On Wed, 10 May 2006, Charles de Miramon wrote:
/var/chroot/sarge/usr/local/src/lyx-qt_1.4.1-1.sarge.2_i386.deb: component
guessed as 'main'
File pool/main/l/lyx/lyx-qt_1.4.1-1.lyx.org.2_i386.deb is already
registered with other md5sum!
(file: 'd89b0f1285b27ddbfed13429a89b821a 1684160',
Quoting Charles Plessy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Bonjour à tous,
Je m'affaire actuellement à développer la partie bioinformatique de
Debian. J'ai déjà préparé trois paquets, mais ma recherche de parrains a
fait plouf sur plusieurs listes.
Y compris debian-science (ou équivalent, je n'ai pas le
merge 366618 366554
thanks
Le Mar 9 Mai 2006 23:50, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cdck
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Alexey Semenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Ven 5 Mai 2006 18:41, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Lionel Elie Mamane:
Why can't we have a master key that signs the yearly keys? After
all, we have a long-term unique X.509 master key, so what's the
difference with OpenPGP?
End users are
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:23:34AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Hello,
antlr
gjdoc
Somehow these seem to be false positives to me because the packages
depend on a java runtime environment which can but does not have to
depend on.
The dependency involve the following packages:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for this. I'm using backuppc at work and was considering to
move our backups to bacula after upgrading our current hardware setup.
Package updates and bug squashing in general was on the roadmap.
:-)
Bacula (specially 1.38.x is much better... hopefully
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve.
Exactly, and this begs the
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Ven 5 Mai 2006 18:41, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Lionel Elie Mamane:
Why can't we have a master key that signs the yearly keys? After
all, we have a long-term unique X.509 master key,
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about compressing all generated pdf with eg pdftk instead of gzip?
That would save on space without troubling potential readers.
Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
which are
* Frank Küster:
Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
which are generated on a Debian system, and somehow TeX is involved
are.
And those which haven't been rebuilt could well be non-free anyway
(because we lack the source code). 8-
hi
I uploaded an experimental version of 'lightspeed', as you see in
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lightspeed/news/20060507T214839Z.html
on Sun 7th of May ; but strangely enough it does not appear, neither in
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lightspeed.html
nor in
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060506 12:46]:
if you take the 2y validity with 1y overlap, to have no problems,
users/images/... just have to be updated once a year (and will have a
life of at least one year, almost two if those are updated as
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:57:22AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
maybe the corresponding g++-X.Y and libstdc++-Z-X.Z-dev packages could
be solved by merging these packages. Anyway, these binaries are built
from the same source, so we should ot care-
please note that cycles that cycles of
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
multiarch. This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
binary targets on the same system, for example running both i386-linux-gnu and
amd64-linux-gnu binaries on the same system
Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello Debian developers,
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
console-common
console-tools
Ok, console-common will depend on ( kbd | console-tools) in the next
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:57:22AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert writes:
Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
g++-3.3
g++-3.4
g++-4.0
g++-4.1
gcj
gcj-4.0
gcj-4.1
java-gcj-compat
libgcj-dev
libgcj6-dev
John Goerzen wrote:
Hello Jose,
Before I reply to your message, I want to be clear that I'm going to be
blunt here, and say exactly what I think. This is not intended to be an
insult or an attack, but the reasons for these concerns.
Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pyfits (python2.x-pyfits for the binaries)
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Science Software Branch of the STScI
* URL : http://www.stsci.edu/resources/software_hardware/pyfits
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 02:00 -0700, Matt Taggart and others wrote:
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
multiarch. This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
binary targets on the same system, for example running
hi
I had the same idea some time ago
if you ever decide to work on that, I may help
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I actualy have a little hack how one could implement patch debs now to
test this out:
1. Create an archive mirror with rsync batch files (or xdelta or
whatever) between the
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:21:58AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote :
* Frank Küster:
Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
which are generated on a Debian system, and somehow TeX is involved
are.
And those which haven't been rebuilt could well be non-free
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
perl
perl-modules
These two packages are meant to be installed together, split only for
arch any/all.
I'm a bit puzzled as to why
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 14:40, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed
by maintainers.
perl
perl-modules
These two packages are meant to be installed together, split
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart and others [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
multiarch. This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
binary targets on the same system, for example running both i386-linux-gnu and
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
perl
perl-modules
These two packages are meant to be installed
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2006 22:49:36 +0200, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alsaplayer-alsa
alsaplayer-common
alsaplayer-gtk
Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on alsaplayer-alsa |
Hi,
If you want to discuss this further, please move the discussion to
-legal; you can ask to get Cc's if you aren't subscribed there.
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:21:58AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote :
* Frank Küster:
Most PDF files in Debian are
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
installed at the same time?
For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
I think that's not going to fly. Just think about the different
On 5/10/06, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
installed at the same time?
For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
I think that's not
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:51:59PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 14:40, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed
by maintainers.
perl
perl-modules
Le mercredi 10 mai 2006 à 23:44 +1000, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
A specific problem, rather than a vague description of evil would
help.
See for example
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316403;msg=15
among many RC bugs caused by circular dependencies.
--
.''`.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:01:21PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
perl
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 15:44, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
The current dependencies are used to allow a slightly newer version
of perl-modules to be installed: porters had issues in unstable
where perl was uninstallable due to the package not having built on
an architecture.*
Package: perl
Depends:
Le Mardi 09 Mai 2006 22:49, Bill Allombert a écrit :
Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org
...
libkcal2b
libkdepim1a
It looks like these two have circular dependencies because libkdepim depends
on libkcal, while a couple of the standard libkcal plugins (namely
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:36:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel.
I should point out that you CC'd your reply to this message I sent you
in private to debian-devel.
Unfortunate, but the proper thing to do in this situation
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:10:52PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
I previously declined very 'consistent' offers to adopt/take over
Bacula, and offered co-maintenance instead.
One of the main reasons: i have quite good relations with upstream
(almost made them move main development to Debian
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
perl
perl-modules
These two packages are meant to be installed
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:24, Bill Allombert wrote:
gjdoc kaffe kaffe-jthreads kaffe-pthreads
http://debian.semistable.com/dot/kaffe-pthreads_stable.png
Can someone point me to an explanation for this (Etch)?
gjdoc depends on kaffe. But kaffe-pthreads provides kaffe.
Why then is it
On 8 May 2006, Marc Haber outgrape:
On Fri, 05 May 2006 11:12:35 +0300, Jari Aalto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Colin Watson wrote:
The rest of the system accounts are happily running with
/bin/false
There is now /bin/nologin
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 17:01, Mike Bird a écrit :
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:24, Bill Allombert wrote:
gjdoc kaffe kaffe-jthreads kaffe-pthreads
http://debian.semistable.com/dot/kaffe-pthreads_stable.png
Can someone point me to an explanation for this (Etch)?
gjdoc depends on kaffe. But
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 22:49 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello Debian developers,
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
[snip]
Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xfce4-mixer
xfce4-mixer-alsa
xfce4-mixer-oss
In
Dear all, dear Frank,
If it was the intention of the general resolution you are reffering to
that any document which has been created by automatic processing of
another document could not be distributed without its source, it is
rather unfortunate that it refers to the DFSG, which explicitely use
Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perl-modules should not depends on perl. It's useless to have only
perl-modules installed, but this create no harm.
moreover people just apt-get install perl, so that won't break anything.
That would be true if perl depended on perl-modules (=
Le Mercredi 10 Mai 2006 17:09, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
why do kaffe-[pj]threads depends upon gjdoc ? isn't a recommends
enough ?
given its description, it looks like a developpement tool, and I don't
get why it's needed just for running java apps, I even don't really
understand why it
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:26:33AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:10:52PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
I couldn't be happier if that happened. We have a bit less than 3 months
(until Etch freezes) to get all of this in shape. Any other volunteers?
I have not
On May 10, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
or some such. In that case, I can
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for the public domain, I thought I was on solid ground because work
made by public servants in the USA is automatically public domain.
However, I realised that the Standford university where the software has
been released is private (correct me if I
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 15:44, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
The current dependencies are used to allow a slightly newer version
of perl-modules to be installed: porters had issues in unstable
where perl was uninstallable due to the
Please, this time, obey the Followup-to to debian-legal.
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I do not want to argue,
Yes. Please. Please do not argue before you've read the discussions we
already had on this. I don't expect you to find any relevant new
points.
and your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
Except that he is not a developer and so far has not showed the minimal
competence required to maintain a package, nor attempts to improve his
procedures.
I also don't see how it matters: If José and John were Co-maintainers,
no other DD would sponsor
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
objection if he
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:03:16PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I also don't see how it matters: If José and John were Co-maintainers,
no other DD would sponsor José's uploads. In consequence, John would be
There is no guarantee of that. Somebody has been uploading these
packages all along, and
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:23:03AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:36:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel.
* Your clean target was ineffective and caused a huge diff.gz
For 1.38 ? Yes. Can't clean
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Except that apt-get fails if any of the signatures are unknown or
expired. So you still need both keys and not just one of them as you
intent.
No, that used to be apt's behavior, but since January apt and all other
Release-verifying tools (debootstrap,
Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
(In fact, IMHO nothing should depends from perl-modules at all).
Correct. I'd prefer that nothing did.
Is this documented anywhere? If is really is the case that nothing
should depend
John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance
Frank Küster wrote:
Well, it isn't, since perl is installed by debootstrap (or whatever the
installer uses)
*blank stare*
Upgrading from sarge should be done according to the instructions in the
release notes. The only things that should be installed separately are
probably aptitude, apt
Russ Allbery writes:
In practice, the rules that say that work done by the government is
automatically public domain...
Work done by US federal government employees on government time is
effectively public domain. This does _not_ apply to work done by state or
local government employees. It
Hello,
I'm writing to let you know that I have just added your website,
lists.debian.org, to my directory.
You can find your listing here...
http://www.faxwin.com/efax
I also wanted to gauge your interest in networking our websites
together more closely for mutual benefit.
If you would
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery writes:
In practice, the rules that say that work done by the government is
automatically public domain...
Work done by US federal government employees on government time is
effectively public domain. This does _not_ apply to work done by
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:08:57PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
You should not go
On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on alsaplayer-alsa |
alsaplayer-output and alsaplayer-gtk | alsaplayer-interface. Is
this really a problem?
My question,
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:53:23PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
developer like yourself in the team to help out and explain where and
why things are good or bad will surely help in the long run. In light of
that, and in light of his past contributions (good and, well, 'not as
good') which
Kurt Petersen wrote:
I was the happy user of Emacs on Debian unstable. After a normal
apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
Emacs disappeared and has not been seen later. I'm I the only one to
miss it?
Could this be the reason:
# apt-get install emacs21-nox
[...]
The following
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on alsaplayer-alsa |
alsaplayer-output and alsaplayer-gtk |
On 5/10/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's just that I'm quite concerned about the precendent this creates. Up
until now, people have abandoned packages when other people felt the
packages in question where poorly maintained. I remember the case of the
Sometimes they have
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:37:34PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
or some such. In
Olaf van der Spek writes...
Does it also allow completely arbitrary combinations to be installed?
We're not sure of this implementation detail yet. But I think...
By default your system won't be multiarch, but the sysadmin can turn on
combinations. The config file for doing this will have
On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:58 -0400, James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
alsaplayer-common contains the main alsaplayer binary
(/usr/bin/alsaplayer), which does not function without an
alsaplayer-output and alsaplayer-input plugin.
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 10, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
or some
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:37:48AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
I uploaded an experimental version of 'lightspeed', as you see in
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lightspeed/news/20060507T214839Z.html
on Sun 7th of May ; but strangely enough it does not appear, neither in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mp3val
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://mp3val.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A program for MPEG audio stream
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on alsaplayer-alsa |
alsaplayer-output and alsaplayer-gtk |
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
installed at the same time?
For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
Read the papers listed in the wiki. The short answer is no, same as it is
today with
On 5/9/06, Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* dh_compress doesn't compress some other files based on extension
including .zip files. PDF (to my knowledge) uses zip internally to
compress the document. So why PDF should be gzipped if .zip not?
Probably because .zip is compressed
Hi,
there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
freeze etch rather soon and also the RC bug count doesn't look too good,
and we want to be on time this time :), we think the switch to gcc 4.1
as
On 5/10/06, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
installed at the same time?
For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
Read the papers listed in
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Dear Developers,
I've raised this discussion at -mentors first [1] but I think it is worth
asking on a devel list since no definite decision was reached and I
could not find similar discussion in the archives.
I've got
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:18:56PM +0200, Kurt Petersen wrote:
Kurt Petersen wrote:
I was the happy user of Emacs on Debian unstable. After a normal
apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
Emacs disappeared and has not been seen later. I'm I the only one to
miss it?
Could this be the
On 5/10/06, Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about improving transparent decompression somehow?
well... unification via mailcap is nice, but as I mentioned before it
would be trickier to make it work from firefox (it assumes all .gz files
Good solutions aren't always trivial.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: summain
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://liw.iki.fi/liw/summain/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
* Although there is a way to view pdf.gz without explicit decompression
(use see or xzpdf) it is inconvenient for being used from firefox for
instance (?)
Could you point us to a bug report ? firefox being a web browser is likely
to be used to download .pdf.gz files from non-Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-nose
Version : 0.8.7
Upstream Author : Jason Pellerin
* URL : http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:26:32 -0700
Source: gnucash
Binary: gnucash-common gnucash
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 1.8.12-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:03:58 +0200
Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Binary: libmysqlclient15-dev mysql-client mysql-client-5.0 mysql-server
mysql-server-5.0 mysql-common libmysqlclient15off
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 5.0.21-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:52:26 +0200
Source: xdb
Binary: libxdb1 libxdb-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:56:37 +0200
Source: pdftk
Binary: pdftk
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.12-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:01:31 +0200
Source: bfbtester
Binary: bfbtester
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:02:17 +0200
Source: avahi
Binary: libavahi-client3 libavahi-glib-dev libavahi-common-data python2.4-avahi
avahi-utils libavahi-common-dev libavahi-qt3-1 libavahi-glib1 libavahi-qt4-dev
libavahi-qt4-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:24:47 +0200
Source: deskbar-applet
Binary: deskbar-applet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.14.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:51:03 +0200
Source: pike7.6
Binary: pike7.6-sane pike7.6-meta pike7.6-gl pike7.6-gdbm pike7.6-core
pike7.6-bzip2 pike7.6-doc pike7.6-pg pike7.6-sdl pike7.6-mysql pike7.6-odbc
pike7.6-image pike7.6-gtk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:16:39 +0200
Source: watchdog
Binary: watchdog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.2.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Meskes [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:55:56 +0200
Source: libnet-z3950-perl
Binary: libnet-z3950-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.51-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:51 +0200
Source: libclass-inspector-perl
Binary: libclass-inspector-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:13:48 +0200
Source: linuxdoc-tools
Binary: linuxdoc-tools-latex linuxdoc-tools-info linuxdoc-tools-text
linuxdoc-tools
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.9.21-0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:26:04 +0200
Source: lighttpd
Binary: lighttpd-mod-mysql-vhost lighttpd-mod-cml lighttpd-doc
lighttpd-mod-trigger-b4-dl lighttpd
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.4.11-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:19:52 +0200
Source: tex-common
Binary: tex-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:17:13 +0200
Source: mopac7
Binary: libmopac7-dev libmopac7-0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Banck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:21:24 -0400
Source: bitpim
Binary: bitpim bitpim-lib
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.8.14.dfsg.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Aaron M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:37:18 +0900
Source: libodbc-ruby
Binary: libodbc-ruby1.8
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.997-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daigo Moriwaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daigo Moriwaki
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
