Re: bug à reproduire : mauvaise trans mission de la map clavier X entre amd64 e t i386

2006-08-10 Thread Vincent Danjean
Sebastien Chaumat a écrit : Bonjour à tous, Est-ce que quelqu'un peu me confirmer ce bug, je n'arrive pas à convaincre l'équipe de xorg qu'il existe : - sur amd64 yeap - installer un chroot sid i386 - installer xbase-clients dans ce chroot J'ai juste copié dans /tmp depuis une

Updated: Russian and Ukrainian translation/localization services

2006-08-10 Thread Olivia Translations
Dear friends, Olivia Translations provides excellent Russian and Ukrainian translation/localization services with the best rates. If you are interested, welcome to http://www.olivia-translations.org for more information. --- We discovered your address while looking

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael S. Peek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.09.1322 +0100]: It seems that Debian doesn't care about keeping up with files created dynamically via install scripts. For instance, I can type 'dpkg -S /etc/papersize', and I get back 'dpkg: /etc/papersize not found.' Yes,

Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

2006-08-10 Thread Lars Wirzenius
ke, 2006-08-09 kello 11:45 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty kirjoitti: I was looking through these, and at least the following errors appear to be false positives for the given packages, caused only by some combination of x11-common, xcursor-themes, xutils (which leaves behind junk in /etc/X11/rstart),

Re: New source packages sometimes bypassing NEW?

2006-08-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Kevin B. McCarty [Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:42:10 -0700]: Hi all, Hi Kevin, In splitting up the cernlib source package, I just uploaded three sets of .debs for new source packages paw, mclibs and geant321. All of these new source packages produce binary .debs that previously were created from

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 03:44:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: Indeed, you are not free to add whatever piece of crap to the Debian archive regardless of the license. Call it a non-free project if you want, but this would only look like a

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 09 août 2006 à 15:44 +0200, Joerg Schilling a écrit : You are again trying to intentionally tell us untrue things about my software! The Debian project accepted the clauses in cdrecord ~ 4 years ago. That doesn't mean the project

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GR stated that invariant sections aren't acceptable for the specific GFDL case, and there is no reason why they would be acceptable for If Linux

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Linas Žvirblis
Joerg Schilling wrote: The Debian project accepted the clauses in cdrecord ~ 4 years ago. That doesn't mean the project still considers them acceptable *NOW*. So you like to tell me that Debian is not trustworthy? The requirements of the project changed. That is called progress. -- To

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't know that you just need to use a clearly _different_ _name_ for such a fork, I can't help you. Read the preamble from the GPL to understand your fault. So all we need to do to apeace you is to call is debianrecord? If that is

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Jean Parpaillon
Hi Joerg, Le 09.08.2006 15:33, Joerg Schilling a écrit : If you don't know that you just need to use a clearly _different_ _name_ for such a fork, I can't help you. Read the preamble from the GPL to understand your fault. Beside the licensing issues, why do you care so much patched

ITP: dc-qt -- GUI frontend for the dc protocol

2006-08-10 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: wnpp Owner: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: dc-qt Version : 0.2.0-alpha Upstream Author : Arsenij Vodjanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://dc-qt.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page * License : GPL Programming

MIME type of OCaml source files

2006-08-10 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, Inclusion of the OCaml syntax highlighting file in GtkTextView is blocked until FreeDesktop includes the MIME type in its shared-mime-info database, but I don't know the MIME type of OCaml source files. Would someone happen to know what the MIME type of OCaml files is? I

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Ralph Amissah
And note: the CDDL is one of 9 preferred licenses: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:11636:200607:nknhhdligldemhkfbhpd One of the preferred licenses *by the OSI*. Debian has nothing to do with the OSI and doesn't not rely on the OSI to be told what is free or not. Can't you even

Re: MIME type of OCaml source files

2006-08-10 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 10 August 2006 17:30, Loïc Minier wrote: Hi, Inclusion of the OCaml syntax highlighting file in GtkTextView is blocked until FreeDesktop includes the MIME type in its shared-mime-info database, but I don't know the MIME type of OCaml source files. Would someone

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't know that you just need to use a clearly _different_ _name_ for such a fork, I can't help you. Read the preamble from the GPL to understand your fault. So all we need to do to apeace

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread sean finney
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:01:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: No, at least not for /etc. You could install the file, the overwrite it, but files installed to /etc by dpkg are conffiles and those must not be touched programmatically, according to policy. i think a better solution (and one

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:01:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: No, at least not for /etc. You could install the file, the overwrite it, but files installed to /etc by dpkg are conffiles and those must not be touched programmatically, according to

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Joerg Schilling dijo [Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:49:36PM +0200]: As I _did_ already receive coplaints against cdrecord that have been e.g. based on the fact that Linux distributoions change the name for the file /etc/default/cdrercord and the fact that the basterdized behavior is incompatible

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1647 +0100]: How about allowing conffiles to list files that are generated at install time and are not included in the deb? You can, but then you run up against policy. You are not allowed to touch a conffile with a script. --

Re: MIME type of OCaml source files

2006-08-10 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006, George Danchev wrote: (I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], but didn't receive any reply.) both from d-o-m ;-) I should have requested to be Cc:ed, but forgot to do so, thanks! -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

RFS: libdevice-serialport-perl 1.002-1, or picking up where 0.22 left off

2006-08-10 Thread Zak B. Elep
Hi all! =) I'm requesting for a sponsor for my `libdevice-serialport-perl' package for the Perl module Device::SerialPort version 1.002 . This package is supposed to be under the care of Michael D. Mattice (mattice on db, LoRez on IRC,) but it hasn't been touched by him in exactly 2 years (the

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu August 10 2006 10:16, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1647 +0100]: How about allowing conffiles to list files that are generated at install time and are not included in the deb? You can, but then you run up against policy. You

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1925 +0100]: Would updating /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list files without touching the appropriate Installed-Size: field be OK? Definitely not. /var/lib/dpkg is the domain of dpkg. Do not go there. You must not even assume that

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu August 10 2006 12:40, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1925 +0100]: Would updating /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list files without touching the appropriate Installed-Size: field be OK? Definitely not. /var/lib/dpkg is the domain of dpkg. Do not go

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1959 +0100]: Such a utility would need to be shipped with dpkg, a 3rd party or random DD implementing it would be silly for anything but local consumption. Is that the only problem? If dpkg knew how to track files it did not directly

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10742 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote: Both forbid to damage the reputation of the original author. Free software gives you the right to change software but free software definitely does _not_ give you the right to use the originam _name_ of the software in case you apply incompatible

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu August 10 2006 13:13, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1959 +0100]: Such a utility would need to be shipped with dpkg, a 3rd party or random DD implementing it would be silly for anything but local consumption. Is that the only problem?

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.2124 +0100]: An update-package command, run at install time by the maintainer's scripts right after file generation succeeds, would head off potential problems with synchronization that are outside of the Maintainer's control (e.g.,

Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?

2006-08-10 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
Hi Kevin, On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: Hi Aurélien G, (sorry for the bad conversion by mutt) No problem, I am still not an UTF-8 guy, so my local ISO-8859-15 encoding is the culprit for you. ;) So there is ONE w-b for {i386,ppc,...) and there is one buildd for

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu August 10 2006 15:10, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.2124 +0100]: An update-package command, run at install time by the maintainer's scripts right after file generation succeeds, would head off potential problems with synchronization that

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, how about the following (and please read it completly before you answer, it contains multiple options): I am sorry, but I cannot believe that you like to make serious proposal with the text you wrote. Let me make a proposal that makes sense for now

Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-10 Thread Roger Leigh
This post is about some issues with the various inetd packages in etch (and unstable). This is a case where I think some coordination between all the packages or some inetd package policy would make them all generally more usable. The currently available inetd packages, and a summary of their

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Michael Banck
Hi fellow Debian people, On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: Let me make a proposal that makes sense for now and the future: Whoever answers to this proposal will be mocked publically. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.2237 +0100]: No point setting oneself up for bugs if it is not necessary. The script wouldn't determine anything, it would simply append paths to the package's list of paths. The Maintainer would need to call the script right after file

Use of generic init script names [WAS Re: Status of inetd for etch]

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Outstanding issues -- * There is no inetd virtual package, so multiple daemons may be installed, all using the same configuration file. Is this a use case we really want to support? Are there really setups

Re: Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-10 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 10, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * There is no inetd virtual package, so multiple daemons may be There is no virtual package because aj (who is still the netbase maintainer, even if he did not touch it in almost five years) mandated that it should be introduced after the mitical

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread peek
sean finney wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:01:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: No, at least not for /etc. You could install the file, the overwrite it, but files installed to /etc by dpkg are conffiles and those must not be touched programmatically, according to policy. i think

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread peek
Bruce Sass wrote: An update-package command, run at install time by the maintainer's scripts right after file generation succeeds, would head off potential problems with synchronization that are outside of the Maintainer's control (e.g., DEBIAN/dynfiles containing incorrectly generated paths)

Re: Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-10 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: The inetd daemon installed by default: etch: openbsd-inetd | netkit-inetd sarge: netkit-inetd woody: netkit-inetd (netkit-base, split from netbase) potato: (in netbase) slink: (in netbase) Users

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread sean finney
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:35:03PM -0400, peek wrote: place. It just seems a little cleaner: you could query dpkg for what package *every* file came from -- no files left out; and you don't what about rotated log files? pid files? lock files? misc stuff in /var/cache? that's not to bash the

Re: Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-10 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:29:48AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 10, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Some inetds automatically listen on v6, whereas others need it I call them broken. I believe that administrators do not expect that services are exposed to IPv6 connections unless

dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Florian Weimer wrote: * martin f. krafft: Thanks to the work of our DPL Anthony aj Towns (and all the other people who have worked on this without my knowledge), I am happy to announce that dak, our archive management software, finally supports the use of the tilde ('~') in version numbers.

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Michael Biebl [Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200]: that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I think is rather odd, because it means that now all version numbers up to 0.9 will be considered 0.09+0.1. 0.09 = 0.9 means: 0 == 0 and . == . and 09 ==

Re: Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-10 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 11, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I call them broken. I believe that administrators do not expect that services are exposed to IPv6 connections unless they are configured this way in inetd.conf. A service can listen: Does not matter. The behaviour of inetd has always

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Hubert Chan
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] If it's not a bug in dpkg, could someone please elaborate on the reasoning of this behaviour. I'd be grateful for any comments and replies. It's documented in Policy 5.6.12 [1]. Substrings composed of digits are

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:29:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Michael Biebl [Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200]: that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I think is rather odd, because it means that now all version numbers up to 0.9 will be considered 0.09+0.1.

Re: Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-10 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:34:39AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 11, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why, for the love of Cthulhu, does netbase depend on inetd in the first place? Let's see: Historical reasons. Now, let's see what depends on *-inetd: Under the current rules

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:12:59AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: I have to admit that when choosing 0.09+0.1 as version number I didn't check with dpkg --compare-versions because then I would have discovered that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I think is rather odd,

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:44:57 +0200 Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stuff deleted for brevity All of this, without even taking into account your brain-dead licensing mix between CDDL and GPL - which are intentionally incompatible licenses, according to Sun guys. If you are so

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:47:36 -0400]: Except that the final comparison ignores that the number was to the right of the decimal, making the zero significant. Er, read Policy 5.6.12. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Michael Banck said: Hi fellow Debian people, On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: Let me make a proposal that makes sense for now and the future: Whoever answers to this proposal will be mocked publically. Even if we mock the

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?-

2006-08-10 Thread Ben Finney
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have to admit that when choosing 0.09+0.1 as version number I didn't check with dpkg --compare-versions because then I would have discovered that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I think is rather odd, because it means that

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 02:21:04AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Roberto C. Sanchez [Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:47:36 -0400]: Except that the final comparison ignores that the number was to the right of the decimal, making the zero significant. Er, read Policy 5.6.12. I have read it. I was

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:47:36PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:29:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Michael Biebl [Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200]: that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I think is rather odd, because it means

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:37:47PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 02:21:04AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Roberto C. Sanchez [Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:47:36 -0400]: Except that the final comparison ignores that the number was to the right of the decimal, making

Re: Silly Packaging Problem

2006-08-10 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu August 10 2006 16:20, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.2237 +0100]: No point setting oneself up for bugs if it is not necessary. The script wouldn't determine anything, it would simply append paths to the package's list of paths. The

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:42:53AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: I'd imagine you'd be hard pressed to find a mathematician who knows what to do with a number that reads 0.0.9, either. That's why we're software developers, not mathematicians. Or, to put it another way: your numbers are not

Desktop themes for Debian ?

2006-08-10 Thread André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira
Hi people, I'm a devel on Art Team in Debian-BR-CDD [1] project in Brazil and maintainer of some icon packages in Debian. The Debian-BR-CDD is a cdd focused in desktop applications for brazilians users in Portuguese, with some themes customized for GNOME, GDM, Splashy, Grub, Icons, website. Any

Re: dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now supports ~ in version numbers]

2006-08-10 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:47:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:42:53AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: I'd imagine you'd be hard pressed to find a mathematician who knows what to do with a number that reads 0.0.9, either. That's why we're software

Re: dak now supports ~ in version numbers

2006-08-10 Thread Brian May
Adeodato == Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Adeodato Package: foo-plugin Depends: foo (= 0.8), foo ( Adeodato 0.9) Adeodato Will probably want to move to: Adeodato Depends: foo (= 0.8), foo ( 0.9~) Can I assume that the first one will accept version 0.9~rc1, but

Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

2006-08-10 Thread Brian May
Lars == Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars While I wait to have time to do something better and more Lars easily usable, the following page lists the logs of failed Lars piuparts files that have not yet been processed: Lars http://piuparts.cs.helsinki.fi/fail/

Re: udev vs ldap at startup

2006-08-10 Thread Brian May
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve libnss-ldap has a new, retarded upstream default where it Steve polls the server several times in the case of a connection Steve refused error instead of just returning a notfound to the Steve caller. Ar So that

Bug#382451: ITP: varnish -- High-performance HTTP accelerator

2006-08-10 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: varnish Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Varnish Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/ * License : Two-clause BSD license

Accepted snort 2.3.3-8 (source i386 all)

2006-08-10 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:44:36 +0200 Source: snort Binary: snort-mysql snort-doc snort-rules-default snort-common snort-pgsql snort Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.3.3-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Javier

Accepted klic 3.003-gm1-4 (source i386 all)

2006-08-10 Thread GOTO Masanori
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:23 +0900 Source: klic Binary: klic klic-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 3.003-gm1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL

Accepted pike7.6 7.6.87-2 (source i386 all)

2006-08-10 Thread Marek Habersack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2006 01:28:37 +0200 Source: pike7.6 Binary: pike7.6-sane pike7.6-meta pike7.6-gl pike7.6-gdbm pike7.6-core pike7.6-bzip2 pike7.6-doc pike7.6-pg pike7.6-sdl pike7.6-mysql pike7.6-odbc pike7.6-image pike7.6-gtk pike7.6-svg

Accepted newt 0.52.2-7 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Alastair McKinstry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:18:08 +0100 Source: newt Binary: libnewt0.52 libnewt-dev libnewt-pic newt-tcl whiptail python-newt Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.52.2-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry

Accepted lua50 5.0.3-1 (source all amd64)

2006-08-10 Thread Enrico Tassi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:45:57 +0200 Source: lua50 Binary: liblualib50-dev liblua50-dev lua50-doc liblua50 lua50 liblualib50 Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 5.0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Enrico Tassi

Accepted gnome-doc-utils 0.6.1-3 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Loic Minier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:17:33 +0200 Source: gnome-doc-utils Binary: gnome-doc-utils Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Loic

Accepted lzma 4.43-2 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:26:37 +0200 Source: lzma Binary: lzma Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.43-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mohammed Adnène Trojette

Accepted kernel-patch-debianlogo 1.5 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:09:52 +0200 Source: kernel-patch-debianlogo Binary: kernel-patch-debianlogo Architecture: source all Version: 1.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Stefano Melchior [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted libglade2 1:2.6.0-2 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Loic Minier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:36:20 +0200 Source: libglade2 Binary: libglade2-0 libglade2-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:2.6.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Loic

Accepted caudium 2:1.4.7-15 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Marek Habersack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:48:06 +0200 Source: caudium Binary: caudium-ultralog caudium-pixsl caudium-perl caudium caudium-dev caudium-modules Architecture: source i386 Version: 2:1.4.7-15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Accepted syslinux 3.11+3.20pre11-1 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:31:00 +0200 Source: syslinux Binary: syslinux Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.11+3.20pre11-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Juan Cespedes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann

Accepted pike-public.parser.xml2 1.38-2 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Marek Habersack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:20:04 +0200 Source: pike-public.parser.xml2 Binary: pike-public.parser.xml2 pike7.6-public.parser.xml2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.38-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack

Accepted pike-public.network.pcap 1.2-4 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Marek Habersack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:18:06 +0200 Source: pike-public.network.pcap Binary: pike-public.network.pcap pike7.6-public.network.pcap Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack

Accepted pike-public.tools.configfiles 1.0-4 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Marek Habersack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:24:47 +0200 Source: pike-public.tools.configfiles Binary: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles pike-public.tools.configfiles Architecture: source all Version: 1.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Accepted pike-public.protocols.syslog 1.1-4 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Marek Habersack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:22:33 +0200 Source: pike-public.protocols.syslog Binary: pike-public.protocols.syslog pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog Architecture: source all Version: 1.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek

Accepted mlterm 2.9.3-2 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:17:04 +0900 Source: mlterm Binary: mlterm-im-m17nlib mlterm-im-scim mlterm-tiny mlterm-im-iiimf mlterm-tools mlterm-common mlterm mlterm-im-uim Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.9.3-2 Distribution: unstable

Accepted last-exit 2.0-1 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Ross Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:42 +0100 Source: last-exit Binary: last-exit Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted python-support 0.4.1 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:03:48 +0200 Source: python-support Binary: python-support Architecture: source all Version: 0.4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin Mouette

Accepted koffice-l10n 1.5.2-2 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:07:20 +0200 Source: koffice-l10n Binary: koffice-i18n-srlatin koffice-i18n-uk koffice-i18n-eu koffice-i18n-fi koffice-i18n-tr koffice-i18n-tg koffice-i18n-sv koffice-i18n-cs koffice-i18n-ptbr koffice-i18n-uz

Accepted gtksourceview 1.7.2-1 (source all i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Loic Minier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:11:43 +0200 Source: gtksourceview Binary: libgtksourceview-dev libgtksourceview-common libgtksourceview1.0-0 libgtksourceview-doc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.7.2-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency:

Accepted texinfo 4.8.dfsg.1-2 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Norbert Preining
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:16:29 +0200 Source: texinfo Binary: texinfo info Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.8.dfsg.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Norbert Preining

Accepted mpt-status 1.1.6-6 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Steffen Joeris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:03:31 +1000 Source: mpt-status Binary: mpt-status Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.6-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL

Accepted xen-tools 2.2-4 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Steve Kemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:43:21 + Source: xen-tools Binary: xen-tools Architecture: source all Version: 2.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted aap 1.072-1.1 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:36:21 +0200 Source: aap Binary: aap aap-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.072-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cory Dodt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted dwm 0.8-1 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:30:00 +0200 Source: dwm Binary: dwm Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted dmenu 0.3-1 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:33:00 +0200 Source: dmenu Binary: dmenu Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libalgorithm-c3-perl 0.04-1 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:14:26 +0200 Source: libalgorithm-c3-perl Binary: libalgorithm-c3-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.04-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted konserve 0.10.3-3 (source i386)

2006-08-10 Thread Alejandro Exojo Piqueras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:49:28 +0200 Source: konserve Binary: konserve Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.10.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Alejandro Exojo

Accepted apt-listchanges 2.60 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit

Accepted rails 1.1.5-1 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Adam Majer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:50:13 -0500 Source: rails Binary: rails Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: emergency Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted elfutils 0.122-3 (source amd64)

2006-08-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:21:05 + Source: elfutils Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.122-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx

Accepted resolvconf 1.36 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Marco Nenciarini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:50:50 +0200 Source: resolvconf Binary: resolvconf Architecture: source all Version: 1.36 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: resolvconf maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL

Accepted meld 1.1.3-1.1 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:02:41 +0200 Source: meld Binary: meld Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.3-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted dspam 3.6.8-2 (source i386 all)

2006-08-10 Thread Debian DSPAM Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:50:44 -0400 Source: dspam Binary: libdspam7-dev libdspam7-drv-pgsql dspam libdspam7-drv-mysql dspam-webfrontend dspam-doc libdspam7-drv-db4 libdspam7 libdspam7-drv-sqlite3 Architecture: source i386 all Version:

Accepted gettext 0.15-0 (source all powerpc)

2006-08-10 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:39:56 +0200 Source: gettext Binary: gettext-doc gettext gettext-base gettext-el Architecture: source all powerpc Version: 0.15-0 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted aspell-de-alt 2.1-1-5 (source all)

2006-08-10 Thread Christoph Berg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:08:00 +0200 Source: aspell-de-alt Binary: aspell-de-alt Architecture: source all Version: 2.1-1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL

  1   2   >