www.psicoterapie.org/179.htm
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
this is the place were source code lives:
http://www.gnusolaris.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/browser/gnusolaris1/gnu
, Permission Denied
| Insufficient permissions to access /gnusolaris1/gnu
`
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:35:38PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
A new version of kernel-package is imminent, it is undergoing
boot camp out in experimental. For the impatient, this release brings
the log awaited debconf usage for kernel image packages -- and the
raison d'etre of
* Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 00:28:07]:
The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license means that
they *may* do so, but are not required to. Am I correct?
IMHO, DebConf paper authors should be *required* to publish in a
DFSG-free manner, as a condition for
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 01:48, Erast Benson wrote:
www.gnusolaris.org is *the same place*.
Oh, I expected some tar-ball to be linked from the same place as the ISOs
(i.e. the Downloads page) not some point-and-click SVN-webinterface.
this URL also does _neither_ offer access to the apt
Hi,
I posted this question yesterday on -mentors, but since nobody answered,
it seems it isn't as trivial as I had hoped.
I have either some fundamental misunderstanding of how debconf or
maintainer scripts work, or there is an error in the descriptioin of how
debconf-using scripts should handle
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: miredo
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Rémi Denis-Courmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.simphalempin.com/dev/miredo/
* License : GPL v2
Description : IPv6
Hi,
once again, the ldap-part of the bts2ldap-gateway changed its location.
It is now on bts2ldap.debian.net (but this host name has the advantage
that it can stay, even if the ldap-server moves once again :), port is
10101.
Thanks to Andrew Pollock for offering some space on one of his machines
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cdpr
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Lance O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.d.umn.edu/~mzagrabe/debian/cdpr/
* License : GPL
Description : Cisco
El Martes, 8 de Noviembre de 2005 1:11, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand your concern. We will release ISO image with CDDL/GPL
sources very soon. Majority of them already available at /apt. The rest
is comming.
Once again, delete the
* Andy Teijelo Pérez:
El Martes, 8 de Noviembre de 2005 1:11, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand your concern. We will release ISO image with CDDL/GPL
sources very soon. Majority of them already available at /apt. The rest
is comming.
Once
Szia!
Levelet kaptam Tõled a [EMAIL PROTECTED] email címemre! Ezt a postafiókomat már
nem használom!
Légyszives ide írj: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cég Vezetõ
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051108 07:11]:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand your concern. We will release ISO image with CDDL/GPL sources
very soon. Majority of them already available at /apt. The rest is
comming.
Once again, delete the binaries *now*.
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To
Re: Eric Cooper in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
You mean, rather than
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:53 -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
On Nov 08, Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
It's the
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
You could send them e.g. a DMCA Takedown Notice. Especially as they
didn't listen before. Of course only if you're the author of one of the
relevant programms.
you could also send their isp(s) and/or hosting provider(s) said
Hi,
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 16:18]:
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:53 -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new
Le lundi 07 novembre 2005 à 14:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
On Nov 07, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong. Nothing needs BSD ptys but some *very* old applications (I would
not even know where to find one).
At least /sbin/bootlogd does not work without BSD ptys and this is
(X-post to kde-devel. please reply to debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
Liebe Entwickler, dear developers,
as far as I can tell, current alternatives to commercial products (I
dare name Abbyy Finereader and Omnipage Pro) such as gocr and ocrad,
fail to reach the same standards. This is partly a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: systemtap
Upstream Authors: Frank Ch. Eigler [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Graydon Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom
Frank Küster wrote:
However, in case apt-utils is installed, this script will be run twice:
Once by dpkg-preconfigure, i.e. in the preinst stage, and once by
confmodule when the postinst script sources confmodule. As far as I can
see, this will have a confusing effect. Assume the configfile
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 01:48, Erast Benson wrote:
www.gnusolaris.org is *the same place*.
Oh, I expected some tar-ball to be linked from the same place as the ISOs
(i.e. the Downloads page) not some point-and-click SVN-webinterface.
this URL also does _neither_ offer access to the apt
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg-reconfigure runs the config script exactly once, so the config file
is read once, its values are used for defaults to the questions to allow
reconfiguration, and are saved to the config file by the postinst.
Yes, I was wrong about this - it's only run
(
Please mail followups to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-legal@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
)
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Quoting Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:51:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 17:17, Erast Benson wrote:
OK, for your convenient, http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources shold has
everything latest/not-committed tarballs of source code with our
modifications for every package we are using.
We are preparing cron job, so, will update them every
Frank Küster wrote:
I found no way to cleanly solve the problem of
- writing the current state into the debconf database, so that
noninteractive installs don't change anything
- actually reflect changed answers in the system.
The config script is passed parameters that you can use to
Andy Teijelo Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
El Martes, 8 de Noviembre de 2005 1:11, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand your concern. We will release ISO image with CDDL/GPL
sources very soon. Majority of them already available at /apt. The
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
It's certainly my
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 17:17, Erast Benson wrote:
OK, for your convenient, http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources shold has
everything latest/not-committed tarballs of source code with our
modifications for every package we are using.
We are preparing cron job, so, will update them every
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Andy Teijelo Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
El Martes, 8 de Noviembre de 2005 1:11, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand your concern. We will release ISO image with CDDL/GPL
sources very soon. Majority of them already
On 11/8/05, Alex Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that we have limited resources.
How is that relevant?
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
OK, for your convenient, http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources shold has
everything latest/not-committed tarballs of source code with our
modifications for every package we are using.
We are preparing cron job, so, will update them every night until we
On 11/8/05, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is the (long awaited) report from the DevJam (Debian Java
Meeting) from Oldenburg (September 23 2005)[0]. You can find other
reports at the SkoleLinux Wiki[1] or an
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
I am including a list of 73 packages which happened to be installed on
my laptop which contain a maintscript with the fragment:
# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
# generated by other debhelper scripts.
Maybe this is a
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 20:29, Erast Benson wrote:
For example, I have found
http://www.gnusolaris.org/apt/dists/elatte-unstable/main/binary-solaris-i
386/base/apt_0.6.40.1-1.1_solaris-i386.deb which seems to be installed on
the ISO image, but no corresponding source package under
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
I am including a list of 73 packages which happened to be installed on
my laptop which contain a maintscript with the fragment:
# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
# generated by
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
I think it's a
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, I prefer the approach over apt-cacher, as the apt-sources
entries remain independent of the server that will be used to retrieve
the files.
I originally kept away from apt-cacher for exactly that reason, but it
now (as of version 1.0.6) supports a
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OH. Maybe I understand. The maintscripts of the packages in my list
were probably initially dh_make templates, and the maintainers didn't
remove that comment. The packages not in my list either have
maintscripts created from scratch by debhelper, or
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone have a suggestion about what to do when the maintainer
can't reproduce it and the reporter can only reproduce it on one
of his machines? I'm kind of stymied on #329333 for Autoconf.
No idea what the problem is here.
Well, the problem is that for
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:40PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This refers to the #DEBHELPER# token.
OH. Maybe I understand. The maintscripts of the packages in my list
were probably initially dh_make templates, and the maintainers didn't
remove that
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
OK, for your convenient, http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources shold has
everything latest/not-committed tarballs of source code with our
modifications for every package we are using.
We are preparing cron job, so, will update them every night until we
Scripsit Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't you agree that seeing non-free or even undistributable (no license
means All Rights Reserved, with current laws!) papers at a DebConf is
really a shame?
I don't.
Remember that non-free != evil, and that some of the arguments why
free software
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: natstat
Version : 0.0.10
Upstream Author : Tommy Wallberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://svearike.sytes.net/natstat/
* License
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:43:14 +0100, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
A new version of kernel-package is imminent, it is undergoing boot
camp out in experimental. For the impatient, this release brings
the log awaited debconf usage
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:07:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Like I said, this defeats the entire point of the FHS.
What is the entire point of the FHS? If it is to disallow alternative
implementations of the same interface to co-exist then the FHS is
broken. Fortunately, this is not my
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:39:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
They began distributing binaries to a large audience *after* they were
notified of the problems. This gives the impression that they don't
care about GPL compliance, and want to gain publicity *now*,
exploiting the GNU and
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
I'm amazed at the level of intolerence that's greeting a pretty major
contribution to the free software community. There are, what, five major
OS/kernels for PCs/workstatsions these days -- Windows, OS X, Solaris,
BSD and Linux. How does it make any
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
It doesn't seem
Anthony:
I'm amazed at the level of intolerence that's greeting a pretty major
contribution to the free software community. There are, what, five major
OS/kernels for PCs/workstatsions these days -- Windows, OS X, Solaris,
BSD and Linux. How does it make any sense at all to be hostile to the
Eric:
Miles Bader wrote:
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
The source and binaries *must* match, period. You can't have tarballs
being
constantly upgraded, and the binaries not, or vice versa. The
source+binary
must be done as a whole unit.
Also, with this email, I am making a formal request: I am
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:39:20AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm amazed at the level of intolerence that's greeting a pretty major
contribution to the free software community. There are, what, five major
OS/kernels for PCs/workstatsions these days -- Windows, OS X, Solaris,
BSD and Linux.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:29:31PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
I think that in this instant case, the hostility is the allegation
that a Debian-based GNU/Solaris system as described by Erast isn't
possible.
Of course it's possible. Trivially: you do it by buying a majority of
shares in all
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:23:30AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
I'm amazed at the level of intolerence that's greeting a pretty major
contribution to the free software community. There are, what, five major
OS/kernels for PCs/workstatsions these
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
When you see some code that's not available under the GPL's terms,
what's your reaction:
(a) gosh, what can I do to convince the author to give it to me
under the GPL?
(b) you aren't/shouldn't be allowed to do that. stop now.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:55:41PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
You'll note that even in the initial part of the thread when Debian
folks were (generally) being polite,
From the very first response:
] and openness.
] You keep using that word. I do not think it means, what you think it
]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libpoe-filter-ircd-perl
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Jonathan Steinert, now Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/~bingos/POE-Filter-IRCD-1.2/
* License : GPL/Artistic
Anthony:
Loved your for those of you following at home post.
As is pressing people. You can justify hostility, certainly; but it's
at least worth trying honest and cooperative as an approach first.
It didn't start out that way, not as I read it anyway.
When you see some code that's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:56:36 -0800
Source: gal0.x
Binary: libgal-data libgal-dev libgal23
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 0.24-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:40:00 +0200
Source: mydms
Binary: mydms
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miguel Gea Milvaques [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miguel Gea Milvaques [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:42:38 +
Source: iaxclient
Binary: iaxcomm libiaxclient-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0+cvs20050725-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:39:15 +0100
Source: asciidoc
Binary: asciidoc
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Fredrik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:21:36 +0100
Source: asciidoc
Binary: asciidoc
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.0.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:40:52 +0100
Source: pylint
Binary: python2.3-pylint pylint pylint-common python2.4-pylint python2.2-pylint
pylint-test
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:40:42 +0100
Source: amarok
Binary: amarok-arts amarok amarok-gstreamer amarok-xine amarok-engines
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adeodato Simó [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:33:49 +0100
Source: tmsnc
Binary: tmsnc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:27:35 +0100
Source: inkscape
Binary: inkscape
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.42.2+0.43pre2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wolfram Quester
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:02:15 +0100
Source: dictionaries-common
Binary: dictionaries-common-dev dictionaries-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.62.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Agustin Martin Domingo [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:56:51 +0100
Source: python-scipy
Binary: python-scipy python2.3-scipy python2.4-scipy
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.3.2-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:43:36 +
Source: console-tools
Binary: kbd-compat console-tools-dev libconsole console-tools
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:0.2.3dbs-58
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:15:22 -0500
Source: geos
Binary: libgeos-dev libgeos-doc libgeos2c2
Architecture: source alpha all
Version: 2.1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Halasz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:15:15 +0200
Source: dillo
Binary: dillo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:53:09 +0100
Source: libwant-perl
Binary: libwant-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:58:44 +0100
Source: traffic-vis
Binary: traffic-vis
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.34-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Samuele Giovanni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:09:25 -0500
Source: mplayerplug-in
Binary: mozilla-mplayer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ari Pollak [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:17:21 +0100
Source: ht
Binary: ht
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.1+cvs20051108-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:17:58 +0100
Source: tomcat5
Binary: tomcat5-admin tomcat5-webapps tomcat5 libtomcat5-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.0.30-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:00:10 +0100
Source: udev
Binary: udev udev-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.074-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:24:32 -0600
Source: libtk-pod-perl
Binary: libtk-pod-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9930-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Carlo Segre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:12:04 -0800
Source: aptitude
Binary: aptitude-doc-cs aptitude-doc-fr aptitude-doc-fi aptitude-doc-en aptitude
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.4.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:14:46 +0100
Source: linux-patch-2.6-mips
Binary: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-sb1-swarm-bn linux-headers-2.6.12-1-r10k-ip27
linux-image-2.6.12-1-r4k-ip22 linux-headers-2.6-r10k-ip30
linux-image-2.6-r10k-ip27
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:51:08 -0600
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 10.008
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:08:34 +0100
Source: dialog
Binary: dialog
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0-20051107-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:15:29 +
Source: maxima
Binary: maxima-test maxima-share maxima-emacs maxima-doc maxima-src xmaxima
maxima
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 5.9.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Camm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:31:30 -0600
Source: liferea
Binary: liferea-mozilla liferea-gtkhtml liferea
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.7b+test1.0rc3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Moreno Garza [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:59:30 -0500
Source: debconf
Binary: debconf-english debconf-doc debconf-utils debconf-i18n debconf
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.59
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:35:01 +0100
Source: dcgui
Binary: dcgui
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.80-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:39:06 -0500
Source: alien
Binary: alien
Architecture: source all
Version: 8.57
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:43:44 +0100
Source: xscavenger
Binary: xscavenger
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.4-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hwei Sheng Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:03:43 +0200
Source: sip4-qt3
Binary: python2.3-sip4-qt3 python-sip4-qt3 sip4 python2.3-sip4-dev
python-sip4-dev python2.4-sip4-qt3 python2.4-sip4-dev
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 4.3.1-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:59:00 +0100
Source: dctc
Binary: dctc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.85.9-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:51:45 +
Source: asterisk
Binary: asterisk-sounds-main asterisk-h323 asterisk-web-vmail
asterisk-gtk-console asterisk asterisk-config asterisk-dev asterisk-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:58:52 +0100
Source: libsvn-notify-perl
Binary: libsvn-notify-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.49-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nacho Barrientos Arias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:47:01 +0100
Source: php-radius
Binary: php-radius
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:47:48 +
Source: zaptel
Binary: libtonezone1 zaptel-source zaptel libtonezone-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:1.0.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:29:07 +0100
Source: s-xml
Binary: cl-s-xml
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:20051107-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luca Capello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luca Capello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:26:25 -0500
Source: rss2email
Binary: rss2email
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:2.55-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
