Bug#492822: ITP: drizzle -- A Lightweight SQL Database for Cloud and Web

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org The Drizzle project is building a database optimized for Cloud and Net applications. It is being designed for massive concurrency on modern multi-cpu/core architecture. The code is originally derived from MySQL. The proj

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ben Finney: > > >> I guess it's more of a Google QA issue > > > > No, if the pages exist and other pages tend to treat them as > > interesting (i.e. interesting pages link to those pages), Google > > is working as advertised if it indexes and reports

Re: Standard way to disable services

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Franklin PIAT wrote: > I haven't investigated it, but I wonder if it isn't the sane way to have > complex dependency (à  la LSB) stored in one place, and system admin > preference in another place. Well, policy-rc.d is obeyed by invoke-rc.d, and therefore, by all maintainer sc

Re: Standard way to disable services

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:40 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 a  13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a ecrit : > > >>>

Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: procinfo-ng Version : 2.0.196 Upstream Author : Thaddeus Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://procinfo-ng.sourceforge.net

Re: procinfo maintainership

tabris wrote: > Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> Thanks for the info. As I wasn't able to find any other email adress or >> activity from the maintainer, I've orphaned the package and it will be >> listed within the orphaned packages on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ >> soon. So you could either adopt it

Re: procinfo maintainership

Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Thanks for the info. As I wasn't able to find any other email adress or > activity from the maintainer, I've orphaned the package and it will be > listed within the orphaned packages on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ > soon. So you could either adopt it and take care of it

Re: New Testing Name ???

> Im just a little bit curious, I wanted to know > what will be the new testing name? > haye you already choose the name or it will be defined later. > Lenny will be stable soon, so this is why the question. No, it hasn't been decided yet, but it will be decided before lenny releases. Cheers, --

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On unactivated account pages launchpad now sets > > > > so these pages should not show up in results from well behaved > search engines. Ah, excellent, thank you. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --

New Testing Name ???

Hi all Im just a little bit curious, I wanted to know what will be the new testing name? haye you already choose the name or it will be defined later. Lenny will be stable soon, so this is why the question. Greetings -- Victor Muchica http://muchikon.blogspot.com http://planeta.debianperu.org LR

Re: procinfo maintainership

tabris wrote: > Bernd Zeimetz wrote: So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a) procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ? >> >> did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not >> interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ >> >

Re: FHS and /var/www

Carl Fürstenberg schrieb: > FHS 2.3 specifies in > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM > to use /srv for "Data for services provided by this system", for > example /srv/www for web root. > In the policy, the section > 9.1.1(http://www.debian.org/doc/debia

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

* Ben Finney: >> I guess it's more of a Google QA issue > > No, if the pages exist and other pages tend to treat them as > interesting (i.e. interesting pages link to those pages), Google is > working as advertised if it indexes and reports them. Sorry, but this is just wrong. If the page is not

Bug#492760: ITP: freedink -- A portable version of the Dink Smallwood game engine.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bradley Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: freedink Version : 1.0.7 (Not 'officially' released yet) Upstream Author : Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.gnu

Re: Lenny frozen

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > OK, thanks. > > > > I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs > > of severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for > > the "important" on

Re: procinfo maintainership

Bernd Zeimetz wrote: So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a) procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ? did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Yes, I tried to contact the maintainer. t

Re: Lenny frozen

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > OK, thanks. > > I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs of > severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for the > "important" ones) in order for inclusion in lenny, or also lesser > severities too

Re: Lenny frozen

Le lundi 28 juillet 2008 à 17:06 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > Olivier Berger wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Can you provide a link to policy documents explaining the freeze process > > in more details ? > > > > In particular, I'm not sure I understand the last paragraph quoted > > bellow, the "only when

Re: Lenny frozen

Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > Can you provide a link to policy documents explaining the freeze process > in more details ? > > In particular, I'm not sure I understand the last paragraph quoted > bellow, the "only when this can be done via unstable" : That means that you shouldn't try to fix

Re: Lenny frozen

Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/07/2008): > Can you provide a link to policy documents explaining the freeze > process in more details ? > > In particular, I'm not sure I understand the last paragraph quoted > bellow, the "only when this can be done via unstable" : Sure: http://www.debian

Re: Lenny frozen

Hi. Can you provide a link to policy documents explaining the freeze process in more details ? In particular, I'm not sure I understand the last paragraph quoted bellow, the "only when this can be done via unstable" : Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008 à 16:00 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit : >

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 23:18 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > No, if the pages exist and other pages tend to treat them as > interesting (i.e. interesting pages link to those pages), Google is > working as advertised if it indexes and reports them. On unactivated account pages launchpad now sets so

Bug#492727: ITP: uuidm -- Universally unique identifiers for OCaml

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: uuidm Version : 0.9.1 Upstream Author : Daniel C. Bünzli * URL : http://erratique.ch/software/uuidm * License : BSD Programming Lang: OCaml Description : Univers

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Russ Allbery: > > > Unfortunately, this then generates a whole pile of web pages > > supposedly for "you" that then show up in Google searches and the > > like despite having no information on them. I think that's one of > > the things that's turned

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

* Russ Allbery: > Unfortunately, this then generates a whole pile of web pages supposedly > for "you" that then show up in Google searches and the like despite having > no information on them. I think that's one of the things that's turned > DDs off on Launchpad; I know that it gave me a bad init

Re: procinfo maintainership

>> So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a) >> procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ? did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Develop

Re: No announcement for etch&half seen ?

Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/07/2008): > I haven't noticed any announcement sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about "Debian > GNU/Linux 4.0 updated and support for newer hardware added" > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2008/msg3.html) ... > maybe this is a user news mostly, but does

Bug#492701: ITP: libwx-perl-processstream-perl -- access IO of external processes via events (Wx::Perl module)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libwx-perl-processstream-perl Version : 0.11 Upstream Author : Mark Dootson, * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Wx-Perl-ProcessStam-0.11/ * License : Same as Perl (GPL-1+

No announcement for etch&half seen ?

Hi. I haven't noticed any announcement sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about "Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 updated and support for newer hardware added" (http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2008/msg3.html) ... maybe this is a user news mostly, but doesn't hurt to notify devs, IMHO. In any case, you're

Bug#492696: ITP: padre -- Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: padre Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Gabor Szabo http://www.szabgab.com/ * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Padre/ * License : Same as Perl5 (GPL-1+|Artistic) Programmi