On 08/10/2016 05:18 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I think a fixed URL for downloading images of major versions would in
fact be good. But you still need to verify the integrity of that image,
for the internet is dark, and full of terrors.
Verification of the existing images has to happen regardless;
Master and murphy are changing colos. This entails a shutdown, de-rack, move
across town(not far, tho), and power back up. Est. time is 2 hours.
Nat rules will be installed, so that access can continue at the old addresses.
DNS will be updated after the move.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The point, however, is that it's rather silly to add yet another
scripting language to the set of Essential packages. Sure, it'd be nice;
but then tomorrow someone else will come along who will claim that
Python is sucky and that Ruby is Teh Thing,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a fairly good amount of Debian Sarge packages
available via http://klik.atekon.de/. However, most of them are having
unmaintained recipes and therefore some of them do not work
properly. I think it would
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
Hi,
I just did an upgrade on Sid and an upgrade on Linus tree. Since
then, I can't create a kernel-image.
gcc version 4.0.3 20060115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-7)
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.032
I just would love to know if
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
What does /bin/sh point to?
Could you please explain what is exactly what you need to check?
ls -l /bin/sh
In other words, what does /bin/sh point to?
What shell is /bin/sh? bash? zsh(gods no)? posh? dash?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
Please consider ALL code written/maintained by me that is present in
Ubuntu and is not bit-identical to code/binaries in Debian to be not
suitable for release with my name on it.
Then how would d-i+debconf have gotten some of the enhancments that you
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
What I find very dissapointing is that mdz asked on debian-devel twice
for a decision from debian how ubuntu should handle the maintainer Field
without any luck:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00678.html
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Debian developers set the Maintainer field to themselves(or a team), when
they
upload to Debian. The upstream author is only mentioned in the copyright
file.
Ubuntu should do something similiar. Set the Maintainer field to someone
from
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Debian developers set the Maintainer field to themselves(or a team), when
they
upload to Debian. The upstream author is only mentioned in the copyright
file.
Ubuntu should do something similiar. Set the Maintainer field to someone
from
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
In my point of view, maintainer field just need to be change when
Ubuntu does a non-trivial change on it. Otherwise, at least to me, is
OK to leave the maintainer field unchanged. Directly imported source
(that will be just recompiled by Ubuntu)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:01:41 -0600
Source: lurkftp
Binary: lurkftp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:30:17 -0600
Source: jmagick
Binary: libjmagick6-jni jmagick6-docs libjmagick6-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 6.2.4-1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that
a lot of you like looking at lesbians, I'd like to share this with
you:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
So vim is in the simple, for newbies class?
No, there's actually three classes: Simple editors for newbies,
not-so-simple but, er, powerful editors, and religions.
ae is the religion variety.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
Hello all and Happy New Year,
Thanks to George, apt-torrent has been mentioned in the Debian Devel
list :o)
I've just noticed it, and the fun part of this discovery, is that I also
found why my ISP has closed sianka.free.fr: Too much hits since
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 1/3/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
should be together with the rest of base, i believe.
[...]
We will have a kernel which is outdated by two versions at
Today our main router's power supply bit the big one. However, it's back now.
Sorry for the inconvience.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages
currently depending on it will add an alternative dependency to udev.
Also, policy should be amended accordingly.
Er, why is makedev being removed? Please clue me in.
--
To
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Hi Milan, Jon,
As discussed, 'the Debian project' as such has huge difficulties accepting
hardware donations - offers are often turned down. (tangent - in my opinion
donations should be accepted more liberally and if the Debian
administrators
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 29, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages
Er, why is makedev being removed? Please clue me in.
Eventual is the key word here.
Because /eventually/ it will not be needed
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 29, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because /eventually/ it will not be needed anymore (at least by most
users, which then will be able to remove it from their systems).
Is there something to replace it, completely, in *all* situations
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 29, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because /eventually/ it will not be needed anymore (at least by most
users, which then will be able to remove it from their systems).
Is there something
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
How does persistance of the permission model work? Can I do chown/chmod on
the dynamic files in /dev, and have them remain the next time? Even if a
device node changes it's name? Or do I have to edit some alternative
database?
You edit or add
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the wrong answer.
What ever happened to standard unix tools? chmod/mkdir/chown/mv?
You're suggesting doing things like some other OS(like Windows, were you
have
to edit a registry).
Indeed
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:00:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
As you can see, %e will go away soon so /etc/udev/cd-aliases.rules will
not be supported anymore.
Some component of debian will have to install a rules file with static
aliases, and
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: checkgmail
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Owen Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://checkgmail.sourceforge.net/
* License
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Hi all
I might be acting paranoid here but just want to clarify couple of
things. I was under the impression that, if I report a bug to
bugs.debian.org, any future correspondence on that bug will be CCed to
me automatically. Is this correct?
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
No, the packages themselves would include such logic in their debian/rules.
There's no way we'd want to keep buildds in sync with what the set of core
packages is.
That would realy defeat the purpose of not having to modify every deb.
We'd
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
debs are created by debian/rules. So, only dependencies of dpkg would have
to
be modified.
I was talking about the hypothetical situation of dpkg defaulting to
!gzip compression and adding a Pre-Depends to the dpkg version
required for
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
It would require some buildd hacking to get it to use gzip only for
those few debs so more human power.
debs are created by debian/rules. So, only dependencies of dpkg would have to
be modified.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, you are the expert, i said this, because the
/usr/share/debconf/confmodule script i use in mkvmlinuz and recomended by
debconf-devel says :
# Redirect standard output to standard error. This prevents common
# mistakes by making
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, c sojanc wrote:
sir,
i want user name and serial number to install Wildform
Wild fx 3
id10t
42
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
File: foo%20bar/hellurei.txt
Size: 12345
MD5: 012345667
SHA-256: 0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a
Mode: 0644
Checksum:
md5: 0123456789[B
sha-256: 0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a
Having the names of the checksums be the
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Due to upstream ABI changes, it looks very likely that libfreetype is
going to have to undergo a library transition in the near future[0].
The details are still being settled, and
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
In the archive, 525 out of 283283 .deb's are dpkg-sig'd (0.19%). There
are 8 distinct keys used for those 525 .deb's, seven of which correspond
to DD's[1].
So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all. Why does
Debian have a reputation of
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David Weinehall wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
scripts should work with dash too.
That's incorrect. A
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
OK, for your convenient, http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources shold has
everything latest/not-committed tarballs of source code with our
modifications for every package we are using.
We are preparing cron job, so, will update them every night until we
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
The source and binaries *must* match, period. You can't have tarballs
being
constantly upgraded, and the binaries not, or vice versa. The
source+binary
must be done as a whole unit.
Also, with this email, I am making a formal request: I am
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
The way I read it was that the authors may pick any license, so long as it's
DFSG-free. Do you see how it could be read that way?
You sound just like Henry Ford.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
dpkg hat
As for relicensing it, fuck off. I need to find a ClueBat(tm) attachment
for
the Sodomotron 2000.
/dpkg hat
...which could certainly have been written:
dpkg hat
As one of the dpkg authors, I do not intent to relicence it.
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
To make it happen, we need to resolve dpkg issue and initial boot
strapping process. Which is quite possible to re-write dpkg as CDDL
software. But to avoid duplication of work, it will be wise for Debian
community to release dpkg under LGPL license. Of
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 21:34 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will never happen. Nobody sane who spent 50$ millon dollars VC's
capital will open their IP for free. This is fact of life. And than
sooner
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, João Silva wrote:
Anyone knows what package brings the todos command?
I had this error in a debian-cd try:
tools/add-bin-doc: line 42: todos: command not found
File a bug on that package for not using a depends.
Also, this is a -user question, not a -devel question.
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Michael Vogt:
When fully supported by the archive, the diff support will be
completely transparent, no changes on your side necessary.
The index support is broken for file urls. It works the first time(ie,
removing all the files in
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, D. Joe Anderson wrote:
As per the recommendation below, I'm forwarding this.
- Forwarded message from Andrew Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:23:08 +0100
From: Andrew Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
- send mail to the bug with a full diff *before* uploading your package to
incoming; two minutes before, two hours before, two days before, it
doesn't matter
And make sure that the mail has actually left your system... (real life
experience).
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How else do you handle the case of a library which implements a line
protocol (presumably Unix sockets, in this case), and that protocol has
changed incompatibly?
You implement the new protocol on a
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
No, you design the protocol from the beginning to have the first token be a
protocol version, followed by a magic number(which could be different per
version).
Presumably it's too late for that. :)
Stupid programmers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, AdeodatoSimó wrote:
shlibs:Depends=libasound2 ( 1.0.9), libc6 (= 2.3.5-1), libfreetype6
(= 2.1.5-1), libglu1-xorg | libglu1, libmodplug0c2 (= 1:0.7-4.1), libogg0
(= 1.1.2), libpng12-0 (= 1.2.8rel), libspeex1, libtheora0, libvorbis0a (=
1.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Trygve[UTF-8] Laugstøl wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libjetty4-lib
libjetty4-java is the proper name.
Version : x.y.z
Er, fill out a version.
Upstream Author : Greg Wilkins [EMAIL
First, I don't know where I should file this bug. Looking for suggestions on
the list.
Second, any ideas on how to fix this problem?
So, I have a system that was created(by debootstrap) between Feb 14 and May
10(dates taken from the libc6 changelog, based on the version installed).
However, I
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Xavier Roche wrote:
Hi folks,
If a source package foo, which produces a binary package (say, bar),
also produces an additional baz package in an updated version, how this
should be handled ? Any specific things to do, apart from appending the
debian/control file (and
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi Joey,
Your response was very much what I needed to hear. I'll have to retract
most of my worries.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:20:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
- A personal interest shared by me, tbm, and taggart is to get Debian
working on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:15:01 -0500
From: Biella Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Dissertation chapter
Resent-Date: Fri, 19
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henning Makholm wrote:
In practice it is acceptable for the sponsor to recompute the .diff.gz
and .dsc using dpkg-buildpackage (which in any case ought to produce
identical files). But I think the sponsoree should provide a .dsc
nevertheless, if only to document the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:27:52 -0500
Source: jmagick
Binary: libjmagick6-jni jmagick6-docs libjmagick6-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 6.0.4-0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.2140 +0200]:
The Berkeley DB storage backend was an enormously stupid thing, but
that's been fixed (phew). My main gripe with Subversion now is that
if I'm not mistaken (which I could very
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]:
Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:16:24AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
When a new source gets uploaded, it replaces the previous. If several NMUs
occur, each one replaces the former. So, when the real maintainer(s) wake
up,
they can only see
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
[snip]
IX. As alioth becomes even more important to Debian, we will
have to strengthen (HA-ing) this resource.
X. Teams shall meet online or in sauna. They are allowed to do
DDR or ballroom dancing.
[Dogme05 is, of course, a pun on Dogme95.]
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Regardless of whether or not I agreed with the changes, there is a real
problem in the sense that my package under revision control is no longer
in sync with whatever is in the archive. I know that NMUs also pose the
same problem, but one of the
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 8/2/05, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that. What, if any, actual
or proposed
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, John Hasler wrote:
Michael writes:
Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that
I took it for a joke.
So you take all spam for a joke?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bruce Perens wrote:
For those of you who are at OSCON, Wednesday night I'm hosting a
recruiting party for Sourcelabs. If you bring your resume I'll buy you
drinks and some food.
Date: Wednesday, August 3
Time: 8:30-10:30pm
Place: Kells Irish Restaurant Pub, Ulster
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bruce Perens wrote:
Oh my goodness, Adam. If I wanted to advertise, I'd ask the DPL for some
freebies. I must merit them by now.
If you had just said that you were hosting a dinner, that'd be one thing. But
you solicted resumes. That's what pushed it into UCE land.
--
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:32:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bruce Perens wrote:
For those of you who are at OSCON, Wednesday night I'm hosting a
recruiting party for Sourcelabs. If you bring your resume I'll buy you
drinks
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi Nikita,
(Are you a girl maybe?)
What does that have to do with anything? Stop being male-chauvanistic.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:35:50 -0500
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Hallo Matthew,
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
sed, awk etc.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, sean finney wrote:
hey,
about a week ago i uploaded a package with priority=high to unstable
to fix a security-related bug. for some reason, that package hasn't
yet made it into unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacti.html
anyone know more about this? i
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I think this can not quite do it, since the chroot will need to be a
woody chroot but get at least partially upgraded in each test to allow
installation of the sarge and sid packages. It looks like piuparts is
otherwise close to the
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:00:43AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
I just wanted to confirm my recollection that now that stable has been
released
with support for ~ in package versions in dpkg and apt, we can now use ~ in
package versions for
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Well and then what is pending for it?
- DAK support for it;
- APT support?
apt already supports it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi!
Erik Steffl [2005-06-12 16:25 -0700]:
why is there a link to logs in /etc?
/etc/postgresql/7.4/main/log is a link to
/var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
The basic idea of the new cluster system was to have the complete
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 16:25 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
why is there a link to logs in /etc?
/etc/postgresql/7.4/main/log is a link to
/var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
/etc is supposed to be for configuration files that are
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 6/13/05, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a stupid argument.
It's not that stupid.
But it is.
If other files shouldn't be there, the specs should explicitly state that.
Use just a *little* bit of common sense.
Oh, wait, common
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Hi!
A little later than the rest of the architectures, we are now ready to
announce the availability of CDs (businesscard, netinst and full) and
DVDs for AMD64.
As AMD64 is unofficial, the URL for downloading the images is slightly
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I don't understand what would be wrong with having a symlink in /bin ...
Because this applies to most of the programs in /sbin. It would be easier
to just merge both directories.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
conflict with git or with cgvg.
I made a note about this in /usr/share/doc/cogito/README.Debian, and I
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=John Goerzen date=2005-06-07 09:48:47 -0500
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=John Goerzen date=2005-06-01 09:06:50 -0500
That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:38:13 -0500 (CDT),
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
3 Future
* fix the Debian Java Policy
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should
interact
once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are built.
As an example, debhelper, while
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
3 Future
* fix the Debian Java Policy;
* update the Debian Java FAQ;
* more packages to pkg-java;
* every packages to cdbs;
SNIP
Why cdbs? I was under
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
3 Future
* fix the Debian Java Policy;
* update the Debian Java FAQ;
* more packages to pkg-java;
* every
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Hey,
as you've probably heard, Google has a summer of code initiative to
stimulate open source coding. They are looking for mentors to support the
coders. Shouldn't Debian be on that list?
Matthijs
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Moore's Law governs the rate at which the speed of hardware (at a given
price-point) doubles. It says nothing about the speed at which current
software will *run* on current machines; and it certainly has nothing to say
about the speed at which such
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:53:24PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ipkungfu
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Rocco Stanzione [EMAIL
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
Hi
I am subscribed to debian-user, debian-mentors and debian-devel
lists. I am finding that typically debian-devel and debian-mentors is
way more spammed than debian-user. Why is it so? Am I just day dreaming
or is there any reason? Is
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in a
great english. But
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
The new toolset(tentatively called dbs-ng while I'm developing it) supports
what I call pre-patched source.
Was this a April-fools joke, or do you have some code that we can look at?
While there is no code to look at, xen 2.0(in experimental)
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why @daily is
significantly easier than 0 0 * * * but
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2005-03-27 kello 09:01 +0200, George Danchev kirjoitti:
I second suggestion given at #250202 and like to see unpacked and
patched
targets to hit Policy 4.8.
I hear that Adam Heath (doogie for those on IRC) has been working on a
new source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:39:56 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.5-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:43:50 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.5-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:16:35 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.4-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:00:57 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.4-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:04:27 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:33:33 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 01:22:45 -0600
Source: xen
Binary: libxen-python libxen-dev libxen2.0 kernel-patch-xen xen xen-docs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.4-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo
