El dom, 4 abr 2021 a las 12:28, Devops PK Carlisle LLC
() escribió:
>
> This is interesting.
>
> First, I must ask... Are either Ralink or Atheros more quickly adopted
> into Linux support before Realtek? Are they more stable, etc.? (In my
> original post, I noted that I pulled a Realtek based 5ghz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Agustin Martin Domingo
* Package name: hunspell-lv
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Janis Eisaks
* URL : http://openoffice-lv.sourceforge.net/openoffice.html
* License : LGPL 2.1+
Description : Latvian dictionary
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:23:50PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26-09-17 21:13, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > Maybe there are cases for others, but I don't think the list
> > should be much longer than that.
>
> Not sure about other helpers or scripts, but dbconfig-common and debconf
> ha
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 07:17:53PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > running unstable is not for users who don't know how to deal with
> > breakage. dealing with breakage involves reading d-d-a.
>
> I was thinking to give users running affected h
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:28:20AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Agustin Martin dijo [Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:51:53AM +0100]:
> > > > Is there *any* way to *force* systemd to start lightdm ...?
> > >
> > > I have a hunch the bug is actually in lxdm (specifically th
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:28:55AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 21 nov 14, 09:45:51, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > so here we are, after the freeze, and systemd stubbornly rejects
> > to start lightdm, my default display manager, and in turn tries
> > to start lxdm, whi
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 19:33 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I though Jan has just described one. For example, taking a 10 year old
> > CD with backups from your safe and trying to get the data back.
>
> Another option would be
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk , 2014-07-30, 22:26:
> >>WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
> >>apt-transport-https
> >>Install these packages without verification? [y/N]
> >>E: Some packages could not be authenticated
> [...]
> >But
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:00:12PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod…
>
> >Martin Zobel-Helas dixit:
> >
> >>Furthermore, we will change the people.debian.org web-service such that
> >>only HTTPS connections will be supported (unencrypted requests will be
> >>redirected).
> […]
> >Take it
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:54:55PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I just tried updating testing on my system. I currently use
> sysvinit-core (reasons below), but aptitude is telling me that I
> should remove this in favour of systemd-sysv. Hmm, why is that?
> Well, because the new version of libp
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 05:24:09PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> >
> >My mother is using Debian 6 with Gnome 2. I don’t know if I will ever
> >update this system. Gnome 3 is not a solution, and I’m not interested in
> >teaching XFCE.
> >
> >Shade and sweet water!
> >
> > Stephan
> >
>
> Th
2013/1/15 Andreas Beckmann :
> On 2013-01-15 10:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How
>> are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums? If anything this stuff
>> should be minor IMO.
>
> If a package is shipping no .md5sum at all, it wi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-09-18 09:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Just to give a short impression what we can find here:
>
> and some more
>
> bts, that's output from debsums -a -c, so the files listed have
> a md5sum mismatch (or are missing if
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:16:07AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We know no-one likes reading long mails on d-d-a, so we'll keep this
> short: we'll be stopping automatic migrations of packages from unstable
> to testing - aka freezing - on June 30th.
>
> Any packages in unstable before
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:29:18PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:35:23PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > * Norbert Preining , 2012-01-18, 22:18:
> > > >Since we are at quilt
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:35:23PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Norbert Preining , 2012-01-18, 22:18:
> >Since we are at quilt 3.0 bashing: Maybe you can give me a
> >rational why I *ALWAYS* have to type in
> > export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
> >before working with debian source packages?
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 01:12:19PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > Besides the problems I pointed out in my last mail, seems to be some
> > confusion for personal git repos. I see they were duplicated during
> > m
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 01:12:19PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > Besides the problems I pointed out in my last mail, seems to be some
> > confusion for personal git repos. I see they were duplicated during
> > m
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:27:42AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] "Bernhard R. Link"
> | With all due respect to the great work you do maintaining alioth
> | and understanding that after such a big transition it can be
> | annoying to have to change things again I really want to urge
> | you t
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:03:13 +0200 Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>
> > If you have a specific example of something that does not work, it can
> > be fixed.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Alioth maintainers for
On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:03:13 +0200 Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> If you have a specific example of something that does not work, it can
> be fixed.
Hi,
Thanks Alioth maintainers for all the hard work you did for the migration.
As happens after every migration, some things may still be left. So
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:41:56PM -0500, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I am DM and I'm trying of upload ora2pg package, but the package is rejected:
>
> Reject Reasons:
> darkju...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package ora2pg
Check that your debian/cont
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:07:01PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Russ Allbery]
> > > Figuring out a better solution for why the files in /var/lib/ispell
> > > and /var/lib/aspell are exc
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:45:38AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > On Wed, 03 Mar 2010, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >> In this day and age of completely and utterly broken MD5[0], I think we
> >> should stop providing these files, and maybe provide something else
> >> instea
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:07:01PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Russ Allbery]
> > Figuring out a better solution for why the files in /var/lib/ispell
> > and /var/lib/aspell are excluded from the md5sums generation because
> > they change after installation is probably needed if we're going
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:20:46PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I'd like to adopt rus-ispell - Russian dictionary for
> aspell/ispell/hunspell/myspell [1]
>
> I'm not familiar with all this *spell staff and like to ask:
> is there any Policy or best practice for such packag
[Resending, seems to be delivery problems, sorry if finally gets duplicated]
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:34:40PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Luk Claes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Fine, though taking the trouble to talk to the porters might still be
> >>> w
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 06:45:12AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> j> good_owners:owners
> j>dpkg -l $$(cat $?)|perl -alnwe 'print $$F[1] if /^.[ic]/' > $@
> I should have used COLUMNS= dpkg...
> I ended up messing up a lot of packages.
> That is life here.
You can try /usr/share/debco
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 09:00:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > For that reason I suggest that ispell, iamerican and ibritish entries
> > be modified *right now* to be optional instead of standard. wbritish
> > seems to be already optional.
>
> For most languages tasksel will automatically install
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:34:35PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> after some discussion within the ftpteam we just modified a few override
> entries (15 to be exact). The following packages moved from standard to
> optional:
...
>
> For the time right after the release we also intend to move ispell
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:00:47AM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:04:05 +0100
> > I am really speechless The French seem to have a completely
> > different understanding of the English language used in all these
> > matters than almost every one else in the world.
> Wel
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:14:29PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
> > > from proprietary for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: hunspell-gl-es
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Mar Castro Pereiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for mancomun
URL :
http://wiki.mancomun.org/ind
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:52:43AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I have no idea if it's trivially possible, but it would be ideal if
> > whatever spell checker we switched to had some sort of compatibility
> > layer for ispell to reduce the number of applications th
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Bernd Zeimetz]
> > I'm forwarding this orphaning bug to debian-devel as I hope this rises
> > the chances to find somebody who is willing to take care of ispell.
> > According to http://ficus-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff/ispell.htm
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its
> > > generated -heade
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:54:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Add to this that each patch should have some standardized header on top
> stating:
> - a description of the patch and its purpose
, including pointers to relevant discussions, if any.
The idea is that anyone reviewing the patch get
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:31:36AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 30-Mar-08, 15:25 (CDT), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dpkg in experimental supports triggers now, and in many cases trigger
> > support can be added to packages without creating a hard dependency on
> > a new version
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 02:54:34AM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:17:52 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Manoj Srivastava]
> >> Are these packages a drop in replacement for ispell?
> >
> > None of the spell checkers are drop in replacements for the others.
>
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 08:08:42AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> If we were to keep a spell checker as part of the default
> installation, I would suggest using hunspell as it is most advanced
> and I am told it support the most languages at the moment. The next
> step would be to change all
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 08:08:42AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Anthony Towns]
> > Kind of reviving an old thread, but anyway:
> > It also includes, but afaics, probably doesn't need to (anymore):
> >
> > ispell, dictionaries-common, iamerican
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:05:41PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071222 20:22]:
> > > Note that the w* packages provide word lists, which are important to
> > > many programs. One could argue that a standard Unix system should
> > > have a word list; a
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:01:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Kind of reviving an old thread, but anyway:
> It also includes, but afaics, probably doesn't need to (anymore):
>
> ispell, dictionaries-common, iamerican, ibritish, wamerican
#416572: ibritish: Should not have priority standa
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:05:37AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > The aspell-autobuildhash / ispell-autobuildhash manpage says create an
> > empty .compat, or one with 0 in it. I guess most people just create th
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:05:37AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:13:32AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> >
> > He doesn't give any information _why_ this complicates packaging that
> > much, while his decision imposes additional work and complexity on
> > others (be it the ex
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:27:45AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Some packages (aspell and ispell packages in particular) ship files
> that they then modify in maintainer scripts and intentionally excl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eu-es-myspell
Version : 2006/10/06
Upstream Author : Eleka Ingeniaritza Linguistikoa S.L. // www.eleka.net
* URL :
http://www.euskara.euskadi.net/r59-738/eu/cont
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:54:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > cat /the/best/dictionary >> /etc/dictionaries-common/words
>
> I don't see the reason why /etc/dictionaries-common/words should be
> a symlink either. The right way to solve this would be to use
> alternatives and provide a se
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:12:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> He has already bragged about how he cracked the KSP by
> presenting an unofficial ID which he bought -- an action designed to
> show the weakness of signing parties. So, this was a bad faith act,
> since the action was
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:13:38AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Taken to extremes, this implies that (1) DD's should only receive mail
> > sent to boxes under their own control and (2) all mail passing through
> > debian-private should, for
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:43:12PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> > I wanted to try out myself whether there are any issues, but it fails
> > to build with
>
> Can you send me the whole build log? Do you have automake or autoconf
> installed? I've noticed that the build process fails if
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:06:27PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to pack Xindy an index processing system like makeindex.
> Xindy's source comes with clisp 2.33.2 and it is compiled at build time.
>
> I've got it managed to build with the clisp package from Debian. But I
> hav
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:14:19AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> If you won't acknowledge that, then know that upstream also object to the
> name "python-base" for something which has a stripped-down standard library.
Both pythol-minimal and python-base sound to something an end user would
expect
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Zejn Gasper wrote:
> I've had the same experience yesterday, i didn't have time, so i downgraded
> to
> 2.6.12.
>
> But there's something wrong with the kernel.
Others wrote:
> >
> > Waiting 2 seconds /sys/block/hda/dev to show up.
> >
> > /bin/cat:/sy
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:34:05PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin (>> 0.60).
> aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual
> packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be
> satisfied.
That
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:16:22PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On 2 of the systems I have upgraded, I had serious problems with
> mdadm.
>
> The documentation said that there was no need for a config file, and I
> never used a 2.2 kernel, so the paragraphs starting with "If your RAID
> array was cr
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:02:52PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> That's still requiring /manual intervention/, and lying about the true
> state of the bug to the BTS. Ideally the BTS should understand that
> the bug was closed by a particular version of the package (the one
> which had Closes: in
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks to base64, I never forward any windows virus to myself, they
> are kept in my ~/mail directory. See my ~/pmrc/executables in master
> for generic anti windows-executable recipes.
I recently found this other source of procmail
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:57:02PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
> Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> >Since it is becoming more and more a kernel topic, you might also want
> >to move discussion to debian-kernel.
>
> Could someone give us a simple rundown of how we would submit a patch to
> the debian kernel s
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 03:44:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Only that dpkg-preconfigure is not guaranteed to be called,
Thanks for pointing out this, Joey
> and if it is
> called, there is nothing really to ensure that it runs for all deb
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 02:30:32AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
>
> yes, it'd have to be rebuilt with the new templates every time they were
> updated, which is definitely a shortcoming.
We did some sort of this in the ancient experimental dictionaries-common
policy, before it was even made semi-o
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:38:58AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> if the templates are included at build-time by a debhelper-style script,
> there's no need for a runtime dependency for these templates.
>
But for shared/* debconf templates this means that all packages using that
template need to be
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:59:01PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:36:40AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > SHARED TEMPLATES
> >It's actually possible to have a template and a question that
> >are shared among a set of packages. All the packages have t
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:03:22AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Indeed, this is a long time since I think about such "common debconf
> templates" package.
> The current way of handling common templates by the use of shared/* is
> not optimal ATM, as all packages using shared/* templates mus
Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Last time I read about that, if is byte compiled it should depend on
virtual package 'emacsen' (provided by all emacs flavours), since
otherwise emacs-package-install failed if no emacsen was installed.
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
AFAIK, you need to depend on emacs itself (and not emacs-common) if you
byte-compile it. I _think_ stuff can break if you don't, but I'm vague
on why. Search the debian-emacsen archives. I split off a package
because of that issue a while back, but the seperate -el packa
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
It is true that the 2.09 compatibility mode works finely in almost
cases. However, LaTeX-2.09 itself still be needed for style files
that use internal macros of LaTeX-2.09. The style file of my
bachelor's thesis is an example of such style files, and there are a
fair num
with a '\documentstyle{your_style}' call
instead of a '\documentclass' one the 209 compatibility mode should
automatically be activated. What kind of problems are you experiencing?
Cheers,
--
=========
Agustin Mart
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es)
* License : (GPL)
Description : The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
This is simply a reservation to notify that I plan to prepare a myspell
r version=0
and also different to 10 or 10, which would just mean major versions
10 or 10
Cheers,
--
=========
Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid,
(U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax:
70 matches
Mail list logo
