Bonjour,
J'aimerais apprendre à mieux connaitre GIT pour éventuellement gérer
mes paquets Debian, est-ce qu'il existe une page similaire à celle
qu'avait écrite Manoj pour tla ?
http://arch.debian.org/arch/private/srivasta/index.xhtml
Apparemment, il me manque des billes, j'ai du mal à
* Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060103 23:37]:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:45:16PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
2.6.8 is not an optimal kernel, but largely due to timing (i.e. SATA just
starting to get implemented).
The real question (IMHO) is probably whether it would be possible
Sorry for the long mail, but i believe there is something important all the
way done, so if you cannot be bothered to read it all; please go down to the
point marked *IMPORTANT*.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:05:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
You have been harranguing the ftp team to approve new
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:58:09AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
well, the kernel is definitly about the same level as the toolchain and
standard/base - changes can have very easily impact on the installer,
and it is not an option to remove the package if it is broken.
Nope, still it is more in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name : qtodo
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tobias [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://qtodo.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Description : Todo List Manager
QTodo is a todo-list manager. It is designed to be
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:13:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a
stable kernel tree, or something?
Have you ever
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-03 22:30:09]:
They are right: most probably they will find it easier to make
contributions to other projects.
we need to promote the easy entry points to contributing to debian
more prominently and should hide the how to become a DD in
Le mercredi 04 janvier 2006 à 01:06 +, Stephen Gran a écrit :
Can you give us a way to change permissions of a device that can be
plugged or unplugged?
Of course. With a static /dev/, the node is always there to be operated
on whether or not there is hardware associated with the
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:15:01AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I think the single-user system is the last one that alternatives handling
should optimize for, since the *one* person who's going to know to type
nvi instead of vi, and the one person
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
we need to promote the easy entry points to contributing to debian
more prominently and should hide the how to become a DD in
comparison.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What on earth for?
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
[...] people who want to help/contribute seem to be
turned
* Sven Luther
| I believe it has also an influence on the place where the source package is
| ohold (alioth svn repo over whatever strange stuff ubuntu uses), and they said
| we should use their system.
yeah, git, really strange stuff in the world of Linux kernel
development. Available from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong
mailinglist.
See:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=pdnsver=2.9.19-2arch=hppastamp=1135294848file=logas=raw
[..]
Setting up tetex-base (3.0-11) ...
Removing unchanged
Kevin Mark wrote:
you may notice that Debian has many programs to catalog thing. Some for
cd/dvd's, some for books, etc. When you make an ITP you will need to
make an argument as to why this packages should be added. Debian
developers will want to know what differentiates your package from
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:39:09PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Sven Luther
| I believe it has also an influence on the place where the source package is
| ohold (alioth svn repo over whatever strange stuff ubuntu uses), and they
said
| we should use their system.
yeah, git, really
also sprach Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.04.0043 +0100]:
Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a
stable kernel tree, or something?
I doubt RH has the same concept of stability as we do, and I surely
don't want a plethora of potentially untested or buggy
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:20:07PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
we need to promote the easy entry points to contributing to debian
more prominently and should hide the how to become a DD in
comparison.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What on earth for?
Andreas Schuldei
Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see any mention of xterm in packagesearch's changelog, nor any bugs
filed about the problem, either.
Look at changelog.gz, probably I should have copied it to
changelog.Debian.gz too. Bugs were not filed against this problem. And
to be honest
With the recent upload of xorg-x11 version 6.9.0 to unstable removing
xlibs-dev, any package still having a Depends: xlibs-dev will become
uninstallable very soon once xlibs-dev disappears from the distribution.
Here's a list of the affected packages from main/i386 by maintainer; filing
of
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:23:31AM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
Perhaps the idea of maintain a kernel with other distros is not bad,
if Ubuntu shows up as a candidate, I would like to add Progeny, Linspire,
Xandros, DCC Alliance Fan Club and also other Debian
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:43:55PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I wonder how that's going to happen wrt udev and a couple of other
things that, as of today, depend on a precise version of the kernel.
The udev breakages were rather annoying but the situation is not as bad
as it looks. ALSA for
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:52:58AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Furthermore, udev doesn't bring new problems. You can't have a
persistent naming scheme with a static /dev either, unless you are
loading modules by hand. If you still want to load your modules by hand,
udev won't prevent you
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:03:00PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
The udev breakages were rather annoying but the situation is not as bad
as it looks. ALSA for example is worse but it gets less press coverage.
Are you serious?
udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log
On Jan 04, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log in) --
_seven_ distinct times since this summer. How on you can claim that ALSA is
worse, is beyond me :-)
This was not always caused by udev bugs.
And anyway, it's
Le mercredi 04 janvier 2006 à 14:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
On Jan 04, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log in) --
_seven_ distinct times since this summer. How on you can claim that ALSA is
worse, is
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:51:17PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
snipp
Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for
Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases,
and this is what upstream needs the most.
the -rc kernels are build in experimental,
On 04-Jan-06, 05:08 (CST), paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time to add a policy-alternatives hook to update-alternatives ??
Huh? If the admin manually sets an alternative with with
update-alternatives, it won't be overridden by a package install. What
more does she need?
Steve
--
Steve
On 03-Jan-06, 19:30 (CST), Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:58:49AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Such behaviour is pretty much standard alternative handling: the default
install is the lowest priority, and the optional variants have higher
priorities.
* Gabor Gombas wrote:
Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for
Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases,
and this is what upstream needs the most.
We already had some -rc releases in experimental for 2.6.14 and
2.6.15.
Norbert
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas!
On 1/4/06, Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please realize that there is a difference between people who want
to *contribute* above average and *people* below average.
While I agree that there are contributions that are either
Daniel Schepler wrote:
With the recent upload of xorg-x11 version 6.9.0 to unstable removing
xlibs-dev, any package still having a Depends: xlibs-dev will become
uninstallable very soon once xlibs-dev disappears from the distribution.
If you're following this, could you please check that
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:39:55 +0100, Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-03 22:30:09]:
They are right: most probably they will find it easier to make
contributions to other projects.
we need to promote the easy entry points to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:39:55 +0100, Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please realize that there is a difference between people who want to
*contribute* above average and *people* below average.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:19:31PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log in) --
_seven_ distinct times since this summer. How on you can claim that ALSA is
worse, is beyond me :-)
That's why I said udev breakage is rather
Hi Daniel!
You wrote:
Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libubit-dev
Maybe this package should just be removed? It doesn't have any reverse
dependencies afaics, and hasn't had a non-QA upload since feb 2004.
Greetings,
Bas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:26:51PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
the -rc kernels are build in experimental, staging area for unstable
and without any potential d-i breakage.
Ah, nice, I did not notice it. Perhaps it should get some more publicity
to attract more testers :-)
Gabor
--
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:19:13AM -0500, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Also note that it
was only one feature of packagesearch which broke (after all
packagesearch does only recommend xterm and works without it). But my
point was that such (unforseeable) things might break things in testing.
Sure,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:20:07PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
You seem to be assuming that Debian should encourage people to contribute,
whereas the NM process was deliberately set up to discourage applicants.
You assume that applicants are scarce, but the assumption behind NM is that
there are
Hello Alejandro,
* Alejandro Bonilla Beeche [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-03 13:11]:
This should not be an email for this ML, but anyway, I think
this version of gallery could be kind of broken as I have used
the Sid one and works like a charm. This is a little box that I
have with gallery
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: polld
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cihar.com/software/polld
* License : GPL
Description : Polling demon
This demon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This demon periodically opens devices (files) listed in configuration.
Main reason is to force rescanning of partitions on usb devices while
using udev.
What is the problem this is trying to solve?
If the
Thus spake Roger Leigh:
What is the problem this is trying to solve?
If the partition table is being changed, the tool that changed it
should issue a BLKRRPART ioctl, like fdisk does for example (see
linux/fs.h).
I have a USB card reader which has 5 different slots for various media.
If I
Hello,
I have a question on how aptitude decides which packages
to install to satisfy dependencies. I was installing vtk yesterday
and it depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1. Aptitude chose to install
xlibmesa-gl which in turn broke my x-window-system-core
metapackage. However, I was able to manually
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mercredi 04 janvier 2006 à 14:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
On Jan 04, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log in)
--
_seven_ distinct times since this summer.
Sven Luther wrote:
For the installer, sure, but the generation of the d-i kernel .udebs is only
marginally of their relevance, and furthermore they don't want the
responsability associated with it, and as proof i can show you that joeyh
upgraded kernel-wedge and the x86 d-i module udebs, but
Hello,
So please disregard my statement against testing
[..]
(In this case, xterm could have had a conflict with your package to
avoid screwing users over unnoticed; and we could (in future) have added
a note to the testing scripts to not allow upgrades of xterm until a
fixed version of
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Daniel!
You wrote:
Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libubit-dev
Maybe this package should just be removed? It doesn't have any reverse
dependencies afaics, and hasn't had a non-QA upload since feb 2004.
Already requested with
Nathan Poznick wrote:
Thus spake Roger Leigh:
What is the problem this is trying to solve?
If the partition table is being changed, the tool that changed it
should issue a BLKRRPART ioctl, like fdisk does for example (see
linux/fs.h).
I have a USB card reader which has 5 different slots
On Jan 04, Nathan Poznick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a USB card reader which has 5 different slots for various media.
If I plug in the card reader and then later insert a CF card, the CF
card slot's device does not have the partition device created when using
udev (I have to insert the
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:11:00PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
For the installer, sure, but the generation of the d-i kernel .udebs is only
marginally of their relevance, and furthermore they don't want the
responsability associated with it, and as proof i can show you that
Jiri Palecek wrote:
Hello,
I have a question on how aptitude decides which packages
to install to satisfy dependencies. I was installing vtk yesterday
and it depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1. Aptitude chose to install
xlibmesa-gl which in turn broke my x-window-system-core
metapackage. However,
Hello,
I have a question on how aptitude decides which packages
to install to satisfy dependencies. I was installing vtk yesterday
and it depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1. Aptitude chose to install
xlibmesa-gl which in turn broke my x-window-system-core
metapackage. However, I was able to manually
Anthony Towns:
Anyway, the real point of replying was for me to have some fun playing
(what I'll hereby dub) the false dichotomy game. That's where you take
a set of contradictory statements, and setup reasonable scenarios where,
in fact, both alternatives are true simultaneously.
I'd call it
Scripsit Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People who do not want to undergo that process can just help
out current developers, fix bugs, send patches, etc.
Why are you then disagreeing with Andreas when he said that we should
make the possibility of doing this more visible?
I am
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:41:38PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Anthony Towns:
Anyway, the real point of replying was for me to have some fun playing
(what I'll hereby dub) the false dichotomy game. That's where you take
a set of contradictory statements, and setup reasonable scenarios where,
I was reading http://www.us.debian.org/doc/ and found a link to
Installation guide for Debian 2.2 (at the end of the page). I am
thinking with sarge release this is somewhat outdated and might send
wrong hints to the end user browsing the website. I think this link
should be removed. Any
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Spare disk space isn't available to add amd64 to mirrors.
Spare bandwith isn't available to add amd64 to mirrors.
I see. Can we please have the numbers? Exactly how much disk space
is needed? Perhaps we can simply go ahead and buy more disks
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, come on. vim-tiny entered the archive this week. The fact that we
have some slow buildds and ports like hurd-i386 that are perennially
behind is irrelevant to this discussion unless you can point to a build
failure log.
Maybe we shouldn't switch the
Hello
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:23:32PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
First, thanks to Lars for drawing our attention to an important topic
and for taking an initiative that is long overdue.
Lars, I agree fully with what you say. When it comes to team
maintenance I would go even further than
(Moving this thread to d-www where this is more on-topic.)
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 20:58, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I was reading http://www.us.debian.org/doc/ and found a link to
Installation guide for Debian 2.2 (at the end of the page). I am
thinking with sarge release this is
What do you think about this request? It seems reasonable, but I think if
this should be supported, there ought to be a general policy (formal or
informal) on it because I think many other init scripts will suffer from
similar problems.
-- Forwarded message --
Subject:
Hi
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:33:26 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
On Jan 04, Nathan Poznick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a USB card reader which has 5 different slots for various media.
If I plug in the card reader and then later insert a CF card, the CF
card slot's device
When I try to upgrade one of my machines running testing, I get a
warning about a missing public key:
[...]
W: GPG error: http://ftp.no.debian.org testing Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W:
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2006, 00:03 +0100 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
When I try to upgrade one of my machines running testing, I get a
warning about a missing public key:
[...]
W: GPG error: http://ftp.no.debian.org testing Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified
Hi,
I'm wondering what the best place is to put a local Debian package
repository. Directories that spring to mind are:
- /var/www/debian
This eases access via e.g. Apache (though a soft link here to
another dir would work fine as well of course)
- /srv/debian
According to the
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:31:26PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Afaict from the webpage 7zip (LZMA) is quite a bit slower bzip2. -
Have you perhaps run some benchmarks?
Memory use during decompression would be interesting, too.
For pure lzma it isn't really bad, it's about 100kb +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, i'm campanoni simone and i'm working on a project named WSS (World
Simulator Server); i'd like that this project will be added in a
debian distribution.
The reasons on why i would like that are mainly three:
~- i'd like to think that the wss
Maurits van Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm wondering what the best place is to put a local Debian package
repository. Directories that spring to mind are:
[...]
- /srv/debian
According to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard the /src dir is for
Data for services provided by this
[Roger Leigh]
In the case of someone who attaches a patch to a bug report, I think
getting a mention in the Debian (or upstream) ChangeLog is
sufficient.
Indeed, back in the days when reporting a bug and attaching a patch was
all I was willing to spend time doing, I thought a mention in the
[Peter Eisentraut]
What do you think about this request? It seems reasonable, but I
think if this should be supported, there ought to be a general policy
(formal or informal) on it because I think many other init scripts
will suffer from similar problems.
This issue was mentioned in the
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Peter Eisentraut]
What do you think about this request? It seems reasonable, but I
[...]
This issue was mentioned in the /run discussion we just had on this
list. I'm in favor of forcing all init scripts to mkdir -p
initscripts co-maintainer
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0500, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
So please disregard my statement against testing
(In this case, xterm could have had a conflict with your package to
avoid screwing users over unnoticed; and we could (in future) have added
a note to the testing scripts to
The monthly Debian Installer team meeting which was initially
scheduled for January 14th is reported to January 21st, as several D-I
developers will attend the Extremadura session about the graphical
installer development
(http://wiki.debian.org/WorkSessionsExtremadura).
Topics for the meeting
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:43:57PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Peter Eisentraut]
What do you think about this request? It seems reasonable, but I
[...]
This issue was mentioned in the /run discussion we just had on this
list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:59:52 +0900
Source: scmail
Binary: scmail
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:06:34 +0900
Source: gauche-gl
Binary: gauche-gl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:03:36 -0500
Source: wmbiff
Binary: wmbiff
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.27-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Spring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Neil Spring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 02:01:26 +0200
Source: cups-pdf
Binary: cups-pdf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin-Ãric Racine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:26:34 +0900
Source: gauche-gtk
Binary: gauche-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:53:37 +0100
Source: logwatch
Binary: logwatch
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Willi Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Willi Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:09:49 +0100
Source: thunar
Binary: libthunar-vfs-1-dev thunar libthunar-vfs-1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.4svn+r18850-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:31:35 +0100
Source: eciadsl
Binary: eciadsl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:37:24 +0100
Source: gmsh
Binary: gmsh
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.61.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:29:03 +0100
Source: openoffice.org-dictionaries
Binary: myspell-th myspell-it openoffice.org-thesaurus-cs myspell-en-us
myspell-sw myspell-en-gb openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us
Architecture: source all
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:48:11 +0100
Source: metapixel
Binary: metapixel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Vanden Berghe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Vanden Berghe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 06:35:48 -0600
Source: gtools
Binary: r-cran-gtools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:32:25 +0800
Source: lunar
Binary: lunar
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:15:29 +0100
Source: multitail
Binary: multitail
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 3.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:22:18 +
Source: bayonne
Binary: bayonne-prompts-en bayonne bayonne-doc bayonne-prompts-sys
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.2.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:00:47 +0100
Source: slime
Binary: cl-swank slime
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:20051227-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:35:32 -0500
Source: libhtml-mason-perl
Binary: libhtml-mason-perl libhtml-mason-perl-examples libhtml-mason-perl-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.32-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:23:12 +0100
Source: gst-plugins-base0.10
Binary: libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev gstreamer0.10-plugins-base
libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-apps
gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:45:57 +0100
Source: mantis
Binary: mantis
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.19.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:15:59 +0300
Source: csync2
Binary: csync2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.29-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:27:10 +0100
Source: postgresql-common
Binary: postgresql-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 39
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Pitt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:11:25 +0100
Source: initramfs-tools
Binary: initramfs-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.48
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian kernel team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:18:20 +0100
Source: redet
Binary: redet-doc redet
Architecture: source all
Version: 8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:11:50 +
Source: fvwm1
Binary: fvwm1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.24r-49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:13:00 -0600
Source: hdbc-sqlite3
Binary: libghc6-hdbc-sqlite3-dev libhugs-hdbc-sqlite3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99.0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:17:12 +
Source: acm
Binary: acm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.0-21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Phil Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:29:49 +0530
Source: gnuradio-core
Binary: gnuradio-doc libgnuradio-core0c2a python-gnuradio libgnuradio-core0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
