On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:56:50PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Avant de comprendre puis de me tenir au courant des transitions, je ne
captais jamais pourquoi apparaissaient des paquets avec un c102 ou ce
genre de suffixe.
Étant donné que ce sera également le cas de 99,99% des utilisateurs
Garcia Charlotte
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:15:23AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
David Nusinow wrote:
Currently, it fakes FHS compliancy by creating various
symlinks (/usr/include/X11, /usr/bin/X11, /usr/lib/X11) to the appropriate
directories in /usr/X11R6. For 7.0, we need to make those symlinks become
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 20:31:53 -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
Ok, i'm not subscribed here so please cc me any responses directly.
Before I propose my suggestion I want to outline my issues with how meta
pkgs are done currently.
[...]
The problem #2: Meta pkgs in debian are one way.
Frank_Küster wrote:
That sounds good, but wouldn't it be even better to have a symlink
/usr/bin/debpython-minimal or so, pointing to the interpreter? Then one
could still replace the interpreter by something else (by putting it
into /usr/local/bin), for example in order to debug a
Dear Debian contributors,
I sent this invitation to participate in a survey to the list before.
Please consider answering if you didn't yet. We received lots of answers
but would like to get more. This is the last message on this subject; I
won't bother you anymore (until the results are
[Bart Martens]
The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a
replacement for flashplugin-nonfree.
Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain
flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way you want it? I
do not see the point of two installer packages for
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Q1.1) Are GFDL licensed works without invariant texts non-free?
Well, according to the RM team, and some developers (full
disclosure: myself included), yes, they are, even if there is no
explicit infraction of specific portions of our
Hi folks,
I have (in the httrack source package) a build-depends containing zlib1g,
zlib1g-dev - is there anything wrong with this dependency ? Some builders
seems to have troubles:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=httrackver=3.40.1-1arch=ia64stamp=1137978811file=logas=raw
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I think you're overly optimistic :-) Most of the simple RC bugs
(related to the xlibs-dev transition) have been fixed; there aren't 90
more like those. Those left are:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-devrepeatmerged=no
You
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:07:29AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
Hi folks,
I have (in the httrack source package) a build-depends containing zlib1g,
zlib1g-dev - is there anything wrong with this dependency ?
Yes, you should not be build-depending on zlib1g.
Some builders seems to have
Hi,
I'll be in London from 25 Jan to 27 Jan and in Paris from 28 Jan to 1 Feb.
If someone wants to meet for a beer/tea/whatever please drop me an email,
in Paris I plan to visit the debian booth at Solutions Linux Expo, so that
might also an occasion to meet.
filippo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:42:54PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Later, Steve Langasek wrote:
The primary aim of this change was to address the fact that there was no
consistent numbering scheme that satisfies the constraint
binNMU security NMU source NMU.
The problems with this were
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.3.6
Tags: patch
Hi folks,
Please consider the attached patch to update the developer's reference
description of recompile-only binNMU versioning so that it matches the
current behavior of dak and sbuild.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:39:00AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain
flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way you want it? I
do not see the point of two installer packages for macromedia flash.
Please limit it to just one,
[Alexander Sack]
You mean take over the package?
If that is required, yes. But I suspect a friendly reenforcement of
the maintainer team is a better solution if one is able to get in
touch with the maintainer.
Have you ever succeeded to get any communication started with Takuo
during the
[Couldn't find any list related to apt-cacher or apt-cacher2, and I
noticed some discussions of them on debian-devel, so I am CCing debian
devel. But if there is a better place to discuss this, please point
me to it, thanks!]
Hi Eduard and Jonathan,
Recently we started using apt-cacher2
Le Lun 23 Janvier 2006 10:39, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
[Bart Martens]
The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a
replacement for flashplugin-nonfree.
Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain
flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pyntor
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Josef Spillner
* URL : http://pyntor.coolprojects.org/
* License : GPL
Description : flexible and componized presentation
Hi,
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base
says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which
was uploaded on Jan 18th:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html
Is this just a bug in the qa scripts, or worse?
Regards, Frank
--
Hi,
while I must admit that I was not at the latest IRC meeting where this
topic came up, I am now bitten by this problem.
I maintain a bunch of kernel modules that can be either patched onto a
kernel tree or built out-of-tree. No problem, have arch:all packages for
patch and source and
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:42:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
And what? If someone tries to bring through a GR stating that
MS office warez can be distributed in main since it meets the DFSG,
one might rule that as frivolous and a waste of time.
I'm not convinced the
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- If a package has both Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep, it
MUST have a build-arch target
Would probably catch 95% of all cases. So far, I know no existing
packages that don't have those targets but use both B-D and B-D-I.
I know tons of such
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
Due to the minimal size and maximum configurability, Pyntor is a nice
alternative to conventional presentation programs.
What do you mean by conventional presentation programs. IMHO we
could differentiate into three groups of presentation
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I think you're overly optimistic :-) Most of the simple RC bugs
(related to the xlibs-dev transition) have been fixed; there aren't 90
more like those.
I got home from work and have second thoughts about the email I
previously sent. I think I am a bit pissed off by
Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
Hi
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base
says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which
was uploaded on Jan 18th:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html
Is this just a bug in the qa scripts,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Has been tried, does not work.
AFAIK it is working as long as you assume debian/rules to be a Makefile,
which is a pretty safe assumption
On 1/23/06, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I think you're overly optimistic :-) Most of the simple RC bugs
(related to the xlibs-dev transition) have been fixed; there aren't 90
more like those.
I got home from work and have second thoughts about the email I
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:49:58PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
Due to the minimal size and maximum configurability, Pyntor is a nice
alternative to conventional presentation programs.
What do you mean by conventional presentation programs. IMHO
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Has been tried, does not work.
AFAIK it is working as long as you
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:45:07PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
There have been various proposals on that matter, and it always boils
down to the same chicken-and-egg problem:
- policy documents existing practice, which is to invoke build.
- the existing practice cannot be changed because
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Questions? Comments? Seconds?
Yet another proposal to solve this problem can be found in #229357
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Russ Allbery wrote:
(Or is
imake going away completely?)
Yep.
Imake is still being shipped for the benefit of third-party packages, but it
is not used by anything in Xorg 7.0 IIRC. Doing a quick check, I think very
few if any other packages in Debian use imake.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
CHASIB W ALSAEDI 614 Strathmore Ave Erie, PA 16505 (814)836-2737
Employment Objective: To obtain a full time position as an Arabic Linguist
- EMPLOYMENT HISTORY -
1999 - 2005 UNITED MISSOURI BANK - Kansas City, MO Job Title: Lead Mailroom Associate Duties: Responsible for
CHASIB W ALSAEDI 614 Strathmore Ave Erie, PA 16505 (814)836-2737
Employment Objective: To obtain a full time position as an Arabic Linguist
- EMPLOYMENT HISTORY -
1999 - 2005 UNITED MISSOURI BANK - Kansas City, MO Job Title: Lead Mailroom Associate Duties: Responsible for
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yep.
Imake is still being shipped for the benefit of third-party packages,
but it is not used by anything in Xorg 7.0 IIRC. Doing a quick check, I
think very few if any other packages in Debian use imake.
I think you should perhaps check a little
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:31:08 +0100, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:45:10PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Has
#include hallo.h
* Anuradha Ratnaweera [Mon, Jan 23 2006, 06:24:08PM]:
- Lazy online: we like apt-cacher to fetch a Packages/Release file
only if it old as set by a timeout. So if one runs apt-get update
many times during a short period, only the first one will need to make
a HEAD/GET
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
Hi
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base
says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which
was uploaded on Jan 18th:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html
[ Bcc'ed to -project, -devel and -legal, any further discussion and/or
seconds on -vote, please. ]
After reading all the recent posts about the GFDL on debian-vote, I
hereby propose the following General Resolution and ask for seconds.
--8--
The Debian Project asserts that
Works licensed under
Matthias Klose wrote:
Joey Hess writes:
Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
gcc-snapshot
no. must be a false positive.
Yes, didn't anchor the pattern and it matched stuff in
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
Joey Hess writes:
Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
gcc-snapshot
no. must be a false positive.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:17:36PM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:45:10PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
The difference between the two is that -q checks whether a target is
uptodate and return an appropriate exit code, while -p prints out the
data base (i.e. the rules
Frank Küster wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base
says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which
was uploaded on Jan 18th:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Here's a list of packages that install binaries into /usr/X11R6/bin and
don't have lintian overrides for it. In spot checks, about a quarter of
these packages use imake. And that's just the packages with binaries;
there are a number of other packages that don't install
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base
says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which
was uploaded on Jan 18th:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:40:30PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:42:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
And what? If someone tries to bring through a GR stating that
MS office warez can be distributed in main since it meets the DFSG,
one might rule
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:08:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
And I would strongly suggest you to consider Simon Richter's proposal,
which sounds a lot cleaner to me: if you have build-depends-indep in
your debian/control file, you must also implement build-arch and/or
build-indep.
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Imake is considered dead-except-for-routine-maintenance upstream as far
as I can tell, so best practice would be to migrate away from it.
Unless someone plans to adopt it.
imake the program, and xmkmf, are *probably* not that horribly difficult
to
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 20:31:53 -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
Ok, i'm not subscribed here so please cc me any responses directly.
Before I propose my suggestion I want to outline my issues with how meta
pkgs are done currently.
[...]
The problem #2: Meta pkgs in debian are one
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-parenscript
Version : 1:20060122-1
Upstream Author : Manuel Odendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edward Marco Baringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/ucw/repos/parenscript
* License
* Wouter Verhelst [Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:08:00 +0100]:
And I would strongly suggest you to consider Simon Richter's proposal,
which sounds a lot cleaner to me: if you have build-depends-indep in
your debian/control file, you must also implement build-arch and/or
build-indep.
Additionally,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:22:24PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
Because the remainder of the Xorg 7.0 packages will require this change
to have taken place, they will have to pre-depend upon an appropriate
version of x11-common. As such, I'm writing to the list in accordance with
policy.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:55:00AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
There is some software that contains hardcoded paths to executables in
/usr/bin/X11; for example, sshd hardcodes the path to
/usr/bin/X11/xauth. sshd stats whatever it thinks is the location of
xauth to find out whether it can do
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:54:54PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right. The everything that you'd expect to go in to /usr/bin and
/usr/lib will install there, at least as far as Xorg goes. An example of
that is that the new xterm package installs to
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:32:33AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Right. The everything that you'd expect to go in to /usr/bin and /usr/lib
will install there, at least as far as Xorg goes. An example of that is
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:48:33AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
David Nusinow wrote:
Right. The everything that you'd expect to go in to /usr/bin and /usr/lib
will install there, at least as far as Xorg goes. An example of that is
that the new xterm package installs to /usr/bin rather than
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
they share the same source. Hence having Ubuntu developers triage the
bugs to rule out such
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
they share the same source.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
they share the same source.
Paul Johnson writes:
Given Ubuntu hopelessly complicates everything, pretends there is
cooperation where there is none, and merely duplicates the effort of the
debian-desktop project, and contributes nothing to the community or
society...
Do you have evidence to support this, or is it just
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote:
Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of
libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though
they share the same source.
On 1/24/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
Hi again,
* Anuradha Ratnaweera [Mon, Jan 23 2006, 06:24:08PM]:
- Lazy online: we like apt-cacher to fetch a Packages/Release file
only if it old as set by a timeout. So if one runs apt-get update
many times during a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:56:56PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
#include hi.h
and thanks for your time to write such a useful note about how you and
others are keeping Debian great!
much snip-age
It leads me to think Debian accounts should expire in a year of no
activity and packages be automatically
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:28:40PM +0100, Stefan Müller wrote:
Hi,
I am a grammar developer and I started to work on Chinese. We use a
development system that needs utf-8 input. I managed to set up
everything for emacs 21.3. All I had to say was:
(setq default-input-method \chinese-py\)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
snipage
As said bvefore, if you activate this mode manually, this should be an
easy feature to add on. How do you want to configure it?
Eduard.
Hi Eduard,
I was just struck by your choice of phrase. It, in a way,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I think you're overly optimistic :-) Most of the simple RC bugs
(related to the xlibs-dev transition) have been fixed; there aren't 90
more like those. Those left are:
On 1/24/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Set the following value to the maximum age (in hours) for method A or to 0
# for method B
expire_hours=0
It seems that if a file is not found, i.e., apt-get update prints an
`Ign', isn't it a good idea to cache, or rather negative cache,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:42:16 +0100
Source: gnushogi
Binary: gnushogi xshogi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:30:50 +
Source: gmessage
Binary: gmessage
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll Overgaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:14:12 +
Source: jamvm
Binary: jamvm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:36:25 -0800
Source: libvisual
Binary: libvisual0.2 libvisual0.2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:30:13 +0100
Source: libdbix-class-loader-perl
Binary: libdbix-class-loader-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:49:34 +0100
Source: aclock.app
Binary: aclock.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:01:51 +
Source: choose-mirror
Binary: choose-mirror
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:55:21 -0400
Source: nitpic
Binary: nitpic
Architecture: source i386 mips alpha sparc
Version: 0.1-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:41:16 +0100
Source: projectcenter.app
Binary: projectcenter.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gürkan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:01:30 +0100
Source: libhtml-tree-perl
Binary: libhtml-tree-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.19.01-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:27:31 +
Source: tzsetup
Binary: tzsetup-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Colin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:01:41 +0100
Source: puf
Binary: puf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.93.2a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:03:16 +1100
Source: xtranslate
Binary: xtranslate
Architecture: source i386 mips alpha sparc
Version: 0.2-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:52:08 +1000
Source: conspy
Binary: conspy
Architecture: source i386 mips alpha sparc
Version: 1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Stuart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:29:53 +0100
Source: phpqladmin
Binary: phpqladmin
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:25:10 +0200
Source: libvmime
Binary: libvmime0 libvmime-dev
Architecture: source i386 mips alpha sparc
Version: 0.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mattias Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:31:49 +
Source: quik-installer
Binary: quik-installer
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.0.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:16:24 +0100
Source: type-handling
Binary: type-handling
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:16:01 +0100
Source: lighttpd
Binary: lighttpd-mod-mysql-vhost lighttpd-doc lighttpd
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.4.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian lighttpd maintainers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:00:32 -0800
Source: samba
Binary: samba-doc-pdf samba-doc libsmbclient libpam-smbpass swat winbind
smbclient samba libsmbclient-dev samba-common samba-dbg python2.3-samba smbfs
Architecture: source i386 all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:27:39 -0500
Source: idesk
Binary: idesk
Architecture: source i386 mips alpha sparc
Version: 0.7.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Avelar (Fixxxer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anibal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:45:24 +
Source: prep-installer
Binary: prep-installer
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:38:48 +
Source: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6
Binary: hfs-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-miboot-di
scsi-core-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-di
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-miboot-di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:47:17 +
Source: hdate-applet
Binary: hdate-applet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.15.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hebrew Packaging Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Baruch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:34:58 +
Source: partman-prep
Binary: partman-prep
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:09:05 +
Source: partman-newworld
Binary: partman-newworld
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:52:52 +0100
Source: timemon.app
Binary: timemon.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:33:27 +
Source: cdrdao
Binary: cdrdao
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.2.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:52:23 +0100
Source: puf
Binary: puf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
