Sorry for the delay in the reply, house moving ...
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:24:34PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Sorry, no insinuation intended, although I see, in retrospect, how it
can be read that way; my apologies. I just used Stefano? to draw your
attention and ask for your comments.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph,
I had similar thoughts recently, so I enjoyed your mail.
Just some short comments:
Some of the things you mentioned are already
available, even if you are not an official developer.
For example,
- - your packages are listed at
* Linas Zvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-02 01:43:47]:
There are a lot of people out there that are willing to help Debian, but
Help Debian does look a bit like a horror detective story.
I like the idea of an official title for contributers, but I am not so
keen on I-did-this-and-that
ma, 2006-01-02 kello 09:03 +0100, Andreas Fester kirjoitti:
You are already a Maintainer as soon as you have a package
in the archive. Speaking of an official title as you suggested,
maybe something like the following stages could be reasonable:
I find your title unambitious and suggest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I find your title unambitious and suggest improvements.
- - Having at least one package in the archive: Debian Maintainer
Debian Vice President for Packaging Foo
which could be subdivided into Junior Vice President (aka
co-maintainer) and
hi
does the Debian Policy mandate that binaries should be dynamically
linked and not statically linked to their needed libraries ?
I thought so but I could not find it; in particular, I looked in
section 10.1 Binaries, where it goes at length in talking of the
debugging and stripping options,
Op ma, 02-01-2006 te 11:24 +0100, schreef Andreas Fester:
(No, I don't really think titles will attract most of the productive
kind contributors to Debian. Sorry.)
I agree that title might not be appropriate. Thats why I primarily
talked about stages (maybe there is a better word...),
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
there are parts that provide a much easier and smoother entry to
helping debian. The debian-installer, the inofficial security
team and debian-edu for example are groups that allow even
non-Debian-Developers to get their hands dirty and do real
(important, relevant) work
On 1/1/06, Joseph Michael Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.)All people psychologically want to feel important and that they are an
official
part of an organization. I feel there should be an official title for all
contributers
so they feel like they are part of the community, not just a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-support
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : None yet
* License : LGPL
Description : automated rebuilding support for
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:29:16PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
I'd call that broken, just as I consider udev (076) to be broken given that
it breaks expectations wrt device naming. (Here, it swapped the names of the
DVD drives (drivers are built-in) and sound devices (drivers are modular).)
But
Hi Margarita! :-)
On 1/2/06, Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You suggest that people keep track of their contributions, everybody
can do that in their personal wiki page (yes, that's what Ubuntu does,
I don't know if it works or not). You could encourage people to do
that. It's
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
there are parts that provide a much easier and smoother entry to
helping debian. The debian-installer, the inofficial security
team and debian-edu for example are groups that allow even
non-Debian-Developers to get their hands
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Linas Zvirblis wrote:
A hypothetical example: I decide to found a debian-geology team and I am
not a Debian Developer. So what now? Should I help debian-med to become
a DD? But I am not interested in medicine, I am interested in geology.
1) Open a
Hi!
* Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060102 10:21]:
(No, I don't really think titles will attract most of the productive
kind contributors to Debian. Sorry.)
Being one of those who contributed a lot, I disagree a bit. I would
say, that having a title would be a nice to have: You could
* Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-02 22:26:46]:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
there are parts that provide a much easier and smoother entry to
helping debian. The debian-installer, the inofficial security
team and debian-edu for example are
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060102 10:21]:
(No, I don't really think titles will attract most of the productive
kind contributors to Debian. Sorry.)
Being one of those who contributed a lot, I disagree a bit. I would
say, that having a
On Monday 02 January 2006 15:42, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
so should we try to compile such a list and advertise it better,
perhaps from the startpage on www.debian.org?
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ seems more suited for that.
That whole page could maybe be organized a bit better by
Hi all, happy new year and all that.
Just rolled my own 2.6.12 on a 700 MHz Pentium III, with everything I
need built-in, and very little that I don't. Boot time from button
press to text console, via a grub default confirm, 72 secs :-)
So now that I'm up to speed, I'm trying to grok the
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:06:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote
On Monday 02 January 2006 15:42, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
so should we try to compile such a list and advertise it better,
perhaps from the startpage on www.debian.org?
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ seems more suited for that.
That
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:43AM -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I could support or maintain some packages if I could be teached once, and if
the mentoring process to get ownership of one package wouldn't be a pain. I
once wanted to make a package for the ieee80211 stack or another small
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:28:06 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:43AM -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I could support or maintain some packages if I could be teached once, and if
the mentoring process to get ownership of one package wouldn't be a pain. I
once
I wonder why there is no 2.6 kernel package for 586 in Sarge while there
is for 2.4?
I can find 386-486-686 and k7, but no 586.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 02 January 2006 16:40, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
I wonder why there is no 2.6 kernel package for 586 in Sarge while
there is for 2.4?
I can find 386-486-686 and k7, but no 586.
Try linux-{source,image,headers}.
pgpWpHgVmaU8B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:58:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Possibly doing it on the wiki at a page named something like :
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386
would be a good way to go.
The page is in place for kfreebsd-i386.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:28:06 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:43AM -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I could support or maintain some packages if I could be teached once, and
if
the mentoring process to get ownership of one package
* Alejandro Bonilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-02 09:21:43]:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:06:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote
On Monday 02 January 2006 15:42, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
so should we try to compile such a list and advertise it better,
perhaps from the startpage on www.debian.org?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cl-s-base64
Version : 20051102
Upstream Author : Sven Van Caekenberghe
* URL : http://homepage.mac.com/svc/s-base64/
* License : LLGPL
Description : A Common Lisp
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I would love to help, but the fact is that people that know how to do
these things like they know the palm of their hands, don't share
information or actually show people how to do things.
There is plenty of documentation about how to get started in creating a
Debian
Hi
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 02:55, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2006 16:40, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
I wonder why there is no 2.6 kernel package for 586 in Sarge while
there is for 2.4?
I can find 386-486-686 and k7, but no 586.
Try linux-{source,image,headers}.
(on sarge, long lines
Le lundi 02 janvier 2006 à 16:40 +0100, Jérôme Warnier a écrit :
I wonder why there is no 2.6 kernel package for 586 in Sarge while there
is for 2.4?
I can find 386-486-686 and k7, but no 586.
AFAIK, this was done to reduce the (way too high) number of kernels. The
performance improvement of a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cl-s-sysdeps
Version : 20051122
Upstream Author : Sven Van Caekenberghe
* URL : http://homepage.mac.com/svc/s-sysdeps/
* License : LLGPL
Description : An Abstraction
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:10:52 +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote
* Alejandro Bonilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-02 09:21:43]:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:06:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote
On Monday 02 January 2006 15:42, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
so should we try to compile such a list and advertise it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cl-s-utils
Version : 20051212
Upstream Author : Sven Van Caekenberghe
* URL : http://homepage.mac.com/svc/s-utils/
* License : LLGPL
Description : A collection of
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:22:00 -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I would love to help, but the fact is that people that know how to do
these things like they know the palm of their hands, don't share
information or actually show people how to do things.
There is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cl-s-http-server
Version : 20051218
Upstream Author : Sven Van Caekenberghe
* URL : http://homepage.mac.com/svc/s-http-server/
* License : LLGPL
Description : A
Well I decided to grab the bull by the horns.
Margarita Manterola had this to say:
So, rounding it up, if you have ideas as to how to get more people to
help Debian, your best course of action is to _go do it_. Create a
wiki page, blog or get someone to blog about it on Planet, etc. No
one is
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
package, but NO. I had to know someone, that the someone had a developer
friend that would actually trust me, to ever be able to try posting something.
Supposedly, one post to debian-mentors should have gotten you started. I
guess the How can you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cl-kpax
Version : 20051222
Upstream Author : Sven Van Caekenberghe
* URL : http://homepage.mac.com/svc/kpax/
* License : LLGPL
Description : A Common Lisp
On 23-Dec-05, 11:54 (CST), Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
The size of base matters a little, but it's not an every byte is
sacred situation.
Cheers, aj (base maintainer, for those playing along at home)
Anthony:
So, it seems that so far as Stefano (vim maintainer) and I (nvi
Your ideas reminds me of the Mandriva Club system, where users can
come together and show their commitment and involvement in Madriva
(previously Mandrake Linux). The site is supposed to be
URL:http://club.mandriva.com/, but I'm unable to get any response
from it. The google cache gave me this
Andreas Fester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My impression is that the process of becoming a developer is very hard,
both for the applicant but also for the Application Managers. If someone
contributed to the project continously for a long time, then decides to
apply for New Maintainer which then
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:11:26PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I suspect a similar system for Debian might increase visibility and
commitment from a large set of users.
With the exception of the web forums and most of the commercial stuff
that does sound rather like debian.org.
--
You
Am Sonntag 01 Januar 2006 19:46 schrieb Joseph Michael Smidt:
h) Advocacy I have given to the open source community.
Dear Joseph,
happy new year to you all. In this matter, I'd like to stress the
importance to gain the youth, i.e. pupils, for free software, i.e.
GNU/Linux. I plea to support
On Monday 02 January 2006 14.48, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:29:16PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
I'd call that broken, just as I consider udev (076) to be broken given
that it breaks expectations wrt device naming. (Here, it swapped the
names of the DVD drives (drivers are
On Monday 02 January 2006 16.21, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
[...]
I could support or maintain some packages if I could be teached once, and
if the mentoring process to get ownership of one package wouldn't be a
pain. I once wanted to make a package for the ieee80211 stack or another
small
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:34:31 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote
On Monday 02 January 2006 16.21, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
[...]
I could support or maintain some packages if I could be teached once, and
if the mentoring process to get ownership of one package wouldn't be a
pain. I once wanted to
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:55:01 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:34:31 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote
On Monday 02 January 2006 16.21, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
BTW, Who da hell is some AntiSpam UOL? Everytime that I send an email to
debian-devel that stupid machine sends me an
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
BTW, Who da hell is some AntiSpam UOL? Everytime that I send an email to
debian-devel that stupid machine sends me an email. Is there a way to block?
Yes, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is back. You will just have to
block this address on your side until listmaster takes care
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:11:26 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I suspect a similar system for Debian might increase visibility and
commitment from a large set of users.
Lacking quality control of the input, I am not at all
convinced that this is desirable. You know
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:21:43 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:06:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote
On Monday 02 January 2006 15:42, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
so should we try to compile such a list and advertise it better,
perhaps from the startpage on
Hi
I would like to share some interesting experience about using debian
as desktop system.
I have been using debian as my desktop system for several years.
Lately, becouse I gained access to internet, i upgraded my system to
the latest testing distribution of debian (etch, with the Gnome 2.10
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:11:26PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Your ideas reminds me of the Mandriva Club system, where users can
[Snip]
Sounds like an idea that's being thrown around at the moment:
http://wiki.debian.org/FriendsOfDebian
:P
Neil
--
__
.` `. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
[Neil McGovern]
Sounds like an idea that's being thrown around at the moment:
http://wiki.debian.org/FriendsOfDebian
Ah, right. Very good idea indeed. :)
That page even had a few more of those. Perhaps we should just go
ahead and implement it . :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hallo! Du (Linas Zvirblis) hast geschrieben:
BTW, Who da hell is some AntiSpam UOL? Everytime that I send an email to
debian-devel that stupid machine sends me an email. Is there a way to
block?
Yes, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is back. You will just have to
block this address on your side until
Hello,
First of all, I would like to note that I have never experienced
anything like that with my Debian desktop. The only time I have
witnessed such devastating effects was when mixing packages from various
distributions. Yes, that was my own fault. I knew it could happen and it
did
Hello
Secondly, you do not seem to understand how Debian works. Unstable is
called Unstable for a reason. It is the first stage of public testing.
Renaming it to Latest would not only falsely describe what it is, but
would simply be not true. If you want the latest, you download and
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:47:05AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
If you agree with the change, do Stefano and I need to do anything
other than swap vi alternative priorities and swap important-optional
priorities?
On my TODO list I also have to split the vim configuration files in
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I suspect a similar system for Debian might increase visibility and
commitment from a large set of users.
Lacking quality control of the input, I am not at all
convinced that this is desirable. You know the old adage of computer
men, GIGO.
All the given
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: k3dsurf
Version : 0.5.4
Upstream Author : Abderrahman Taha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://k3dsurf.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : tool for
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
However I have often heard complaints about broken dependencies and
broken software in testing. From what I have heard, I would not like to
go with testing for my system.
How on Earth would that be allowed into testing? I can imagine Serious
bugs slipping trough
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:47:05AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 23-Dec-05, 11:54 (CST), Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
The size of base matters a little, but it's not an every byte is
sacred situation.
Cheers, aj (base maintainer, for those playing along at home)
So, it
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 23:59:41 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I suspect a similar system for Debian might increase visibility
and commitment from a large set of users.
Lacking quality control of the input, I am not at all convinced
that this is
* Anthony Towns [Tue, 03 Jan 2006 07:55:06 +1000]:
I still think the vi provided by vim-tiny needs to default to compatible
mode and no-auto-indenting; but afaik it still doesn't.
If you agree with the change, do Stefano and I need to do anything
other than swap vi alternative priorities
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:49:38 +0900, Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
A new version of kernel-package is imminent, it is undergoing boot
camp out in experimental.
Congratulations; nice to see some hot action :)
I've been pondering on using kernel-package to generate debug
Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo! Du (Linas Zvirblis) hast geschrieben:
BTW, Who da hell is some AntiSpam UOL? Everytime that I send an email to
debian-devel that stupid machine sends me an email. Is there a way to
block?
Yes, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is back. You will just have to
Hello
How on Earth would that be allowed into testing? I can imagine Serious
bugs slipping trough (because most are reported as Normal, after all),
but broken dependencies?
I admit I was imprecise, often it are conflicts (usually through library
stuff) that prevent packages from being
Hi,
This should not be an email for this ML, but anyway, I think this
version of gallery could be kind of broken as I have used the Sid one
and works like a charm. This is a little box that I have with gallery
and my web services. I think it most be apache2 the one giving a hard
time
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:52, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Given the choice between having to double check work done by
potentially inexperienced folks, and ensuring that the package is
done by people who can do some of the double checking on their own,
and make less errors, I'd go for the
ma, 2006-01-02 kello 22:16 -0500, Benjamin Mesing kirjoitti:
I admit I was imprecise, often it are conflicts (usually through library
stuff) that prevent packages from being installable when you have
certain other installed, even though you would want both.
But as mentioned I am only repeating
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:25, Cord Beermann wrote:
Someone who is subscribed to d-devel forwards the mails to
petsupermarket. petsupermarket itself is not subscribed to any of our
mailinglists.
If you have seen those c-r-responses outside of the debian-lists, or
in the last days on other lists
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 00:28, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:25, Cord Beermann wrote:
Someone who is subscribed to d-devel forwards the mails to
petsupermarket. petsupermarket itself is not subscribed to any of
our mailinglists.
If you have seen those c-r-responses outside of
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:47:05AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 23-Dec-05, 11:54 (CST), Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
The size of base matters a little, but it's not an every byte is
sacred situation.
Cheers, aj (base maintainer, for those playing along at home)
So,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:29:00AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2006-01-02 kello 22:16 -0500, Benjamin Mesing kirjoitti:
But for example I can speak for my package (packagesearch) which broke,
when xterm changed how it handles command line arguments. Of course I
didn't knew this before,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:59:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Anthony Towns [Tue, 03 Jan 2006 07:55:06 +1000]:
I still think the vi provided by vim-tiny needs to default to compatible
mode and no-auto-indenting; but afaik it still doesn't.
If you agree with the change, do Stefano and I
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:14:09PM -0500, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
However I have often heard complaints about broken dependencies and
broken software in testing.
Sure. Testing isn't perfect, it won't guarantee your software is bug
free; and furthermore it changes daily, which means which bits
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:29:30PM +0800, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Linas Zvirblis wrote:
A hypothetical example: I decide to found a debian-geology team and I am
not a Debian Developer. So what now? Should I help debian-med to become
a DD? But I am not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 12:59:27 +
Source: eclipse-cdt
Binary: eclipse-cdt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:52:24 +0100
Source: libdbix-class-perl
Binary: libdbix-class-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.04.999.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:22:02 +
Source: libdbix-searchbuilder-perl
Binary: libdbix-searchbuilder-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.38-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:31:30 +0100
Source: libdbix-class-perl
Binary: libdbix-class-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.04.999.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:37:44 +
Source: libuniversal-exports-perl
Binary: libuniversal-exports-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.03-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:02:08 +
Source: liblocale-maketext-lexicon-perl
Binary: liblocale-maketext-lexicon-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.53-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:20:27 +0100
Source: synaptic
Binary: synaptic
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.57.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:13:51 +0100
Source: rfb
Binary: rfb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1-11.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:10:27 +0100
Source: pycxx
Binary: python2.4-cxx-dev python2.4-cxx python2.3-cxx-dev python-cxx
python2.3-cxx python-cxx-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.3.5-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:07:07 +
Source: clc-intercal
Binary: clc-intercal
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.05-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:06:28 -0200
Source: pessulus
Binary: pessulus
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guilherme de S.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 06:20:57 -0600
Source: washngo
Binary: libghc6-wash-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: John Goerzen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:27:02 +
Source: fort77
Binary: fort77
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.15-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:01:49 +
Source: lsadb
Binary: lsadb
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:0.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:08:10 +0100
Source: dialog
Binary: dialog
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0-20060101-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 23:29:32 +0100
Source: fiaif
Binary: fiaif
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.20.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 22:11:45 +0100
Source: aspectc++
Binary: aspectc++
Architecture: source alpha
Version: 0.99+1.0pre2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 11:29:08 -0500
Source: glibc
Binary: libc6-dev-amd64 libc6-i686 libc6-dev-ppc64 libc0.3-pic glibc-doc
libc1-udeb libc0.3 libc6.1-dev libc1-pic libc6-s390x libnss-files-udeb
libc1-dbg libc6-dev-sparc64 libc0.3-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 00:39:59 +1100
Source: fbb
Binary: fbb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 7.04j-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers debian-hams@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:47:28 +
Source: tendra
Binary: tendra
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.1.2-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:29:15 +
Source: tendra-doc
Binary: tendra-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.2-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:47:53 +0100
Source: tmake
Binary: tmake
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jan Niehusmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:12:02 +0100
Source: latex2html
Binary: latex2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 2002-2-1-20050114-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Stigge
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
