Tyler MacDonald wrote:
I moved the server because wedohosting.com's bandwidth fees were
getting prohibitive (i'm with iweb.ca now).. otherwise I would have been
happy to have it continue running for another few thousand days. :-)
I find that Tera-Byte.com in Edmonton has nice colo rates.
Ken Bloom wrote:
I noticed that glabels is broken on i386 because it's not binary NMU
safe, and someone did a binary NMU.
After poking around a bit, I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2005/11/msg0.html, which
discussed a possible solution to this problem. Since then, we have
On 5/12/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Adam M.]
Description : a stateful address autoconfiguration protocol for IPv6
DHCPv6 is a stateful address autoconfiguration protocol for IPv6, a
counterpart to IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration protocol.
Please
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:23 -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
Yup.
I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
package, it probably should be orphaned.
OK, please check the bugs, review
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Adam Majer dijo [Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:23:10PM -0500]:
Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*libnet**-easytcp-perl
**mrtg
I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
package, it probably should be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: dhcpv6
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : ?? Not a single one - many...
* URL : http://dhcpv6.sourceforge.net/
* License : Mostly BSD, some LGPL and MIT/X
Description
Vadim Petrunin wrote:
Sorry, but looks like there is no rc bugs in the baghira package.
There was only one bug Serious policy violations but it is resolved
now.
Why it is out of release?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/baghira.html
Ask the maintainer. It was not in Sarge because of that one
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Not necessary. For 'sattrack' for example, I got
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Adam M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are not part of Debian. We are not allowed to use certain Debian
resources such as buildd.d.o for buildd logs, access to the incoming
queue for buildds or wanna-build and several other things.
So if Debian itself does not think
Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi DD folks,
Sarge is now approaching zero kelvin and folks are scrambing to get the
last few bugs squashed. I was recently thinking about why the non-clued
folks bash Debian with incomplete or inaccurate facts and a way to
address that. I think there should be a section on the
On 5/4/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
grave - serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
difference between them (both are RC)
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities
Holger Levsen wrote:
btw, google has no (good) hits for sarge releasenotes, but for sarge
release notes they have... maybe this helps.
Try sarge release notes
- Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adrian Bunk wrote:
grave - serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
difference between them (both are RC)
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
are there to inform the developer and the rest of the Debian world about
the seriousness of the
François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
Reported by: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 63 days old.
#297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
langband engine Reported
martin f krafft wrote:
Apple has just released launchd, a init/cron/watchdog/etc.
replacement. Has anyone looked at it? It seems like a bit of work to
It is not a good idea to replace multiple system utilities with one.
Right now I can install a different cron or inetd or atd, or I can
remove
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
The according bug is #306608.
This is a bug, though possibly not in the libwxgtk2.4-python package. If
the relevant maintainers (libwxgtk2.4-python, wxpython2.5.3) and bug
sumitters can't work out a solution, then ask the Technical
Steve Langasek wrote:
Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should be used if possible. MySQL
has changed the way passwords are stored in the database and this
prevents clients from
Isn't the process:
1) make a patch
2) give it to the apache developers
3) new packaged apache versions have the patch
4) patch makes it upstream
5) patch no longer needed in debian package
You know, there are security updates for stable releases. You have to
patch those. If there are 15
On 4/20/05, Jeff Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam M wrote:
? I guess I don't understand enough about how the build process works
for the packages in debian but that sounds funny to me. Or I just don't
understand what you mean.
To build security patches, you need the same libraries
On 4/16/05, Patrick Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:48 -0500, Adam M. wrote:
Unfortunately this totally changes the purpose of stable. Stable is
Yes and no. It changes the concept of stable in that stable evolves.
You still have the static release as long
Patrick A. Ouellette wrote:
The progression I see is:
unstable - testing - candidate - stable
Unfortunately this totally changes the purpose of stable. Stable is
there not to provide bug free, up-to-date software releases. Stable is
to provide environmental stability. When someone installs
Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
archs buildds which will be dropped low?
No. Just leave it as any unless there is a good reason
Christian Storch wrote:
Strange: Could there be any correlation with my observed problems
about resolving anything of debian.org during exactly that time?
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2005/04/msg00023.html)
Name Server:SAENS.DEBIAN.ORG
Name Server:KLECKER.DEBIAN.ORG
Name
Blars Blarson wrote:
Name Server:SAENS.DEBIAN.ORG
Name Server:KLECKER.DEBIAN.ORG
Name Server:SPOHR.DEBIAN.ORG
spohr changed IP addresses last week, and the glue record returned by
the .org nameservers still had the old address when I checked a few
hours ago. This has been reported to
Shaun Jackman wrote:
This doesn't work for me:
$ cat debian/watch
version=2
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/n/ne/neutrino/neutrino-(.*)\.tar\.gz
debian uupdate
$ uscan
neutrino: Newer version (0.8.2) available on remote site
(local version is 0.7.3)
neutrino: Successfully downloaded updated
Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Hi all,
[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to this list.]
As some have already noticed, openswan has been removed from testing a while
ago, most probably because of bug #291274, which did not apply to package
version 2.2.0-4 (the one that has been
David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:31 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
client.
Is it so little that it would be better to include it with the
27 matches
Mail list logo
