Hi!
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:25:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
Now all I need is for dpkg to accept that the absence of
debian/source/format is declarative of source format 1.0.
That's the case _for now_.
packages don't need to be changed
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Ryan Oram r...@infinityos.net wrote:
From the Ubuntu mailing list, in case of you aren't subscribed there:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Dane Mutters dmutt...@gmail.com wrote:
I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that
(allegedly)
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 02:39:00 Ryan Oram wrote:
I wasn't aware of this when I posted this thread on the mailing list.
I still feel, however, the suggestion and DNS-prefetching features be
made opt-in.
What do you mean by opt-in? I have searched and the only meaning i could
find was about
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:39:00PM -0400, Ryan Oram wrote:
From the Ubuntu mailing list, in case of you aren't subscribed there:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Dane Mutters dmutt...@gmail.com wrote:
I think some of you would be interested in reading this page that
(allegedly) documents
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:06:10PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543420#10
This pretty much proves my point. I was never sent these patches,
instead Debian kept them to itself and never attempted to get them
upstream.
Well, we can
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Roger Lynn]
But apt has been using pipelining for years. Why has this only just
become a problem?
It has been a problem in Debian Edu for years. Just recently I
figured out the cause and a workaround.
And FWIW I have experienced this problem for
]] Mike Hommey
| opt-in like in the Options dialog ?
«opt-in» usually means «requires active effort to be enabled», so in
this case, disabled by default.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I have noticed that the default configuration is to shutdown the computer when
the power button is pressed.
But on normal desktop installations, the DE will handle the event and take the
appropriate actions.
I also think that on non-desktop it should be the admin to decide whether if
this
On 2010-05-19, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
So maybe this default should be reviewed?
I doubt it's the default. You have to install acpid to get this
behaviour, at least in VMs.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 13:56:55 Philipp Kern wrote:
I doubt it's the default. You have to install acpid to get this
behaviour, at least in VMs.
It is, i just turned off my laptop (installed in march) for mistake, and i
dindn't install manually acpid.
Bye
--
Salvo Tomaselli
signature.asc
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:42:55AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
2) http proxy servers cannot always process pipelined requests due to
the complexity this adds (complexity is always bad for security), and
This is bullshit. It's *VERY* easy to support pipelining: parse one
request at a time, and
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:42:55AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
2) http proxy servers cannot always process pipelined requests due to
the complexity this adds (complexity is always bad for security), and
This is bullshit. It's *VERY* easy to support
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
I have noticed that the default configuration is to shutdown the computer
when
the power button is pressed.
You might want to check which software did react on the button.
But on normal desktop installations, the DE will
On 18/05/10 04:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Would it be feasible to have some sort of automation surrounding this?
Breaches that are fixed by a subsequent upload will very likely contain
some strings in the
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Most of the repackaging is done because we don't _want_ to redistribute
those files not because we do not have the right to redistribute them.
[citation needed]
My perception of the matter is the other way around.
Take the case of stripped RFC,
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:19:08 Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
I have noticed that the default configuration is to shutdown the computer
when the power button is pressed.
You might want to check which software did react on the
On 19 May 2010 14:10, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
It is, i just turned off my laptop (installed in march) for mistake, and i
dindn't install manually acpid.
It's not acpid that shuts down the computer on power button, it's
acpi-support-base (installed by default)
If you pressed
On 19 May 2010 16:10, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
Right, if you do not have a DE running, one way to react on the power
button is using acpid *and* acpi-support-base.
But if i have it (and most of the time this is the case) it's just very
annoying having configured kde to lock
On 19 May 2010 16:09, Abhishek Dasgupta abh...@gmail.com wrote:
Just upgraded to the latest bits from squeeze, and ethernet is not
working here. Tried modprobing atl1c but that did not change anything.
Ethernet was working before the upgrade. Anyone else has this problem?
See bug #573607
The
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 16:14:41 Luca Niccoli wrote:
I don't think you can call this an unreasonable
behaviour.
But as every good luser i opened powerdevil and set it to lock the screen, so
for me it was totally unreasonable since it did something else than what i had
manually configured to
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 16:17:49 Luca Niccoli wrote:
Mmm, you are saying that you are running KDE, with the KDE power
manager; that you have configured KDE not to switch the computer off
on power button; and that nonetheless the computer goes off when you
press it?
That is exactly what i am
On 19 May 2010 16:30, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
But as every good luser i opened powerdevil and set it to lock the screen, so
for me it was totally unreasonable since it did something else than what i had
manually configured to do.
Then it's a bug in acpi-support-base, since
On 19 May 2010 16:38, Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com wrote:
File it to the BTS please.
Hint:
since you already found out that the culprit was
/etc/acpi/powerbtn-acpi-support.sh, running
$reportbug /etc/acpi/powerbtn-acpi-support.sh
would have automatically filed a bug against the package
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 16:42:12 Luca Niccoli wrote:
that it's not meant for bug reporting.
I actually thought it was the intended behaviour...
Bye
--
Salvo Tomaselli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
HBase needs a high nofile limit. What would be the preferred way to set the
limit for the HBase daemons?
Just call ulimit in the initscript?
The java process is started by daemon (Debian package daemon).
Thank you,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net writes:
Well, I don't know why something has 'suddenly' become a problem: its
a known issue for years. The HTTP smuggling
[http://www.watchfire.com/resources/HTTP-Request-Smuggling.pdf]
attacks made that very obvious 5 years ago now.
Reading that I
On 2010-05-19, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Reading that I don't think that is really a pipelining issue. You do not
need pipelineing for it to work. The real problem is keep-alive. The
connection isn't destroyed after each request so you can put multiple
requests into the
I demand that Ryan Oram may or may not have written...
http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php
This should become a full open source project with a community behind it.
With Mozilla disregarding H.264, the community needs a full browser capable
of H.264 video
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no writes:
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Roger Lynn]
But apt has been using pipelining for years. Why has this only just
become a problem?
It has been a problem in Debian Edu for years. Just recently I
figured out the cause and a workaround.
And
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no writes:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:42:55AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
2) http proxy servers cannot always process pipelined requests due to
the complexity this adds (complexity is always bad for security), and
This is
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
opt-in like in the Options dialog ?
Show suggestions for navigation errors
Use a suggestion service to help complete searches and URLs typed in
the address bar
Use DNS pre-fetching to improve load performance
There is
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 13:27:08 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2010 11:47:40 +0200, Julien Cristau
jcris...@debian.org wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, faster boot is irrelevant. Using an init
daemon that actually does its job of supervising services, and lets us
get rid of most of
For the record: I've changed the umask setting in /etc/profile to this:
if [ `id -u` -ge 1000 ]; then
umask 002
else
umask 022
fi
which is fully consistent with Debian policy when it says that user
accounts, by default, start at uid 1000.
So, this is now a very simple rule (umask 002) with
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote:
This would be definitely a bug, not intended behaviour.
I absolutely agree. This code is used to find out of powerdevil is running:
for p in $(pidof kded4); do
test -r /proc/$p/environ || continue
On 05/19/2010 11:25 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
For the record: I've changed the umask setting in /etc/profile to this:
if [ `id -u` -ge 1000 ]; then
umask 002
else
umask 022
fi
[snip]
Some people proposed complex code to determine whether UPG was in use
for system users. Such thing
On 2010-05-19, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested this, which I don't think is complex. However, what you have
suggested should work just fine.
if [ $(id -un) =3D $(id -gn) ] [ $UID -gt 99 ]; then
umask 0002
else
umask 0022
fi
id -n might cause network
#include hallo.h
* Robert Collins [Tue, May 18 2010, 02:02:59PM]:
Given that pipelining is broken by design, that the HTTP WG has
And if not? Counter example, it seems to work just fine with my
apt-cacher-ng proxy, at least bug reports related to that have appeared
for about a year now.
On 05/19/2010 01:00 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
When I do newgrp group it's still UPG and the umask should still be
2, no? This check would change my umask.
If the new default group is named something other than your username,
it's no longe UPG. UPG is only if the user name and group name match,
On 19/05/10 18:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
For the record: I've changed the umask setting in /etc/profile to this:
if [ `id -u` -ge 1000 ]; then
Should we also be catering for the reserved globally allocated UIDs in
the range 6-64999 with this check (Policy §9.2.2)?
Regards,
Roger
--
To
On 2010-05-19, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/19/2010 01:00 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
When I do newgrp group it's still UPG and the umask should still be=
2, no? This check would change my umask.
If the new default group is named something other than your username,
it's no
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/19/2010 01:00 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
When I do newgrp group it's still UPG and the umask should still be
2, no? This check would change my umask.
If the new default group is named something other than your
On 05/19/2010 01:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
Sorry, I assumed that UPG is a system-wide concept and that I could just
change to my collaboration group and have a useful umask there too. So we
only cater for the setgid flag on directories?
The newgrp command changes your default group. The
On 05/19/2010 01:25 PM, James Vega wrote:
Except /etc/profile won't be sourced again unless newgrp - group is
used, right?
Correct, or the user issues a new login shell after the change has been
made.
--
. O . O . O . . O O . . . O .
. . O . O O O . O . O O . . O
O O O . O .
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
A HTTP/1.1 conforming server or proxy
This is not the real world...
is free to process pipelined
requests serially one by one. The only requirement is that it does not
corrupt the second request by reading all available data into a buffer,
Hi!
Some people proposed complex code to determine whether UPG was in use
for system users. Such thing would be an exception to the exception
and as such I think it would be a bad thing, as it would make things
a lot more complex without any real gain.
The gain would be a guard against
On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:51:25 +0200, Willi Mann foss...@wm1.at wrote:
The gain would be a guard against accidental 002 umasks in non-UPG
environments, which I'm quite sure will happen. Either because admins do
not
read the release notes or because they forget to do the change on one of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry kar...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: mango-lassi
Version : 001
Upstream Author : Lennart Poettering mz...@0pointer.net, Sven Herzberg
* URL :
btw: What happened to the idea of movin umask completely away from
/etc/profile?
I mean regardless of the discussion about UPGs and which value is the
best default for umask, I found it to be a good idea to drop it there.
Can someone please explain me the reason why login.defs isn't used for
On 05/19/2010 03:11 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Or is that already, the case? At least I've had the impression that
neither mine, nor the arguments of some other people (Harald, Peter, etc.)
were even answered here.
You've only mentioned that SSH won't operate if the write bit is set
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at
* Package name: pyrit-cuda
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Lukas Lueg lukas.l...@gmail.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pyrit/
* License : GPLv3 + linking exceptions for OpenSSL and
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:22:04 -0600, Aaron Toponce
aaron.topo...@gmail.com
wrote:
You've only mentioned that SSH won't operate if the write bit is set on
the keys or anything under the ~/.ssh/ directory. Can you explain how an
ssh client failing to connect to an external ssh server because of
On 19/05/10 10:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Most of the repackaging is done because we don't _want_ to redistribute
those files not because we do not have the right to redistribute them.
[citation needed]
My perception of the matter is the other way
On 19/05/10 11:46, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
HBase needs a high nofile limit. What would be the preferred way to set the
limit for the HBase daemons?
Just call ulimit in the initscript?
The java process is started by daemon (Debian package daemon).
Thank you,
Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Roger Leigh wrote:
On 19/05/10 18:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
For the record: I've changed the umask setting in /etc/profile to this:
if [ `id -u` -ge 1000 ]; then
Should we also be catering for the reserved globally allocated UIDs in the
range 6-64999 with this
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:11:54PM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Nevertheless may I suggest to stop any further active changes in that
issue (UPG/umask) until this discussion here is over and final
decision has been made.
Sorry, but Debian is a do-ocracy first, and a democracy then.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:20:35PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
HBase needs a high nofile limit. What would be the preferred way to set the
limit for the HBase daemons?
Just call ulimit in the initscript?
The java process is started by daemon (Debian package daemon).
Thank you,
Thomas
Hi all,
i don't want to interrupt your battles so feel free to ignore me,
but i want to raise some questions (for you and me) none the less:
The notice about the - in the eyes of the writer of this manpage
section - broken squid version 2.0.2 in the apt.conf manpage
was changed the last time in
On 19/05/10 18:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:20:35PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
HBase needs a high nofile limit. What would be the preferred way to set the
limit for the HBase daemons?
Just call ulimit in the initscript?
The java process is started by daemon (Debian
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:51:25PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
This is the wrong answer to the question how do I set ulimits for a daemon
process? /etc/security/limits.d is only processed by pam_limits, which has
no reason to be in the path for service startup.
cron, atd and schroot load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: itp
Severity: wishlist
Version: 0.4;
* Package name : dirsum
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Dirk Bartley bartle...@chartermi.net
* URL: http://code.dyne.org/?r=dirsum
* License: GNU GPL
Description: Dirsum is a command line tool to
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 04:00:57AM +0200, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
Felipe Sateler schrieb:
I mean, is there a reason for why I would want a non-UPG system?
What about a hosting environment where you need to have user files
world-readable (HTML documents or (PHP) scripts readable by
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/05/10 10:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Most of the repackaging is done because we don't _want_ to redistribute
those files not because we do not have the right to redistribute them.
[citation needed]
In article 20100519225812.gb28...@dario.dodds.net you wrote:
These daemons load pam_limits *when running on behalf of other users*.
That's an entirely different scenario than running a daemon per se.
In the case of a java process started with an init script, it would be su
doing the pam chain
On 19/05/2010 23:22, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Roger Leigh wrote:
On 19/05/10 18:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
For the record: I've changed the umask setting in /etc/profile to this:
if [ `id -u` -ge 1000 ]; then
Should we also be catering for the reserved globally allocated
Le Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:10:25PM -0600, Aaron Toponce a écrit :
UPG is only if the user name and group name match,
and the user is the only member of that group.
Hi Aaron and everybody,
is there any ‘official’ definition of UPG, for instance the first document
presenting the concept after
Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro writes:
HBase needs a high nofile limit. What would be the preferred way to set
the limit for the HBase daemons?
Just call ulimit in the initscript?
That's what I'd do.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro writes:
HBase needs a high nofile limit. What would be the preferred way to set
the limit for the HBase daemons?
Just call ulimit in the initscript?
That's what I'd do.
I'd suggest having it in /etc/default/hbase (or
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:30:37AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article 20100519225812.gb28...@dario.dodds.net you wrote:
These daemons load pam_limits *when running on behalf of other users*.
That's an entirely different scenario than running a daemon per se.
In the case of a java
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no was heard
to say:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
This is bullshit. It's *VERY* easy to support pipelining: parse one
request at a time, and until you're done with a given request, you just
stop to watch the
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes:
On 2010-05-19, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Reading that I don't think that is really a pipelining issue. You do not
need pipelineing for it to work. The real problem is keep-alive. The
connection isn't destroyed after each request so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Kohler ivan-deb...@420.am
Owner: Ivan Kohler ivan-deb...@420.am
* Package name: libhash-fieldhash-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Goro Fuji gfuji(at)cpan.org
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Hash-FieldHash/
*
On 05/19/2010 03:48 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
See above, or do you wish a larger paper discussing the issues?! ^^
So FUD it is. At least you're consistent.
--
. O . O . O . . O O . . . O .
. . O . O O O . O . O O . . O
O O O . O . . O O O O . O O O
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
A HTTP/1.1 conforming server or proxy
This is not the real world...
is free to process pipelined
requests serially one by one. The only requirement is that it does not
corrupt the second request by reading
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Kohler ivan-deb...@420.am
Owner: Ivan Kohler ivan-deb...@420.am
* Package name: libobject-id-perl
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.com
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Object-ID/
* License
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
i don't want to interrupt your battles so feel free to ignore me,
but i want to raise some questions (for you and me) none the less:
The notice about the - in the eyes of the writer of this manpage
section - broken squid
Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no was
heard to say:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
This is bullshit. It's *VERY* easy to support pipelining: parse one
request at a time, and until you're done with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 01:22:40 +0200
Source: evolution-data-server
Binary: evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-common
evolution-data-server-dev evolution-data-server-dbg libedataserver1.2-11
libedataserver1.2-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:51:48 +0200
Source: evolution-exchange
Binary: evolution-exchange evolution-exchange-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.30.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Evolution Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:40:03 +0300
Source: skrooge
Binary: skrooge skrooge-common
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.7.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:57:14 +0200
Source: dpkg
Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.15.7.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:43:54 +0200
Source: qemu-kvm
Binary: qemu-kvm qemu-kvm-dbg kvm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12.4+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jan Lübbe jlue...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jan Lübbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:25:22 +0900
Source: gsfonts
Binary: gsfonts
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) mha...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 16:07:50 +0800
Source: dkimproxy
Binary: dkimproxy
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:42:03 +0300
Source: lusernet.app
Binary: lusernet.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:21:37 +0200
Source: postgis
Binary: postgresql-8.4-postgis postgis libpostgis-java
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.5.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:56:43 +0200
Source: preview.app
Binary: preview.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.5-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Federico Gimenez Nieto fgime...@coit.es
Changed-By: Federico Gimenez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 19:54:09 +0200
Source: libpam-mklocaluser
Binary: libpam-mklocaluser
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers debian-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:08:19 +0200
Source: libpam-mklocaluser
Binary: libpam-mklocaluser
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers debian-...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 13:43:26 +0200
Source: libpam-script
Binary: libpam-script
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martijn van Brummelen mart...@brumit.nl
Changed-By: Martijn van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 15:47:38 +0200
Source: xen
Binary: xen-docs-4.0 libxenstore3.0 libxen-dev xenstore-utils xen-utils-4.0
xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 xen-hypervisor-4.0-i386
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 4.0.0-1~experimental.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:18:41 +0200
Source: cricket
Binary: cricket
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.5-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org
Changed-By: Christian Marillat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:13:01 +0200
Source: cssutils
Binary: python-cssutils python-cssutils-doc python-encutils
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:11:49 +0100
Source: ggcov
Binary: ggcov
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 22:47:02 +0200
Source: sibyl-installer
Binary: sibyl-installer
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 1.17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:26:09 +0200
Source: nusoap
Binary: libnusoap-php
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.5-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu
Changed-By: Olivier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:49:14 +0200
Source: linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6
Binary: kernel-image-2.6.32-3-sb1-bcm91250a-di
nic-shared-modules-2.6.32-3-sb1-bcm91250a-di
ppp-modules-2.6.32-3-sb1-bcm91250a-di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:41 +0100
Source: gtk-sharp2
Binary: gtk-sharp2 gtk-sharp2-examples gtk-sharp2-gapi libglib2.0-cil
libglib2.0-cil-dev libgtk2.0-cil libgtk2.0-cil-dev libglade2.0-cil
libglade2.0-cil-dev monodoc-gtk2.0-manual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:42:11 +0200
Source: fluxbox
Binary: fluxbox
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org
Changed-By: Denis Briand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 16:17:20 +0200
Source: linux-ftpd
Binary: ftpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17-30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta a...@inittab.org
Changed-By: Mats Erik Andersson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:06:27 +0200
Source: ffc
Binary: python-ffc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
