first to
find there GNU coreutils, GNU bash, GNU Emacs, GNU Compiler
Collection, gzip, GNU awk,GNU make, the GNU Debugger, GNU sysutils,
GNU tar, GNUpg, GNU grep, GNU mailutils, GNU ncurses, GNU readline,
GNU
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:42:23 -0500
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think daemons first showed up in the _Fiend Folio_, which
means we have the British to thank for this confusion. ;-)
What about Maxwell's daemon? This is usually thought to be the
computer origin of
[ Re-adding Cc to debian-bsd, since it's a serious naming proposal ]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:12:05PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:42:23 -0500
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think daemons first showed up in the _Fiend Folio_, which
means we have
Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Julian Mehnle dijo [Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:56:15PM +0100]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as
replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker. Not
that there was a serious chance of
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mathieu Roy wrote:
...
When I'm told that a system is running GNU/whatever, I expect first to
find there GNU coreutils, GNU bash, GNU Emacs, GNU Compiler
Collection, gzip, GNU awk,GNU make, the GNU Debugger, GNU sysutils,
GNU tar, GNUpg, GNU grep, GNU
Scripsit Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 'slander', if such it is (and I, obviously, don't consider it such)
is against the named set of churches, and those that follow their doctrinal
decrees
Claiming that Christians are against civil liberties is slander in my
book. You named, among other,
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-12-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: p3scan
Version : 1.0-rc6
Upstream Author : Jack S. Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://p3scan.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : transparent POP3-proxy with
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
