Ciao a tutti,
Il 18 giugno alla facolta' di scienze politiche alcuni partecipanti di
hackmeeting
in collaborazione con il professor Adam Ardvisson vorrebbero organizzare
alcune presentazioni sul tema p2p economies.
Con questo incontro si vorrebbe permettere ad alcune esperienze
comunitarie
In data lunedì 27 aprile 2009 12:42:11, giskard ha scritto:
Il 18 giugno alla facolta' di scienze politiche alcuni partecipanti di
hackmeeting
in collaborazione con il professor Adam Ardvisson vorrebbero organizzare
alcune presentazioni sul tema p2p economies.
Con questo incontro si vorrebbe
Bonjour,
vous avez un site Internet et vous voulez qu'il soit premier sur Google
pour vous ramener un maximum de clients ?
Savez-vous que les Formations au marketing sont remboursées à 100% par
le DIF (droit individuel formation, pour les salariés) ou le CIF
(crédit impôt formation, pour les
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Given that we agree that that example is just plainly broken no matter
what, why do you consider it as a valid motivation for throwing all
away?
That's not what I intended. My intention is to give guidelines which
might be independent from a
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ FWIW, if you want to try it out please use the live version [1],
I've just fixed a stupid bug which caused ignoring the last
paragraph of a description ]
[1]
reportbug forgot to CC it to d-devel...
Original Message
Subject: RFP: ingex -- tapeless television production software
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:47:26 +0200
From: Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lee and...@linux.org.tw
* Package name: menu-cache
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan) pcman...@gmail.com
* URL : http://lxde.org/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C)
Description : an
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:48:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 21:41 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
#494120 and #494122.
[...]
I disagree with these as the tables in question are easily small enough
to be a plausible preferred form for modification.
Indeed; this is a
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Hal checks the drive capabilities and shouldn't be polling drives that
support async notifications. Is that code not working for you?
It is working fine, thanks for the head's up about it
On 2009-04-26, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FIRST: GO AWAY WITH YOUR STUPID CC'S. I OBVIOUSLY READ THE LIST.
Dude, chill out.
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
Kind regards,
Philipp
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means to
enforce it (either pure social or aided by technology), it will continue to
happen.
regards,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro
* Package name: libcss-blueprint
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Olav Bjorkoy? ? (Question to upstream)
* URL : http://www.blueprintcss.org/
* License : MIT (modified) (Question to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:27:03AM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2009-04-26, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FIRST: GO AWAY WITH YOUR STUPID CC'S. I OBVIOUSLY READ THE LIST.
Dude, chill out.
Interestingly you did it
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means to
enforce it (either pure social
Hi
Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:15 +0100
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org napsal(a):
* The Debian lists are the only lists I have ever come across that mandate,
or
even care, about such a thing. I have been on many lists in my time, and
my
current list of mailing list
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means
to
enforce it (either pure social or aided by technology), it will continue to
happen.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:15PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header, meaning that by default my
email client wants to send replies to individual posters. To get the
mailing
list included in the reply means that I have to reply to all. It's a
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:27:03AM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2009-04-26, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FIRST: GO AWAY WITH YOUR STUPID CC'S. I OBVIOUSLY READ THE LIST.
Dear lazylist,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
* The Debian lists are the only lists I have ever come across that
mandate, or
even care, about such a thing. I have been on many lists in my time,
and my
current list of mailing list subscriptions stands at 73. On
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
I don't know, but there are plenty of reasons to choose from. See e.g.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Those
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:34:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If nobody from -policy objects, I'll submit it tomorrow.
Sounds good.
Done: #525843. Discussion can continue in that bug log now, I guess.
Also, a live archive of all long descriptions (from unstable/amd64)
rendered as
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:06:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Definitely not the only one which mandates this.
Please list others so I can mock them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
* I don't know much about mailing list software, so I'm not going to be as
bold as to suggest I know what the solution is. However, on all the other
lists, I never get duplicate copies of email when people reply to me with
an
Hi
Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:33:06 +
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org napsal(a):
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Definitely not the only one which mandates this.
Please list others so I can mock them.
For example Mutt lists I mentioned. I saw the same rule in
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about
that
more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and
hope
for the next poster's mailclient to support that header. Which
Noah Slater wrote:
Either you avoid Reply-To because it is harmful and accept that you will get
carbon copies from the commonly implemented group reply function of modern
mail
clients, or you include the harmful Reply-To header and avoid it.
What am I missing? This seems too obviously
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:12:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de was
heard to say:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I would prefer Restructured Text, for the simple reason that it has an
actual specification with a fairly complete description of its syntax
and semantics.
I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Noah Slater wrote:
Either you avoid Reply-To because it is harmful and accept that you will
get
carbon copies from the commonly implemented group reply function of modern
mail
clients, or you include the harmful
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Mail-Followup-To is:
A. Useless junk without clear semantics
B. Violating standards
Which standards would that be?
Bjørn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lee and...@linux.org.tw
* Package name: lxmenu-data
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan) pcman...@gmail.com
* URL : http://lxde.org/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (XML)
Description :
On 27 Apr 15:41, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Noah Slater wrote:
Either you avoid Reply-To because it is harmful and accept that you
will get
carbon copies from the commonly implemented group reply function of
modern
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org
* Package name: evolution-mapi
Version : 0.26.1
Upstream Author : Johnny Jacob jjoh...@novell.com
* URL : http://www.go-evolution.org/MAPIProvider
* License : LGPL 2.1/3
Programming
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Wow, that's a lot of work! I certainly won't ask you to do it all
over again.
No, not really. I might replace just the markdown by the reST
call. That's probabyl quite cheap and I might try this in the
next couple of days even while beeing under
+ Noah Slater (Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:10:17 +0100):
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
lists
I fully agree with this. I think having to remember which key one must
use in each context for reply
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
On 27 Apr 15:41, Noah Slater wrote:
You're arguing that a Reply-To header is harmful (not that I am
convinced) and
Think of the occasions when you actually do want to do an offlist reply - it's
not that uncommon - having
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:48:50PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I fully agree with this. I think having to remember which key one must
use in each context for reply is lame. This is why I do in my ~/.muttrc:
[...]
Where l/debian is the folder which contains Debian lists, and it allows
to always
Dear Daniel,
The upstream developer of LXDE told me compared to the fd.o app menu,
debian menu uses more resource, but provide no usability improvement.
And most of the items from Debian menu are already in fd.o app menu. So
that the debian menu would possibly be deprecated.
Maybe it's time for
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:51:50PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
debian menu uses more resource, but provide no usability improvement.
And most of the items from Debian menu are already in fd.o app menu. So
that the debian menu would possibly be deprecated.
Maybe it's time for debian to add
Zack Weinberg za...@panix.com writes:
Ben Pfaff wrote:
(Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package
altogether, come to think of it.)
It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas
(iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libnspr and libnss, which are
not just
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:19:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:34:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If nobody from -policy objects, I'll submit it tomorrow.
Sounds good.
Done: #525843. Discussion can continue in that bug log now, I guess.
Also,
If you ask me things are quite clear: From a Debian point of view the
source includes *.orig.tar.gz, *.dsc and *.diff. The files are connected
via md5sum in *.dsc. So shipping the source of a PDF in the diff should
be acceptable from a Debian point of view (even if it would be nice to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:05:11PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Also, a live archive of all long descriptions (from
unstable/amd64) rendered as Markdown using render-dctrl is now
available at http://upsilon.cc/~zack/stuff/longdesc-mdwn/ . It is
weekly re-generated. Anybody who spots absurd
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 23:51 +0800, Andrew Lee a écrit :
The upstream developer of LXDE told me compared to the fd.o app menu,
debian menu uses more resource, but provide no usability improvement.
Yes, the Debian menu sucks, but adding it to a fd.o menu implementation
is trivial using
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:36:59PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:05:11PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Also, a live archive of all long descriptions (from
unstable/amd64) rendered as Markdown using render-dctrl is now
available at
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:19:54PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:36:59PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:05:11PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Also, a live archive of all long descriptions (from
unstable/amd64) rendered as Markdown
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:15 +0100
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org napsal(a):
* The Debian lists are the only lists I have ever come across that
mandate, or
even care, about such a thing. I have been on many lists in
Hi
Hope be posting at the right list.
I've been googling around and couldn't find a way to make debconf when
using type 'select' template to display
strings different that goes to backend.
For example, some thing like:
Template: foo/bar
Type: select
Choices: left, right, center
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
I’m considering asking for the removal of this snippet, since it is only
useful for those having upgraded a pre-woody system all along. While I’m
one of those doing that, I’m not sure there are as many people like
that, and I guess they could live with
Hi,
I recently converted a few quilt using local packages to the new 3.0
(quilt) format. Additionaly those packages are kept in an RCS
(mercurial here). Now the problem is: How to version control them?
The new format allows one to just edit the source and build it. No
creation of patches
Lucas Brasilino wrote:
Template: foo/bar
Type: select
Choices: left, right, center
Display-Choices: Wanna go left ?, Wanna go right ?, Wanna go straight?
Choices-C does exactly what you want (supported in Etch and later):
Template: foo/bar
Type: select
Choices-C: left, right, center
Choices:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonny Lamb jo...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: refdbg
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Josh Green jgr...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://refdbg.sourceforge.net/
* License :
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Hal checks the drive capabilities and shouldn't be polling drives that
support async notifications. Is that code not working for you?
It is working
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
C. Only supported by a handful of clients
A number of clients won't automatically generate the header, but may
still support it for group replies. I think this might include Evolution
and Thunderbid (although it was a while
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:23:33 +0200
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:15 +0100
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org napsal(a):
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header, meaning that
by
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
lists, which as you can see, doesn't happen very often.
No, the point of a ‘reply to list’ command is you *don't*
Hi Frans:
Template: foo/bar
Type: select
Choices: left, right, center
Display-Choices: Wanna go left ?, Wanna go right ?, Wanna go straight?
Choices-C does exactly what you want (supported in Etch and later):
Template: foo/bar
Type: select
Choices-C: left, right, center
Choices: Wanna
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:34:49AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
/me had to use 'L' on Debians default MUA for the reply-to-list.
It's all very well having a feature like this, but if that feature is easy to
forget because Debian's lists are the only ones that want me use it, it's hardly
of any real
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
Dear lazylist,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
In brief: because that field is for the *sender* to set, if they want;
and the mailing list software has
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be writes:
This thread will come over again and again until:
[…]
4. The following MUA are fixed to behave properly when a user
press reply:
Those MUAs already *do* the right thing when a user presses “reply to
author” (sometimes just called “reply”): they reply
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:53:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
No, the point of a ‘reply to list’ command is you *don't* have to
remember when to use it. Just use it every time you reply to any list,
and it will DTRT because it uses the standard fields which are in just
about every mailing list
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Those MUAs already *do* the right thing when a user presses “reply to
author” (sometimes just called “reply”): they reply to the author or,
if the author sets a ‘Reply-To’ field, to the author's chosen reply
address from that field.
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
You're arguing that a Reply-To header is harmful (not that I am
convinced)
That field is very useful. What's harmful is mailing-list software
munging that field, which is for the author to set and for nothing else
to fiddle with.
--
\ “Saying
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
As far as I see it:
* Debian has dropped the Reply-To header because it is harmful in
some way.
* Debian has mandated that all replies must behave as if Reply-To existed.
If this were the case, this would be an easy solution. However, it's
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:11:26PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The primary problem with setting Reply-To is that it makes private
replies extremely difficult (in clients that honor the RFC-defined
meaning of the header field, at least) and significantly increases the
chances that private
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me
about that more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set
Mail-Followup-To
Mail-Followup-To is:
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Many of the more popular MUAs on your list have this command already,
Can you name any others apart from mutt that come with this by default?
Gnus has a version of it. It doesn't work quite
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 03:09 +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Those MUAs already *do* the right thing when a user presses “reply to
author” (sometimes just called “reply”): they reply to the author or,
if the author sets a ‘Reply-To’
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no writes:
I don't know, but there are plenty of reasons to choose from. See e.g.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
A stronger, and simpler, case is made by
URL:http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful/ which
notes that the newer IETF standards
Ben Finney a écrit :
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
lists, which as you can see, doesn't happen very often.
No, the point of a ‘reply to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about
that
more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 08:41:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:42:04PM +, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
Hi Maintainer,
rejected, i think we are missing the source for the pdf in doc/.
Almost two monthes of waiting to read this…
What was the license on the PDF in
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:35:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
Perfectly well defined.
An interesting riposte for those arguing the opposite IETF angle.
If adherence to standards is so important, surely it's a
Brian May b...@snoopy.debian.net writes:
IIRC Thunderbird use to have a reply to list command, but I can't find
it anymore :-(.
The bug has been open since 2000, and has recently seen activity again
URL:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45715.
Meanwhile Debian's Thunderbird is
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
I am not saying anything like I will not obey the Code of Conduct
because it is stupid but rather something like I will try my best,
like I have been doing, but I know I will continue to fail.
Well, “like you have been doing” means *not* using it, even
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
If this is such a concern, I would like to see the Code of Conduct
updates to recommend that people concerned with follow up emails set
the appropriate headers in their own clients. This was detailed
earlier in this thread.
The appropriate fields
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Is this so hard, people? We have large brains evolved in part
precisely for the purpose of figuring out the protocols of
communication and applying them moment to moment. If you don't want to
decide in a given instance whether you want to respond
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:35:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
Perfectly well defined.
An interesting riposte for those arguing the opposite IETF angle.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:10:14PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I tried hard, for many years, to love the Mail-Followup-To field, but I
must agree that it doesn't serve the purpose well enough to recommend.
(Briefly: it breaks when a discussion crosses between different mailing
lists, and other
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:54:56PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Well, “like you have been doing” means *not* using it, even in this
thread, so I find the above rather difficult to believe — especially
because “I forgot” is even less plausible in the context of this
thread where you've been
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:59:53PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
The appropriate fields *are* set: the mailing list sets the RFC 2369
fields for replies to the list, and the author sets the From and
(optionally) the Reply-To fields for replies to the sender.
The appropriate fields are set, I never
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
The generated, new symbols file looks something like:
Why exactly is this file generated, and how? Symbols files don't work
very well if they aren't being deliberately maintained; it would be much
simpler to just use shlibs in that
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:53:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org writes:
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
lists, which as you can see, doesn't happen very
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 09:52:14AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
a long time ago, packages using GConf used to ship schemas
in /etc/gconf/schemas. Now, they are moved to /usr/share/gconf/schemas.
However, during upgrades, dpkg would let the old file in place since it
was a conffile. This is
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:05 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means
to
enforce it (either pure social
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:03:02 +0400
Source: blockout2
Binary: blockout2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4+dfsg1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org
Changed-By: Dmitry E. Oboukhov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:31:17 -0500
Source: htp
Binary: htp
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.16-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org
Changed-By: Diego Escalante Urrelo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:35:30 +0200
Source: postgresql-8.4
Binary: libpq-dev libpq5 libecpg6 libecpg-dev libecpg-compat3 libpgtypes3
postgresql-8.4 postgresql-client-8.4 postgresql-server-dev-8.4
postgresql-doc-8.4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:24:27 +0300
Source: vala
Binary: valac vala-utils vala-doc libvala0 libvala-dev valac-dbg libvala0-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.7.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Maintainers of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:46:47 +0200
Source: asio
Binary: libasio-dev libasio-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Richter s...@debian.org
Changed-By: Simon Richter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:53:16 +0200
Source: treecc
Binary: treecc
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Richter s...@debian.org
Changed-By: Simon Richter s...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:18:04 +0200
Source: kdevelop
Binary: kdevelop kdevelop-data kdevelop-dev
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 4:3.9.92-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:12:28 +
Source: varnish
Binary: varnish libvarnish1 libvarnish-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:49:13 +0200
Source: libparser++
Binary: libparser++-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Richter s...@debian.org
Changed-By: Simon Richter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:46:58 +0200
Source: jed
Binary: jed xjed jed-common
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:0.99.18+dfsg.1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian JED Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:05:19 +0200
Source: jedstate
Binary: jedstate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.4.transitional.1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian JED Group pkg-jed-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:55:16 +0200
Source: texinfo
Binary: texinfo info install-info
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.13a.dfsg.1-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:39:07 +0200
Source: policykit-gnome
Binary: policykit-gnome policykit-gnome-doc libpolkit-gnome0 libpolkit-gnome-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.9.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
