Comme nous sommes en octobre 2012, il est désormais possible de traiter
les archives du mois de septembre 2012 des listes francophones.
N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs
pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes.
Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur:
]] Russ Allbery
A package that wants to change a directory to a symlink (or vice versa) is
a very special case, and one that runs afoul of dpkg support for the local
system administrator moving and symlinking directories (something that can
be quite useful if one screws up disk partitioning
On 01/10/12 07:51, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Now that we have well working bind mounts, we could actually deprecate
[sysadmins moving directories to a less full filesystem and leaving
symlinks behind] and just tell people to use bind mounts instead. At
least
if our non-Linux ports has decent
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:05:11AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
Build-depends installation: apt-get build-dep is fine if you are
building an unmodified package from a repo but it's of no use if you
have modified the build-dependencies to make them satisfiable.
Annoying isn't it? This has
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 00:28:15 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
I tend to think that a re-build (via binNMU or otherwise) will
be sufficient for most of the packages affected.
Unless there'll be objections, I'm going to file the respective
bug reports regarding the
Hi Arno,
Thanks for this initiative. It seems like a useful guideline.
* A previous NMU was not acknowledged, and at least another issue
justifying another NMU is pending for /one month/ [5].
I was wondering what 'acknowledging an NMU' means nowadays. Of course, we
all used this term from the
Le Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:51:22AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
I was wondering what 'acknowledging an NMU' means nowadays. Of course, we
all used this term from the time that NMU's did not close bugs in the BTS
and therefore needed to be explicitly acknowledged by an MU. However,
since
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:51:22 +0200
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Arno,
Thanks for this initiative. It seems like a useful guideline.
* A previous NMU was not acknowledged, and at least another issue
justifying another NMU is pending for /one month/ [5].
I was wondering
Hello,
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:22:01 +0200
Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
* URL : http://www.rust-lang.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C/C++, Rust
Description : a safe, concurrent, practical language
Oh, please, please package it! It seems like it's
On 01/10/12 09:51, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've had an NMU in the past for a package when I had a little less time,
but the change was sound and correct. So I didn't bother to make an
(empty) MU just to acknowledge it - I think that should be OK and not
'punished' by taking it as a sign of an
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, peter green wrote:
I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages for
raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6 hardfloat) and run
into a few things which I thought i'd share and/or ask about.
I'd like to see cross-toolchains
Stefano Zacchiroli writes (Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun
and profit: A proposal):
I just meant that if we encourage to post seconds (which are in fact
just a form of review of the intention to orphan) on a list such as -qa
(which is more specific-purpose than, say,
Hi there,
I happened upon your collection of college and career web resources for
prospective students here
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1998/09/msg00565.html and thought you
might be interested in another authoritative online resource to add to those.
Are you the correct person to
+++ Paul Wise [2012-10-01 17:42 +0800]:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, peter green wrote:
I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages for
raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6 hardfloat) and run
into a few things which I thought i'd share and/or
+++ Wookey [2012-10-01 11:14 +0100]:
+++ Paul Wise [2012-10-01 17:42 +0800]:
I'd like to see cross-toolchains in sid before wheezy is out, is that
going to be possible?
Sorry - meant to say, that whilst we should definately have a go at
this in experiemental, the libsdtc++ changes needed
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Wookey wrote:
It's possible, but some more is still needed to have them built by the
normal buildds. Wanna-build needs support for cross-arch dependencies;
that's not been done yet. Splitting (multiarching) libc++-dev is also
needed to build the g++
Hi,
On Sonntag, 30. September 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
* We are effectively ruling out opinions of non-members. That's bizarre,
since we allow them to maintain (and even hijack) packages.
No, we d/won't allow non-members to hijack packages. We probably will allow
them to salvage packages OTOH.
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sonntag, 30. September 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
* We are effectively ruling out opinions of non-members. That's bizarre,
since we allow them to maintain (and even hijack) packages.
No, we d/won't allow non-members to hijack
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:34:18PM +0100, peter green wrote:
I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages
for raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6
hardfloat) and run into a few things which I thought i'd share
and/or ask about.
Great!
I'm busy with
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Have you done any actual calculation on this? A quick Google search on SSD
write
cycles shows more articles debunking this theory than supporting it.
Reading specifications of intel's SSD 320 line at the following link:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:27:04PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Wookey wrote:
Thibg's final report gives a useful summary:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2012/08/msg2.html
and this blog post gives some more details:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
On 30/09/2012 18:49, Frank Bauer wrote:
Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
computer won't be idling all the time - especially considering modern
desktop environments running whole database engines
On 2012-10-01 13:32, Frank Bauer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Have you done any actual calculation on this? A quick Google search on SSD
write
cycles shows more articles debunking this theory than supporting it.
Reading specifications of intel's
Hi,
While rebuilding our archive using pbuilder I noticed that all packages
build-depending on gnome-pkg-tools failed to build. That led me to filing
#684503, which I'll quote here for convenience:
| The file control.header ends with an empty blank line. As the contents of that
| file is
Hi,
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2012, Michael Hanke wrote:
Just a data point:
interesting, thanks.
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel instead of
the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to wlan/intel gfx
problems, though last time I tried was three
Michael Tautschnig writes (Comments+blank line in debian/control:
Clarification in policy or MBF?):
Taking a pragmatic position, it would be best to have policy acknowledge the
fact that empty paragraphs don't count, and get the parser in pbuilder fixed.
This wouldn't help people doing
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 02:25:36PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
- the problem affects all packages *build-depending* on gnome-pkg-tools, thus
I'd actually have to do an MBF (it's more than 160 packages)
It would be worth looking at a) whether those 160 packages have a common
maintainer,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:37:19PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2012, Michael Hanke wrote:
Just a data point:
interesting, thanks.
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel
instead of the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to
❦ 1 octobre 2012 18:26 CEST, Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li :
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel
instead of the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to
wlan/intel gfx problems, though last time I tried was three months
ago, might been fixed
Frank == Frank Bauer frank.c.ba...@gmail.com writes:
Frank Hi, I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a
Frank SSD to speed things up. Since SSD lifetime is severely
Frank limited (about 5000 overwrites for consumer grade MLC), I
Frank wanted to know beforehand,
Le lundi 01 octobre 2012 à 14:43 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
This wouldn't help people doing backports or whatever. I think this
should be fixed in the packages involved.
Changing gnome-pkg-tools to replace the blank line with an empty comment
is trivial. In unstable.
How does that help
]] Vincent Bernat
In case of ext4 over encrypted LVM, does the kernel have all the
discard/trim support? The Debian wiki says that LVM supports trim to
declare unused space with lvresize as an example. Does it include unused
space inside a logical volume?
Yes, but you need to enable it
* Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org, 2012-10-01, 14:25:
By policy, blank lines separate paragraphs, comments are discarded,
so we end up with an empty first paragraph. Policy, however, requires
that the *first* paragraph contains essential package information
(Policy 5.2).
I'm not convinced
Le lundi 01 octobre 2012 à 14:43 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
This wouldn't help people doing backports or whatever. I think this
should be fixed in the packages involved.
Changing gnome-pkg-tools to replace the blank line with an empty comment
is trivial. In unstable.
How does that
Le Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:00:54PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
* Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org, 2012-10-01, 14:25:
By policy, blank lines separate paragraphs, comments are
discarded, so we end up with an empty first paragraph. Policy,
however, requires that the *first* paragraph contains
The newest sip4 release, 4.14 increases the API version to 9.0. Since it has
potential incompatibilities, I've uploaded it to Experimental so maintainers
of rdepends can investigate if changes are needed. I hope to land this in
unstable very shortly after Wheezy is released.
There are a few
Package: general
Severity: important
After booting into Debian 6.0.6 the login screen fails to appear. This is an
intermittant problem.
I still hear the sound associated with the login screen and can interact with
it (eg enter my password and log in) but the screen itself is not visible. The
only
reassign 689381 gdm3
thanks
Quoting Michael Hanke (m...@debian.org):
I'm on an Intel SSD (120GB) since Aug 2009 -- running Debian testing all
the time. I do not upgrade daily, but often. I have _not_ done any of
the optimizations mentioned on the wiki. I have on average approx 15GB
free on the drive. Obviously, I ran a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:14:08 +0200
Source: icinga
Binary: icinga-common icinga-cgi icinga-idoutils icinga icinga-core icinga-doc
icinga-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.7.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 01:57:53 -0400
Source: sip4
Binary: python-sip python-sip-dbg python-sip-dev python-sip-doc python3-sip
python3-sip-dev python3-sip-dbg
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4.14-1
Distribution: experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:52:23 +
Source: keystone
Binary: python-keystone keystone keystone-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2012.1.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: PKG OpenStack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:51:17 +0900
Source: namazu2
Binary: namazu2 namazu2-index-tools namazu2-common libnmz7 libnmz7-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.21-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: NOKUBI Takatsugu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:43:46 -0700
Source: spek
Binary: spek
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Kojevnikov alexan...@kojevnikov.com
Changed-By: Alexander Kojevnikov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:12:56 +0200
Source: python-augeas
Binary: python-augeas
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Free Ekanayaka fr...@debian.org
Changed-By: Free Ekanayaka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:50:24 +
Source: scscp-imcce
Binary: libscscp0 libscscp0-dev libscscp0-dbg libscscp-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.7.0+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:23:16 +0400
Source: goldendict
Binary: goldendict
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.2~git20120929-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org
Changed-By: Dmitry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:44:16 +0200
Source: glyr
Binary: libglyr1 libglyr1-dbg libglyr-dev libglyr-doc glyrc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.0.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:07:51 -0500
Source: rcpp
Binary: r-cran-rcpp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:51:06 +0200
Source: newsbeuter
Binary: newsbeuter
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nico Golde n...@debian.org
Changed-By: Nico Golde n...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:27:18 +0100
Source: jconvolver
Binary: jconvolver jconvolver-config-files
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.9.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:32:17 +0100
Source: mgp
Binary: mgp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.13a+upstream20090219-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Colin Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:10:23 +0800
Source: fcitx-googlepinyin
Binary: fcitx-googlepinyin
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: IME Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:52:21 +0200
Source: moodle
Binary: moodle
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.3.dfsg-2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Moodle Packaging Team
pkg-moodle-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:07:50 +0200
Source: fs2ram
Binary: fs2ram
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.3.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Philippe Le Brouster p...@nebkha.net
Changed-By: Philippe Le Brouster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:03:12 +0200
Source: ldap-git-backup
Binary: ldap-git-backup
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Elmar S. Heeb el...@heebs.ch
Changed-By: Elmar S. Heeb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:53:00 +0200
Source: org-mode
Binary: org-mode
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.9.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:24:32 +0200
Source: scirenderer
Binary: libscirenderer-java libscirenderer-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:07:10 +0200
Source: software-center
Binary: software-center
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.1.2debian3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
Changed-By: Julian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:30:21 +0800
Source: spice-gtk
Binary: spice-client-gtk libspice-client-glib-2.0-1
gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0 libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev
libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1 gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:27:32 +0200
Source: pidgin-otr
Binary: pidgin-otr
Architecture: source ia64
Version: 4.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org
Changed-By: Thibaut VARENE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:32:52 +
Source: gcl
Binary: gcl gcl-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.7-104
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Camm Maguire c...@debian.org
Changed-By: Camm Maguire c...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:53:29 +0200
Source: fdpowermon
Binary: fdpowermon fdpowermon-icons
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:11:17 +
Source: cxref
Binary: cxref cxref-doc cxref-emacs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.6d-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Camm Maguire c...@debian.org
Changed-By: Camm Maguire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:16:11 +0300
Source: ncdu
Binary: ncdu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org
Changed-By: Eugene V. Lyubimkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:54:05 +0200
Source: klibc
Binary: libklibc-dev libklibc klibc-utils klibc-utils-udeb
klibc-utils-floppy-udeb libklibc-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:56:55 -0400
Source: git-annex
Binary: git-annex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.20121001
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess jo...@debian.org
Changed-By: Joey Hess jo...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:31:43 +
Source: gcl
Binary: gcl gcl-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.7-105
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Camm Maguire c...@debian.org
Changed-By: Camm Maguire c...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:26:47 +0200
Source: packagekit
Binary: packagekit packagekit-tools packagekit-docs libpackagekit-glib2-16
libpackagekit-glib2-dev gir1.2-packagekitglib-1.0 libpackagekit-qt2-4
libpackagekit-qt2-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:55:06 +0200
Source: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
Binary: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.6.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:08:45 +0200
Source: hdf5
Binary: libhdf5-7 libhdf5-7-dbg libhdf5-dev libhdf5-serial-dev
libhdf5-openmpi-7 libhdf5-openmpi-dev libhdf5-openmpi-7-dbg libhdf5-mpich2-7
libhdf5-mpich2-dev libhdf5-mpich2-7-dbg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:33:12 +0200
Source: robocode
Binary: robocode robocode-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lamb la...@debian.org
Changed-By: Simon Paillard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:58:58 +0200
Source: gle-graphics
Binary: gle-graphics
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.2.4c-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian T. Steigies c...@debian.org
Changed-By: Christian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:16:56 +0200
Source: swi-prolog
Binary: swi-prolog swi-prolog-nox swi-prolog-x swi-prolog-java swi-prolog-odbc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 6.2.2-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Євгеній
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:10:40 -0400
Source: python-qt4
Binary: python-qt4 python3-pyqt4 python-qt4-dbg python3-pyqt4-dbg
python-qt4-phonon python3-pyqt4.phonon python-qt4-phonon-dbg
python3-pyqt4.phonon-dbg python-qt4-dbus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:33:47 +0200
Source: hspell
Binary: hspell myspell-he
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hebrew Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:46:52 +0200
Source: swi-prolog
Binary: swi-prolog swi-prolog-nox swi-prolog-x swi-prolog-java swi-prolog-odbc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 6.2.2-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Євгеній
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:08:15 +0200
Source: guile-1.6
Binary: guile-1.6 guile-1.6-dev guile-1.6-doc guile-1.6-libs libqthreads-12
libguile-ltdl-1 guile-1.6-slib
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.6.8-10.2
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2012 23:29:40 -0400
Source: qscintilla2
Binary: libqscintilla2-8 libqscintilla2-designer libqscintilla2-dev
libqscintilla2-doc python-qscintilla2 python3-pyqt4.qsci
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.2-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:12:47 -0700
Source: minimodem
Binary: minimodem
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com
Changed-By: Kamal Mostafa
80 matches
Mail list logo
