* Joe Smith
| Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
| news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| debconf
| debconf-english
| debconf-i18n
|
| These are all necessary, and debconf is an essential package which is
| not subject to the circular dependency postinst
* Christian Perrier
| No chance that people from Canonical show up over there? I can even
| host (Perrier's bed and breakfast, including cheese)...:)
I doubt it; There's a Ubuntu distro sprint in London that week so
we'll all be very, very busy with discussions and bug fixing on our
own.
--
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:48:21 +0100, martin f krafft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, the border between contributing and employing people who also
work on Debian is not entirely clear.
How do you think Canonical could *better* work with Debian, ignoring
whether they meet up to their promises at the
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 à 01:49 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
At the very least, I think they should be treated like pre-depends, with
a request on this list being mandatory before adding a circular
dependency. Until now, all circular dependencies cases I have met were
fixable.
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 22:15 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debconf
debconf-english
debconf-i18n
These are all necessary, and debconf
Hi guys,
For various personal reasons you've probably not seen me around much in
the last few months; and unfortunately, for the same reasons I've
decided to take a Sabbatical from working on Debian.
I've already arranged maintainership of both of my packages:
Matthias Klose will take over
Can't Canonical devote resources to better Ubuntu's contribution to debian? This seems like a reasonable request since Canonical crows about how they are the number one linux distro and they have excellent support, but surely the reliability of their product rests upon the reliability of
Hello!
Dou you know when will be available libecw in Debian repository?
Thanks!
Jorge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure if it's license (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered
free enough to be in main:
Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression for
applications licensed under a GNU General Public style license (GPL) is
governed by
El Jueves 12 Enero 2006 10:58, Miriam Ruiz escribió:
I'm not sure if it's license (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered
free enough to be in main:
And in non-free ?
Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression
for
It has come to my attention that this last email could have been construed as a
personal attack
against a certain ubuntu developer. It is not meant that way.
What I don't seem to have put across properly are the following points.
1) the blog post mentioned that made me irate was because of the
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:01:58AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| These are all necessary, and debconf is an essential package which is
| not subject to the circular dependency postinst ordering problems afaik.
|
| Well, I'm not sure if that is an excuse for violating policy.
Essential:
* Anthony Towns:
If you'd like to make suggestions about ideas that would be useful,
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the job of either the bug submitter or (more
usually) the Debian maintainer to contact upstream to make sure that
they're aware of the bug. It is *not* the upstream maintainer's job to
examine Debian's bug database.
that
On Jan 12, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The relevant context is generally available in the changelog (which is in
At least for my packages, this is often false.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Florian Weimer]
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
Why is specifying the consequences of doing a bad job with maintaining
ones debian packages threatening?
Personally I believe it is time we made clear and written down
explanations on what will happen to badly maintained
also sprach Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.12.1209 +0100]:
If you'd like to make suggestions about ideas that would be useful,
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
Thanks, Anthony, for the heads-up.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Florian Weimer]
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
Why is specifying the consequences of doing a bad job with maintaining
ones debian packages threatening?
IMHO it isn't at all.
Personally I believe it is time we made
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:09:04PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Anthony Towns:
If you'd like to make suggestions about ideas that would be useful,
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
For instance, bug #303131 has been open since April last year, and
has had no further
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that sometimes users do the wrong thing in spite of this, and that's
unfortunate. However, given that I've never received an inappropriate
message from an Ubuntu user about one of my packages in Debian at my
Maintainer: email address, it seems
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: itrans
Version : 5.3
Upstream Author : Avinash Chopde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.aczoom.com/itrans/
How did you
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53.zip
Link is on http://www.aczoom.com/itrans/#download
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Florian Weimer]
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
Why is specifying the consequences of doing a bad job with maintaining
ones debian packages threatening?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can definately understand some DD's views here - they seem to get
nothing from ubuntu - have to wade through patches or whatever to try
and find the useful stuff - have to do all this work to get all the
On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensus on this idea of
every Ubuntu changeset, a patch in Debian BTS between DDs.
On 1/11/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(...)
I don't
remember Linspire, Progeny, ... employees doing the same thing so it
makes no sense rant against Canonical only.
On the other hand, Linspire and Progeny do not pretend to be
On 1/12/06, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Florian Weimer]
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
Why is specifying the consequences of doing a bad job with maintaining
ones debian packages threatening?
IMHO it
Felipe Sateler wrote:
This seems like a nice idea. File a whishlist bug against reportbug ;)
If you really want to do this, look at
/usr/share/doc/reportbug/README.developers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
If RC bugs go unanswered for 3 months, I agree that something should be
done; I just don't think that saying someone else should take it over is
necessarily enough. I believe we need clearer methods for handling packages
in the case that *no one* is
Hi,
first of all, thanks for taking the initiative I think the matter is too
important to be left alone just for avoiding to step on anyones toes.
Anthony Towns wrote:
Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal of
On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:25:01PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
Are you saying that they're spending more money with PR than really
contributing back ?
I don't know about money, but I'm pretty sure their claims exceed
their
On 1/11/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 19:54 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensus on this
On 1/11/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:48:22PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 16:48 +0100, martin f krafft escreveu:
What would you like to see?
I think submitting bugs and
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I'm not sure if it's license (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered
free enough to be in main:
FYI, the right place to ask this is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving it over there. Full-quoting because of this.
Summary: I don't believe this is a
On 1/12/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
I agree with similar things being said but i'm yet to hear about the
lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
that anaconda
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53.zip
That's exactly what I tried - it doesn't matter which
On Thu, January 12, 2006 14:23, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal of
Maybe this should not only be limited to packages with RC bugs... For a
lot of packages with inactive
The submitter of #344758 wrote:
The script should create /var/run/dirmngr to allow users to map their
/var/run to a temporary filesystem like tmpfs. Thanks.
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
What do you think about this request? It seems reasonable, but I think if
this should be supported, there
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I very much agree that we should strive to make packages as good as
possible, but if users depend on a package and there are no real
showstoppers in it, we might do our users a better service with shipping
than with not shipping the package.
No. Shipping unsupported
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
While the package might not be of the quality we strive to achieve within
Debian; if a bug is not release critical we consider the bug not to be
serious enough to impact the packages' releaseworthyness. This is by
definition. Even if there are many of
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, January 12, 2006 14:23, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal of
Maybe this should not only be limited to packages with RC bugs... For
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:48:22 -0200, Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 16:48 +0100, martin f krafft escreveu:
What would you like to see?
I think submitting bugs and patches to the BTS would already be
enough.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:17:55 -0200, Gustavo Franco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I disagree with a pile of patches and as i said it would be better a
revision control system and good log (and debian/changelog) entries.
How is a revision control system (BTW, all of my packages are
in a
Frank Küster wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53.zip
That's exactly what I tried -
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
without maintained rdepends from testing?
Seconded.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:58, Frank Küster wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53
.zip
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:36:06 +, Martin Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole -
thing, so apologies if it shows up in some weird place in threaded
view.
Basically - I dont think the brand should be put on ubuntu as a
whole -
On 1/12/06, Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression
for
applications licensed under a GNU General Public style license (GPL) is
governed by the ECW SDK PUBLIC USE LICENSE AGREEMENT.
Not sure what they're
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:21:03PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote :
...
If a maintainer would not manage to respond to an RC bug for three months
the package is obviousely not maintained and should be taken over by
somebody else, IMHO.
I wish something like that applied to all bugs.
On 1/12/06, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if you read my other mail, but I do find it hard to
cooperate with Ubuntu for my own package, because each time it has
been uploaded to Ubuntu it was done my a different person, so I don't
know who I should be cooperating /with/.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:26:26AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 ? 01:49 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a ?crit :
At the very least, I think they should be treated like pre-depends, with
a request on this list being mandatory before adding a circular
dependency.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:47:53AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/11/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course people can do this, but this is so very much not the point. The
point is that publishing source packages on a website that people have to
poll is not giving back to
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
without maintained rdepends from testing?
Seconded.
well, just make a list that I can just copy into my hint file.
Cheers,
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
I agree with similar things being said but i'm yet to hear about the
lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
that anaconda port to say
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Of course, this is trivial, but fixing this bug (251 days old) is
also trivial. Then why complain ? I feel that it gives a bad image of
debian, when it suggests to use a broken tool while another one is being
repaired.
But if you
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-12 16:05]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
without maintained rdepends from testing?
Seconded.
I don't think it's such a great idea (at least not done by itself).
While
* Christoph Berg [Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:05:52 +0100]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
without maintained rdepends from testing?
Seconded.
Me too.
(jftr, http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/06/msg00176.html)
On Thu, January 12, 2006 16:02, Frank Küster wrote:
But if a rather new package in active development has many non-RC bugs,
some of them crippling upstream features, and one of them New version
N.m.o available (retitled three times meanwhile), then our users are
probably better served by
* Thomas Viehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 15:56]:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I very much agree that we should strive to make packages as good as
possible, but if users depend on a package and there are no real
showstoppers in it, we might do our users a better service with shipping
than
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The greatest strength of having Canonical on our side, from my POV, is that
it's a company full of people like Daniel, who are fundamentally Debian
people, and who are willing to work with you on this kind of personal
level. I don't really buy in to
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I see, i would like to see the utnubu patch list[0] integrated in PTS
(scott's already is[1]), with that everyone subscribed to the package
The patch list from utnubu is the same than the one from Scott, so there's
no point to add a pointer to the
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
without maintained rdepends from testing?
Seconded.
well, just make a list that I can
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
without maintained rdepends from
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:30:56AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 22:15 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debconf
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:12:27PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
Looking at them, I fail to see why debconf-i18n has to depend on
debconf.
Because /usr/share/doc/debconf-i18n is a symlink?
perhaps the link should be the other way round. for example the most
common package split would be
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Of course, this is trivial, but fixing this bug (251 days old) is
also trivial. Then why complain ? I feel that it gives a bad image of
debian, when it suggests to use a broken tool while another one is
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:34:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I cannot point you exactly why _this_ circular dependency is going to
be a problem, no.
However I can point you to bug #310490 which show a woody system that
could not be upgraded to sarge without removing most of KDE.
I've
[note: sent to d-d only]
I demand that Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton may or may not have written...
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:04:45PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
* Matthew Garrett [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:50:56 +]:
[snip]
It's the job of either the bug submitter or (more usually) the Debian
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:23:31 +0100, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Hi,
first of all, thanks for taking the initiative I think the matter is too
important to be left alone just for avoiding to step on anyones toes.
Anthony Towns wrote:
Random ideas for negative consequences
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Of course, this is trivial, but fixing this bug (251 days old) is
also trivial. Then why complain ? I feel that it gives a bad image of
debian, when it
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned
Dear Mr(s),
I visited your site (debian.org) today, and I really like it. I am very
interested in exchanging links. I've gone ahead and posted a link to
your site, on this page:
www.budapestnetapartments.hu/travel-links/europe-finland-helsinki.htm
Your website details:
Url: debian.org
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Let's take this one apart and see what it is that pisses people off so
much.
I don't intend to participate in this type of email argument with you; I've
yet to
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Let's take this one apart and see what it is that pisses people off so
much.
I don't intend to
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
While the package might not be of the quality we strive to achieve within
Debian; if a bug is not release critical we consider the bug not to be
serious enough to impact the packages'
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Let's take this one apart and see what it
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:49:14AM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:34:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I cannot point you exactly why _this_ circular dependency is going to
be a problem, no.
However I can point you to bug #310490 which show a woody system that
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
While the package might not be of the quality we strive to achieve within
Debian; if a bug is not release critical we consider the bug not to be
serious enough to impact the packages' releaseworthyness. This is by
definition. Even if there are many of those bugs, they
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew
Andrew Suffield wrote:
Well it's nice in theory. The problem is that you have to set the
threshold high enough to exempt glibc and dpkg, and when you do that,
I have not yet found a metric that complains about any other packages
(I've tried two or three times to invent one).
I think the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xara
* URL : http://www.xaraxtreme.org/
* License : to be released as GPL
Description : a vector drawing program
The makers of the long-around Windows XaraX vector drawing
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Well it's nice in theory. The problem is that you have to set the
threshold high enough to exempt glibc and dpkg, and when you do that,
I have not yet found a metric that complains about any other packages
(I've tried two or three times to invent
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 19:36]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
Re: Thomas Viehmann in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really,
also sprach Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.12.2135 +0100]:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 19:36]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:25, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jens Peter Secher [Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:50:26 +0100]:
I need to test that a package can be built with g++ = 4:4.0.2-2 on
HPPA, Arm, or M68k. Is there a DD accessible machine that has a current
version of g++ installed?
paer's
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
However, on the other hand feel free to create a common maintained
packages team that adopts such packages :)
Isn't that pretty much what the qa team does?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 21:47]:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
However, on the other hand feel free to create a common maintained
packages team that adopts such packages :)
Isn't that pretty much what the qa team does?
Not really. All
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:52:13PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 21:47]:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
However, on the other hand feel free to create a common maintained
packages team that adopts such packages :)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Moratti Claudio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: knmap
Version : 1.99-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/knmap
* License : GPL
Description : Kde interface to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: fullquottel
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Toastfreeware ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.toastfreeware.priv.at/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: mailtextbody
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Toastfreeware [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.toastfreeware.priv.at/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniele Sempione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mpc123
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : Fernando Vezzosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://mpc123.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Command-line
Em Qui, 2006-01-12 às 18:08 -0200, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
- Scott's url with patches isn't part of the give something back
approach that we want. We need to be well informed about patches, but
we don't know exactly how;
Don't we?
Debian is Ubuntu's upstream, right?
When you modify
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
that distinction isn't made clear: it's only if people think about it
that they will realise that they are supposed to report debian-specific
packaging bugs to the debian bugs database and package-specific bugs to
whatever upstream
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, that's current practice, but nobody is stopping anyone to give a
little bit more care into QA packages...
The hardest problem, speaking as someone who wanted to do that and who
still wants to do that as soon as I can find time, is that many
* Joerg Platte wrote:
Am Montag, 7. November 2005 17:48 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski:
I'll add initramfs-tools soon, the reason why there's only yaird
is that it's easier to backport than initramfs-tools.
Great news :-) I'm using initramfs-tools for sid for some time now
with some
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:26:50AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
/me...who expects tons of Ubuntu/Debian discussions at Solutions Linux
in Paris (Jan 31-Feb 2) with both fellow French developers,
users...and Ubuntu users as well. No chance that people from Canonical
show up over there? I can
Hi,
This is an update on using userland COW method with pbuilder.
cowdancer is a tool that allows you to cp -al (hardlink) a tree, and
break the hardlink when a write-open to a file is performed. The
adventurous part of cowdancer COW implementation is that it's trying
to do this from within
What does aptitude give as the breakdown between unused packages being
automatically removed, and packages being removed that you actually
requested installed?
Well I did not install any packages through aptitude.
The numbers of packages below the lines
The following packages will be
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
