Bonsoir,
je développe depuis pas mal de temps le websso Lemonldap::NG (récriture
complète de Lemonldap). Les sources incluent le packaging Debian et
j'aimerai savoir s'il y aurait une bonne âme DD pour estimer mon
travail. Tout est là:
deb http://lemonldap.objectweb.org/NG/debian testing/
upgrade path for two releases now, with its Recommends: handling being a
major reason for this. I'd be surprised if there weren't at least *some*
users switching to it as a result.
Developer users probably. The ones that resist are more non-developer
users. I'm constantly being annoyed at
Michael Vogt schrieb am Montag, den 11. Juni 2007:
Hi,
*snip*
[..]
- automatic installation of recommends like aptitude
[..]
This is currently turned off because of the concerns raised. its a
matter of changing the default of APT::Install-Recommends to true.
I want to turn it on by
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another widely misunderstood feature of aptitude is the ability to
handle packages installed as dependencies. It's pretty often badly
understoood and leads to horror stories floating around of aptitude
wants to remove half of the system while the
On 10 Jun 2007, at 6:38 pm, Steffen Moeller wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 17:20:54 you wrote:
On 9 Jun 2007, at 11:27 am, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Once a (computational) biologist starts a new
project, (s)he wants the latest data no matter what and anything
older than
three months (or a week
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Alexander Wirt wrote:
I want to turn it on by default in the near future, but with a
reasonable warning time for the transition.
Please never make it a default. Humans make errors and I never want packages
installed by default. I consider this really a dangerous option
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul van Tilburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ffrenzy
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Authors: Bas Kloet [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christian Luijten [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Since proposed-updates contain only approved updates for the next stable
release it make sense to add it to the sources.lists (at least for some
users).
I have done so and I'm discovering a little quirk related to its use.
Until now I had etch +
Hi all,
Please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix . I
put a bug up for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/119822
Aaron helpfully said it needs more discussion. I have had great
support from libtorrent code.rasterbar.com as well as the guys at
deluge
Ugh,
The second example I wanted to give was of libburnia
http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/877 . Sorry
--
Shirish Agarwal
This email is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Please never make it a default. Humans make errors and I never want packages
Recommends *are* to be installed by default, unless you specifically tell
the tool not to. This is the whole point, one that has been broken for a
few *years* now and has
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:08:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Really? I'd have guessed that most people used aptitude. I can't imagine
anyone preferring synaptic to aptitude. Of course, I don't really
understand why anyone prefers [any graphical MUA] to mutt, or [any
graphical newsreader]
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:01:18PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
i have 2 servers that i only login for apt-get update apt-get upgrade
-y, they are running sarge (yet) and only install security upgrades.
These 2 server will not
shirish wrote:
Hi all,
Please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix . I
put a bug up for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/119822
Aaron helpfully said it needs more discussion. I have had great
support from libtorrent code.rasterbar.com as well as the guys at
deluge
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 18:27 +0530, shirish a écrit :
Hi all,
Please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix . I
put a bug up for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/119822
Aaron helpfully said it needs more discussion. I have had great
support from libtorrent
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: José L. Redrejo Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pysycache
Version : 3.0.1
Upstream Author : Vincent Deroo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.pysycache.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Educational
If was time, where string comparisons with void were ... with features.
|-*-
if [ x$a = 'x|' ]; then
|-*-
Yet arithmetic ones are still with them:
|-*-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ bash -c test '' -eq 0 ; echo \$?
bash: line 0: test: : integer expression expected
2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$
On Monday 11 June 2007 14:57, shirish wrote:
Please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix . I
put a bug up for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/119822
Aaron helpfully said it needs more discussion. I have had great
support from libtorrent code.rasterbar.com as well
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I'm in favour! (But are you requesting that aptitude use SI prefixes
correctly, or that it use IEC (binary) prefixes?
I think we should go for the binary prefixes. Users will be confused
when they read 1k and notice that the package has 'just' 1000 bytes.
Plus, the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Please never make it a default. Humans make errors and I never want packages
Recommends *are* to be installed by default, unless you specifically tell
the tool not to. This is the whole point, one that has been
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- KRYPTIVA PACKAGED MESSAGE -
PACKAGING TYPE: SIGNED
Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
unsubscribe
mm... crap I'm really sorry.
- KRYPTIVA SIGNED MESSAGE -
This email claims to have been packaged by Kryptiva.
To process this email and authenticate its origin, get
the free plugin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:37AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Diskspace *is* a problem for mirrors, as is bandwidth in many countries.
Also, you should think about this issue not just in the context of the
single package you
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:14:18PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I'm in favour! (But are you requesting that aptitude use SI prefixes
correctly, or that it use IEC (binary) prefixes?
I think we should go for the binary prefixes. Users will be confused
when they
Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Montag, den 11. Juni 2007:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Alexander Wirt wrote:
I want to turn it on by default in the near future, but with a
reasonable warning time for the transition.
Please never make it a default. Humans make errors and I never want packages
shirish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
everywhere.
No it doesn't.
The SI binary prefixes are an abomination.
Kibibytes? Christ... [Did they try pronouncing these horrid things
when standarizing them?!?]
-Miles
--
We are all lying in
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
FWIW, synaptic has an option in its preferences dialog called Consider
recommended packages as dependencies, which is off by default.
I completely agree, to treat Recommends as weak dependencies and
install them by default
On Monday 11 June 2007 18:53, Miles Bader wrote:
shirish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
everywhere.
No it doesn't.
The SI binary prefixes are an abomination.
Why - besides pronunciation?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:05:23PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Why - besides pronunciation?
Aren't the names enough? :)
Maybe they could have called them Kilobin bytes and Megabin bytes or
something somewhat less awful sounding that they came up with. Did they
even talk to anyone that might
I prefer not to use these new prefixes, because the old ones only became
confused due to the efforts of drive manufacturers. Who are perfectly
capable (and equally financially motivated) of pulling the same trick
with the new units, standards body or no.
Also, the ib prefixes sound stupid.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:59:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:37AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Diskspace *is* a problem for mirrors, as is bandwidth in many countries.
Also,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:03:47AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
upgrade path for two releases now, with its Recommends: handling being a
major reason for this. I'd be surprised if there weren't at least *some*
users switching to it as a result.
Developer users
Joey Hess wrote:
I prefer not to use these new prefixes, because the old ones only became
confused due to the efforts of drive manufacturers. Who are perfectly
capable (and equally financially motivated) of pulling the same trick
with the new units, standards body or no.
Also, the ib prefixes
On 06/11/07 12:28, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:59:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:37AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Diskspace *is* a problem for mirrors, as is
On 10-Jun-07, 20:16 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:08:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 10-Jun-07, 17:47 (CDT), Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since then, it seems like most users have switched to apt-get and
synaptic, with hardly
On 11-Jun-07, 08:45 (CDT), Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:08:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Really? I'd have guessed that most people used aptitude. I can't imagine
anyone preferring synaptic to aptitude. Of course, I don't really
understand why
On Monday 11 June 2007 19:26, Joey Hess wrote:
I prefer not to use these new prefixes, because the old ones only became
confused due to the efforts of drive manufacturers. Who are perfectly
capable (and equally financially motivated) of pulling the same trick
with the new units, standards body
Hi,
* Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-11 20:09]:
[...]
Ok, sounds stupid and may not fit on 80 column screen.
I agree with the sounds stupid part, although I don't belive
this is a valid argument. What I don't believe is your 80 colums
argument. Could you please name a few of
On Monday 11 June 2007 20:06, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I agree with the sounds stupid part, although I don't belive this is a
valid argument. What I don't believe is your 80 colums argument. Could
you please name a few of the *many* programs which would have to drop
information, precision, or
Bastian Venthur wrote:
I agree with the sounds stupid part, although I don't belive this is a
valid argument.
It's a perfectly valid argument for me to use to ignore a bad standard.
If the standard makes me talk funny, I will ignore it or make fun of it.
(Bibibibibibibibibibib.)
What I
On Monday 11 June 2007 15:07, shirish wrote:
Ugh,
The second example I wanted to give was of libburnia
http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/877 . Sorry
Uh, tell them that kiB should be KiB. Don't ask me why.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:28:13PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Actual data seems to show the cheap desktop disks are not worse than
so-called server-class disks.
My actual data does not back up your claim. Moreover, desktop-class
hard disks never support hotplugging, which you really want for a
On Monday 11 June 2007 13:09:40 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
That may be true when it comes to breakdowns. However, I challenge you
to show me a cheap desktop disk that is also SCSI or SAS *and*
hotpluggable.
While not SCSI or SAS, there are SATA controllers that support hotplugging
drives.
wt
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I don't believe that to be true. There are other computer-related contexts
where SI prefixes aren't used for powers of two, although perhaps most of
them don't involve bytes. For an average user, knowing two sets of prefixes
should be easier than knowing exactly in
Hallo,
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
Like in kg or km?
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
Like in kg or km?
This thread is about units of data.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hallo,
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
Like in kg or km?
This thread is about units of data.
The prefix don't change
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:25, Joey Hess wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
In that case you're just sloppy. Prefixes and symbols for units are case
sensitive.
--
Magnus
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:41, Joey Hess wrote:
Alex Queiroz wrote:
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
Like in kg or km?
This thread is about units of data.
kbit? kbit/s? kB/s?
--
Magnus Holmgren
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 15:25 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
/me waits for the day measuring jugs are graduated in powers of two,
just to please a group of hackers who don't
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Monday 11 June 2007 13:09:40 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
That may be true when it comes to breakdowns. However, I challenge you
to show me a cheap desktop disk that is also SCSI or SAS *and*
hotpluggable.
While not SCSI or
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 21:16 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
The point wasn't that you can't set up a professional RAID array using
cheap desktop hard disks; you can, if you really want to, though I
wouldn't recommend it. And yes, you're completely free to ignore that
particular advise, so
Hi,
316 + 0,9K Jun 10 22:32 Debian Installe cb+myon=de
postpone_0.1_amd64.changes is NEW
320 + 0,4K Jun 11 12:30 Debian Installe cb+myon=de
postpone_0.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
looks like postpone got fast-tracked in the NEW queue (thanks Joerg!),
so here's what I posted in my blog
I personally have 6 or 7 U320 73GB 10K RPM SCSI drives that I am not using for
anything interesting. Can anyone tell me if these would be useful to Debian
or recommend another free software group to donate them?
Thanks,
wt
--
Warren Turkal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:46:48PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=tex-commonsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Any idea?
I have none, is anyone able to help? Is this a
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Florent noticed that for tex-common, two versions are listed as being
available in testing although the package is Arch: all:
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I don't understand why both 1.0.1 and 1.7 are listed for
On Monday 11 June 2007 22:36, Christoph Berg wrote:
As a test implementation, I modified the post{inst,rm} templates in
the tex-common package [2] and rebuilt texlive-lang-* using that. dpkg
-i texlive-lang-*.deb takes over 4 minutes in the old version, but
only a total of 60s with postpone
Hi,
As a maintainer of a pam module (pam-keyring), I would like to know if
there is any plan to upgrade the version of the libpam in lenny.
The current version is antique (0.79 vs 0.99) and doesn't have some
features as syslog logging...
Regards
Laurent
pgpd9XLNhRqvV.pgp
Description: PGP
Am Montag 11 Juni 2007 22:15 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 15:25 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
/me waits for the day measuring jugs are graduated in
On Mon, June 11, 2007 22:11, Eduard Bloch wrote:
In either case, ~ 2 million bytes suits your requirement, or it
doesn't. This sounds to me like solving a non-problem, unless you can of
course tell me in which situations adding the B or iB in the field
above would solve a real question.
I would like to ask you interested in our next release to stop and
look at 'testing' for a while. I believe that now, during the start of
a development cycle and during debcamp/debconf we've a interesting
opportunity to review pros and cons of our current approach.
We believe that 'testing'
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 21:16 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
The point wasn't that you can't set up a professional RAID array using
cheap desktop hard disks; you can, if you really want to, though I
wouldn't recommend it. And yes, you're
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:15:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 15:25 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
/me waits for the day measuring jugs are
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a stale m68k Packages file lying around plus the fact that
I still had m68k in the testing architecture list.
Should be fixed now.
Ah, many thanks!
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f.
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be honest, this is exactly an example where I would *NOT* want to see
this implemented.
A major downside of the mechanism supported by this package is that there
is absolutely no check is any errors occur during the running of these
postponed
hi,
Qt4.3.0 was uploaded in experimental. There's some API changes.
Please, check your packages works with this new upstream release:
Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
classpath
Debian LyX Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lyx
Jan Niehusmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
psi
qca
Utopia
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070611 22:27]:
Can you tell me in which cases you would make a different decision if this
was
either 2134*1000 or 2134*1024 bytes?
In either case, ~ 2 million bytes suits your requirement, or it doesn't.
This sounds to me like solving a non-problem,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:11:25PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 21:16 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
The point wasn't that you can't set up a professional RAID array using
cheap desktop hard disks; you can, if
José L. Redrejo wrote:
The activities make children practice on clicking, double-clicking, drag
and drop, moving and identify the mouse buttons.
Since children probably learn this by age five or so with or without help,
perhaps the author should focus on making a similar tool for adults
On Monday 11 June 2007 15:10:24 Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Montag 11 Juni 2007 22:15 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 15:25 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to
Gustavo Franco wrote:
* testing metric is too simple, packages are allowed to enter testing
only after a certain period of time has passed no matter if much
people tested it before that and just when they don't have
release-critical bugs filed against them.
Of course we have a team of RMs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael D'Leon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: balance
Version : 3.35
Upstream Author : Thomas Obermair ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.inlab.de/balance.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with the sounds stupid part, although I don't belive this is a
valid argument. What I don't believe is your 80 colums argument. Could
you please name a few of the *many* programs which would have to drop
information, precision, or significantly
Fine. Stick with Kilobytes, but strictly define it as 10^3 bytes. Just
choose one over the other and be consistent.
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 01:53 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
shirish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
everywhere.
No it
On 6/11/07, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine. Stick with Kilobytes, but strictly define it as 10^3 bytes. Just
choose one over the other and be consistent.
That's not consistent. Kilobyte has always meant 2^10 bytes. kilo
in kilobyte is not an SI prefix. SI prefixes only apply to SI
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:56 -0500, Mark Reitblatt wrote:
On 6/11/07, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine. Stick with Kilobytes, but strictly define it as 10^3 bytes. Just
choose one over the other and be consistent.
That's not consistent. Kilobyte has always meant 2^10 bytes. kilo
in
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
The frontends imho just need a clear way of showing which packages are
going to be installed because of a Depends and which because of a
Recommends, so it would be easier to de-select a recommended package.
Otherwise there would
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:46:08PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
I personally have 6 or 7 U320 73GB 10K RPM SCSI drives that I am not using
for
anything interesting. Can anyone tell me if these would be useful to Debian
or recommend another free software group to donate them?
As shipping may
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:20:17PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I would like to ask you interested in our next release to stop and
look at 'testing' for a while. I believe that now, during the start of
a development cycle and during debcamp/debconf we've a interesting
opportunity to review
Miles Bader wrote:
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, we have the chance to avoid user confusion
No one is actually confused.
can you say, in all the thousands of users, not a single one is ever
confused? Not a single one ever wonders if it means 1000 or 1024?
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:52:09 Kevin Mark wrote:
As shipping may be a consideration, in the cost-benefit analysis, it may
be useful to say where in the world you are, in a general way, so that
someone in the area, who could use them, could reply.
I will ship anywhere in the US. Exporting them
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:46:08PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
I personally have 6 or 7 U320 73GB 10K RPM SCSI drives that I am not using
for
anything interesting. Can anyone tell me if these would be useful to Debian
or recommend another free software group to donate them?
The m68k port
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:15:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 15:25 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:19:00PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:52:09 Kevin Mark wrote:
As shipping may be a consideration, in the cost-benefit analysis, it may
be useful to say where in the world you are, in a general way, so that
someone in the area, who could use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:00:17 +0200
Source: php-xajax
Binary: php-xajax
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:02:28 +0200
Source: dmake
Binary: dmake
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:4.8~cvs20070706-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:01:15 +0900
Source: libapache2-mod-fcgid
Binary: libapache2-mod-fcgid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Taku YASUI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tatsuki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:12:49 +0100
Source: ckermit
Binary: ckermit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 211-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:14:14 +0200
Source: tex-common
Binary: tex-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frank Küster [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:58:34 +0200
Source: gst-plugins-good0.10
Binary: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good-doc gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
gstreamer0.10-esd gstreamer0.10-plugins-good-dbg
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.10.5-7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:21:00 +0200
Source: pcproxy
Binary: pcproxy
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:15:41 +0530
Source: linhdd
Binary: linhdd
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:37:03 +0200
Source: gnome-commander
Binary: gnome-commander
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:56:06 +
Source: mklibs
Binary: mklibs mklibs-copy
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.1.23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:42:01 +0200
Source: kde-style-qtcurve
Binary: qtcurve kde-style-qtcurve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.51-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:26:42 +0200
Source: gtk2-engines-qtcurve
Binary: gtk2-engines-qtcurve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.51-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:31:19 +0200
Source: empathy
Binary: empathy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Telepathy Maintaince Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:21:00 +0200
Source: kde-style-qtcurve
Binary: qtcurve kde-style-qtcurve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.51-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:20:11 +0200
Source: gtk2-engines-qtcurve
Binary: gtk2-engines-qtcurve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.51-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:42:38 +0200
Source: swh-plugins
Binary: swh-plugins
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.15-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
