On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:40:06PM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
I just installed the textedit.app package; it pulled in a few GNUstep
libraries, but not a complete desktop environment.
Do the GNUstep libs still start a demon at startup? Last time I
checked, they did, instead of starting them
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Miles Bader wrote:
Marc Dequ«²nes (Duck) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, if i'm not dead for GNOME 2.10, custom Debian menu is gonna die, as
it is a bunch of unbrowseable nightmare stuff.
IMHO this would be a very bad move to remove the menu which looks the same
on all user
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package: libimage-base-bundle-perl
Description: modules for loading, saving and creating xpm and xbm images
A set of perl modules for loading, saving, and creating xpm and xbm
images. Contains the following modules:
.
Image::Base
Image::Xpm
I am not sure what you mean by startup.
When Linux boots up.
When the libraries were loaded, they started a few daemons, but, I
believe KDE and GNOME libraries do the same thing. Again, how is GNUstep
any different in this regard than the other desktop environments?
At one point in time,
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is this document useful for offline reading and not a few billion
others? (And where's that package of the Finnish constituition we were
promised a few years back?!)
Many parts of Debian intend conformance with SUSv3, which makes
it more important
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I think that every upload to the security archive should be
accompanied by a security advisory. I wouldn't be at all surprised if
the security team felt that uploads that don't merit security advisories
were an inappropriate use of their archive.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dictem
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Aleksey Cheusov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.mova.org/~cheusov/pub/dictem/
* License : GPL
Description : Dict client for emacs
Dictem implements all
Hi folks,
Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
possibly others involved)!
If you'd be so kind as to refer to #274993, I think we have
a problem. A number of packages (see the bug report) depend on
spamassassin, but some are not going to work with version 3, which
changed
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
If you'd be so kind as to refer to #274993, I think we have
a problem. A number of packages (see the bug report) depend on
spamassassin, but some are not going to work with version 3, which
changed the API considerably. The
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
b. provide a new version that can interface with spamassassin 3.
Just for the record, current amavisd-new can talk to spamassassin 3, even if
not perfectly (chroots needs some... tweaking).
As for the bugs, go ahead. spamassassin 2 is pretty much
Miles Bader wrote:
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
libraries that I use to write my apps -- you wouldn't put GTK+ in
the name of your apps,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi folks,
Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
possibly others involved)!
Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
my workstation due to performace problems. It is really a
also sprach Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1418 +0200]:
Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin
3 on my workstation due to performace problems. It is really
a memory and cpu hog.
I have to confirm.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 14:20]:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
possibly others involved)!
Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
my
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce
spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3.
Or we should not consider it.
In such case 2.64 will become obsolete even faster than 2.20 did
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce
spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3.
Or we should not consider
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 15:05]:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
my workstation due to performace
* Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo:
Here is some kind of explanation:
http://www.tribulaciones.org/blog/computers/ext3-performance_27-09-2004.html
The most common performance issue with ext3 file systems is caused by
software that accesses files in the order returned by readdir. Has
this been ruled
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
The most common performance issue with ext3 file systems is caused by
software that accesses files in the order returned by readdir. Has
this been ruled out?
What other, sane alternatives are there? Should the list be sorted by
Would anybody at Debian be interested to discuss my lmbench results attached
below (comparing vanilla Linux 2.6..8-rc4 kernel with and without kernel
preemption option running on PQ2FADS-VR with MPC 8275) ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Povolotsky, Alexander
Sent:
Hi,
Will Debian's native PowerPC compiler (similar to gcc version ?) run on
vanillarLinux 2.6.8-rc4 on MPC 8275 (PQ2FADS-VR) ?
Also does Debian have a PowerPC perl package ? and would it run on
vanillarLinux 2.6.8-rc4 on MPC 8275 (PQ2FADS-VR) ?
Also did anybody at Debian tried running Cerberus
On Oct 06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but the basic problem I'm speaking about has nothing to do with
volatile - but just that requiring substancially more memory might be a
bad idea. We still have inn1 and inn2 parallel (and I'm a happy user of
inn1), for similar reasons.
Scripsit Joachim Reichel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uups, I missed that I might have to change the name of the library
itself. Or is it possible to have a package named libcore++1
containing libraries libcore.so.1? (If yes, there is still the
problem that a quite generic (file)name is used.)
Unless
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
If you'd be so kind as to refer to #274993, I think we have
a problem. A number of packages (see the bug report) depend on
spamassassin, but some are not going to work with version 3, which
changed the API considerably. The
* Steinar H. Gunderson:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
The most common performance issue with ext3 file systems is caused by
software that accesses files in the order returned by readdir. Has
this been ruled out?
What other, sane alternatives are there?
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
sarge if necessary.
That prevents SA from entering Sarge.
I say: remove all the others from Sarge
Is the Installed-Size field supposed to be computed for a specific
block size, or can I just go with a usual block size like 4k ?
--
André Majorel URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
Do not use this account for regular correspondance.
See the URL above for contact information.
Hi,
in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
problem. Basically, we do
tempfile=`mktemp`
echo something $tempfile
and this will fail if the noclobber option is set in the executing
shell, because
On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the same thing. The difference
is that we *have* to give enough information about an app using only two
pieces of information -- the name of the app and its icon.
*Have* to? Why?
Scripsit Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the Installed-Size field supposed to be computed for a specific
block size, or can I just go with a usual block size like 4k ?
Do not try to compute Installed-Size by hand - dpkg-gencontrol will do
it for you correctly.
That is, unless you have a
Scripsit Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in order
that we don't forget to remove said other packages from sarge if
necessary.
Won't work, at least not by itself. Since we expect the other packages
to sooner or later be updated to
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
could you do me the favor of producing readable mails, i.e. with
empty lines between text and quotes, and sensible line lengths?
Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0),
On 2004-10-06 16:09 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the Installed-Size field supposed to be computed for a specific
block size, or can I just go with a usual block size like 4k ?
Do not try to compute Installed-Size by hand - dpkg-gencontrol will
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
problem. Basically, we do
tempfile=`mktemp`
echo something $tempfile
and this
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:33:37PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I say: remove all the others from Sarge unless or until they comply
with SA 3.
OK, so you want to remove exim4 from sarge, thus breaking installation
altogether?
I fail to see yours and Adrian's rationale for why spamassassin
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:08:42PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am under the impression that 'normal procedures' does not involve
updating the application to catch new threats. If I'm wrong, then there
* martin f krafft
| What do you think?
API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
system. Per child.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user
Scripsit Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2004-10-06 16:09 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Do not try to compute Installed-Size by hand - dpkg-gencontrol will do
it for you correctly.
For my enlightenment, what does dpkg-gencontrol do that is more
correct than summing st_blocks ?
Use the
On 06-Oct-04, 11:06 (CDT), Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only use dpkg-architecture and dpkg-deb -b. Everything under
DEBIAN/ is generated by hand.
Why? The tools are there, and have been for a long time. I've been
with Debian since 0.9x, and I don't think I ever wrote the final
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, I think that every upload to the security archive should be
accompanied by a security advisory. I wouldn't be at all surprised if
the security team felt that uploads that don't merit security
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* martin f krafft
| What do you think?
API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
system. Per child.
After running for a little while,
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES
also sprach Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]:
After running for a little while,
[...]
I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going
on..
I had -m10 passed to spamd for 2.64. When I upgraded, I left that in
place. I almost hosed a server that went up to
Stay at any fairfield resort for as low as 85 dollars a night. I have
an ownership with one million points. I cant use them all Let me know
where you want to stay. 727-571-4298
ERIC
Please Paste following link to Un-subscribe :
http://usvad.net/newsletter2/maillist/[EMAIL
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]:
After running for a little while,
[...]
I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going
on..
I had -m10 passed to spamd for 2.64. When I upgraded, I left that
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
system. Per child.
This is a ridiculous big RSS. What are you telling SA to do? Load 20MB of
AWL and 20MB of Bayes data into memory?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: haskell-devscripts
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : N/A (will be maintained in Debian only)
* License : GPL
Description : Tools to help Debian developers build
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]:
After running for a little while,
[...]
I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going
on..
I had -m10 passed to spamd for 2.64. When I upgraded, I left that in
place.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:19:35PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
problem. Basically,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi folks,
Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
possibly others involved)!
Well, I'm not at all convinced this is so good. Didn't the RMs say
something about 'no major new upstream releases', in order to
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #274003
I have already completed a package myself for kmenc15.
I am now looking for a Debian sponsor for my program.
The package can be found at
http://ares.penguinhosting.net/~ods15/kmenc15/kmenc15-0.01e.tar.gz
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.2023
+0200]:
How much network latency do you have? If -m10 is helping you, you
must be waiting on TCP/IP requests like crazy.
I am not sure. A normal run via spamd takes about 3 seconds per
message. At peak times, the
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought that 'issues related to the development of debian' was on topic
for this list. It is not at all clear to me that this is a security
issue, because outdated A/V software usually does not place the server
it runs on at risk for compromise.
We
also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.2133 +0200]:
I think (1) is true, and I think both (A) and (B) are true. I am
not sure about (2), but I do understand why people are arguing for
it. If they are correct, then it seems to me that the security
archive is already an
Steinar H. Gunderson [u] wrote on 06/10/2004 18:29:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:33:37PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I say: remove all the others from Sarge unless or until they comply
with SA 3.
OK, so you want to remove exim4 from sarge, thus breaking installation
altogether?
??? Since
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
sarge if necessary.
That prevents SA from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: php4-pear-html
Version : 1.10.1
Upstream Author : Pierre-Alain Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Template_IT/
* License : GPL
Description : Simple template API. Template
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought that 'issues related to the development of debian' was on topic
for this list. It is not at all clear to me that this is a security
issue, because outdated A/V software usually does
also sprach Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06. +0200]:
The major change that I'm aware of is the nonsensical change of
'hits' to 'score'[1] in the output. Just provide both 'hits' and
'score' and this particular problem will go away. [This was the
major issue facing
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 16:35]:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
sarge if necessary.
That prevents SA
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:01:12PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
??? Since when does exim4 use SA by default? AFAIK, you have to
specifically configure it to use it. Right? If so, there should be no
reason to remove it or for it to conflict with SA3.
Well, if I dist-upgrade my mail server so a
also sprach Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.2234 +0200]:
I guess spamassassin3 won't be added to sarge. Can you remember
the upload of the latest kde to unstable, and the explicit NO from
the release masters? Can you remember that already before that it
was said no new upstream
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 22:40]:
also sprach Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.2234 +0200]:
I guess spamassassin3 won't be added to sarge. Can you remember
the upload of the latest kde to unstable, and the explicit NO from
the release masters? Can you remember
El mi, 06-10-2004 a las 08:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
escribi:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
b. provide a new version that can interface with spamassassin 3.
Just for the record, current amavisd-new can talk to spamassassin 3, even if
not perfectly (chroots needs
also sprach Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.2244 +0200]:
That can be done of course - as well as we have exim4 in addition
to exim, or inn2 in addition to inn. But in this case, reverting
the latest upload of spamassassin might be a good idea.
I can't wait for Duncan to join in and
On 06 Oct 2004 12:33:42 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought that 'issues related to the development of debian' was on
topic for this list. It is not at all clear to me that this is a
security issue, because outdated A/V
On Oct 06, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if I dist-upgrade my mail server so a new spamassassin comes in, my
mail setup breaks. Now, that is clearly broken, and an RC bug on some
package.
We are talking about unstable.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [8393 idbw1qdMcWarw]
Steinar H. Gunderson [u] wrote on 06/10/2004 22:37:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
??? Since when does exim4 use SA by default? AFAIK, you have to
specifically configure it to use it. Right? If so, there should be no
reason to remove it or for it to conflict with
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:33:37 +0200, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.1616
+0200]:
This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from sarge
if necessary.
also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.06.2256 +0200]:
Under your scheme, Sarge would be bereft of all the packages
that build on SA that have not changed, at the cost of something that
has shown all evidence of being flakey and not ready for prime time
yet.
My
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the problem is not so much whether s.d.o is the right place,
but rather whether anti-virus stuff can go in there. Security fixes
are backported to ensure no new features trickle in and to minimise
changes. With AV software and the like, this
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I (and it seems, others) would like to see is:
3) some other method to upgrade software that has to change rapidly to
meet new classes of threats, even though these threats may not affect
the machine running the software itself. This category
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 23:05]:
On Oct 06, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if I dist-upgrade my mail server so a new spamassassin comes in, my
mail setup breaks. Now, that is clearly broken, and an RC bug on some
package.
We are talking about
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, while this may well be analogous, it is far from being
the same thing, and I don't think the security team should be saddled
with yet another task.
I am happy to agree that the brunt of meeting the new work is upon the
proposers of the
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 23:25]:
Unfortunately, most of what I have seen has been an attempt to have a
new place that involves no actual backporting and publicity work,
rather than volunteering to take that load on.
Actually, I'm considering very much to pick the task
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, while this may well be analogous, it is far from being
the same thing, and I don't think the security team should be saddled
with yet another task.
I am happy to agree that the
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I (and it seems, others) would like to see is:
3) some other method to upgrade software that has to change rapidly to
meet new classes of threats, even though these threats may not affect
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 23:12, Sven Mueller wrote:
Oded Shimon [u] wrote on 06/10/2004 20:33:
I have already completed a package myself for kmenc15.
I am now looking for a Debian sponsor for my program.
The package can be found at
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:51:46PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
But the problem is that spamassassin 2 works in usual people MX systems
(which usually is your older desktop) while SA3 has a big problem in
that machines, making it unusable.
And, BTW, since version 2.64 we have:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:37:04PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:01:12PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
??? Since when does exim4 use SA by default? AFAIK, you have to
specifically configure it to use it. Right? If so, there should be no
reason to remove it or
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:22:02PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
The major change that I'm aware of is the nonsensical change of 'hits'
to 'score'[1] in the output. Just provide both 'hits' and 'score' and
this particular problem will go away. [This was the major issue facing
spamass-milter,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* martin f krafft
| What do you think?
API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
system. Per child.
Umm... I'd like to see
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I really think spamassassin 3 should make it into Sarge, if at all
possible, and not be held up by depending packages which aren't up
to speed.
I'm currently inclined to leave 2.64 in sarge (as has been my
intention ever since
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, the problem is that the procedure that we have is called
backports.org, or private repositories. I agree that we also have a
lack of an agreed upon maintenance strategy, but I respectfully disagree
that we have either a team or an archive at
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, I rather thought that several people, myself included, had offered
to take on the work of doing what we thought was valuable, and you have
been trying to push it off on the security team over strenuous
objections that it is not their job.
No, you
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:31:49PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
- recording talks on video is a problem and a big job; Martin the
Argentinian living in New Zealand was interested in the issue (mooch)
Did I hear someone call my name? ;)
I am keen on organizing the video capture
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:41:03AM -0400, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
libraries that I use
Hi,
Today, cupsys failed to start after its installation because a RPC
service (rpc.statd) was already listening on TCP port 631.
I wondered how portmap assigned such a port, and looked it up in glibc.
portmap uses svctcp_create to create such a socket. svctcp_create
calls
Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many gnustep apps OTOH, use absurdly generic names, and I can only
conclude that the developers do not think about mixed systems at all.
I disagree in the first case, and you are incorrect in the second.
What can I say? You claim this, but the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:30:19 -0500
Source: mysql-query-browser
Binary: mysql-query-browser mysql-query-browser-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.0.7a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:30:56 +0200
Source: gnat-gdb
Binary: gnat-gdb gnat-gdb-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 14:41:53 +0200
Source: abs-guide
Binary: abs-guide
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 01:16:06 -0400
Source: libpod-sax-perl
Binary: libpod-sax-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.14-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jay Bonci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jay Bonci [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:19:56 -0700
Source: ripperx
Binary: ripperx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 02:40:08 -0400
Source: libpod-simple-perl
Binary: libpod-simple-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.02-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jay Bonci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jay Bonci [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 03:09:52 -0400
Source: libterm-query-perl
Binary: libterm-query-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jay Bonci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jay Bonci [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 03:06:39 -0400
Source: libsub-uplevel-perl
Binary: libsub-uplevel-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.09-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jay Bonci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jay Bonci [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 02:46:35 -0400
Source: libproc-invokeeditor-perl
Binary: libproc-invokeeditor-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.02-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jay Bonci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:06:13 +0200
Source: mailscanner
Binary: mailscanner
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.34.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 01:37:50 +0200
Source: lm-sensors-old
Binary: lm-sensors-2.4.27-1-k6 lm-sensors-2.4.27-1-586tsc lm-sensors-source
lm-sensors-2.4.27-1-k7 lm-sensors-2.4.27-1-686 lm-sensors-2.4.27-1-386
lm-sensors-2.4.27-1-k7-smp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 01:31:01 +0200
Source: i2c-old
Binary: i2c-source i2c-2.4.27-1-k6 i2c-2.4.27-1-k7-smp i2c-2.4.27-1-586tsc
i2c-2.4.27-1-686-smp i2c-2.4.27-1-386 i2c-2.4.27-1-k7 i2c-2.4.27-1-686
Architecture: source i386 all
Version:
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
