Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
libgnutls-dev is a suitable substitute for libssl-dev when one wants
libssl.
However, libssl-dev provides *two* libraries; the other is libcrypto.
Is there a GPL-compatible
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:01:25 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to the reports of another member of the ftp-master team, the
situation was cleared up, but Mr. Troup re-enabled the check that
breaks dpkg-sig on purpose after not
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:25:07AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Don't use other *-config tools.
While many libraries these days use pkg-config, there are also other
libs which ship their own tools for querying library and header include
Quoting John Walther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If any Debian developers or prospective developers would like to have
their GPG keys signed, I will probably be in Bangalore next month.
The keysigning will probably be at the Bangalore LUG meeting, but other
arrangements can be made. Email me.
[Please, Cc: to me, I am not currently subscribed to debian-devel.]
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 02:13]:
Stephen Gran wrote:
FWIW, Rafael, at first blush I have to say I agree with you. A
maintainer address in Debian is just a way to get in touch with someone
when
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
As regards the copy of this information into the Changed-By field of the
changes file, we are already requiring that the developers of the DOG
use the -e option of debuild (cf the DOG Guidelines, at
And the autobuilders get
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:56:15AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
I will fill a whishlist bugreport against debuild to support dpkg-sig
side by side with debuild.
There is already #247825. #247824 is the wishlist bug for
dpkg-buildpackage support.
Indeed, I spotted them just after the
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you can for example have 4 config sets (each in its own location):
- one with the upstream default values
- one with overrides for upstream settings by maintainer
- one with cdd-overrides for the settings
- one with admin-overrides for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Haber writes:
So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all.
I think that DD's do not use dpkg-sig and debsigs because they believe them
to be hard to use and not supported by the
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:51:55 +, Roger Leigh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Haber writes:
So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all.
I think that DD's do not use dpkg-sig and debsigs because they believe them
to be hard to use and not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
(the cvs, not deb)
Which sbuild CVS repo? I'll be happy to merge the changes into the
official sbuild package (buildd-tools
Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2005, 21:21 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Let me just make the suggestion to better use reprepro.
That's not an alternative. It has no easy incoming mechanisms for remote
systems.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:51:55 +, Roger Leigh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Haber writes:
So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all.
I think that DD's do not use dpkg-sig and debsigs because they
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:54:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I think it's cryptographic
Hello,
Frank Maffia wrote:
I have also asked to be removed from 'Call Wave'. I am also on Comcast
broadband but my Visa card is still being billed.
You have reached the Debian project. As such, we are not affiliated in
any way with them, however Google shows our pages as especially relevant
On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...]
On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes
buildd logs,
Then that description is wrong. It never did include buildd
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:02:36AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
(the cvs, not deb)
Which sbuild CVS repo?
It is a SVN repo now, the one used by the buildd
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:38:45AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...]
On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes
buildd
* Matthew Palmer [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:54:58 +1100]:
Sorry, that was a massive typo on my part. I thought buildd output, and
wrote buildd logs when I meant buildd .changes files. My question, as
amended, though, still holds -- are the .changes associated with the upload
of autobuilt packages
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:02:36AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
(the cvs, not deb)
Which sbuild CVS repo?
It's actually a subversion repository, and it's at
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil, at least in so far
A signed deb has a seal of procedence and allows one to
Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2005, 21:27 -0600 schrieb Ron Johnson:
Where can I go to discover it's status?
The evolution packagers are organized here:
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-evolution/
Maybe ask on their mailinglist:
https://alioth.debian.org/mail/?group_id=30664
--
Noèl Köthe
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
You can already use release signatures for this. Further, changing the
deb after upload would make it much more difficult to check the deb was
what was uploaded -- you can no longer just use md5sum, you've instead
got to use special tools.
While the
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 10:21]:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
As regards the copy of this information into the Changed-By field of the
changes file, we are already requiring that the developers of the DOG
use the -e option of
Steve Langasek wrote:
* Use Debian's libtool.
I took one affected package (kmldonkey) from your list, relibtoolized
it as described, and rebuilt it, which failed spectacularly. Then, I
took another one (rekall), relibtoolized it, rebuilt it, and that
failed with a strikingly similar pattern.
Le Jeudi 24 Novembre 2005 14:43, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
Steve Langasek wrote:
* Use Debian's libtool.
I took one affected package (kmldonkey) from your list, relibtoolized
it as described, and rebuilt it, which failed spectacularly. Then, I
took another one (rekall), relibtoolized it,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libsub-name-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Matthijs van Duin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~xmath/Sub-Name-0.02/
* License : Perl:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libclass-c3-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Stevan Little, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Class/Class-C3-0.06.tar.gz
* License
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:21:27PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 10:21]:
And the autobuilders get this value from where? They use the common way
by looking into the changelog.
They get the correct entity, which is in the changelog (in the case
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
[Please, Cc: to me, I am not currently subscribed to debian-devel.]
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 02:13]:
Stephen Gran wrote:
FWIW, Rafael, at first blush I have to say I agree with you. A
maintainer address in Debian is just a way to get in
Hi,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Well, assuming .changes is not snake-oil, then why should in-deb sigs be
called snake-oil? After all, according to you they essentially do the same
job.
Not exactly. .changes files say that the archive should be changed. If
the archive were to accept
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
libgnutls-dev is a suitable substitute for libssl-dev when one wants
libssl.
However, libssl-dev provides *two* libraries; the other is libcrypto.
Is there a GPL-compatible
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kat
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : Roberto Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://kat.mandriva.com
* License : GPL
Description : desktop search environment for
On Thursday 24 November 2005 16:35, Fathi Boudra wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kat
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : Roberto Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://kat.mandriva.com
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: sendcard
Version : 3.2.3
Upstream Author : Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.sendcard.org
* License : Artistic License or QPL (contacted author to
* Anthony Towns:
Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil, at least in so far
as it relates to Debian. I remain interested in seeing any realistic
demonstration of how a Debian user could reasonably rely on them for
any practical assurance.
The assurance doesn't come from the
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:50:11PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
(the cvs, not deb)
Patches for the Debian package are welcome, of course.
Michael
Do you know about
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were, originally. Ryan's been very active on it since, and it's
diverged a bit from the code you're maintaining.
Then he should send patches and bug reports to the debian
package. This split between the user/developer visible sbuild and the
secret
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:09:21AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
2) A signature from dinstall saying this package was installed in the
Debian archive would provide a means of automatic assurance of the source
of a binary package, when I'm putting
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:31:22PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Then there's the opposite argument about why not do that inside the .deb?.
Simple answers: unnecessary bloat, unwarranted feeling of security
leading to bad decisions.
Where do you
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
deb after upload would make it much more difficult to check the deb was
what was uploaded -- you can no longer just use md5sum, you've instead
got to use special tools.
So? Is that so bad?
Also so
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Well, assuming .changes is not snake-oil, then why should in-deb sigs be
called snake-oil? After all, according to you they essentially do the same
job.
Not exactly. .changes files say that the archive should
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 09:18:40PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Use 1: I have this deb in my apt-move mirror and I want to know if it
was compromised on yesterdays breakin
Boot a clean system with debian keyring and check all deb
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
[Please, Cc: to me, I am not currently subscribed to debian-devel.]
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 02:13]:
Stephen Gran wrote:
FWIW, Rafael, at first blush I have to say I agree with you. A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: culmus-fancy
Version : 0.0.20051018
Upstream Author : Maxim Iorsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://culmus.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Type1 Fancy
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:31:51PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Hello,
Frank Maffia wrote:
I have also asked to be removed from 'Call Wave'. I am also on Comcast
broadband but my Visa card is still being billed.
You have reached the Debian project. As such, we are not affiliated in
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2005, 21:21 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Let me just make the suggestion to better use reprepro.
That's not an alternative. It has no easy incoming mechanisms for remote
systems.
Regards, Daniel
And apt-ftparchive has?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:51:24PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I personally see the packages in unstable as something good for
end-users who want to use it, or understand how the system works; but
for Debian's purposes, it's not optimal.
Stephen Frost writes (Re: master's mail backlog and upgrade time):
*I* don't bounce much of anything. Talk to Ian about wanting to
generate bounces, it wasn't my idea. What I want is for him to bounce
it himself if he feels it needs to be bounced, not make master do it.
What I want is for
Stephen Gran wrote:
[snip]
The maintainer name and email address used in the changelog should
be the details of the person uploading this version. They are not
necessarily those of the usual package maintainer.
[snip]
I think that are two distinct concepts here. The
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If such a signature mechanism is implemented, dinstall could also append
a copy of the filelist, with updated md5sums. I'm not familiar with the
ar format, but can one restore the old md5sum when you unpack the deb,
remove the additional signature, and
Anthony Towns writes (Re: Automated testing - design and interfaces):
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 06:22:37PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
This is no good because we want the test environment to be able to
tell which tests failed, so the test cases have to be enumerated in
the test metadata file.
Stephen Gran wrote:
[snip]
And we are in danger of allowing policy to drive practice, rather than
vice versa.
The problem is, there are many packages currently being group
maintained. These groups generally have some sort of group contact
email address:
grep-dctrl -n -s Maintainer ''
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Btw, about this simple-minded test:
299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and
nobody there felt compelled to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the changelog
for whatever reason.
What is the difference betwen this:
Maintainer:
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Btw, about this simple-minded test:
299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and
nobody there felt compelled to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the changelog
for whatever reason.
What is the difference
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:26:17PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Btw, about this simple-minded test:
299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and
nobody there felt compelled to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the changelog
for
Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2005, 19:53 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2005, 21:21 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Let me just make the suggestion to better use reprepro.
That's not an alternative. It has no easy
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Btw, about this simple-minded test:
299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and
nobody there felt compelled to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Btw, about this simple-minded test:
299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and
nobody there felt compelled to put
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 22:03, Stephen Gran wrote:
But the .dsc is. This stuff is easily traceable, if we want to. I can
see the benefit of having the same name in the Maintainer field and in the
changelog for some. I can see arguments against it, but none that make
it an RC bug. We
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 22:36, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
I can see arguments against it, but none that make
it an RC bug.
Policy violations are RC by definition.
According to policy should's are not RC.
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Isaac Clerencia wrote:
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 22:03, Stephen Gran wrote:
But the .dsc is. This stuff is easily traceable, if we want to. I can
see the benefit of having the same name in the Maintainer field and in the
changelog for some. I can see arguments against it, but none
Hi
First, what is DOG, I never heard about it.
In the debian/changelog for octave2.9 (and all other packages maintained
collectively by the Debian Octave Group, the DOG)
Start of Thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/msg01378.html
Second, I'm a member of the
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 21:42]:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:26:17PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Btw, about this simple-minded test:
299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and
nobody there
Isaac Clerencia wrote:
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 22:36, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
I can see arguments against it, but none that make
it an RC bug.
Policy violations are RC by definition.
According to policy should's are not RC.
Policy 5.6.4 has no should.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-24 15:51]:
First, what is DOG, I never heard about it.
The Debian Octave Group (http://pkg-octave.alioth.debian.org)
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 24 November 2005 22:54, Thomas Weber wrote:
Second, I'm a member of the debian-installer team. I never say
uploads with such entries.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/11/msg01337.html
Wrong example. The changelog for that version is:
base-installer (1.37)
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said:
Isaac Clerencia wrote:
On Thursday, 24 November 2005 22:36, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Policy violations are RC by definition.
According to policy should's are not RC.
Policy 5.6.4 has no should.
It also has no must or could or might.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:48:39PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Yes, I have been doing things wrongly in the past, but this is not the
case anymore. The Changed-By fields are correct now. See, for instance,
my last upload:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:54:12PM +, paddy wrote:
I though a robots.txt thingy on the list web archive is coming to the
rescue ?
Huh? Isn't having the lists searchable generally a good thing? Or has it
been decided that it causes more harm than it's worth with cases like
this one?
--
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:44:42PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:50:11PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
(the cvs, not deb)
Patches for the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:51:24PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were, originally. Ryan's been very active on it since, and it's
diverged a bit from the code you're maintaining.
Then he should send patches and bug reports to the debian
* Goswin von Brederlow [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:51:24 +0100]:
Hi,
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were, originally. Ryan's been very active on it since, and it's
diverged a bit from the code you're maintaining.
Then he should send patches and bug reports to the debian
* Florian Weimer [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:28:04 +0100]:
Hi,
AFAIK, binary NMus aren't announced on debian-devel-changes.
Binary-only uploads are announced in the appropriate
debian-devel-$ARCH-changes list.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:12:46PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Le Jeudi 24 Novembre 2005 14:43, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
Steve Langasek wrote:
* Use Debian's libtool.
I took one affected package (kmldonkey) from your list, relibtoolized
it as described, and rebuilt it, which failed
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:39:57AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Uh, packages not uploaded to the official Debian archive can do whatever
they want.
It would, however, be convenient to be able to upload a package to
Debian and to be able to use the same package for different things.
As far as
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Michael Banck wrote:
1. Please drop the `secret' immediately. Unless you really want to call
http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd `secret'. That your mail got resent
with the this subject to debian-devel-announce is already stressing it
*a lot*, IMHO.
I did the
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:39:57AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Uh, packages not uploaded to the official Debian archive can do whatever
they want.
It would, however, be convenient to be able to upload a package to
Debian and to be able to use the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:44:37PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:48:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:31:22PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I think the final judgment in this issue is going to come down to personal
taste and needs more
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:43:38AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 09:18:40PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Use 1: I have this deb in my apt-move mirror and I want to know if it
was compromised on yesterdays
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:13:45AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
While the point about you can no longer just use md5sum is useless (you
need gpg, other special tools won't make it any more difficult, especially
since they are gzip and ar),
The problem is that using gzip and ar is
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:28:04PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Of course, with current state of technology, there can't be a digital
signature that directly says that installation of this package will
not cause any harm. But this doesn't mean that we should give up
completely.
Mmm. I'd
When I run the Makefile below it installs the module in :
/lib/modules/$(KERNELRELEASE)/extra
As far as I can find out, this is the expected behaviour from the kbuild
Makefiles.
However, modprobe looks for modules in
/lib/modules/`uname -r`.
How can I get the modules to install in this
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 182 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 90 (new: 2)
Total number of packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:20:42 +0100
Source: netmon-applet
Binary: netmon-applet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:20:12 +
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Binary: nvidia-glx nvidia-glx-ia32 nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-glx-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.7676-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:22:47 +0100
Source: glpk-shlib
Binary: libglpk0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:29:22 -0800
Source: libofx
Binary: libofx2c2a ofx libofx-dev
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:0.8.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:11:03 +0100
Source: wesnoth
Binary: wesnoth-sotbe wesnoth-data wesnoth wesnoth-httt wesnoth-server
wesnoth-trow wesnoth-editor wesnoth-music wesnoth-ei
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:58:37 +1100
Source: bootp
Binary: bootp
Architecture: source i386 alpha sparc
Version: 2.4.3-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:23:22 +0100
Source: memprof
Binary: memprof
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:23:18 +
Source: quark
Binary: quark
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 3.21-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:36:57 +
Source: monster-masher
Binary: monster-masher
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:48:33 +0100
Source: fv
Binary: fv
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:51:57 +
Source: hardware-monitor
Binary: hardware-monitor
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:44:21 +0100
Source: octave2.9
Binary: octave2.9-headers octave2.9-info octave2.9-htmldoc octave2.9
octave2.9-emacsen octave2.9-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.9.4-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:11:01 +0100
Source: ragel
Binary: ragel
Architecture: source alpha
Version: 4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:48:03 +0100
Source: slime
Binary: cl-swank slime
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:20051122-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:21:17 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp-dev clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.35-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
