On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:18:00AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10469 March 1977, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used to
be accepted in the past.
Because people then fuck up their packages even more.
No, they havent been
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Because it isn't true that the previous version didn't use debconf. It
just asked the questions totally differently and took an approach that I
now would call flawed. But still it gave the users the impression that
their ls-R files'
It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner; if you
plan on presenting, some DFSG free license of the material you present
should be expected so portions of the work can be utilized in main or
otherwise
[Chip Salzenberg]
I see no point in trying to force my way (back) into a project that
shows no interest in allowing me to keep participating. Therefore,
I hereby resign from the Debian Project.
Please, do not do this. The project is to large and fuzzy to have
any interest, but there are
also sprach Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.11.10.1908 +0100]:
CVSsuck is a mirroring tool for CVS repositories. Unlike other
tools such as CVSup or rsync, it uses cvs command to access the
repository. So, it works well with remote repositories without
a special server or shell
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Nicolas Fran?ois wrote:
Hi,
In #276419, the bug submitter complained that when a command and some
arguments were passed to su, all these arguments were concatenated, and
provided to the shell -c option.
This behavior differs from su on other
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:51:30 +1000
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Anyway, if it's recompressing like I think, there's no way to get the
same compressed md5sum -- even if the information could be
transferred, there's no guarantee the local gzip _can_ produce the
same output as the
Le vendredi 11 novembre 2005 à 00:55 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit :
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Why is this the case ? I'm running with experimental GNOME packages; if
I upload a binary package depending on them, it will be uninstallable on
unstable systems.
How can you
On 11/10/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Josselin Mouette]
I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
to be accepted in the past.
It's the first line of defense against people uploading things that
don't build, wasting various infrastructure
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:22:39PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
sure you would find several of them willing to sponsor your upload.
That's not a fix, it's a bad workaround. I was a
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
Whatever you choose to do, you need to take care of partial upgrade.
Not across released stable versions! Since when do we support
stable/stable+1 mixed systems?
Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
done right. New
[Brian Nelson]
Oh, so Ubuntu packages are fucked up more by their maintainers more
than Debian packages are?
Yes, or so it's been alleged.
Not being a user of ubuntu unstable, I can't confirm or deny.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:54:09AM -0500, Michael Vogt wrote:
A problem is that zsync needs to teached to deal with deb files (that
is, that it needs to unpack the data.tar and use that for the syncs).
[Anthony Towns]
That seems kinda awkward -- you'd need to start by downloading the ar
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously correct, why
force people to do it? If some people are uncomfortable with it, why
fight that?
Even within Debian, it's become clear to me that, if we want DFSG-free
things,
Hi,
We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
* keep a Debian specific implementation and tag this bug wontfix
* reapply the patch to fix this bug, and report bugs on the packages that
uses this feature
Could you document and wait until etch release?
The ideal way to approach this is to announce a change,
Which is what we are doing now. We neglected to do so the first time
(mostly because we didn't anticipate this would break pbuilder so
much) and this is why we reverted the change very quickly.
document that change, provide some
I never got an answer, and when upstream was presented with the problem
OpenSCEP more or less died. Go figure. I lost interest in the packageing
due to this.
Lars, If you ever got an answer to your question below could you
share it with me. I'm trying to compile a mixed fortran C code that
Op do, 10-11-2005 te 16:22 -0800, schreef Chip Salzenberg:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
sure you would find several of them willing to sponsor your upload.
That's not a fix, it's a bad workaround.
Yes, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for the sheet music to the song due1ing b4nj0s from the
movie deliverance. It's for guitar. Can you tell me where I can
find it?
Please see (for instance)
http://www.cowboylyrics.com/tabs/flatt-and-scruggs/due%6cing-b%61nj%6fs-6185.html
Hi,
I tried to download and run Live CD but without
success. I think that collaboration of enterprise forces of
Solaris-security,stable,expandableand usability of Debian platform is
great idea. I'm a sys admin in Institute of Computer and Comm. Systems - Bulg.
Academy of Science. Ourefforts
Hi,
support for that change (like POSIXLY_CORRECT)
Then change.
We've got quite a bit of tools in sarge that doesn't work with
this change, right?
From what Nicolas investigated, not that much. He only found dchroot
and pbuilder up to now. Nicolas does not pretend to have a
Hi,
It seems that not every new maintainer is building a package
on an unstable system which is recommended (or at least a
version with the current policy version).
So there are errors in packages which come to debian-mentors
which are checked with an old version of the debian policy.
So what
Re: Nico Golde in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what about a special exception which provides updated
lintian linda packages for the stable distribution?
Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be
fixed.
This doesn't make sense. You need unstable to build on unstable, and
only updating
Hi,
CVSsuck is a mirroring tool for CVS repositories. Unlike other
tools such as CVSup or rsync, it uses cvs command to access the
repository. So, it works well with remote repositories without
a special server or shell account. However it is inefficient and
not perfect because CVS
FWIW, pbuilder in sid is fixed since 0.129 (17 August 2005),
and I am hoping that will
probagate into some stable backports, so that practically,
pbuilder side is ready for the new su.
Well, this is actually great news as pbuilder was by far the main
blocker for this change. Sorry for
Hi,
Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it can be
unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no open critical bug
was seen. After Boot the system was completely broken as of the libpcre
dependency.
So please do not close bugs bevore it is available on
Anthony:
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:56:32PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
And, I mean, seriously: using the threat of legal action to make people
remove free software from the Internet? Whose side are we on here?
No. The threat of legal action to stop the theft of
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:07:33PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
[0] Presuming the FSF's claims about dynamic linking hold up in this
case, anyway.
I consider a Debian-derived distribution a derived work of the contained
Debian
e.g. you cannot fix Sarge pbuilder anyway, so etch su must work with sarge
pbuilder. That why it would have been better to announce the change before
Sarge release.
Maybe, but unfortunately, this bug was properly analysed a few weeks
*after* sarge release. Remember, there were over 150
Bill Gatliff writes:
With all due respect, and a certain unwillingness to get distracted
from the main thread of discussion or to further inflame an already
pretty volatile situation, I think that theft may in fact be the
appropriate term to use here.
Theft, n.:
1. (Law) The act of
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
So what about a special exception which provides updated lintian
linda packages for the stable distribution? Is it technical possible?
I mean becaused it should be fixed.
It might not be necessary as an exception: perhaps the rule
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
scripts should work with dash too.
That's incorrect. A correctly written /bin/sh script is allowed to
use
Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James has
more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle keyring
updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills paid. As most of
us do, I suppose.
Yep, this is something I was about to add.
Most of us have
Bill Gatliff writes:
Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
is not being deprived of any property.
Whether Erast did so with malicious intent, that's another question
entirely.
It is not. Theft requires
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kde-style-polymer
Version : 0.5.5
Upstream Author : Marco Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=27968
* License : GPL
Hi!
* Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05 15:28]:
So what about a special exception which provides updated
lintian linda packages for the stable distribution?
Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be
fixed.
Curently it's quite easy to run unstables lintian, debootstrap and
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:11:24AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Bill Gatliff writes:
Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
is not being deprived of any property.
There's something darkly amusing about
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Esteban Manchado Velázquez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libcommandline-ruby
Version : 0.7.10
Upstream Author : Jim Freeze
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/optionparser/
* License : BSD-style
Description :
Op vr, 11-11-2005 te 15:28 +0100, schreef Nico Golde:
So what about a special exception which provides updated
lintian linda packages for the stable distribution?
Doesn't sound like a particularly good idea to me. You need no just
unstable's linda/lintian; you also need unstable's libraries
Glenn:
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:11:24AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Bill Gatliff writes:
Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
is not being deprived of any property.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:09:22PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op do, 10-11-2005 te 16:22 -0800, schreef Chip Salzenberg:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
sure you would find several of them willing to sponsor
Klaus Ethgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it can be
unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no open critical bug
was seen. After Boot the system was completely broken as of the libpcre
dependency.
So please do not close bugs
[Wouter Verhelst]
Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James
has more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle
keyring updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills
paid. As most of us do, I suppose.
Yes, most of us have changing priorities, and am
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:10:06 -0600, Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
No, the owner hasn't been deprived. But the rights said owner
conveyed via the GPL (which amount to some level of ownership, at
least philosophically) have been deprived from the GNU/Solaris end
users. It's the
Hi,
while my regular clean up RC-bugs-work I noticed that the package krb4
is RC-buggy in more than one way. On further investigation, I also
noticed that kerberos 4 is dying right now, and also that the bugs are
not as easy to fix. Also, upstream doesn't look too active according to
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:23 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Over the past five weeks
And guess how long will take to get your account removed.
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: C671257D
Este no es un
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David Weinehall wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
scripts should work with dash too.
That's incorrect. A
What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
The various testing migration pages seem to be all confused:
- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=sork-passwd doesn't give
me the excuses link anymore
- http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sork-passwd
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 00:53, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:50:01PM -0800, Alex Ross wrote:
Here's the 2nd part of the answer:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is, are you going to pursue a legal action against Sun
Microsystems?
To which my answer was
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from
kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do not, I would
start to push into that direction. And of course, feel free to send me
things that need to be changed. As usual, the
Andreas == Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Hi, while my regular clean up RC-bugs-work I noticed
Andreas that the package krb4 is RC-buggy in more than one
Andreas way. On further investigation, I also noticed that
Andreas kerberos 4 is dying right now, and also
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: borg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: Buoh
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://buoh.steve-o.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Buoh is a reader for online strips comics, designed to work
well under
Suppose you have a repository stuffed full of binary packages, in this
case Debian Packages. If you were unlucky enough to have them in a
rather un-organized fashion, I was just wondering if the package file
itself would provide said information to allow me to write a program to
sort them out.
Hi,
Christopher Crammond Christopher Crammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Suppose you have a repository stuffed full of binary packages, in
this case Debian Packages. If you were unlucky enough to have them
in a rather un-organized fashion, I was just wondering if the package
file itself would
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
So what about a special exception which provides updated
lintian linda packages for the stable distribution?
Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be
fixed.
That's imho wrong idea because of at least one very
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 05:18:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:40:27PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:53:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:55:41PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
many of Erast's responses
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Find out what is required to keep AFS support working (assuming I
don't already have it).
Well, what sort of AFS environment? The answer is different if you mean
AFS using kaserver than if you mean AFS using krb524 or native K5.
--
Russ Allbery
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 21:47]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from
kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do not, I would
start to push into that direction. And of course, feel free to
El jue, 10-11-2005 a las 23:43 +0100, Josselin Mouette escribió:
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 23:00 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
* Josselin Mouette [Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:45:20 +0100]:
(And don't tell me to use pbuilder, I don't have the disk space nor the
bandwidth for it.)
Why
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You think that December 2006 (the expected release time of etch) is too
early to drop Kerberos 4?
I'm not sure. I think it's going to be tight for some people, but on the
other hand not shipping etch with MIT Kerberos 1.5 is not exactly
appealing. I
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 23:26]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You think that December 2006 (the expected release time of etch) is too
early to drop Kerberos 4?
I'm not sure. I think it's going to be tight for some people, but on the
other hand not shipping
Hi,
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-11 23:41]:
Op vr, 11-11-2005 te 15:28 +0100, schreef Nico Golde:
So what about a special exception which provides updated
lintian linda packages for the stable distribution?
Doesn't sound like a particularly good idea to me. You need no
On Friday 11 November 2005 21:19, George Danchev wrote:
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 00:53, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:50:01PM -0800, Alex Ross wrote:
Here's the 2nd part of the answer:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is, are you going to pursue a legal
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:23 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Over the past five weeks
And guess how long will take to get your account removed.
Hmm... Doesn't a resignation require a message signed with a key on the
On Friday 11 November 2005 19:36, Erast Benson wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
Let's consider this dpkg binary from the GNU/Solaris LiveCD, which I have
loop
mounted:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gnusolaris/livecd-mnt/usr/bin$ ./dpkg
bash: ./dpkg: No such file or
Peter == Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter [Miles Bader]
I'd say so. Or fix the bug.
Peter Kind of quick and dirty, and not particularly tested, since
Peter I don't actually know how to use ttysnoop.
Peter But it's a proof of concept of how easy it is to add
Junichi == Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Junichi Hi,
Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it
can be unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no
open critical bug was seen. After Boot the system was
completely broken as of the
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:19:07PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 21:47]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from
kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do not, I
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:26:58 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
FYI, a possible response might be: we care about freeness, but we
pick our battle, and our battle is Debian main. I care about
starving children, but I don't donate the
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
The various testing migration pages seem to be all confused:
- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=sork-passwd doesn't give
me the excuses link
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: italc
Version : 0.9.6.2
Upstream Author : Tobias Doerffel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://italc.sourceforge.net/download.php
* License : GPL
Description : teaching
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-turbogears
Version : 0.8a3
Upstream Author : Kevin Dangoor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.turbogears.org/
* License :
Hello folks,
I prepared a new package of grub for upload in next days. It still
needs some work but looks like a good improvement.
Would be good if you could do a brief test of it and provide feedback
directly to me. If it solve any previous bug that you had before,
would be good if you could
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:43:23AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:11:24AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Bill Gatliff writes:
Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
is not being
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner;
OTOH, conferences usually ask for the minimal permission they actually
need to do their job.
if
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:00:55AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously correct, why
force people to do it? If some people are uncomfortable with it, why
fight that?
Even within
Hi,
Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it
can be unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no
open critical bug was seen. After Boot the system was
completely broken as of the libpcre dependency.
So please do not close bugs
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
sork-passwd |2.2.2-2 | testing | source, all
sork-passwd |2.2.2-2 | unstable | source, all
It migrated already...
Cheers,
aj
Scribit Josselin Mouette dies 10/11/2005 hora 22:45:
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 13:32 -0800, Debian Installer a écrit :
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
to be accepted in the past.
And I see a rationale
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner;
OTOH, conferences usually ask for the minimal
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:46AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Andreas == Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Hi, while my regular clean up RC-bugs-work I noticed
Andreas that the package krb4 is RC-buggy in more than one
Andreas way. On further investigation, I also
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:46:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Of course, within Debian DFSG-freeness isn't mandatory or enforced: you
can upload to non-free instead of main just by tweaking your control file.
The response is predictable, but here it is anyway: non-free isn't within
Debian;
Scribit Anthony Towns dies 11/11/2005 hora 16:43:
The problem is a technicality, not a moral or practical difference
from the GPL's expectations: you still have the source to OpenSolaris
libc, and you still have permission to modify it, redistribute it,
sell it, etc.
Didn't someone ask for
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:48:20 +1000, Anthony Towns
aj@azure.humbug.org.au said:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:07:33PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
[0] Presuming the FSF's claims about dynamic linking hold up in
this
case, anyway.
I consider a Debian-derived distribution a derived work of
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:26:52 +1000, Anthony Towns
aj@azure.humbug.org.au said:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
[If this poses a problem,[1] you always have the option of not
presenting, or presenting your work in an informal session.]
*sigh*
Does this
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:26:58 +1000, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au
said:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
FYI, a possible response might be: we care about freeness, but we
pick our battle, and our battle is Debian main. I care about
starving children,
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:29:56 +0100, Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Scribit Josselin Mouette dies 10/11/2005 hora 22:45:
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 13:32 -0800, Debian Installer a écrit :
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
I can't see the rationale for rejecting source
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:46:24 +1000, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au
said:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:00:55AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously
correct, why force people
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-pyprotocols
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] com
* URL : http://peak.telecommunity.com/PyProtocols.html
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-ruledispatch
Version : 0.5a0dev
Upstream Author : Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://www.turbogears.org/download/eggs/RuleDispatch-0.5a0dev_r2097.zip
* License
Dear Sir
We are Exporter of all kind of
Textile Waste from Pakistan and
would like to extend our Business Relationship with your esteem Company, we can
provide you following item
Gin mote
Card Fly
Cotton Yarn Waste
P/C Yarn Waste
Comber Noël
Hosiery Cutting 100% Cotton
Hosiery Cotton
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-testgears
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Kevin Dangoor dangoor+testgears at gmail com
* URL : http://www.turbogears.org/testgears/
* License :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:37:51 +0200
Source: drift
Binary: drift
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Arjan Oosting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
drift
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:32:15 +0100
Source: ksubtile
Binary: ksubtile
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ana Beatriz Guerrero Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Isaac Clerencia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:02:16 +0100
Source: gnome-python
Binary: python-gnome2-dev python2.4-gnome2 python2.3-gnome2 python-gnome2
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.10.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Sebastien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:12:20 +0100
Source: gnome-swallow
Binary: gnome-swallow-applet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josselin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:25:52 +1000
Source: spca5xx
Binary: spca5xx-source
Architecture: source all
Version: 20051105-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian spca5xx Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:27:27 +0100
Source: abuse-lib
Binary: abuse-lib
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.00-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Hocevar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:04:29 +0100
Source: geneweb
Binary: geneweb gwtp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.10-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Perrier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:07:05 +0100
Source: mozilla-firefox
Binary: mozilla-firefox mozilla-firefox-gnome-support
mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc2.dfsg-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency:
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
