On Monday 07 November 2005 15.53, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:51 +1100, Brian May wrote:
However, I prefer the approach over apt-cacher, as the apt-sources
entries remain independent of the server that will be used to retrieve
the files.
Is there a good alternative?
I
On Thursday 03 November 2005 20.51, Erast Benson wrote:
HW vendors will *never* open their IP in
drivers.
Ok, this becomes a bit OT here, but let me just remark that Linux today
supports a *lot* of hardware, and that quite a few drivers (some RAID
controllers, Intel SATA stuff, most of the
On Friday 04 November 2005 19.00, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Complete bullshit. Get a life. plonk
Ahhh, yet another instance of asuffield.
-- vbi
--
featured product: GNU Privacy Guard - http://gnupg.org
pgpToLVOlXVEk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 04 November 2005 14.33, John Hasler wrote:
Wouter Verhelst writes:
Any *distributed* changes to foo.c must be contributed back to the
community.
That's not true either. Any distributed changes must be made available
to those to whom the changes were distributed. In practice
On Thursday 03 November 2005 04.37, Erast Benson wrote:
If don't, Nexenta will continue its way more like Ubuntu does.
You'll hire heaps of Debian developers and actually pay people to contribute
their stuff back to Debian? Now there's a thing! Which Debian developers
are in your pay (just
On Thursday 03 November 2005 08.32, Erast Benson wrote:
Matthew:
[...] whether you want to be part of A Debian Release.
Hard to say right now... Lets see how all this thing will progress.
But, *yes* we are willing to cooperate.
So I guess this summarizes the technical side of this
On Sunday 23 October 2005 21.48, Ken Bloom wrote:
I'm tracking through some old bugs I submitted, cleaning up. I'd like
to close bug 256715, because jpilot and gtk-engines-smooth no longer
interact (because jpilot uses GTK+2 now). What's the appropriate
version to specify to the BTS?
If you
Just a few hints for the future:
- you should not cc: a wnpp bug (ITP, RFP, ...) to d-devel, because these
bugs go to d-devel anyway.
- if you want to cc: a bug submission somewhere, please use the
X-Debbugs-CC: header (read up in the bts documentation) instead of directly
cc-ing, because
On Friday 21 October 2005 22.22, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
It depends on what you mean by up to date. If we're only including
glibc headers, then we can only use functionality that glibc supports.
If we bypass glibc and directly use kernel functionality, then we get
all the latest and greatest
merge 335173 195948
thanks
On Saturday 22 October 2005 12.08, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
* Package name: dspam
I am packaging this program, because we are using it the students'
representation at university, and having a standardized, easy to install
package would be very handy.
Have you
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 19.40, Matej Vela wrote:
See http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/debian/1.1/
for buzz disks.
Thanks.
Now, does anybody know if buzz/Linux 2.0.0's 'ne' driver didn't support
realtek PCI network cards, or if it's a qemu problem? (I suspect the
Yo!
(Yes, I thought about sending this to -curiosa instead... :-)
For research/fun/..., I want to install historical versions of Debian. Does
anybody have install media of rex and buzz? I guess it is possible to
create packages by starting at bo and compiling the older binaries, but I
don't
On Saturday 01 October 2005 17.07, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
But your reaction proves that the name cinelerra-cvs is misleading.
But IMHO that's not something the Debian packager can do anything other than
write it in the description. Renaming the package would only confuse users
searching for
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 17.36, you wrote:
Please have a look at this guys.
[word document attached]
[silly disclaimer to finish it]
Please, do not post word documents on this list. For several reasons:
- we're reading email here. Why should I need to start an additional
application
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15.30, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[arch release criteria]
Personally, I find the list of requirements sensible, and very
understandable after the clarifying rounds on the lists. This colors
my view of the discussion.
AOL!!1!
The only thing I'd modify is the 50
On Thursday 22 September 2005 11.15, Debian-armeb Porting Team wrote:
We are keeping patches[7] for the armeb port separate, and are ready to
contribute them now, or at any future time that is more appropriate.
Another chicken-and-egg - are package maintainers expected to accept
patches for
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 18.03, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Lars Wirzenius:
Isn't this:
int64_t, which
can, if necessary, be provided using suitable autotools magic.
exactly the answer to your:
[...] Some upstream developers have to deal with old Solaris
installations, though. We might
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 17.15, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Make sure you use only POSIX features when doing this. I think
grep -o is a GNU extension, FreeBSD doesn't have it for example.
Doesn't the 'only POSIX' apply to the shell code only? At least, shouldn't
it be judged on a
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 06.44, Joe Smith wrote:
By the way, i386 does not make the cut according to the vancouver
prospect due to the number of buildds required. So are we left with 0
archs in etch? :) That will certainly speed up the release.
LOL.
Release NOW! Release now, damnit!
I
On Monday 22 August 2005 23.51, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 06:22:11PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:29:31PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
really matters: can we (the Debian project) maintain the port? Thus
I propose we only limit on the number
On Monday 22 August 2005 16.08, W. Borgert wrote:
[...]
This is a really nice idea: A DD with a strange sense of humour
could
[...]
If we're starting to worry about what kind of damage a DD can do to the
world by providing some bogus uploads, let's just not. Any DD can cause
code to be
On Monday 22 August 2005 12.58, Marc Haber wrote:
I can imagine that for archs with less than 50 machines reporting to
popcon it could be possible to have some kind of registration
mechanism.
Uh, please don't add huge technical overhead for corner cases that will
rarely happen, if ever. I'm
On Monday 22 August 2005 12.17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 05-Aug-22 11:48, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 11:36]:
If not, what does the 98% rule really mean?
Your port needs to be able to and does build the vast majority of the
archive before we
On Monday 22 August 2005 11.25, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
[ the 'must have a working installer' requirement ]
Trivial. debootstrap does that.
Debootstrap is not an installer, in very much the same way that tar
isn't, either.
They both are. They can install debian, so it's an
On Sunday 14 August 2005 02.40, Robert Collins wrote:
On a related note, should we consider defining a convention similar to
soname for dynamic languages like perl/python etc? I.e. for a python
library 'foo', install the code as 'foo1', and have a dummy package
'foo' which has a __init__.py
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00.46, Joey Hess wrote:
[debconf dance]
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
postgrey
tags +pending (fixed in svn)
I hear a new upstream version is in the works, so I'll wait a week or two
before uploading.
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured product: SpamAssassin
On Thursday 21 July 2005 20.32, Kirk Reiser wrote:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION!
This is an automated message.
The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation
before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the
message below, just hit the Reply button and send this
message back
On Sunday 17 July 2005 10.14, Karl Chen wrote:
Suppose package P contains files /usr/bin/B1 and /usr/bin/B2. B1
is the important program, and B2 is not as important. Is it OK
for the declared package dependencies to not satisfy all the
run-time shared library dependencies of B2? What if
On Sunday 17 July 2005 23.28, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10353 March 1977, Santiago Vila wrote:
we need to remove
from the archive all the Woody-to-Sarge transition dummy packages.
No, that's not true, we don't *need* to remove woody-to-sarge dummy
packages, as they are also woody-to-etch
On Thursday 21 July 2005 14.41, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
[piuparts]
Go ahead - if you, as you say, investigate the bugs manually, it doesn't
matter how you discovered the bug.
Just curious: what kind of bugs can piuparts help discover?
cheers
-- vbi
--
The jig's up, Elman.
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 11.51, Mikael Olenfalk wrote:
it was not my intention to state that Debian is about free beer
Sorry - you misunderstood me. I tried to make a (bad) joke, nothing more.
greetings
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/smtp
pgpXlfH0UtbyY.pgp
Description: PGP
On Monday 11 July 2005 22.18, Roger Leigh wrote:
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 04 July 2005 11.51, Horms wrote:
I am not sure about 3.4's ability to compile 2.4.27, but
it seems unlikely to me that all of the gcc versions you mention above
will be omitted from etch
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 23.15, Mikael Olenfalk wrote:
So if there is a DD living in Stockholm, Sweden; I'm would be pleased
to pay for dinner+beer (or equivalent) for a laptop-packaging-session
Debian is about free speech, not free beer, so you can have that cheaper:
just allow the DD to
On Friday 08 July 2005 14.33, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
TODO: Should this be in
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?ReleaseProposals ?
It's http://wiki.debian.net/?EtchTODOList - which contains a short
disclaimer on its difference vs. ReleaseProposals.
Manoj:
Mere wishlists by
On Saturday 09 July 2005 00.39, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:49:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
IMHO, we should keep dummy packages around for at least two releases,
to support upgrades which skip one release.
In practice, upgrades that skip a release are not
On Monday 04 July 2005 11.51, Horms wrote:
I am not sure about 3.4's ability to compile 2.4.27, but
it seems unlikely to me that all of the gcc versions you mention above
will be omitted from etch.
I'm quite confident that the release team and/or gcc maintainers will agree
that 'is needed to
On Monday 11 July 2005 09.59, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:25:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is a huge list, with probably 0 chances of getting
accomplished. How about this: remove every single item from the list,
and only add items
On Thursday 07 July 2005 14.13, martin f krafft wrote:
If you can help the Debian Project out in this area, we would
`appreciate it`_. Please contact the Debian host system administration
team at [EMAIL PROTECTED], and feel free to contact me
at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well.
The ETH Zurich
On Monday 27 June 2005 18.15, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
[circular dependencies]
[uninstalling foo-data at libfoo uninstall]
This should really be fixed in the packaging tool -- aptitude will
handle this very elegantly, maybe bringing its expanded package states
to libapt itself would be
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 20.02, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
[debian infrastructure]
I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
(more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
load on central servers?
You said it yourself: in the long term.
I think
On Monday 13 June 2005 23.00, John Hasler wrote:
Jesus Climent writes:
Exactly my point, what impedes an admin to set some defaults wether the
system comes as it comes now or with some predefined options and
settings?
Nothing, except for the fact that most admins haven't the foggiest idea
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08.00, Eric Dorland wrote:
3. Accept MoFo's offer of Debian-specific trademark usage.
I don't
believe #3 is acceptable under the DFSG.
IMHO this *trademark* license corresponds quite exactly to the *copyright*
license that require renaming on change, which seems to
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 18.21, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is DFSG 4 if not a grudging acceptance of this sort of
behaviour as free?
(This is a compromise.
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 16.20, Humberto Massa Guimares wrote:
* Towns ::
Does calling it firefox or thunderbird hurt free software?
At first, no. But it *does* hurt our users. Why? Because they are
confident that getting something from the Debian mirror, modifying
it and re-distributing
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 14.24, Colin Tuckley wrote:
TaRT features include random
taglines, optional daemon functionality, display of current date, custom
layout of signature, and special date tagline text. The command line
syntax is simple and well explained. LinuxTaRT is designed to be run as
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19.14, Humberto Massa Guimarães wrote:
[...]
Hmmm. Is it just my kmail, or does your mailer produce strange (or no?)
In-Reply-To headers? All your posts I saw (and none others afaict)
appeared to be in reply to some completely irrelevant other message in the
same
On Monday 13 June 2005 09.41, frank wrote:
[texlive vs. teTeX]
Let me add some comments from my point of view (Debian teTeX
maintainer).
Sounds like packaging texlive and trying to get it really stable would be
the thing to do, with the goal of phasing out teTeX for etch+1
Not becuase I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:42:15 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.21-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
On Friday 10 June 2005 10.40, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Hello Olaf,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
ifconfig is in /sbin and only in root's path. But ifconfig is runnable
and useful for normal users, so it'd be nice if it could be added to
the path of
On Friday 10 June 2005 21.39, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hello.
Is the TODO list for etch available anywhere?
It is now.
http://wiki.debian.net/?EtchTODOList
Please help updating it. Because I really mean it, I repeat here the
guidelines that I feel can keep this list useful instead of
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 19.51, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jun 07, Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my wishlist there is NO support of 2.4 kernels
Hmm. I've never verified this myself, however until recently it was
often claimed that 2.6 is still quite a bit worse than 2.4
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 23.32, Roger Leigh wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 23:02, Roger Leigh wrote:
Existing installs are already configured with debconf. Their
/etc/locale.gen will not be touched.
If you do dpkg-reconfigure locales, then users could
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 01.03, Javier Fernndez-Sanguino Pea wrote:
[ End user improvements ]
- better support for displaying as many languages as possible without
having to search for corresponding font packages. From what I can see
gnome is slightly better than KDE in replacing missing
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 01.47, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jun 07, Javier Fernndez-Sanguino Pea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my wishlist there is NO support of 2.4 kernels
Hmm. I've never verified this myself, however until recently it was often
claimed that 2.6 is still quite a bit worse than 2.4
On Saturday 04 June 2005 19.20, Joshua Jackson wrote:
Where could I find out about projects that still need developers. I could
code in perl and java. Please tell me where I can read the resources
regarding to the available projects in debian.
Java: A group of people tries very hard to get as
On Saturday 04 June 2005 07.50, venkat prasad wrote:
sir,
can u please give me the information bout the decik WAP phone
simulator.i.e., the brief description about the phone simulator.
As far as I can tell, Debian does not ship the decit WAP phone simulator, so
I don't know what
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 19.17, Stephen Birch wrote:
Still looks more like a fork than a derivative . or a spoon :-)
I have problems with your terminology - what do you mean by 'fork', and what
do you mean by 'derivative'?
To my understanding, Ubuntu is certainly a derivative of Debian
On Monday 30 May 2005 02.03, Nicolas François wrote:
Does anybody know where I can find older sources?
[ of shadow ]
- have you tried asking the shadow maintainers
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - perhaps somebody has old CVS
repositories or whatever lying around?
- The Debian changelog goes back to
On Friday 27 May 2005 14.15, Gergely Nagy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:13 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
the right thing to do would be to switch from sections, to keywords, so
that kmplayer could live in sound + video + kde, instead of multimedia
that is not very informative.
Now
On Sunday 15 May 2005 23.24, Grzegorz Bizon wrote:
Description : Guitar Pro 3/4 tabs viewer and player
Somebody should file a wishlist bug against all guitar related software
packages to include a certain song as example data.
I won't name it. If you're new on this list, google for
On Monday 16 May 2005 23.27, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 16, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels
up to 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so
theoretically people could still be using it with current
[cc:ed as I don't know if you read both -devel and -mentors]
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 22.05, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
[cogito]
Sebastian, can I humbly request that you don't announce cogito package
updates on (at least the -devel) mailing list? While I - and, I guess,
many others - are
On Saturday 07 May 2005 16.56, Brad and Billie Fick wrote:
do you know how I can get the sheet music to this? If so I would greatly
appreciate it. Thank you
There we go again. I am so glad this happens, helps to lighten the mood
everywhere and certainly eases the way to general happiness in
On Saturday 30 April 2005 07.54, Dillinger wrote:
Hi,
I invented Macromedia Flash.
[...]
Can I get one of those things your're smoking?
-- vbi
--
Could this mail be a fake? (Answer: No! - http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro)
pgp2E1218gns7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 25 April 2005 14.51, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
libmysqlclient-lgpl - Linuxthreads test has to be switched off for
amd64
[...]
Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend
on libmysqlclient10-dev:
exim4
Does that mean amd64 installer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:46:26 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.21-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:01:24 +0200
Source: latex-svninfo
Binary: latex-svninfo
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:07:15 +0100
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.18-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
[cc to you - I don't know if you read the list]
On Friday 18 March 2005 17.22, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
As for example, it's been now around 7 years for me now using Linux and I
do have a fair amount of knowledge now. It would be great if DD's here
could harness the skills in wannabe
On Monday 14 March 2005 05.45, Steve Langasek wrote:
Architectures that are no longer being considered for stable releases
are not going to be left out in the cold. The SCC infrastructure is
intended as a long-term option for these other architectures, and the
ftpmasters also intend to provide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:28:22 +0100
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 15.55, Javier Fernndez-Sanguino Pea wrote:
Further: do not accept every package to enter Debian...
Should be done, but if ftp-maintainers take this decissions they get
bashed on the basis of them preventing freedom. And we're back again to
the pointless hot-babe
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06.39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
There is another problem with NEW: The US laws.
Untill a package has been processed through NEW and a mail send to
some goverment agency Debian runs risk of violating the crypto export
laws.
I've already proposed this: if silly
On Friday 04 March 2005 23.57, sean finney wrote:
anyone who is tired of having to spend hours maintaining their
home-rolled mysql/pgsql mangement maintainer script code is whole
heartedly encouraged to check this out!
*applaudes heartily*
That's sorely needed. Now I hope that the point
tags 296693 +unreproducible
thanks
On Saturday 05 March 2005 00.16, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Can a user with an i386 attempt to reproduce the bug and report back?
I appear to be able to use gnucash just fine, I checked all the library
versions in the bug report and adjusted my system
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 06.35, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
I think you meant to ask, Why would anyone want to execute the C
library?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/libc.so.6
Ok, this is off topic for this thread, but still, strangely:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-2.3.2.so
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 21.49, Raphael Bossek wrote:
Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF).
Warning: The signature is bad.
Something's broken somewhere...
Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up?
thanks
-- vbi
--
Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to
Hi,
Is master just hopelessly overloaded, or is popcon defunct? I get bounces
('warning: msg not delivered after 24h') from master.
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro
pgpwfLEDQFM2a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 28 January 2005 15.49, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 28-Jan-05, 04:30 (CST), Francois Bottin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those not speaking french, this is a nigerian scam... The first I
have ever received in this language, albeit very poorly written.
That's sad, because the English
On Saturday 29 January 2005 18.28, Frank Küster wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, sean finney wrote:
why not do something like this in
any script that uses gettext:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=${PATH}:/usr/share/gettext/scripts
. gettext.sh
Because we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:02:57 +0100
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.17-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:55:55 +0100
Source: libmime-base32-perl
Binary: libmime-base32-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.01-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 22.55, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:43:05PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
An ascii to postscript renderer
...
I think you want to say plaintext to postscript renderer here, since
clearly text that contains non-ascii
On Thursday 06 January 2005 08.01, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Now, switchconf is too simple. It does very little, but does not do it
very well. I originally intended to work with it to make it much more
robust... But in the end, I didn't get around to do it.
IMHO removing it is the right solution.
On Friday 24 December 2004 11.01, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:21:08PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
I was trying to think of a word for news you need to know now and will
not be of much use to you in the far future.
debian-devel? :-P
No, that's news you don't
On Thursday 30 December 2004 10.07, Maciej Dems wrote:
please notify, that many ITPs
are done by non-DDs. In this case the main reason for their inactivity is
the lack of a sponsor.
IMHO for such ITPs, the RFS should be cc:ed to the bug, so anybody reviewing
the ITP would see that it's not
On Thursday 16 December 2004 00.34, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
[de-installing run-level links that weren't installed]
How about installing links as /etc/rc?.d/K??foo - so the links are there and
are properly manageable, but the init script will only be called as 'K??foo
stop'
-- vbi
--
Segunda
Yo all!
Seeing this discussion wander in many directions, please consider what is
acutally under discussion here:
Bruce:
I would not suggest that Debian commit to using LCC packages at this
time. We should participate for a while and see how many changes we'd
have to make and whether the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:13:47 +0100
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
On Friday 10 December 2004 06.15, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
John Goerzen dijo [Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:40:51PM -0600]:
we could participate in this organization even if we didn't take
their packages? That is, perhaps we could influence the direction to
a more useful one?
Then we would be
On Friday 10 December 2004 15.35, Steve Langasek wrote:
we don't exactly have a strong history of being able to pull off
timely releases
Did Debian even try?
I didn't follow the woody release too closely, being a Debian newbie at the
time, so I don't know. But - this was my impression - from
On Friday 10 December 2004 13.20, Frank Kster wrote:
Rene Mayrhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still thinking about doing an upgrade package of freeswan
though, which depends on openswan and simply moves the configuration of
the old freeswan configuration to openswan. Any preferences
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:10:40 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.16-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:00:40 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:25:51 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:56:01 +0200
Source: libnet-ntp-perl
Binary: libnet-ntp-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:31:26 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:19:49 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.14-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:05:12 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:59:29 +0200
Source: postgrey
Binary: postgrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL
201 - 300 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
